Jump to content

Boris for PM ?


alpine_saint
 Share

Recommended Posts

brown was treated harshly because he was a major factor in hundreds of thousands dead in the middle east, the very poor state the UK was in with no money in reserve and the facts he made goof after goof on personal levels to voters

 

You sort of agree with me here on your third point. On a personal level he failed to connect because of how his personality was perceived. I think it would be wrong to suggest that personality doesn't play a huge part in modern politics.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You sort of agree with me here on your third point. On a personal level he failed to connect because of how his personality was perceived. I think it would be wrong to suggest that personality doesn't play a huge part in modern politics.

of course.......but stop being patronising...brown was slated for much more than his dour ways

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You sort of agree with me here on your third point. On a personal level he failed to connect because of how his personality was perceived. I think it would be wrong to suggest that personality doesn't play a huge part in modern politics.

 

Absolutely no one disputed that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Of course it is, but to suggest that Boris would get elected purely because he is funny is doing him and the British public a disservice.

 

I'm not doing them a disservice at all. Most people don't discuss politics at all, maybe once every few years when an election comes round. Most people vote along tribal lines because they have always voted that way and don't give that much thought to finer details. Most people do not delve into the specifics of manifestos and so on. So in the end it comes down to maybe a couple of key policies people like the sound of and whether they person is likeable or not.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not doing them a disservice at all. Most people don't discuss politics at all, maybe once every few years when an election comes round. Most people vote along tribal lines because they have always voted that way and don't give that much thought to finer details. Most people do not delve into the specifics of manifestos and so on. So in the end it comes down to maybe a couple of key policies people like the sound of and whether they person is likeable or not.

I would say, you, pap and the like included

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not doing them a disservice at all. Most people don't discuss politics at all, maybe once every few years when an election comes round. Most people vote along tribal lines because they have always voted that way and don't give that much thought to finer details. Most people do not delve into the specifics of manifestos and so on. So in the end it comes down to maybe a couple of key policies people like the sound of and whether they person is likeable or not.

 

I ain't most people, i don't think anyone is, but i can back Andy up here in that he's pretty much described me. I mean I ain't ever done a vote yet, but i might if Jimmy Carr or David Beckham or someone was running!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would say, you, pap and the like included

 

Probably, although I would argue that I have looked at the finer details of what parties believe what. I would happily vote for most parties though if they came up with a manifesto I could agree with.

Edited by Saintandy666
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would say, you, pap and the like included

 

I'm sure that you would, but then you say a lot of silly things, TDD.

 

Keep trying mate, maybe one time you'll get a proper rise out of me instead of a nonchalant dressing down.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cameron isn't hindered by being PM, he's hindered by being in a coalition government...

 

Cameron chose to be in coalition. The man didn't have the balls to go back to the public to secure a proper mandate, so the deal with the Lib Dems was done. Cameron believed that he could be an effective Prime Minister under such an arrangement. He was wrong, and will have to face the electoral consequences of that decision.

 

The coalition was always just one of several possible outcomes of that election. Cameron not only chose that outcome, but seems to have developed the idea that the Coalition is just a Conservative government with some convenient Lib Dems to hang crap policy on. Governing in the national interest? Don't make me laugh. Governing for self-interest and private interest, more like.

 

The coalition hinders Cameron, sure - but it was his choice, and as such, it shouldn't be used as any sort of excuse for the otherwise pitiful performance of our PM.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

http://m.myfinances.co.uk/pensions/2012/08/05/niesr-calls-on-uk-to-delay-austerity-to-boost-economic-growt

 

Grim reading for the Eton boys. Key points:-

 

"NIESR says that had the austerity measures been delayed from 2011 to 2014, the economy would have delivered £239 billion more economic output and a200,000 jobs could have been saved".

 

"The think-tank also warns that austerity measures may have cost the UK's GDP up to 16.5 per cent in cumulative economic growth".

 

"Despite £18.5 billion extra cuts being made in 2012-13, the deficit is expected to increase by £12 billion to £138.5 billion".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've always known what Boris is about. Politics is politics and you do have to have many faces to get ahead. As I said though, unlike other politicians Boris isn't afraid to stand up for what he believes in. Like his stance on Europe, no other mainstream politician would dare to take a similar stance but he does and he has my admiration for that.

 

Many Tories believe that Boris + binding EU referendum after election = landslide.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

A strange editorial piece without a single shred of evidence that the whole Boris persona is stage managed. Even if it were, he's hugely more likeable and interesting than the average Labour MP and his opinions make sense. Pathetically trying to claim he has no friends- there is no evidence for that claim. What ridiculous bias.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A strange editorial piece without a single shred of evidence that the whole Boris persona is stage managed. Even if it were, he's hugely more likeable and interesting than the average Labour MP and his opinions make sense. Pathetically trying to claim he has no friends- there is no evidence for that claim. What ridiculous bias.

 

Are you being serious, hypo?

 

Stage-managed or not, that article contains enough verifiable information to cast serious doubt on Johnson's credentials as PM, such as going through three police commissioners or the scandals that have surrounded his administration. And no, the article can't prove that Boris is billy-no-mates, but he has left a trail of former friends in his wake. That does strike me as a bit odd. Did he bumble his way out of their affections?

 

I think Boris realised early on that the buffoon act was a winner and is planning to rinse and repeat to get to Downing Street.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You just dislike him because he doesn't like scousers. He just says what everyone else is thinking.

 

What is this? Happy hour at the "Push Pap's Buttons Bar"?

 

Nice try. Won't work. I don't want to get into an argument with you anyway, hypo. I'm scared of your bird.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I like Boris but doubt he could cut it as the leader of a party. As London Mayor you get your face in the paper lots but dont have to make too many tough decisions, nor even be particularly party political. You just have to be likeable, which he is. Funny left field comments are ideal as Mayor - they would get him torn apart as PM.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A strange editorial piece without a single shred of evidence that the whole Boris persona is stage managed. Even if it were, he's hugely more likeable and interesting than the average Labour MP and his opinions make sense. Pathetically trying to claim he has no friends- there is no evidence for that claim. What ridiculous bias.

 

Did you cut and paste that? Suspicious amount of long words.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Except that Boris is highly intelligent unlike Berlosconi.

 

I see no evidence to support either of those claims - for a start, Berlosconi is a self-made man. Anyway, my comment was not related to intelligence but to the fact that neither seem capable of keeping it in their trousers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's really sad that most posters on here cannot debate any subject without descending into bickering on party lines and name calling . "boorish" that is soooo funny.

 

I like boris, he's good fun. As PM, Not for me, his (adopted) persona works at the local level, but not on the world stage

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...