Viking Warrior Posted 7 January, 2012 Share Posted 7 January, 2012 Nothing to do with the Sun article Saintandy666. Its on other news sites which is where I first heard about it. Its also mentioned on other social networks but dont let that cloud you labour red tinted galsses Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
anothersaintinsouthsea Posted 7 January, 2012 Share Posted 7 January, 2012 I see Millipede has entered the fray re twitter. making a tribute to bob holness and is work with Blackbusters. I thought he went to a posh school what an idjit did you mean "his" work? I'm assuming that's your spelling mistake and not his, easily done isn't it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Viking Warrior Posted 7 January, 2012 Share Posted 7 January, 2012 fair comment anothersaint but then I didnt go to posh schools and had the privaliges milliepde had and still does Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Saintandy666 Posted 7 January, 2012 Share Posted 7 January, 2012 Nothing to do with the Sun article Saintandy666. Its on other news sites which is where I first heard about it. Its also mentioned on other social networks but dont let that cloud you labour red tinted galsses Every newspaper which reports it as an awful thing is ridiculous. Also, I'm not a labour supporter. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Saintandy666 Posted 7 January, 2012 Share Posted 7 January, 2012 fair comment anothersaint but then I didnt go to posh schools and had the privaliges milliepde had and still does He went to comprehensive schools. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thorpe-le-Saint Posted 7 January, 2012 Share Posted 7 January, 2012 Dave has been on good form: tweeting that sitting opposite Ed balls in the HOC is like sitting opposite someone with tourettes. Just when the ****servatives had the opportunity to take the moral high ground. British politics: rotten to the core. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
um pahars Posted 7 January, 2012 Share Posted 7 January, 2012 Dave has been on good form: tweeting that sitting opposite Ed balls in the HOC is like sitting opposite someone with tourettes. Just when the ****servatives had the opportunity to take the moral high ground. British politics: rotten to the core. Wouldn't have thought he would be tweeting that as sure he doesn't partake in Twitter (hence his "too many tweets make you a tawt line") Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Verbal Posted 8 January, 2012 Share Posted 8 January, 2012 I thought he went to a posh school what an idjit Hardly. His dad was the noted Marxist political scientist Ralph Miliband ('The State in Capitalist Society', if you're interested in one of his bestsellers). The Milibands all went to comprehensive schools. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LGTL Posted 8 January, 2012 Share Posted 8 January, 2012 Wouldn't have thought he would be tweeting that as sure he doesn't partake in Twitter (hence his "too many tweets make you a tawt line") Wasn't on Twitter, within a newspaper according to this... http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-16458524 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dune Posted 8 January, 2012 Share Posted 8 January, 2012 Dave has been on good form: tweeting that sitting opposite Ed balls in the HOC is like sitting opposite someone with tourettes. I lol'd. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pap Posted 8 January, 2012 Share Posted 8 January, 2012 The Diane Abbott debacle looms large on this week's Any Questions. Many of the same points that are made on here. Constance Briscoe is perhaps most up-front about the issue, highlighting Abbott's past hypocrisy and stating that the only reason that Diane Abbott is still in her job is because she is black. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gambol2K9 Posted 8 January, 2012 Share Posted 8 January, 2012 Her words don't offend me, however from this and other things she has said, it's clear that when she looks at somebody she doesn't see a person, she sees a colour. I find it disturbing that someone with that attitude can hold a high position in the shadow cabinet. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Saintandy666 Posted 13 January, 2012 Share Posted 13 January, 2012 (edited) She is on This Week next week. Andrew Neil will probably destroy her over her comments, as he often does when he lays into her with hard questioning. Edited 13 January, 2012 by Saintandy666 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Griffo Posted 13 January, 2012 Share Posted 13 January, 2012 I find it disturbing that someone with that attitude can hold a high position in the shadow cabinet. Isn't it funny how shadows are black and so is she. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alpine_saint Posted 13 January, 2012 Share Posted 13 January, 2012 Her words don't offend me, however from this and other things she has said, it's clear that when she looks at somebody she doesn't see a person, she sees a colour. Isnt that a text book defintion of a racist mentality ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trousers Posted 13 January, 2012 Share Posted 13 January, 2012 Isnt that a text book defintion of a racist mentality ? Only if there is an intent to cause harm (mentally or physically) behind the actual words (IMO) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Saintandy666 Posted 13 January, 2012 Share Posted 13 January, 2012 Only if there is an intent to cause harm (mentally or physically) behind the actual words (IMO) Correct. There is racialism which is saying people of different races have different qualities and then racism which is actually saying because of different perceived qualities, then the races must be treated to different standards. One is dangerously close to the other and personally I just think we should concentrate on what unites and allow equality to stem from there. Race is irrelevant or it should be if not for a few nasty individuals. Edit: having looked into this a bit more it seems there is much debate over whether the two terms are the same these days or not. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alpine_saint Posted 13 January, 2012 Share Posted 13 January, 2012 Only if there is an intent to cause harm (mentally or physically) behind the actual words (IMO) No, no, no. Cannot agree !!! "harm" is too restrictive a word. "treat in the slightest way differently" is much more inclusive. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alpine_saint Posted 13 January, 2012 Share Posted 13 January, 2012 Correct. There is racialism which is saying people of different races have different qualities and then racism which is actually saying because of different perceived qualities, then the races must be treated to different standards. One is dangerously close to the other and personally I just think we should concentrate on what unites and allow equality to stem from there. Race is irrelevant or it should be if not for a few nasty individuals. Edit: having looked into this a bit more it seems there is much debate over whether the two terms are the same these days or not. If I say black blokes are better dancers and sportsmen, am I being racist or racialist ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Saintandy666 Posted 13 January, 2012 Share Posted 13 January, 2012 If I say black blokes are better dancers and sportsmen, am I being racist or racialist ? Racialism is more about scientific statement and evidence. Anyhow, I don't like to draw differences full stop. We are all equal and should be treated such. And just for Dune, let's have another Dumbledore quote 'It matters not what you are born, but who you grow to be' Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Verbal Posted 13 January, 2012 Share Posted 13 January, 2012 If I say black blokes are better dancers and sportsmen, am I being racist or racialist ? No, just ignorant. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Whitey Grandad Posted 13 January, 2012 Share Posted 13 January, 2012 No, just ignorant. Alpinist! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Verbal Posted 13 January, 2012 Share Posted 13 January, 2012 Alpinist! True. I do enjoy a good ski. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Whitey Grandad Posted 13 January, 2012 Share Posted 13 January, 2012 True. I do enjoy a good ski. There's nothing better than going for a tramp in the Alps. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alpine_saint Posted 15 January, 2012 Share Posted 15 January, 2012 Still any doubts about concerning the sort of person the erstwhile Mizz Abbott is ? Yes ? Read further..... http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2086722/Diane-Abbott-told-Tory-voting-graduate-Jade-Knight-work-white-Conservative.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alpine_saint Posted 16 January, 2012 Share Posted 16 January, 2012 Still any doubts about concerning the sort of person the erstwhile Mizz Abbott is ? Yes ? Read further..... http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2086722/Diane-Abbott-told-Tory-voting-graduate-Jade-Knight-work-white-Conservative.html No comment from the resident left-wing intelligensia ? Or just taking a while to come up with a decent excuse ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vershinin Posted 16 January, 2012 Share Posted 16 January, 2012 No comment from the resident left-wing intelligensia ? Or just taking a while to come up with a decent excuse ? Unsuprising coming from her. She's a disgrace, the chip on her shoulder is quite staggering. She is always moaning that we don't allow more black politicians in this country, yet she turns a potential candidate away. Hypocrite. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Verbal Posted 16 January, 2012 Share Posted 16 January, 2012 No comment from the resident left-wing intelligensia ? Or just taking a while to come up with a decent excuse ? We're just waiting for you to learn how to spell. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alpine_saint Posted 16 January, 2012 Share Posted 16 January, 2012 We're just waiting for you to learn how to spell. Very good. Your pedantry allows you to avoid answering the substance for a little bit longer while you make up an excuse. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Verbal Posted 16 January, 2012 Share Posted 16 January, 2012 Very good. Your pedantry allows you to avoid answering the substance for a little bit longer while you make up an excuse. You haven't made a point of any substance. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pap Posted 16 January, 2012 Share Posted 16 January, 2012 You haven't made a point of any substance. Careful now. I know for a fact that Alps got this for Christmas:- Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Foxstone Posted 16 January, 2012 Share Posted 16 January, 2012 Still any doubts about concerning the sort of person the erstwhile Mizz Abbott is ? Yes ? Read further..... http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2086722/Diane-Abbott-told-Tory-voting-graduate-Jade-Knight-work-white-Conservative.html Had not seen this until now... She really does increasingly come across with an "anti-white" chip on her shoulder hypocrite... Really hope she is chucked out at the ballot box - No more than the old bat deserves IMO.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alpine_saint Posted 16 January, 2012 Share Posted 16 January, 2012 Careful now. I know for a fact that Alps got this for Christmas:- Talking about waving the white flag... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pap Posted 16 January, 2012 Share Posted 16 January, 2012 Talking about waving the white flag... No point. You'd swear it was black, and suggest that there is "something wrong with people" that disagree. Have to say though, it is much easier to respond to you as a troll than as a human, so thanks for that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alpine_saint Posted 16 January, 2012 Share Posted 16 January, 2012 No point. You'd swear it was black, and suggest that there is "something wrong with people" that disagree. Have to say though, it is much easier to respond to you as a troll than as a human, so thanks for that. Anything to avoid facing an ugly truth, eh ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Verbal Posted 16 January, 2012 Share Posted 16 January, 2012 Anything to avoid facing an ugly truth, eh ? Trolltastic! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alpine_saint Posted 16 January, 2012 Share Posted 16 January, 2012 I will take both of your insistences on playing the poster and not the post as being a tacit acceptance of racism under certain circumstances. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pap Posted 16 January, 2012 Share Posted 16 January, 2012 I will take both of your insistences on playing the poster and not the post as being a tacit acceptance of racism under certain circumstances. Do what you like, Alps. Can't speak for Verbal, but from my POV, you can just take it that I'm going to dismiss everything you say until you become a lot more conciliatory in your posts. I am highly amused by your whining though, so please, continue pulling people up for stuff you do in 98% of your posts. Your inane proclamations and simplistic traps provide a welcome break from sensible and well-reasoned posts. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frank's cousin Posted 16 January, 2012 Share Posted 16 January, 2012 If I say black blokes are better dancers and sportsmen, am I being racist or racialist ? NO, just reinforcing sterotypes. Good question though - The problem with making positive statements about 'races' (although we are actually all one Human race) in this way and including the 'colour' is that in principle its no different from a negative statemnet about a group which is racist - whats the difference, if differentiating a group on colour when we know its not actually true - the fact that the 100 m final in 2012 will be 8 Black men is not because they are black - but because of a variety of reasons - some will be genetic - and this is where it gets dangerous as its these princinciples that Nazi nutters based Eugenics on - a genetic advantage that is the result of environmental impact on evolution - particularly where those humans have had to survive in far harsher environmental conditions - and where there is high infant mortality - meaning there is a stronger natural selction impacting on the localised gene pool than in more affluent countries + the normal environmental survival advantages. This has nothing to do with being balck though - as we see with the quality of sportsmen and women who are white but have a multi-generational history in South Africa or even Australia etc. The other main one IMHO is the same reason we so many good Russian and Eastern European Tennis players - the economic question - the drive to improve your situation - no surprise the number of top class sportsmen that have pretty humble backgrounds. Re. Dianne A being racist? - not really, but she as others have pointed out, she does have a massive chip on her shoulder. Thing is when we know that there is still racism out there (and far more than most would like to believe) its probably easy to be paranoid, but her comments were not only unwise but do not help improve the situation either. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Verbal Posted 16 January, 2012 Share Posted 16 January, 2012 NO' date=' just reinforcing sterotypes. Good question though - The problem with making positive statements about 'races' (although we are actually all one Human race) in this way and including the 'colour' is that in principle its no different from a negative statemnet about a group which is racist - whats the difference, if differentiating a group on colour when we know its not actually true - the fact that the 100 m final in 2012 will be 8 Black men is not because they are black - but because of a variety of reasons - some will be genetic - and this is where it gets dangerous as its these princinciples that Nazi nutters based Eugenics on - a genetic advantage that is the result of environmental impact on evolution - particularly where those humans have had to survive in far harsher environmental conditions - and where there is high infant mortality - meaning there is a stronger natural selction impacting on the localised gene pool than in more affluent countries + the normal environmental survival advantages. This has nothing to do with being balck though - as we see with the quality of sportsmen and women who are white but have a multi-generational history in South Africa or even Australia etc.[/quote'] If it were simply down to genetics and their interaction with environment, Frank, there would be streams of record-breaking 100-metre runners from Senegal and Mali, where vast numbers of North American and Caribbean blacks have ancestors. But neither country produces remotely quick runners. The principal reason has to do with the decidedly non-natural selection of slavery and the slave trade. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sergei Gotsmanov Posted 16 January, 2012 Share Posted 16 January, 2012 If it were simply down to genetics and their interaction with environment, Frank, there would be streams of record-breaking 100-metre runners from Senegal and Mali, where vast numbers of North American and Caribbean blacks have ancestors. But neither country produces remotely quick runners. The principal reason has to do with the decidedly non-natural selection of slavery and the slave trade. Then why do the kenyans dominate the long distance events. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
buctootim Posted 16 January, 2012 Share Posted 16 January, 2012 Then why do the kenyans dominate the long distance events. Saw an intersting article about this. Its not even Kenyans in general - just a very small area of Kenya about 40 mile radius around one village, cant remember its name. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
um pahars Posted 16 January, 2012 Share Posted 16 January, 2012 Saw an intersting article about this. Its not even Kenyans in general - just a very small area of Kenya about 40 mile radius around one village, cant remember its name. Did you mean this article??????? http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-14679657 Interesting reading and certainly makes you think about how we generalise races and ethnic groups Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Verbal Posted 16 January, 2012 Share Posted 16 January, 2012 Did you mean this article??????? http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-14679657 Interesting reading and certainly makes you think about how we generalise races and ethnic groups As the article says: The truth is rather different. There is far more genetic variation within racial groups (around 85%) than there is between racial groups (just 15%). Indeed, surface appearance is often a highly misleading way of assessing the genetic distance between populations. And this is especially true of black Africans, among whom there is FAR greater genetic variation (hence the 'Out of Africa' theory) than between a black African and a white Norwegian. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
buctootim Posted 16 January, 2012 Share Posted 16 January, 2012 Did you mean this article??????? http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-14679657 Interesting reading and certainly makes you think about how we generalise races and ethnic groups Yes, thanks, think it probably was. I rember reading a little more detail though - perhaps it inspired me to go off and google other info. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Saintandy666 Posted 16 January, 2012 Share Posted 16 January, 2012 She's withdrawn from This Week. She was meant to come back for a one off episode. No doubt worried about being destroyed by Andrew Neil... or at least her party is. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alpine_saint Posted 16 January, 2012 Share Posted 16 January, 2012 She's withdrawn from This Week. She was meant to come back for a one off episode. No doubt worried about being destroyed by Andrew Neil... or at least her party is. More left-wing cowardice. Would have loved to see that on You Tube. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alpine_saint Posted 16 January, 2012 Share Posted 16 January, 2012 Do what you like, Alps. Can't speak for Verbal, but from my POV, you can just take it that I'm going to dismiss everything you say until you become a lot more conciliatory in your posts. I am highly amused by your whining though, so please, continue pulling people up for stuff you do in 98% of your posts. Your inane proclamations and simplistic traps provide a welcome break from sensible and well-reasoned posts. Whatever. The refusal of you two to condemn her and to deflect attention by attacking me speaks volumes about your personalities. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Saintandy666 Posted 16 January, 2012 Share Posted 16 January, 2012 More left-wing cowardice. Would have loved to see that on You Tube. To be honest, they ripped her quite a lot last week! But would have been interesting to see how she would have coped with it if she was there... not well at all if the last few times Neil went hard on her is anything to go by. I have a feeling they might have fallen out. And saying 'left-wing cowardice' just brings your point into the gutter. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Verbal Posted 16 January, 2012 Share Posted 16 January, 2012 Whatever. The refusal of you two to condemn her and to deflect attention by attacking me speaks volumes about your personalities. Dear Dimwit, please see, among others, posts 37, 41, 146, 174, 181. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.thumb.jpg.de4a569395af1bfcb94415b95fe46419.jpg)
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now