paulwantsapint Posted 1 November, 2008 Share Posted 1 November, 2008 Just looking at fixtures we play Bristol next sat can SJ play or not? If he does odds that he scores hatrick? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stu Man Do Posted 1 November, 2008 Share Posted 1 November, 2008 I would imagine not, in the same way that Robertson could not play against Sheff Utd or Dyer against us the other week. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Glasgow_Saint Posted 1 November, 2008 Share Posted 1 November, 2008 lets hope not Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gemmel Posted 1 November, 2008 Share Posted 1 November, 2008 Just looking at fixtures we play Bristol next sat can SJ play or not? If he does odds that he scores hatrick? For all his faults, lowes pretty could when it comes to contracts. I would doubt very much he will play. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
saint J Posted 1 November, 2008 Share Posted 1 November, 2008 http://www.saintsfc.co.uk/news/?page_id=10787 definately not playing, not eligable. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Marsdinho Posted 1 November, 2008 Share Posted 1 November, 2008 For all his faults, lowes pretty could when it comes to contracts. I would doubt very much he will play. Dont think it has anything to do with Lowe, think the rules of the football league prevent loanees playing against their old club. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mowgli Posted 1 November, 2008 Share Posted 1 November, 2008 Dont think it has anything to do with Lowe, think the rules of the football league prevent loanees playing against their old club. Of course its not FL rules. That's why there is always so much debate about it. But I was surprised the Blades had not put the clause in as Robertson (I think) was saying this week how disappointed he was to miss that game. May be wrong but I thought that was what he said. Rasiak would have played against us had it not been for injury. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Plumstead_Saint Posted 1 November, 2008 Share Posted 1 November, 2008 Of course its not FL rules. That's why there is always so much debate about it. But I was surprised the Blades had not put the clause in as Robertson (I think) was saying this week how disappointed he was to miss that game. May be wrong but I thought that was what he said. Rasiak would have played against us had it not been for injury. Yes you are wrong. "Robertson also sat out the previous match against Sheffield United as he was ineligible to play against his parent club, much to his annoyance." from OS. HTH Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
musesaint Posted 1 November, 2008 Share Posted 1 November, 2008 Not allowed to play against us We may be stupid ....but not yet totally mental Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Marsdinho Posted 1 November, 2008 Share Posted 1 November, 2008 Of course its not FL rules. That's why there is always so much debate about it. But I was surprised the Blades had not put the clause in as Robertson (I think) was saying this week how disappointed he was to miss that game. May be wrong but I thought that was what he said. Rasiak would have played against us had it not been for injury. Someone looks stupid.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Saint_clark Posted 1 November, 2008 Share Posted 1 November, 2008 Someone looks stupid.... It's not FL rules. Lucketti could have played for us V Sheffield United but chose not to. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fan The Flames Posted 1 November, 2008 Share Posted 1 November, 2008 Yes you are wrong. "Robertson also sat out the previous match against Sheffield United as he was ineligible to play against his parent club, much to his annoyance." from OS. HTH This may have been a condition of the loan not a FL requirement. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Marsdinho Posted 1 November, 2008 Share Posted 1 November, 2008 I stand corrected - its a Prem League rule. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Arizona Posted 1 November, 2008 Share Posted 1 November, 2008 Who needs John now we've got Alex Pearce! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
forever a red and white Posted 1 November, 2008 Share Posted 1 November, 2008 my mate was just at the city reading game, reading fan. He said Stern played well, everyhting went through him and he was a touch of class! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now