Jump to content

Relationship with the press


EBS1980

Recommended Posts

Seems the guardian and observer aren't our friends now.

 

Tweet from Paul Hayward chief sports writer at observer:

 

Football's least helpful press office/club: Southampton. Word of advice. Never suppress good news.

 

Caused a bit of a reaction from fans commenting back.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

PaulHayward_gnm Paul Hayward

@

@BenStanners That's right. I wanted to know which right-back they're going to buy. The aim was to write about the success of the club.

 

"Hey Southampton tell me your transfer targets! What? No! well I'm just going to throw a tantrum on twitter"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hayward's a pretty average journalist. Think he wrote for the Mail before moving to Guardian/Observer a couple of years ago which is the equivalent of moving from Pompey to Saints. He writes a feature column in the Observer Sport section. My guess is he wanted to do a piece on Saints but no one from the club was available for interview (or couldn't be arsed).

 

Oh well. We don't need to whore ourselves out to the media.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A wider readership than the Gruaniad and its sister paper then.

 

Well obviously in regards to print media, but the Guardian does have about 31 million users of it's website and for a long time was the biggest UK newspaper website until the Mail started ramping up their traffic by stuffing their front page with pictures of scantily clad females and concentrating on exciting things like celebrity gossip.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

he wanted saints to tell him which right back was joining us and the club didn't respond. He seems more upset that they didn't even acknowledge his request.

 

"supressing good news" suggests actively doing something than just ignoring him. If it simply means keeping schtum about some transfer target, good for them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How do you know that?

 

PaulHayward_gnm Paul Hayward

@

@BenStanners That's right. I wanted to know which right-back they're going to buy. The aim was to write about the success of the club.

 

The journalist outright states that his intention was to get our press office to tell him the name of a right back he believes we are about to buy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The journalist outright states that his intention was to get our press office to tell him the name of a right back he believes we are about to buy.

 

He must be a bit simple to think they would tell him. Push the price up, alert the competition, destabilise the deal and **** off Butterfield and Richardson. Not an all round win is it?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The journalist outright states that his intention was to get our press office to tell him the name of a right back he believes we are about to buy.
He's being sarcastic. He's obviously looking at doing a piece on our success this season, we'll get a lot more of it, despite some of the berks on here thinking there is an anti Saints agenda in the media.

And some of the Saints fans on twitter seriously make me cringe, utter sad cases.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wouldn't be surprised if we're back in for Clyne. Could cost a bit though.

 

He is out of contract in the summer and is refusing at the moment to sign a new deal. He could be available for a knock down price in January or for a compensation fee due to being under 24 in the summer. So he might not cost that much...

 

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/article-2054784/England-cards-Nathaniel-Clyne-Premier-clubs-eye-Crystal-Palace-defender.html

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He is out of contract in the summer and is refusing at the moment to sign a new deal. He could be available for a knock down price in January or for a compensation fee due to being under 24 in the summer. So he might not cost that much...

 

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/article-2054784/England-cards-Nathaniel-Clyne-Premier-clubs-eye-Crystal-Palace-defender.html

 

Good on FIFA 12 to so he must be decent.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So he wants exclusive information on our transfer targets, and he dangles a carrot of writing a positive story about us to try and get it, then goes off on one on Twitter when we don't bite?

 

Sod him, we get positive stories written about us every single week in the match reports.

 

Edit: Hm, maybe my sarcasm detector needs recalibrating again... or maybe sleep heh.

 

Ah well, either way, positive stories will be written one way or the other while we're doing well on the pitch, and negative ones while we're not doing well. Point being, the bits on the pitch come first.

Edited by Jimmy_D
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ah well, either way, positive stories will be written one way or the other while we're doing well on the pitch, and negative ones while we're not doing well. Point being, the bits on the pitch come first.

 

Absolutely. Let them sniff while we are rosy. But give them nothing, they wouldn't dare drop us a favour if fortune went the other way, bloody vultures.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The journalist outright states that his intention was to get our press office to tell him the name of a right back he believes we are about to buy.

 

You do realise he was being sarcastic don't you :facepalm:

 

And as someone else has posted, some of the Twitter responses are cringetastic. Fortunately, there are a couple of people on there that display a more mature, thoughtful and reasoned response.

 

As for the actual thrust of his Tweet, then whilst I sort of understand our reluctance to engage with the press, like the Photo Ban I do think it is something we might want to reconsider.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As always the Saintsweb and twitter muppets come out in force at the sligtest hint that SFC aren't 100% in the right... The same people on twitter saying "the media hate us", "no one writes about us", why are we 2nd on the Football league show ffs" etc etc stick up for the club when they refuse to return the calls of a journo at a national that wants to do a positive feature on the club!!!!!

 

Personally I get my SFC fixes from a variety of locations, including here and twitter, but I love reading about us in the papers and online knowing fans of other clubs will be reading it too and noticing the great work being done here. That goes for when things are bad too, at work I've had plenty of Hammers, Spurs, Gooners etc sympathising with our plight under Lowe when people like Martin Samuel were destroying him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As always the Saintsweb and twitter muppets come out in force at the sligtest hint that SFC aren't 100% in the right... The same people on twitter saying "the media hate us", "no one writes about us", why are we 2nd on the Football league show ffs" etc etc stick up for the club when they refuse to return the calls of a journo at a national that wants to do a positive feature on the club!!!!!

 

Personally I get my SFC fixes from a variety of locations, including here and twitter, but I love reading about us in the papers and online knowing fans of other clubs will be reading it too and noticing the great work being done here. That goes for when things are bad too, at work I've had plenty of Hammers, Spurs, Gooners etc sympathising with our plight under Lowe when people like Martin Samuel were destroying him.

 

This^^^

 

We complain that we never get any coverage in the press and then complain when the press try to give us coverage....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

But by the same token I'm glad we don't give "exclusives" down the pub to selected journalists on the back of a promise.

 

Keep it professional. We do press conferences (every Thursday?) open to all journalists. If you have any questions, feel free to ask.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

But it's all completely true - which part is unaccurate? On one side you moan the Echo gets rumours off football websites then you back the club when they print factual, relevant information (good news story too) about training ground redevelopments without the clubs say so?

 

I suppose you also think the back page article in today's Echo where they interview the England U17 manager and he sings the praises of our academy is another example of the Echo running negative stories about the club?

 

Jeez, sometimes you just have to use common sense, put your hands up and say fair enough, 99% of the way SFC is run is great but they could do a tiny bit better in the PR stakes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Depends how well written said text is. Couldn't see any overt sarcasm in the OP twitter quote. Perhaps it was taken out of context? Dunno.

 

@Paul Hayward

@BenStanners That's right. I wanted to know which right-back they're going to buy. The aim was to write about the success of the club.

 

This is the outstandingly obvious sarcasm.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

@Paul Hayward

@BenStanners That's right. I wanted to know which right-back they're going to buy. The aim was to write about the success of the club.

 

This is the outstandingly obvious sarcasm.

 

Ah ok. Fair dos. I was going by the OP and skim read the rest. My bad.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...