SuperSAINT Posted 16 January, 2012 Share Posted 16 January, 2012 Pleased with this. Here's how I see it - Harry knows a good player when he see's one. So Spurs bring him over on loan to see him in training, for a few months, sign him up & immediately send him to us. If he wasn't any good, they would've sent him back to Italy without signing him. Really looking forward to seeing him play. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Saint_clark Posted 16 January, 2012 Share Posted 16 January, 2012 Does this mean we have to be (even slightly) grateful to Redknapp? :/ If Redknapp is to be believed, Levy would be the one who handled this transfer on Spurs end. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr Saints Posted 16 January, 2012 Share Posted 16 January, 2012 Does this mean we have to be (even slightly) grateful to Redknapp? :/ No. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Colinjb Posted 16 January, 2012 Share Posted 16 January, 2012 Does this mean we have to be (even slightly) grateful to Redknapp? :/ There is no need to use that name on this forum. As a moderator you should know better then to use such profanity. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fitzhugh Fella Posted 16 January, 2012 Share Posted 16 January, 2012 Niaive? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ART Posted 16 January, 2012 Share Posted 16 January, 2012 Thoroughly agree with you on Harry knowing a good player when it comes to midfield and forwards. Defenders he's not so hot, at least during his time at Saints. Having been a winger himself I think he understands that position better than most. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stattmeister Posted 16 January, 2012 Share Posted 16 January, 2012 Didn't Redkrapp big up Nigel last season..........? That supports the view he is a fan of the way we play and as others have said that this should benefit the lad. I propose we begin selling Paella in the concourse. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CanadaSaint Posted 16 January, 2012 Share Posted 16 January, 2012 Does this mean we have to be (even slightly) grateful to Redknapp? :/ I'm not as anti-Harry as most on here. His big mistake was trying to work with Rupert and his futuristic ideas when he's as old-school as they come. I don't think he bears us any malice and he might even feel a tiny smidgeon of guilt every time he watches Bale play. And then again ... Having said that, Harry's out for his own best interests and sending Falque to us reflects them because of the playing styles of the two clubs. Even if Levy handles the deals for Spurs, I can pretty much guarantee you that this one wouldn't have happened unless Harry was cool with it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Causer Posted 16 January, 2012 Share Posted 16 January, 2012 To the Cortese Pompey Chant Iago Ohhhhhhh He's evil in Othello He ****ing hates Cassio Iago I'll get my coat Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Saint_lambden Posted 16 January, 2012 Share Posted 16 January, 2012 Niaive? Is that the French bloke we're after? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CityRanger Posted 16 January, 2012 Share Posted 16 January, 2012 Aren't Spurs having a bit of a feud over the Olympic Stadium with West Ham? Hopefully they'll lend us a few more stars to p!ss off the Hammers even more! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
davefizzy14 Posted 16 January, 2012 Share Posted 16 January, 2012 Very happy about this looking forward to seeing him play Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CWD Posted 16 January, 2012 Share Posted 16 January, 2012 Anyone concerned about pronounciation should watch Disney's Aladdin. Or if you wish to be somewhat more cultured, watch Shakespeare's Othello. Interesting signing, looking forward to how he does. It's likely to take time for him to settle so I hope we can give him that time as fans. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
S-Clarke Posted 16 January, 2012 Author Share Posted 16 January, 2012 I'm quite pleased to read a couple of comments from people who have actually seen him play. ''He'll be in our top 3 players from no onwards'' ''Think of another Lallana with a bit of pace'' Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
for_heaven's_Saint Posted 16 January, 2012 Share Posted 16 January, 2012 I wonder if he owns the Aston Martin that was parked outside SMS earlier. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cascadia Saint Posted 16 January, 2012 Share Posted 16 January, 2012 I'm quite pleased to read a couple of comments from people who have actually seen him play. ''He'll be in our top 3 players from no onwards'' ''Think of another Lallana with a bit of pace'' Great news, can't wait to see what kind of impact he has. He sounds absolute class on paper. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jimmy_D Posted 16 January, 2012 Share Posted 16 January, 2012 Looks like he's bound to improve our chances of getting promoted at any rate Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scudamore Posted 16 January, 2012 Share Posted 16 January, 2012 Or if you wish to be somewhat more cultured, watch Shakespeare's Othello. Have Disney done a version? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scott_saints Posted 16 January, 2012 Share Posted 16 January, 2012 http://www.tottenhamhotspurs.tv/forum/transfer-news/26050-spurs-sign-iago-falque-permanent-deal.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
for_heaven's_Saint Posted 17 January, 2012 Share Posted 17 January, 2012 Apparently some Juventus fans reckon Spurs paid £3million for him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Avenue Saint Posted 17 January, 2012 Share Posted 17 January, 2012 Very excited about this guy. Potentially another gem Adkins and cortese having unearthed here (albeit short term) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PokingFun Posted 17 January, 2012 Share Posted 17 January, 2012 What is wrong with blooding our youngsters as opposed to other teams unproven youngsters? Maybe they're not as good as this lad? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
skintsaint Posted 17 January, 2012 Share Posted 17 January, 2012 Looks to be pretty much totally left footed going on that vid. Means if he plays on the right it would make us narrow with him cutting in and Lallana doing the same on the left. Although we could start to change them around midgame to make the game wider/narrower at our choosing and to keep the opposition on their toes. Interesting signing and looking forward to how he plays. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Professor Posted 17 January, 2012 Share Posted 17 January, 2012 If only Adkins' interviews could be more convincing. At least the interview on Falqué didn't have the hairy old cliches about the bus and the building but if Adkins doesn't want to answer a question, why doesn't he just say so. Instead we have a question on where will Falqué play answered by saying he can play anywhere, and asked if he can speak English, Adkins says his Spanish is good and he can speak Portuguese. So, no English then, but why not say so, and say if having committed to playing in England, learning the language will be something he will do, which surely is the case. The point about Falqué is that he is only here for 3 months so his signing can only have one purpose, to improve the team for the promotion run-in. That should mean Falqué will take one of the four midfield slots, although not necessarily the same slot every time, but he's got to be on the pitch or there is no point to his loan. We read elsewhere that Falqué performs best behind the strikers and that he's not comfortable in a 4-4-2. So will we be playing the diamond to accommodate him, does that mean giving up on width, and which of Lallana, Morgan, Hammond, Cork and Chaplow are likely to lose out, as well as de Ridder? Oh, and what about Guly? If he's displaced from the front by Lambert's return, an in-form David Connolly and Tadanari Lee, is there a place in midfield for him? Does Adkins believe that in a few weeks time it will be apparent which is his strongest eleven? Seems there's no point any interviewer asking Adkins these questions as he will only answer in riddles yet surely he could be more frank in his replies without giving anything away if he just acknowledged that there are decisions have will have to be taken, that a lot will depend on how players perform and how individuals respond to the competition for places, and that the fans will see the outcome as team selections are announced. As for those who are 'gutted' that our loan signee, who we haven't seen play yet, isn't here with the prospect of a permanent transfer, surely that is completely immaterial. All that matters is promotion. If we are in the Premier League next season, the club will have some hard decisions on which players are capable of stepping up to the higher level and team building will be key, so losing our loan player, if he's been as good as his pedigree suggests, will just mean one more place to be filled, either by buying in or bringing up a player from the under-21s, but by then Falqué will have done his job if he's helped get us promoted. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dubai_phil Posted 17 January, 2012 Share Posted 17 January, 2012 If only Adkins' interviews could be more convincing. At least the interview on Falqué didn't have the hairy old cliches about the bus and the building but if Adkins doesn't want to answer a question, why doesn't he just say so. Instead we have a question on where will Falqué play answered by saying he can play anywhere, and asked if he can speak English, Adkins says his Spanish is good and he can speak Portuguese. So, no English then, but why not say so, and say if having committed to playing in England, learning the language will be something he will do, which surely is the case. The point about Falqué is that he is only here for 3 months so his signing can only have one purpose, to improve the team for the promotion run-in. That should mean Falqué will take one of the four midfield slots, although not necessarily the same slot every time, but he's got to be on the pitch or there is no point to his loan. We read elsewhere that Falqué performs best behind the strikers and that he's not comfortable in a 4-4-2. So will we be playing the diamond to accommodate him, does that mean giving up on width, and which of Lallana, Morgan, Hammond, Cork and Chaplow are likely to lose out, as well as de Ridder? Oh, and what about Guly? If he's displaced from the front by Lambert's return, an in-form David Connolly and Tadanari Lee, is there a place in midfield for him? Does Adkins believe that in a few weeks time it will be apparent which is his strongest eleven? Seems there's no point any interviewer asking Adkins these questions as he will only answer in riddles yet surely he could be more frank in his replies without giving anything away if he just acknowledged that there are decisions have will have to be taken, that a lot will depend on how players perform and how individuals respond to the competition for places, and that the fans will see the outcome as team selections are announced. As for those who are 'gutted' that our loan signee, who we haven't seen play yet, isn't here with the prospect of a permanent transfer, surely that is completely immaterial. All that matters is promotion. If we are in the Premier League next season, the club will have some hard decisions on which players are capable of stepping up to the higher level and team building will be key, so losing our loan player, if he's been as good as his pedigree suggests, will just mean one more place to be filled, either by buying in or bringing up a player from the under-21s, but by then Falqué will have done his job if he's helped get us promoted. IMHO it seems NA is starting to think a little further ahead. The "standard" formation these days in the EPL is to play variations on 4-3-3 and 4-5-1, but basically with a lone striker With the extra "attacking" wide player coming in, this now gives us a midfield 5 - 3 strong CM's with the rotation of AL, YF, SDR & Guly. AL took some time to get back to his usual standards after his foot injury and some are starting to think that Guly is in need of a break, and NA rotated his CM's regularly earlier in the season. With the nature of the 4 "extra" AM's we also have the option to go to a diamond but also to have two up top with Lee AND we have that cover now (and the makings of the squad cover in each position that we would need when we hit the PL) All of which is then blown out the water with the Hooper interest..... Hmm confusing But next season would expect to see much closer to the one up that the majority of PL clubs use these days Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
westmidlandsaint Posted 17 January, 2012 Share Posted 17 January, 2012 http://www.tottenhamhotspurs.tv/forum/transfer-news/26050-spurs-sign-iago-falque-permanent-deal.html Looking at these quotes the majority of spurs fans are really happy they signed him permanently, long term replacement for Van Der Vaart according to some Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fan The Flames Posted 17 January, 2012 Share Posted 17 January, 2012 Looks like a good addition we have to thank Harry, Kevin & Joe. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Glasgow_Saint Posted 17 January, 2012 Share Posted 17 January, 2012 Apparently some Juventus fans reckon Spurs paid £3million for him. 1.5m says the Sun http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/sport/football/4065820/Tottenham-sign-Iago-Flaque-Silva-on-permanent-deal.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stubby Posted 17 January, 2012 Share Posted 17 January, 2012 Does this mean we have to be (even slightly) grateful to Redknapp? :/ Redknapp is acting in his own self interest. We are acting in ours. Gratitude doens't come into it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SaintRichmond Posted 17 January, 2012 Share Posted 17 January, 2012 Southampton have acquired the services of Spanish starlet, Iago Falque on loan until the end of the season, after Spurs completed a permanent transfer for the winger from Juventus. http://www.saintsfc.co.uk/page/NewsDetail/0,,10280~2579341,00.html So, who have Spurs lined up to get from us at the end of the season 'Arry boys gives with one hand ..... etc etc Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
buctootim Posted 17 January, 2012 Share Posted 17 January, 2012 (edited) To the Cortese Pompey Chant Iago Ohhhhhhh He's evil in Othello He ****ing hates Cassio Iago I'll get my coat Cloak shirley ? Edited 17 January, 2012 by buctootim Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
London Saint Posted 17 January, 2012 Share Posted 17 January, 2012 Spurs fans I have spoken to about Falque rate him very highly from seeing just a handful of Carling Cup performances and were pleased to sign him permanently Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alpine_saint Posted 17 January, 2012 Share Posted 17 January, 2012 Redknapp is acting in his own self interest. We are acting in ours. Gratitude doens't come into it. He didnt have to come to us though, most probably other teams were interested. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eurosaint Posted 17 January, 2012 Share Posted 17 January, 2012 If only Adkins' interviews could be more convincing. At least the interview on Falqué didn't have the hairy old cliches about the bus and the building but if Adkins doesn't want to answer a question, why doesn't he just say so. Instead we have a question on where will Falqué play answered by saying he can play anywhere, and asked if he can speak English, Adkins says his Spanish is good and he can speak Portuguese. So, no English then, but why not say so, and say if having committed to playing in England, learning the language will be something he will do, which surely is the case. The point about Falqué is that he is only here for 3 months so his signing can only have one purpose, to improve the team for the promotion run-in. That should mean Falqué will take one of the four midfield slots, although not necessarily the same slot every time, but he's got to be on the pitch or there is no point to his loan. We read elsewhere that Falqué performs best behind the strikers and that he's not comfortable in a 4-4-2. So will we be playing the diamond to accommodate him, does that mean giving up on width, and which of Lallana, Morgan, Hammond, Cork and Chaplow are likely to lose out, as well as de Ridder? Oh, and what about Guly? If he's displaced from the front by Lambert's return, an in-form David Connolly and Tadanari Lee, is there a place in midfield for him? Does Adkins believe that in a few weeks time it will be apparent which is his strongest eleven? Seems there's no point any interviewer asking Adkins these questions as he will only answer in riddles yet surely he could be more frank in his replies without giving anything away if he just acknowledged that there are decisions have will have to be taken, that a lot will depend on how players perform and how individuals respond to the competition for places, and that the fans will see the outcome as team selections are announced. As for those who are 'gutted' that our loan signee, who we haven't seen play yet, isn't here with the prospect of a permanent transfer, surely that is completely immaterial. All that matters is promotion. If we are in the Premier League next season, the club will have some hard decisions on which players are capable of stepping up to the higher level and team building will be key, so losing our loan player, if he's been as good as his pedigree suggests, will just mean one more place to be filled, either by buying in or bringing up a player from the under-21s, but by then Falqué will have done his job if he's helped get us promoted. This signing is also about improving the squad ! Recently our bench has been pretty lightweight with limited options ! Whether Falque plays regularly (and in which role!) is dependent on who is fit, who is on form, who is suspended etc... As far as I see it, we have more permutations available than before and this can only be a good thing ! Same applies to Lee and anyone else we might sign within this window, it adds to the concept of 'strength in depth' ! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Andy Durman Posted 17 January, 2012 Share Posted 17 January, 2012 I think this deal has been orchestrated by Harry. He got us relegated and wants to help us get promoted. Although I'm not sure he would want that over his beloved West Ham?? Maybe we were trying to sign him permanently, maybe there's an option to purchase next year at a fee agreed over and above what Tottenham paid. Maybe I haven't got a bl**dy clue!!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jack Posted 17 January, 2012 Share Posted 17 January, 2012 My Spurs supporting mate thinks this bloke will be a good signing for them in years to come. Quick. A better SDR maybe? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Saint Charlie Posted 17 January, 2012 Share Posted 17 January, 2012 I think this deal has been orchestrated by Harry. He got us relegated and wants to help us get promoted. Although I'm not sure he would want that over his beloved West Ham?? Maybe we were trying to sign him permanently, maybe there's an option to purchase next year at a fee agreed over and above what Tottenham paid. Maybe I haven't got a bl**dy clue!!!! Harry doesn't care, he just wants his player to get a good standard of football somewhere that suits the player. This way his player improves which is all he is bothered about, and rightly so. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CHAPEL END CHARLIE Posted 17 January, 2012 Share Posted 17 January, 2012 Top CV for a youngster - Im very much looked forward to seeing if he's as half good on grass and he is on paper. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Foxstone Posted 17 January, 2012 Share Posted 17 January, 2012 It's a compliment to us that a club in the Premiership title race lends us a player because they believe we play football the right way... Never mind that its Twitchy doing the lending, it's a benchmark to show how well we are regarded. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cricketphilly Posted 17 January, 2012 Share Posted 17 January, 2012 Harry doesn't care, he just wants his player to get a good standard of football somewhere that suits the player. This way his player improves which is all he is bothered about, and rightly so. Harry has previous in loaning out players for experience, think Defoe and Lampard. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Avenue Saint Posted 17 January, 2012 Share Posted 17 January, 2012 If only Adkins' interviews could be more convincing. At least the interview on Falqué didn't have the hairy old cliches about the bus and the building but if Adkins doesn't want to answer a question, why doesn't he just say so. Instead we have a question on where will Falqué play answered by saying he can play anywhere, and asked if he can speak English, Adkins says his Spanish is good and he can speak Portuguese. So, no English then, but why not say so, and say if having committed to playing in England, learning the language will be something he will do, which surely is the case. The point about Falqué is that he is only here for 3 months so his signing can only have one purpose, to improve the team for the promotion run-in. That should mean Falqué will take one of the four midfield slots, although not necessarily the same slot every time, but he's got to be on the pitch or there is no point to his loan. We read elsewhere that Falqué performs best behind the strikers and that he's not comfortable in a 4-4-2. So will we be playing the diamond to accommodate him, does that mean giving up on width, and which of Lallana, Morgan, Hammond, Cork and Chaplow are likely to lose out, as well as de Ridder? Oh, and what about Guly? If he's displaced from the front by Lambert's return, an in-form David Connolly and Tadanari Lee, is there a place in midfield for him? Does Adkins believe that in a few weeks time it will be apparent which is his strongest eleven? Seems there's no point any interviewer asking Adkins these questions as he will only answer in riddles yet surely he could be more frank in his replies without giving anything away if he just acknowledged that there are decisions have will have to be taken, that a lot will depend on how players perform and how individuals respond to the competition for places, and that the fans will see the outcome as team selections are announced. As for those who are 'gutted' that our loan signee, who we haven't seen play yet, isn't here with the prospect of a permanent transfer, surely that is completely immaterial. All that matters is promotion. If we are in the Premier League next season, the club will have some hard decisions on which players are capable of stepping up to the higher level and team building will be key, so losing our loan player, if he's been as good as his pedigree suggests, will just mean one more place to be filled, either by buying in or bringing up a player from the under-21s, but by then Falqué will have done his job if he's helped get us promoted. Personally think we should do away with manager interviews! Not worth the hassle involved in looking for 'straight' answers... ? This getting new transfers in seems like bit of a bother too. Where is everyone else going to play??? Lol... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
for_heaven's_Saint Posted 17 January, 2012 Share Posted 17 January, 2012 Talking about formations, I think I'm right in saying that the Academy and youth teams all more or less play a 4-2-3-1 system? I'd like (and wouldn't be surprised) to see it implemented in the first team. Perhaps a midfield and attack that looks something like: -------Morgan----Cork------- Falque------Guly-------Lallana -----------Lambert------------ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boris Karloff Posted 17 January, 2012 Share Posted 17 January, 2012 Looking at comments from some of the Spurs fans they all seem to like him despite being slightly underwhelmed by his Europa Cup performances. Hopefully he will find the games in the Championship a little more open than the Europa Cup where most of the teams just parked the bus against Spurs and he was playing in a team which was a mix of first-teamers, reserve players and youth who won't have played much together. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pressingon Posted 17 January, 2012 Share Posted 17 January, 2012 I think this deal has been orchestrated by Harry. He got us relegated and wants to help us get promoted Nice to get a new conspiracy on a thread about a new player! Of course relegation had nothing to do with Lowe/Wigley/the short sighted fans who kicked off about a return for Hoddle and the 30+ professionals out on the pitch. Oh and we didn't have MLT to get us out of the sh*te as usual. I'm no more of a fan of saggy chops than anyone else on here but some balance wouldn't go amiss. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Secret Site Agent Posted 17 January, 2012 Share Posted 17 January, 2012 I believe his dad is Papa Yago. Are you sure it's not Papa Mango. Was underwelmed, but I am more up beat now I have read up on him, and all the loverly boys on here already agreeing it's a good thing. Onwards and upwards. Who's next? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Special K Posted 17 January, 2012 Share Posted 17 January, 2012 He may get a few sub appearances, but i wouldn't expect him to play a big part in the run in, unless we have a crippling injury list. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Window Cleaner Posted 17 January, 2012 Share Posted 17 January, 2012 He may get a few sub appearances, but i wouldn't expect him to play a big part in the run in, unless we have a crippling injury list. Thought he might get a start in our next FA Cup tie but I see he's already played for Spurs in the Cup this season. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CHAPEL END CHARLIE Posted 17 January, 2012 Share Posted 17 January, 2012 He may get a few sub appearances, but i wouldn't expect him to play a big part in the run in, unless we have a crippling injury list. To my way of thinking there doesn't seem much sense in him coming here at all if he didn't have real a chance of playing. I suspect that Redknapp has probably gotten assurances from Adkins that the boy will get a proper chance to show what he can do here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Secret Site Agent Posted 17 January, 2012 Share Posted 17 January, 2012 Personally think we should do away with manager interviews! Not worth the hassle involved in looking for 'straight' answers... This getting new transfers in seems like bit of a bother too. Where is everyone else going to play??? Lol... I think that the process is that when we started the season,and everyone assumed we were a mid to lower table candidates, maybe even flirting with relegation, teams were underwelmed when they were about to play us. And we played them off of the pitch and were unbeatable at home. Our away form was, and is, a little derisable, but we didn't do too bad. Then we got to the top. Teams then spent times looking at how we played and found ways to stifle our playing style. Our form started to slip. When Rickie was suspended that was it for us for three weeks. No Lambert against Coventry, firts teamers out, Saints are going to lose, especially with kids. WE won. No Lambert against Nottingham, even though they are bottom, Saints to struggle. WE won. With all this 'who's going to play where' I think we are at the stage where we have to once more stymie teams by being unpredictable and mixing the formation about. I personnaly think that is what Adkins was upto with Morgan on the wing, and with the signings so far, and the ones to come? With No Rickie to mark, who woudl opposing managers mark? With Adam playing in the midfield, then the wing, how to mark him? If our two best players are not the ones scoring the goals, how to stop us playing? Lets see now. Mark Guly, and Connely, and Morgan is scoring, so mark him, and Adam. What about Lee? How to mark him? What about Hammond, he's shooting from range. By keeping them guessing, we only open them up and stop them marking us off the park. so the only solution is to park the bus. But with the pacey players we have, we only ahve to beat the off side trap a few times before we score. And again. We are going into the realms of playing the saints way, in the saints formation. Which one is it? Well, lets keep them guessing. Because we can change the formation to suit the cecumstances and we are trying to get the players to do that. But with greedy agents, clubs looking to hold on to what they got, or be compensated for their loss, the asking of silly money is one thing that WILL stiffle us, as we will not pay it!!! Nicola is ahppy to tell them to Fuss Off, and I beleieve that our Jay Rods, Maynards, Sharpes et all will actually be from abroad eventually, as the french, Spanish, Dutch, versions will be just as good, but much cheaper, (or better value for money) that 6m, 7m 8m, for pretty good Championship players, who are average in the Premiership. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
St_Tel49 Posted 17 January, 2012 Share Posted 17 January, 2012 (edited) If it is Iago, it is almost certainly the first Shakespearian character we have ever signed. Well at least his diving should be realistic Edited 17 January, 2012 by St_Tel49 remove unnecessary phrase Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now