Will Stern John Play?

[paulwantsapint]

Just looking at fixtures we play Bristol next sat can SJ play or not?

 

If he does odds that he scores hatrick?

[Stu Man Do]

I would imagine not, in the same way that Robertson could not play against Sheff Utd or Dyer against us the other week.

[Glasgow_Saint]

lets hope not

[Gemmel]

Just looking at fixtures we play Bristol next sat can SJ play or not?

 

If he does odds that he scores hatrick?

 

For all his faults, lowes pretty could when it comes to contracts. I would doubt very much he will play.

[saint J]

http://www.saintsfc.co.uk/news/?page_id=10787

 

definately not playing, not eligable.

[Marsdinho]

For all his faults, lowes pretty could when it comes to contracts. I would doubt very much he will play.

 

 

Dont think it has anything to do with Lowe, think the rules of the football league prevent loanees playing against their old club.

[Mowgli]

Dont think it has anything to do with Lowe, think the rules of the football league prevent loanees playing against their old club.

 

Of course its not FL rules. That's why there is always so much debate about it. But I was surprised the Blades had not put the clause in as Robertson (I think) was saying this week how disappointed he was to miss that game. May be wrong but I thought that was what he said.

 

Rasiak would have played against us had it not been for injury.

[Plumstead_Saint]

Of course its not FL rules. That's why there is always so much debate about it. But I was surprised the Blades had not put the clause in as Robertson (I think) was saying this week how disappointed he was to miss that game. May be wrong but I thought that was what he said.

 

Rasiak would have played against us had it not been for injury.

Yes you are wrong.

"Robertson also sat out the previous match against Sheffield United as he was ineligible to play against his parent club, much to his annoyance."

from OS.

HTH

[musesaint]

Not allowed to play against us

 

We may be stupid ....but not yet totally mental

[Marsdinho]

Of course its not FL rules. That's why there is always so much debate about it. But I was surprised the Blades had not put the clause in as Robertson (I think) was saying this week how disappointed he was to miss that game. May be wrong but I thought that was what he said.

 

Rasiak would have played against us had it not been for injury.

 

Someone looks stupid....

[Saint_clark]

Someone looks stupid....

 

It's not FL rules. Lucketti could have played for us V Sheffield United but chose not to.

[Fan The Flames]

Yes you are wrong.

"Robertson also sat out the previous match against Sheffield United as he was ineligible to play against his parent club, much to his annoyance."

from OS.

HTH

 

This may have been a condition of the loan not a FL requirement.

[Marsdinho]

I stand corrected - its a Prem League rule.

[Arizona]

Who needs John now we've got Alex Pearce!

[forever a red and white]

my mate was just at the city reading game, reading fan.

 

He said Stern played well, everyhting went through him and he was a touch of class!