solentstars Posted 4 January, 2013 Share Posted 4 January, 2013 Ok. I posted "nutter alert!" because your post about the immigrant rapists and rape victims being tarts indicated to me that you are mentally unstable. The post is below - you can read it again if you want. Another major indicator that you're a loon is the way you say that Littlejohn is "spot on again". Only a complete nutcase would ever think that Littlejohn is always spot on. Even Hypochdriac agrees on that, and he's a little bit of a nutter himself. a. This is also not a particularly positive response to your post. I have referred to this already. Not even DPS can agree with you and he's one the forums biggest Tories (in all senses). Basically, Nadia, I found your post to be uninformed and stupid to he extreme.agree but thats the daily mails core readership. the people i used to work with were some of the most stupid people i have ever met in my life all loved that hate rag. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hypochondriac Posted 4 January, 2013 Share Posted 4 January, 2013 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jGAOCVwLrXo Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dig Dig Posted 4 January, 2013 Share Posted 4 January, 2013 Oh dear. I'll spell out why is think Nadia is a nutter - we do not have thousands of migrants wandering the streets of this country raping people. That is just extreme paranoia. For some reason Nadia has decided that migrants are rapists and need to be thrown out of the country. There is no evidence for this. It is a bizarre belief that singles Nadia out as a nutter. But, I might be wrong. Maybe Nadia is not alone in this belief? Do you think there are thousands of immigrants going around raping people? The last bit of Nadias post says that the women were tarts when the were allegedly raped and now are just old tarts who want some money. Is that how sane people respond to women who come forward and say they have been raped? They may be making it up, they may have been raped. But why automatically dismiss it and start calling them tarts? I wonder if Nadia has considered how women who have been raped feel when they are accused of beng tarts? This also singles him out as a nutter (or *****, if you will). Maybe, he's not alone n this way of looking at rape. Do you automatically assume that women who say they have been raped are tarts and after money? Im very interested to hear your views. Maybe Nadia is a migrant? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
solentstars Posted 4 January, 2013 Share Posted 4 January, 2013 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jGAOCVwLrXogreat video and hes spot on with his remarks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lord Duckhunter Posted 5 January, 2013 Share Posted 5 January, 2013 Right, dog needed a walk I needed a pint, so popped into local that allows dogs. Complete dive, but newspapers to read. Spotting mail/fail/hail read lttlejohns article. Rather than being nutty I found it pretty much spot on, certainly more entertaining than one of toynbees efforts. Pretty much agreed with most of it. Why was dawn raid on 82 year old Stewart halls gaff, he's hardly likely to go on the run. Why was latest suspect arrested at airport, then a day later released on bail till march, if within one day you're bailed for 3 months isn't airport arrest a bit Ott.why police pics of house search and removing evidence, the allegation was 40 years old and he's moved dozens of times since,what evidence are they hoping to find? And finally the point that if you report a burglary from yesterday, plod aren't interested and can't don't have the man power, report a celeb from 40 years ago and its like the Sweeny. Littlejohn summised that maybe plod, having ****rd up over Saville are putting on a show. Also said something suspicious is going on here,something that was alluded to earlier in this thread. He did say that time should be no bar to charges, but how can you prove beyond reasonable doubt in a he said she said sex case from 40 years ago. The article got me thinking, next time a toe rag breaks into my shed, instead of just taking a crime number, I'm going to tell them it was damaged 40 years ago by cher who after giving me a blow job against my will rode off on my bike. Maybe that way they'll do their job properly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CB Saint Posted 5 January, 2013 Share Posted 5 January, 2013 Right, dog needed a walk I needed a pint, so popped into local that allows dogs. Complete dive, but newspapers to read. Spotting mail/fail/hail read lttlejohns article. Rather than being nutty I found it pretty much spot on, certainly more entertaining than one of toynbees efforts. Pretty much agreed with most of it. Why was dawn raid on 82 year old Stewart halls gaff, he's hardly likely to go on the run. Why was latest suspect arrested at airport, then a day later released on bail till march, if within one day you're bailed for 3 months isn't airport arrest a bit Ott.why police pics of house search and removing evidence, the allegation was 40 years old and he's moved dozens of times since,what evidence are they hoping to find? And finally the point that if you report a burglary from yesterday, plod aren't interested and can't don't have the man power, report a celeb from 40 years ago and its like the Sweeny. Littlejohn summised that maybe plod, having ****rd up over Saville are putting on a show. Also said something suspicious is going on here,something that was alluded to earlier in this thread. He did say that time should be no bar to charges, but how can you prove beyond reasonable doubt in a he said she said sex case from 40 years ago. The article got me thinking, next time a toe rag breaks into my shed, instead of just taking a crime number, I'm going to tell them it was damaged 40 years ago by cher who after giving me a blow job against my will rode off on my bike. Maybe that way they'll do their job properly. whilst littlejohn does spout a lot of guff, he has raised some valid points here. the problem is, the police are so teerified of the media that they have to demonstrate results from time to time. B cause this is such a massive enquiry that uis costing god knows how much money, they have to show some progress otherwise the press will hammer them. i hope they have got some o these nicks right because, innocent or not, the likes of Davidson and Cliffords reputations will be ruined by association. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
the stain Posted 5 January, 2013 Share Posted 5 January, 2013 Right, dog needed a walk I needed a pint, so popped into local that allows dogs. Complete dive, but newspapers to read. Spotting mail/fail/hail read lttlejohns article. Rather than being nutty I found it pretty much spot on, certainly more entertaining than one of toynbees efforts. Pretty much agreed with most of it. Why was dawn raid on 82 year old Stewart halls gaff, he's hardly likely to go on the run. Why was latest suspect arrested at airport, then a day later released on bail till march, if within one day you're bailed for 3 months isn't airport arrest a bit Ott.why police pics of house search and removing evidence, the allegation was 40 years old and he's moved dozens of times since,what evidence are they hoping to find? And finally the point that if you report a burglary from yesterday, plod aren't interested and can't don't have the man power, report a celeb from 40 years ago and its like the Sweeny. Littlejohn summised that maybe plod, having ****rd up over Saville are putting on a show. Also said something suspicious is going on here,something that was alluded to earlier in this thread. He did say that time should be no bar to charges, but how can you prove beyond reasonable doubt in a he said she said sex case from 40 years ago. The article got me thinking, next time a toe rag breaks into my shed, instead of just taking a crime number, I'm going to tell them it was damaged 40 years ago by cher who after giving me a blow job against my will rode off on my bike. Maybe that way they'll do their job properly. You could re-read your defence of Nadia Slim, re-read my explanation and then actually answer the questions I put to you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Viking Warrior Posted 17 January, 2013 Share Posted 17 January, 2013 It's being reported on news at ten that an investigation into a peado ring in the 70' and 80 is following Tom Watsons claims re politicians are now being investigated . . Didn't someone mention this on this thread Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
badgerx16 Posted 17 January, 2013 Share Posted 17 January, 2013 It's being reported on news at ten that an investigation into a peado ring in the 70' and 80 is following Tom Watsons claims re politicians are now being investigated . . Didn't someone mention this on this thread http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/crime/police-launch-criminal-investigation-into-mps-child-sex-ring-8456434.html " Scotland Yard tonight launched a full investigation into allegations that Conservative politicians were members of a paedophile ring which abused children in care the 1980s. Operation Fernbridge will centre on the alleged historic sexual abuse of children at Elm Guest House, in Rocks Lane, a suburban street in Barnes, south-west London. Residents of a nearby care home run by Richmond Council claim they were sexually assaulted at the property by a network of prominent individuals, including Tory MPs, who used their connections to escape justice." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ottery st mary Posted 18 January, 2013 Share Posted 18 January, 2013 Some would say CONGRATULATIONS.......... Long overdue.... Mind you certain peeps have had these enquiries put aside before.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trousers Posted 20 January, 2013 Share Posted 20 January, 2013 http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2265343/BBC-apologises-episode-childrens-The-Tweenies-features-character-dressed-child-sex-abuser-Jimmy-Savile.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hypochondriac Posted 20 January, 2013 Share Posted 20 January, 2013 http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2265343/BBC-apologises-episode-childrens-The-Tweenies-features-character-dressed-child-sex-abuser-Jimmy-Savile.html Hardly news... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Colinjb Posted 20 January, 2013 Share Posted 20 January, 2013 http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2265343/BBC-apologises-episode-childrens-The-Tweenies-features-character-dressed-child-sex-abuser-Jimmy-Savile.html Utterly inspired!! Someone at the BBC must have seen that coming.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
peacey Posted 20 January, 2013 Share Posted 20 January, 2013 Ok. I posted "nutter alert!" because your post about the immigrant rapists and rape victims being tarts indicated to me that you are mentally unstable. The post is below - you can read it again if you want. Another major indicator that you're a loon is the way you say that Littlejohn is "spot on again". Only a complete nutcase would ever think that Littlejohn is always spot on. Even Hypochdriac agrees on that, and he's a little bit of a nutter himself. This is also not a particularly positive response to your post. I have referred to this already. Not even DPS can agree with you and he's one the forums biggest Tories (in all senses). Basically, Nadia, I found your post to be uninformed and stupid to he extreme. We all know that. I knew he was "SPECIAL" for sometime, but bless him anyway, he does try- Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CB Saint Posted 22 January, 2013 Share Posted 22 January, 2013 Stuart hall just been charged. Rape and indecent assault. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hatch Posted 22 January, 2013 Share Posted 22 January, 2013 http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-21154999 Broadcaster Stuart Hall has been charged with one offence of rape and 14 offences of indecent assault, Lancashire Police have said Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pap Posted 22 January, 2013 Share Posted 22 January, 2013 (edited) http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-21154999 Broadcaster Stuart Hall has been charged with one offence of rape and 14 offences of indecent assault, Lancashire Police have said Deleted. Poor taste. Edited 23 January, 2013 by pap Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trousers Posted 29 March, 2013 Share Posted 29 March, 2013 @BBCNews: 82-year-old man from Berkshire arrested for sexual offences bailed until May - @metpoliceuk http://t.co/c2Oolwhfa8 #OperationYewtree Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bpsaint Posted 29 March, 2013 Share Posted 29 March, 2013 @BBCNews: 82-year-old man from Berkshire arrested for sexual offences bailed until May - @metpoliceuk http://t.co/c2Oolwhfa8 #OperationYewtree I thought he'd already been arrested over this? Or was he just questioned under caution last time? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hatch Posted 29 March, 2013 Share Posted 29 March, 2013 new offences I guess Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kingsland Nick Posted 29 March, 2013 Share Posted 29 March, 2013 @BBCNews: 82-year-old man from Berkshire arrested for sexual offences bailed until May - @metpoliceuk http://t.co/c2Oolwhfa8 #OperationYewtree Strewth Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
benjii Posted 29 March, 2013 Share Posted 29 March, 2013 I wonder what Harris is accused of? Always found him a little odd but didn't think he was sinister. Compared to Saville, who was obviously a sex case. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LVSaint Posted 29 March, 2013 Share Posted 29 March, 2013 tie me kangaroo down, i've lost my mummy, two little boys...... just sayin' Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
anothersaintinsouthsea Posted 29 March, 2013 Share Posted 29 March, 2013 @BBCNews: 82-year-old man from Berkshire arrested for sexual offences bailed until May - @metpoliceuk http://t.co/c2Oolwhfa8 #OperationYewtree Can we tell who it is yet? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Viking Warrior Posted 31 March, 2013 Share Posted 31 March, 2013 I don't believe this accusations. He has been married since 1958 / If its who i saw named the other day then he was 83 yesterday, Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hypochondriac Posted 31 March, 2013 Share Posted 31 March, 2013 (edited) I don't believe this accusations. He has been married since 1958 / If its who i saw named the other day then he was 83 yesterday, That doesn't give me much to go on Edit yeah I already knew that. It's what everyone has been talking about through he use of clever puns... Edited 31 March, 2013 by hypochondriac Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
View From The Top Posted 31 March, 2013 Share Posted 31 March, 2013 I don't believe this accusations. He has been married since 1958 / If its who i saw named the other day then he was 83 yesterday, Doesn't really matter what you believe, the OB obviously feel there is enough to arrest Rolf and if he's charged then the CPS will also believe there is enough to go on. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sunrise Posted 1 April, 2013 Share Posted 1 April, 2013 I just wonder if it's starting to turn into a witch-hunt, after all the old bill royally fecked up on Savile, now they are nicking people just to show they are doing something. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hypochondriac Posted 1 April, 2013 Share Posted 1 April, 2013 I just wonder if it's starting to turn into a witch-hunt, after all the old bill royally fecked up on Savile, now they are nicking people just to show they are doing something. Hmm yeah that is my worry. I mean fair enough if all these people are guilty but it may not be the case. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Viking Warrior Posted 1 April, 2013 Share Posted 1 April, 2013 One BBC employee was recently exonerated mr d'eath . Arrested for the same reasons . I never will trust the met police Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sunrise Posted 26 April, 2013 Share Posted 26 April, 2013 Max Clifford charged with 11 indecent assaults - on BBC news webpage. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hatch Posted 1 May, 2013 Share Posted 1 May, 2013 http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-22366981 uh oh, Ken Barlow as well now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Manuel Posted 1 May, 2013 Share Posted 1 May, 2013 So, are we to conclude from all this that all men will eventually be found to be rapists? Or is that all men sexually active in the 1960s will eventually be found as rapists? Or is it just those who've been on the telly, or is it radio. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hatch Posted 1 May, 2013 Share Posted 1 May, 2013 Just TV and Radio for now. Rock stars will be the rage in 2014 and footballers 2015. It's only a matter of time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dingbattigger Posted 1 May, 2013 Share Posted 1 May, 2013 Mrs D here. Have to say that rape is NEVER acceptable but I'm very uncomfortable with all this. Back in the 60's it was the height of many young girls dreams to have sex with a 'star', maybe it still is. It was also very difficult to judge someone's age. If this was so bad why were these claims not made before? I can get that the OB messed up with Saville but with everyone? Or is this now nothing more than a witch hunt? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Viking Warrior Posted 1 May, 2013 Share Posted 1 May, 2013 how ever serious the allegations , the police will be clocking up oodles of overtime with these claims and sue their own forces for tripping over steps and being bitten by fleas. I am very uncormfortable the way the police now trawl for evidence through the media. Especially in the climate of compensation claims. I think it has an impact on those that have genuinely been victims of crime. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hypochondriac Posted 1 May, 2013 Share Posted 1 May, 2013 I think it's ridiculous that all these celebrities are allowed a trial by media before they have been charged or convicted of anything. I also don't understand why the likes of Rolf Harris' name was kept out of the papers for months yet people like Stuart Hall were outed straight away. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
andysstuff Posted 1 May, 2013 Share Posted 1 May, 2013 Mrs D here. Have to say that rape is NEVER acceptable but I'm very uncomfortable with all this. Back in the 60's it was the height of many young girls dreams to have sex with a 'star', maybe it still is. It was also very difficult to judge someone's age. If this was so bad why were these claims not made before? I can get that the OB messed up with Saville but with everyone? Or is this now nothing more than a witch hunt? /\. This Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Micky Posted 1 May, 2013 Share Posted 1 May, 2013 Mrs D here. Have to say that rape is NEVER acceptable but I'm very uncomfortable with all this. Back in the 60's it was the height of many young girls dreams to have sex with a 'star', maybe it still is. It was also very difficult to judge someone's age. If this was so bad why were these claims not made before? I can get that the OB messed up with Saville but with everyone? Or is this now nothing more than a witch hunt? I tend to agree. The alleged crime occurred some 45 years ago - why wait so long to make a complaint? Obviously we don't know the full extent of the allegations but I'm kind of uneasy that some people may well be 'jumping on the bandwagon', perhaps in the hope of compensation. Very difficult to call. Tend to agree with hypo as well - the media should be shut out until at least such times as formal charges are bought. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bridge too far Posted 1 May, 2013 Share Posted 1 May, 2013 how ever serious the allegations , the police will be clocking up oodles of overtime with these claims and sue their own forces for tripping over steps and being bitten by fleas. I am very uncormfortable the way the police now trawl for evidence through the media. Especially in the climate of compensation claims. I think it has an impact on those that have genuinely been victims of crime. Maybe because those now making the allegations were dismissed by the police at the time of the alleged events - viz Jimmy Savile, the North Wales childrens' home etc., etc. So the victims go to the media instead where at least they'll get some sort of hearing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hypochondriac Posted 1 May, 2013 Share Posted 1 May, 2013 Maybe because those now making the allegations were dismissed by the police at the time of the alleged events - viz Jimmy Savile, the North Wales childrens' home etc., etc. So the victims go to the media instead where at least they'll get some sort of hearing. Or they make it up for five minutes of fame. It works both ways... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spudders Posted 1 May, 2013 Share Posted 1 May, 2013 I read the Bill Roach had his house searched by the police today, I assume they were hoping he'd kept his 1967 diary! Not sure what else they'd be expecting to find after all this time? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hypochondriac Posted 1 May, 2013 Share Posted 1 May, 2013 I read the Bill Roach had his house searched by the police today, I assume they were hoping he'd kept his 1967 diary! Not sure what else they'd be expecting to find after all this time? Apparently they felt the evidence was strong enough to charge him. I fail to see how... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spudders Posted 1 May, 2013 Share Posted 1 May, 2013 "Dear diary, today after filming, a cracking chick came on to me in the pub after work. She was well up for some naughty stuff so I took her back to mine & flung it up her, she absolutely loved it. She said she was 17 years old, but she did look a bit younger, but hey, what you gonna do huh, this is the 60's and she knew exactly what she was doing judging by the way she noshed me off. Anyway, if I know woman like I think I do I can't see anything coming of it. Right diary, I'm tired so before I go to sleep I'm gonna go learn some more lines for my big scene we're filming tomorrow, me and Anne Kirkbride have a wedding scene to film. If I know tv like I think I do, I can't see anything coming of our characters Ken & Deirdre getting married, it'll never last!" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Saint in Paradise Posted 2 May, 2013 Share Posted 2 May, 2013 How on earth can you properly defend yourself when accused of something which supposedly happened 47 years ago especially as you are now 81 years old? I can't remember much stuff from 47 weeks ago so heaven help me if I am accused of anything from the distant past. Surely this shows there is a case of statutory time limit within which such allegations must be brought or forget it altogether. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lord Duckhunter Posted 2 May, 2013 Share Posted 2 May, 2013 How on earth can you properly defend yourself when accused of something which supposedly happened 47 years ago especially as you are now 81 years old? I can't remember much stuff from 47 weeks ago so heaven help me if I am accused of anything from the distant past. Surely this shows there is a case of statutory time limit within which such allegations must be brought or forget it altogether. Spot on. There is also a massive difference between this and a crime that was reported 47 years ago. Had one of these women gone to the police in 1967 and said " i was raped" then the police would take a statement, would have taken her clothes ECT, i don't know if they had rape kits in those days, but maybe would have photographed brusies and the like. Maybe they didn't have enough to charge someone, but advances in DNA or maybe a witness came forward, then i can see no reason why charges can't be brought 47 years down the line. However, to report a crime 47 years and then expect the accused to get a fair trial is just bonkers. The other thing that gets go me about it is this. Sex offenders like Saville and the like spend a life time doing it. This other guys Ken Barlow, Clifford ECT happened years ago, did they stop abusing or could the police fond no latter victims, seems strange if nobody came forward from the modern era when abuse was more acknowledged. One thing for sure abusers just don't suddenly stop. What i am uncomfortable with is that because of the screw up with Saville the police are fishing, throwing names in tbe ring to see if any victims come forward. There have been plenty of women used and abused, particulary in the later part of the last century. When i see what's not acceptable now and what is a crime, i cam honestly say i sailed very close to the wind when a testosterone filled young man. Since having my daughter I've thought about my past and some of the awful way i treated some girls. I've often wondered how they felt after being treated like a piece of meat and those feelings must be compounded if the user was a famous guy or a hero. I never ever did anything that was illigal then , but stupid things like walking into a bar with my "conquests" knickers on my head to the cheers of my mates. At the time I thought " sluts own fault for putting out behind the pub" . We used to have pig of the night competitions to see who could bang the ugliest one. All sorts of sheite like that demean and humilate women, but are not illigal. Maybe these guys used their fame, lied to these girls, told them to **** off, after seducing them , maybe that's it. Maybe they really do think they were raped, some seduction moves from that era are borderline nowadays, remember you could legally rape your wife back then, so it wasn't a particularly enlightened time. But i can't see how anyone can get a fair trial so long after the event or alledged event. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hypochondriac Posted 2 May, 2013 Share Posted 2 May, 2013 How on earth can you properly defend yourself when accused of something which supposedly happened 47 years ago especially as you are now 81 years old? I can't remember much stuff from 47 weeks ago so heaven help me if I am accused of anything from the distant past. Surely this shows there is a case of statutory time limit within which such allegations must be brought or forget it altogether. That is the sort of point max Clifford was making. Seems like a horrible person tbh but the charges against him are equally ridiculous. I'm very uneasy about people crying rape about something that happened over 40 years ago. It is impossible to prove. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bridge too far Posted 2 May, 2013 Share Posted 2 May, 2013 That is the sort of point max Clifford was making. Seems like a horrible person tbh but the charges against him are equally ridiculous. I'm very uneasy about people crying rape about something that happened over 40 years ago. It is impossible to prove. Although the police are saying, with regard to Roach, that they are confident that they have enough evidence. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hypochondriac Posted 2 May, 2013 Share Posted 2 May, 2013 Although the police are saying, with regard to Roach, that they are confident that they have enough evidence. What could they possible have from 47 years ago? Someone filmed it perhaps? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hatch Posted 2 May, 2013 Share Posted 2 May, 2013 http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-22379286 Stuart Hall admits the charges!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now