Jump to content

Leicester City build up thread


Bad Wolf

Recommended Posts

. Davis

 

Richardson - Fonte(?) - Jos . Fox

 

De Ridder . Cork . Morgan .Lallana

 

Guly - Connolly

 

Subs: Bart, Martin, Chaplow, Falque, Lee

 

Key match for the promotion campaign, after Leicester and Cardiff it's all downhill at home and these 10 matches will decide just how simple (or not) being 1st or 2nd will be.

 

If we can take say 25 out of 30 at home that leaves us just needing a handful of points from the 10 aways,

 

I'd guess that the starting 11 will look very much like that of last Saturday dependant on the status of Fonte and Richardson.If they're both ready straight post for post swap for Harding and Martin, other than that steady as you go. Subs bench will

be much changed though but once again totally dependant on the fitness of Fonte and Richardson.

Edited by Window Cleaner
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd stick with Saturday's starting XI, maybe just FR to come back in for Harding. I see no reason to change the midfield, they were very decent on Saturday. Dropping Deano out of the XI, let alone the squad, would be madness

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lighthouse and SourMash don't have a defender on the bench, so I'd adapt their selection as:-

 

Davis

Richardson - Fonte if fit, or Martin - Hooiveld - Fox

Cork - Morgan - Hammond - Lallana

Connolly - Guly

 

Subs: Bart; Harding; Falque; Lee; De Ridder (or Martin if Fonte starts).

 

If Martin plays because Fonte is still not fit, the CB back-up is Cork, freed-up by bringing on Falque or de Ridder.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lighthouse and SourMash don't have a defender on the bench, so I'd adapt their selection as:-

 

Davis

Richardson - Fonte if fit, or Martin - Hooiveld - Fox

Cork - Morgan - Hammond - Lallana

Connolly - Guly

 

Subs: Bart; Harding; Falque; Lee; De Ridder (or Martin if Fonte starts).

 

If Martin plays because Fonte is still not fit, the CB back-up is Cork, freed-up by bringing on Falque or de Ridder.

I'll think you'll find I did. On a related note, I'd come back to not playing a sub keeper, still believe it is overly cautious when only having the option of 5 on the bench and would be very frustrating leaving some of our players out of the squad for Bart to sit on the bench for 90mins.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Fair enough, although the team will have had over a week to rest/prepare for the Leicester match.

 

what can i say mate, if im being honest, i am not hammonds biggest fan...

 

No doubt he has improved his game like a lot of others this season but i still see him as a "grit" player and less so talent.

 

The issue i have when i watch him closely during games is that he is quite often half a yard (in thinking) behind most of the players around him. Where Adkins wants to take this team in terms of the "southampton style", i cant see how long he will last on the journey.

 

He obviously brings something to the dressing room otherwise wouldnt be captain but I would seriously consider getting someone in with more technical ability but the same play breaking "grit" value in the near future.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The 4th Offical is due to be Andy D'Urso. Those of you near the dugouts will have a chance to tell him what you think of his refereeing at brighton a couple of weeks ago.

 

The Ref is due to be Neil Swarbrick.

Last Saints game was a 3-1 win at Hartlepool in 2009, before that a 1-1 draw at Coventry and a 2-1 defeat at Stoke in 2007.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You obviously weren't at Nottingham.

 

You would never in a million years consider dropping Hammond on that performance.

 

Hammond, Cork and Schneiderlin are learning to play together. They are the first 3 picked on my team sheet for Leicester.

 

This.

 

With Cork on the right again. Morgan and Deano have to be the middle pair when all three play.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You obviously weren't at Nottingham.

 

You would never in a million years consider dropping Hammond on that performance.

 

Hammond, Cork and Schneiderlin are learning to play together. They are the first 3 picked on my team sheet for Leicester.

 

No you're right i wasnt. Just caught second half on stream.

 

I hope he continues playing well and to be proved wrong.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This.

 

With Cork on the right again. Morgan and Deano have to be the middle pair when all three play.

 

Having all three allows all of them to get forward more and a better defensive structure,if you look at Saturday's game you'll see just how much they all help out the defence at times, always one of them on hand in case any of the defenders get skinned or cock-up.Must be reassuring for the 2 CBs to know that help is usually at hand.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Key match for the promotion campaign, after Leicester and Cardiff it's all downhill at home and these 10 matches will decide just how simple (or not) being 1st or 2nd will be.

 

If we can take say 25 out of 30 at home that leaves us just needing a handful of points from the 10 aways,

 

I'd guess that the starting 11 will look very much like that of last Saturday dependant on the status of Fonte and Richardson.If they're both ready straight post for post swap for Harding and Martin, other than that steady as you go. Subs bench will

be much changed though but once again totally dependant on the fitness of Fonte and Richardson.

 

Isn't Burnley our next home match after Cardiff?

 

Hardly an easy game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd come back to not playing a sub keeper, still believe it is overly cautious when only having the option of 5 on the bench and would be very frustrating leaving some of our players out of the squad for Bart to sit on the bench for 90mins.

 

That is taking a huge risk! Yes it is unlikely a sub keeper will be needed, but with 20 games left, playing an outfield player in goal if Davis gets injured/sent off could be the difference between promotion and another year in this league. Having one more outfield player on the bench won't make that much difference, having no sub keeper in a game where you need one could make a huge difference to the outcome of an entire campaign with the league so tight.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That is taking a huge risk! Yes it is unlikely a sub keeper will be needed, but with 20 games left, playing an outfield player in goal if Davis gets injured/sent off could be the difference between promotion and another year in this league. Having one more outfield player on the bench won't make that much difference, having no sub keeper in a game where you need one could make a huge difference to the outcome of an entire campaign with the league so tight.
It's a matter of opinion and most football managers are obviously of the same opinion as you. However, how many times have you been at a game when the keeper has gone off and has needed a replacement? How many times have you been at a game when a team has been crying out for an extra attacking option off the bench? Or an extra defensive option when holding on to a lead?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's a matter of opinion and most football managers are obviously of the same opinion as you. However, how many times have you been at a game when the keeper has gone off and has needed a replacement? How many times have you been at a game when a team has been crying out for an extra attacking option off the bench? Or an extra defensive option when holding on to a lead?

 

If Saints end up losing out on promotion because Adkins took that risk in one game and dropped 2 or 3 points because he put Jack Cork in goal for example, would you want to be the manager at the centre of it? The fanbase wouldn't be happy in the summer... imagine what Alpine or Dalek2003 would say?! I'm normally optimistic, Dalek2003 would self destruct!

Edited by Matthew Le God
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If Saints end up losing out on promotion because Adkins took that risk in one game and dropped 2 or 3 points because he put Jack Cork in goal for example, would you want to be the manager at the centre of it? The fanbase wouldn't be happy in the summer... imagine what Alpine or Dalek2003 would say?! I'm normally optimistic, Dalek2003 would self destruct!
What if we missed out on promotion due to not having necessary defensive cover on the bench and losing a game because of that. Or not winning a game due to lack of attacking options on the bench, something that could be argued we've already seen this season? It doesn't have as obvious an impact as a keeper going off, but certainly a much more common problem. I'm sure NA will stick with Bart, but he's going to have a right old headache if everyone's fit and in form at the same time!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

What if we missed out on promotion due to not having necessary defensive cover on the bench and losing a game because of that. Or not winning a game due to lack of attacking options on the bench, something that could be argued we've already seen this season? It doesn't have as obvious an impact as a keeper going off, but certainly a much more common problem. I'm sure NA will stick with Bart, but he's going to have a right old headache if everyone's fit and in form at the same time!

 

You can cover most problems easily with 4 outfield subs. One defender, one defensive midfielder, two attack minded players.

 

In the past you had to cope with 0/1/2/3 subs in total let alone 5 or 7! :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Think De Ridder could quite easily see himself slipping down the pecking order if Lee, Falque + one other are all involved.

 

De Ridder would have played the last 2 games, but is struggling with his groin. He was on the bench at Nottingham, but was happy not to come on (his words)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

De Ridder would have played the last 2 games, but is struggling with his groin. He was on the bench at Nottingham, but was happy not to come on (his words)
I would have thought he would have as we're missing so many players, but if everyone is available for selection I can see him being left off the bench,
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lighthouse and SourMash don't have a defender on the bench, so I'd adapt their selection as:-

 

Davis

Richardson - Fonte if fit, or Martin - Hooiveld - Fox

Cork - Morgan - Hammond - Lallana

Connolly - Guly

 

Subs: Bart; Harding; Falque; Lee; De Ridder (or Martin if Fonte starts).

 

If Martin plays because Fonte is still not fit, the CB back-up is Cork, freed-up by bringing on Falque or de Ridder.

 

They joy of having Cork in your side is he a very capable defender as well as being a brilliant midfielder. Should one of our defenders get injured, I'd just bring on De Ridder, stick him on the right and have Cork fill in whichever defensive possition sustained the injury. It's not a permanent solution and is a little bit George Burley, but it would surfice against anyone in this league.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Doesn't seem to be much hope of Lee being involved on Monday, at least from what the OS says. It suggests Yago might be involved but no mention of Tadanari, so looks like he won't be back for a while yet. Odd really.

 

Odd ? Are you implying that there is a problem in Lee's signing ? Maybe NA thinks there is no urgency and that we are good enough to beat Leicester with the players available. I don't sense any urgency from NA's interviews.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Odd ? Are you implying that there is a problem in Lee's signing ? Maybe NA thinks there is no urgency and that we are good enough to beat Leicester with the players available. I don't sense any urgency from NA's interviews.

Yes. I'm not ITK, but I get a sense of lack of activity, since the news that the work permit was granted. OK, so he went back to Japan, but given he had been over here training it just seems a bit of a long time, and there has been no mention of him for a few days. Maybe just getting a little paranoid.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Assuming that Lee won't be ready to play, and if we get a clean bill of health for the squad (aside from Chaplow and Lambert, obviously) I would play this:

 

------------------DAVIS--------------------

FRAZER-----FONTE-----HOOIVELD-------FOX

CORK----HAMMOND-----MORGAN----LALLANA

---------CONNOLLY-----GULY---------------

 

Subs: Bart, Martin, Harding, Falque, De Ridder

 

Martin has been sublime since he's come into the team, and ideally I would keep him in but Fonte and Jos have an understanding which hasn't quite developed with Martin and Jos yet. More games will yield a good partnership. Cork was excellent on the right against Forest, and I would keep him there because A) Starting Falque might be too much, too soon and B) De Ridder is a great impact player and I can't drop Morgan or Deano from the middle either.

 

I'm feeling proper confident for this game, reckon we'll turn them over!

 

COYR!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

how long would it take you to sort all your affairs in order to be able to move to the other side of the world? its a very big move for the bloke and his family/partner.

A week. Happens all the time, work ask if you can go away to customer site for 4 months, flight booked on the plane within a week. He's not having to leave Japan for good, he will be allowed back in. Come May on the plane back home and make any longer term arrangements. I just don't buy this idea it takes weeks and that maybe something is not right (or maybe not).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Having spoken to NA on Saturday I do think that something doesn't quite sit right with NA and the Lee saga.

 

My question is whether he actually wanted him in the first place.

 

Second is the language barrier.

 

Third is the time needed to integrate him.

 

& Fourth the time its taking to get him over here and into consideration for the next match.

 

Very speculative.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Chatting to a colleague at work earlier, I said I'd prefer De Ridder to start (if fit) with Falque on the bench, in response he suggested the following, utterly seriously. Tell me it's not just me who thinks he's mental.

 

"Well we could play both, De Ridder can play centre mid you know, we should play Harding on the left and move Lallana to the centre too where he can use his skill".

 

Harding - De Ridder - Lallana - Falque

 

Maybe it's me that's mental and he's a footballing visionary.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Chatting to a colleague at work earlier, I said I'd prefer De Ridder to start (if fit) with Falque on the bench, in response he suggested the following, utterly seriously. Tell me it's not just me who thinks he's mental.

 

"Well we could play both, De Ridder can play centre mid you know, we should play Harding on the left and move Lallana to the centre too where he can use his skill".

 

Harding - De Ridder - Lallana - Falque

 

Maybe it's me that's mental and he's a footballing visionary.

 

Nope, its not you thats mental :-)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Chatting to a colleague at work earlier, I said I'd prefer De Ridder to start (if fit) with Falque on the bench, in response he suggested the following, utterly seriously. Tell me it's not just me who thinks he's mental.

 

"Well we could play both, De Ridder can play centre mid you know, we should play Harding on the left and move Lallana to the centre too where he can use his skill".

 

Harding - De Ridder - Lallana - Falque

 

Maybe it's me that's mental and he's a footballing visionary.

 

Tell your friend that is the best way to make our midfield as weak as possible.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...