sotonswan Posted 23 November, 2011 Posted 23 November, 2011 Does anybody know if there is one? The jungle drums seem to indicate incoming bids at Swansea. He wasn't sold in the best of circumstances (admin), but that doesn't mean there isn't a sell on clause. Obviously benefits Saints if there is. Anybody know?
supergoose Posted 23 November, 2011 Posted 23 November, 2011 We never seemed to have sell on clauses for players that we'd sold in the past so I very much doubt it..... hopefully I'm wrong though.
Matthew Le God Posted 23 November, 2011 Posted 23 November, 2011 We never seemed to have sell on clauses for players that we'd sold in the past. What makes you think that? It is pretty much standard practice for all transfers of young players in English football to include sell on clauses.
Saint_clark Posted 23 November, 2011 Posted 23 November, 2011 What makes you think that? It is pretty much standard practice for all transfers of young players in English football to include sell on clauses. Indeed, but you can almost guarantee that we have no clauses still standing for transfers pre-admin. We would have cashed them all in I think.
Saint Garrett Posted 23 November, 2011 Posted 23 November, 2011 I doubt it. I would have thought we would have cashed in on that one if we cashed in on the Bale & Walcott ones.
sammysaint Posted 23 November, 2011 Posted 23 November, 2011 I would of thought we did, he left because of his off field antics it was obvious he was a quality championship player and had potential to be a decent prem player, and with his old attitude, the potential for him to be playing well but to **** off his current manager would be likely and they would be able to sell. IMO if we had the chance to resign him i would, his attitude seems alot better now and he's proving to be a decent player in the prem.
Saint_clark Posted 23 November, 2011 Posted 23 November, 2011 I would of thought we did, he left because of his off field antics it was obvious he was a quality championship player and had potential to be a decent prem player, and with his old attitude, the potential for him to be playing well but to **** off his current manager would be likely and they would be able to sell. IMO if we had the chance to resign him i would, his attitude seems alot better now and he's proving to be a decent player in the prem. Not really, that was a while before he left. He left because we were relegated and in administration.
sammysaint Posted 23 November, 2011 Posted 23 November, 2011 Not really, that was a while before he left. He left because we were relegated and in administration. He was sent on loan with a view to a permeant move before we were relegated and in admin, and also spent time on loan at sheff utd, i dont think he played after the QPR game we lost 4-1 in the 08/09 season, if i remember the incident with BWP happened in 07/08 season when Pearson was here i remember him fining them and banning them.
Matthew Le God Posted 23 November, 2011 Posted 23 November, 2011 I doubt it. I would have thought we would have cashed in on that one if we cashed in on the Bale & Walcott ones. Swansea, unlike Spurs and Arsenal may not have been in a financial position at the time to free up funds for Saints to cash in early on clauses.
Saint Garrett Posted 23 November, 2011 Posted 23 November, 2011 True but I very much doubt we were that bothered as we let him go out on loan with an option to buy for pretty much nothing.
david in sweden Posted 24 November, 2011 Posted 24 November, 2011 Not really, that was a while before he left. He left because we were relegated and in administration. wasn't it more a case of the Administrator forced us to sell him in order to get money into the club...? (pre Liebherr) as I recall, Swansea had a pitifully low club record for signings ..less than £1 million I think, and Swans cashed in on that deal when we might have got 2 or 3 times more... had we not been forced to sell.....or ?
Channon's Sideburns Posted 24 November, 2011 Posted 24 November, 2011 wasn't it more a case of the Administrator forced us to sell him in order to get money into the club...? (pre Liebherr) as I recall, Swansea had a pitifully low club record for signings ..less than £1 million I think, and Swans cashed in on that deal when we might have got 2 or 3 times more... had we not been forced to sell.....or ? Nah that was Andrew Surman. From memory we got in the region of £400k for Dyer. Back when he was, most of the time, pretty dire.
david in sweden Posted 24 November, 2011 Posted 24 November, 2011 Nah that was Andrew Surman. From memory we got in the region of £400k for Dyer. Back when he was, most of the time, pretty dire. yes, but obviously had untapped potential..was it Liverpool after him ?
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now