Crazy Diamond Posted 21 February, 2012 Share Posted 21 February, 2012 This makes me many different kinds of annoyed. What's the ****ing point? Cretin. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ThreeSixty Posted 21 February, 2012 Share Posted 21 February, 2012 It's not like Portsmouth to waste money... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fowllyd Posted 21 February, 2012 Share Posted 21 February, 2012 Not sure that it's really a £2000 guitar; I think the title is just bragging. Looks like a cheap Les Paul copy to me. He's still a prat though! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
a1ex2001 Posted 21 February, 2012 Share Posted 21 February, 2012 Is a very cheap fake! Bolt on neck, wrong shape head stock and trussrod cover kid is just an attention seeking idiot! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frank's cousin Posted 21 February, 2012 Share Posted 21 February, 2012 Yep bolt on maple neck gives it away- cheap shiedt, but still shows a pathetic destructive streak... what exactly was the point of this? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ken Tone Posted 21 February, 2012 Share Posted 21 February, 2012 Errm ......not to mention that it does not say 'Gibson' on the neck head, even thugh thew shape is that of a Gibson Les Paul. Presumaby it was his Christmas present and by now he's realised that he can't actually play it like a video game. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dimond Geezer Posted 21 February, 2012 Share Posted 21 February, 2012 What a prat, who in their right mind would do that even if it is a cheap copy. As far a rock 'n' roll vandalism goes, it's a bit lame. Pete Townshend used to destroy his in one or two mighty swings, how many attempts did this fool take? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Verbal Posted 21 February, 2012 Share Posted 21 February, 2012 What a prat, who in their right mind would do that even if it is a cheap copy. As far a rock 'n' roll vandalism goes, it's a bit lame. Pete Townshend used to destroy his in one or two mighty swings, how many attempts did this fool take? Hendrix did it better - with lighter fuel. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Golden Balls Posted 21 February, 2012 Share Posted 21 February, 2012 If you're going to do it, surely do it in some rock n roll way? Not pansy throwing it around the garden. Bless him Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crazy Diamond Posted 21 February, 2012 Author Share Posted 21 February, 2012 You're quite right, not a genuine at all. I was blinded by fury when I saw the shirt, title and destruction. Spoilt skate bastard. Course it's fake, but still, what kind of ***** destroys a guitar? Pete Townshend, for one, but the Who don't obey the rules. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pancake Posted 21 February, 2012 Share Posted 21 February, 2012 Pete Townshend, for one, but the Who don't obey the rules. Indeed. Operation Ore agrees. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Trader Posted 21 February, 2012 Share Posted 21 February, 2012 Even a genuine one (Gibson Les Paul Studio) only costs a grand brand new. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now