Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Not too sure if I could've posted this elsewhere, feel free to lock or remove if you don't deem it worthy.

 

The u-18 player who scored 4 goals past us in Notts Forest win against our u-18s in the FA Youth Cup last week has gone to Chelsea for a fee of £1.5m. I'd like to hope we could demand a much greater fee than that if we had a boy with this talent and judging on the Chamberlain fee, I think we do.

Posted

The difference with this kid is that he'd never played a first team game, so his value is never going to be huge - there's no justification for it to be huge.

 

Forest couldn't really reject £1.8m for a 15 year old who has never played a first team game - they need the money too.

 

With us, Chamberlain had been in the first team setup for a year or so - and was a key part in our promotion playing almost 40 times over the season. This is why we could demand a much higher fee for him. (and we're financially sound, so we dictate, which helps)

Posted

He was quality last wednesday, had all the attributes to make a very good striker. If he can add a passing aspect and better movement to his game he'll be a good Prem striker. Good in the air, good finisher, good strength.

Posted
The difference with this kid is that he'd never played a first team game, so his value is never going to be huge - there's no justification for it to be huge.

 

Forest couldn't really reject £1.8m for a 15 year old who has never played a first team game - they need the money too.

 

With us, Chamberlain had been in the first team setup for a year or so - and was a key part in our promotion playing almost 40 times over the season. This is why we could demand a much higher fee for him. (and we're financially sound, so we dictate, which helps)

 

I agree on most, but he's 18 and had made two substitute appearances in the Championship.

Posted

I remember a lad we had in the Youth squad many years ago by the name of Peters??

 

Scored goals for fun and look a bright prospect.

 

Lost his way, ended up at Brentford and from there to obscurity

 

You can never tell at that age

Posted
The difference with this kid is that he'd never played a first team game, so his value is never going to be huge - there's no justification for it to be huge.

 

Forest couldn't really reject £1.8m for a 15 year old who has never played a first team game - they need the money too.

 

With us, Chamberlain had been in the first team setup for a year or so - and was a key part in our promotion playing almost 40 times over the season. This is why we could demand a much higher fee for him. (and we're financially sound, so we dictate, which helps)

 

Yes but didn't Arsenal offer £4m for Shaw before he made his first team debut?

Posted

His contract was up at the end of the season Forest offered him a new terms twice but he rejected them. When you get to the stage of offering highly rated teenagers (inc Morrison) £10 to £15k a week starting salary the likes of Forest are going to struggle to keep the talent especially with this new compensation system.

Posted
The difference with this kid is that he'd never played a first team game, so his value is never going to be huge - there's no justification for it to be huge.

 

Forest couldn't really reject £1.8m for a 15 year old who has never played a first team game - they need the money too.

 

With us, Chamberlain had been in the first team setup for a year or so - and was a key part in our promotion playing almost 40 times over the season. This is why we could demand a much higher fee for him. (and we're financially sound, so we dictate, which helps)

 

 

I thought he had a couple of sub appearances recently?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...