Thedelldays Posted 26 October, 2011 Share Posted 26 October, 2011 Apparently those protesting in London right now are a bunch of armatures. It was thought that many of the tents are left empty over night but the protestors claim otherwise. Met police used thermal imagining and nearly all the tents were empty lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clapham Saint Posted 26 October, 2011 Share Posted 26 October, 2011 So the empty tents are, in effect, large sealed bags being left unattended on the streets of London. Might be terrorists. Best remove and distroy them... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hatch Posted 26 October, 2011 Share Posted 26 October, 2011 not to mention they pop into Starbucks to buy coffee. ****ing moron ******s. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Weston Super Saint Posted 26 October, 2011 Share Posted 26 October, 2011 Thermal imagining sounds interesting. Is it like having 'hot' thoughts Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Saint in Paradise Posted 26 October, 2011 Share Posted 26 October, 2011 "Apparently those protesting in London right now are a bunch of armatures." I find that quote quite electrifying Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Colinjb Posted 26 October, 2011 Share Posted 26 October, 2011 So the empty tents are, in effect, large sealed bags being left unattended on the streets of London. Might be terrorists. Best remove and distroy them... Absolutely. Any abandoned tents should be destroyed as either: 1) An anti terror precaution. 2) A health and safety measure. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clapham Saint Posted 26 October, 2011 Share Posted 26 October, 2011 Or 3) litter Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jonnyboy Posted 26 October, 2011 Share Posted 26 October, 2011 Apparently those protesting in London right now are a bunch of armatures. It was thought that many of the tents are left empty over night but the protestors claim otherwise. Met police used thermal imagining and nearly all the tents were empty Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alpine_saint Posted 26 October, 2011 Share Posted 26 October, 2011 Come on, does anybody take these protests seriously anyway ? They are always populated by the Charlie Gilmours of life. Rich, privelleged w*nkers who somehow feel they are enlightened compared to the proles and therefore are entitled to tell the rest of us how to live our lives. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Saint in Paradise Posted 26 October, 2011 Share Posted 26 October, 2011 Come on, does anybody take these protests seriously anyway ? They are always populated by the Charlie Gilmours of life. Rich, privelleged w*nkers who somehow feel they are enlightened compared to the proles and therefore are entitled to tell the rest of us how to live our lives. Sounds just like some who post on here Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pedg Posted 26 October, 2011 Share Posted 26 October, 2011 http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2011/oct/25/occupy-london-part-time-protest Yesterday's news report that 90% of the tents lie empty at night seemed to exacerbate these prejudices. The protesters aren't just lazy, the rightwing press argued: they're too lazy to even stay there. "It's incredible," said Matthew Richardson, a Corporation of London councillor who blew the whistle on the supposedly vacant tents. "It just shows most of the demonstrators don't have the courage of their convictions and are just here to make trouble." First, then, some myth-busting. I camped at the occupation last week. The idea that occupiers only use one in 10 tents is laughable. I couldn't put an exact number on it, but I reckon that the nights I was down there, more than three quarters were full. The camp operates a sign in/sign out procedure to keep track of vacant tents. What's more, I can't find anyone who will independently confirm where this 90% figure came from. Cllr Richardson says it was determined by police thermal imaging. But a spokesman for the Corporation of London police said he couldn't comment on operational procedure, and that the statistic hadn't come from the police. In fact, the only person who has spoken about it is Cllr Richardson himself, who later told the Guardian he hadn't heard it from official sources. The Daily Telegraph claimed their own thermal imagists had verified the rumour. Yet their video was not only shot at 12:30am (an hour before most occupiers tend to hit the sack): it also shows three separate protesters evaporating from sight when standing behind their tents – casting doubt on the accuracy of thermal imaging technology in the first place. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pap Posted 26 October, 2011 Share Posted 26 October, 2011 Come on, does anybody take these protests seriously anyway ? They are always populated by the Charlie Gilmours of life. Rich, privelleged w*nkers who somehow feel they are enlightened compared to the proles and therefore are entitled to tell the rest of us how to live our lives. TRIP, TRAP! TRIP, TRAP! TRIP, TRAP! TRIP, TRAP! TRIP, TRAP! TRIP, TRAP! Went his hooves on the wooden boards. He was nearly at the middle when suddenly the enormous head of the Troll appeared from beneath the bridge. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bridge too far Posted 26 October, 2011 Share Posted 26 October, 2011 "Apparently those protesting in London right now are a bunch of armatures." I find that quote quite electrifying Shocking, in fact! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Saintandy666 Posted 26 October, 2011 Share Posted 26 October, 2011 I don't really get how this weakens their argument... it's a bit nothing to do with anything. Address their arguments if you want to defeat them. Also, the Starbucks point is irrelevant. Most of them don't actually want to abolish capitalism, they just want to reform and change it as they believe in the current form it is broken and unfair. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clapham Saint Posted 26 October, 2011 Share Posted 26 October, 2011 I don't really get how this weakens their argument... it's a bit nothing to do with anything. Address their arguments if you want to defeat them. Also, the Starbucks point is irrelevant. Most of them don't actually want to abolish capitalism, they just want to reform and change it as they believe in the current form it is broken and unfair. I think part of the problem is that (as far as I have seen) they don't appear to be making much of an argument in the first place. It's all very well complaining that you don't like the current system but in hat case you need to put forward your proposed alternative. If they have a well reasoned proposal then great but it hasn't been apparent from what I have seen/read. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alpine_saint Posted 26 October, 2011 Share Posted 26 October, 2011 I think part of the problem is that (as far as I have seen) they don't appear to be making much of an argument in the first place. It's all very well complaining that you don't like the current system but in hat case you need to put forward your proposed alternative. If they have a well reasoned proposal then great but it hasn't been apparent from what I have seen/read. Yep, great point. All this rebellion and crusading, none of them has a f**king clue what to replace the target of the bile and vitriol with. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Saintandy666 Posted 26 October, 2011 Share Posted 26 October, 2011 I think part of the problem is that (as far as I have seen) they don't appear to be making much of an argument in the first place. It's all very well complaining that you don't like the current system but in hat case you need to put forward your proposed alternative. If they have a well reasoned proposal then great but it hasn't been apparent from what I have seen/read. Perhaps that has been a weakness. But what they want is the return of proper social democracy and fairness. Just look in the US where someone like Warren Buffet pays less of a percentage of his income as tax than an ordinary worker. They want proper regulation on the financial sector, and to tame the excesses of capitalism. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CB Saint Posted 26 October, 2011 Share Posted 26 October, 2011 Perhaps it is time for them to move on. All they are acheiving at the moment is put the finances of St Pauls at serious risk. The longer it goes on and the worse the situation becomes for the church, the more public sentiment will turn against them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Saintandy666 Posted 26 October, 2011 Share Posted 26 October, 2011 Perhaps it is time for them to move on. All they are acheiving at the moment is put the finances of St Pauls at serious risk. The longer it goes on and the worse the situation becomes for the church, the more public sentiment will turn against them. The church could be open if it wanted to be, it's closed for other reasons in my opinion. The protesters have spoken to the London City Health Safety organisation people and they said there wasn't any risk, so make of that what you will... Also, to be honest, this issue goes beyond a building(how magnificent that building is), and I think this is the kind of protest that wherever you are, someone will have an objection, so best just to stick it out. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bridge too far Posted 26 October, 2011 Share Posted 26 October, 2011 A few of them were interviewed on Monday about this 'part-time' accusation. They obviously lived fairly locally and said they popped home for a shower. Since they're normally called 'the great unwashed', I think this is a reasonable thing to do. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CB Saint Posted 26 October, 2011 Share Posted 26 October, 2011 The church could be open if it wanted to be, it's closed for other reasons in my opinion. The protesters have spoken to the London City Health Safety organisation people and they said there wasn't any risk, so make of that what you will... Also, to be honest, this issue goes beyond a building(how magnificent that building is), and I think this is the kind of protest that wherever you are, someone will have an objection, so best just to stick it out. The protesters may have spoke to the H&S brigade, but the fact remains that because of their presence, the church feels unable to open its doors to the public. Perhaps that they think that the protesters intimidate their visitors and parishioners, not in a overtly aggressive way but by their very presence. As to just sticking it out, when you are losing £16,000 a day, you can't stick it out for very long, but hey it's just the church, no one really cares about them anyway. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Saintandy666 Posted 26 October, 2011 Share Posted 26 October, 2011 (edited) The protesters may have spoke to the H&S brigade, but the fact remains that because of their presence, the church feels unable to open its doors to the public. Perhaps that they think that the protesters intimidate their visitors and parishioners, not in a overtly aggressive way but by their very presence. As to just sticking it out, when you are losing £16,000 a day, you can't stick it out for very long, but hey it's just the church, no one really cares about them anyway. They closed it, in my opinion, because they want them gone for political reasons... not because of health and safety! They could open their doors if they wanted to. Edit: Also, the issues facing people up and down the country that the protesters represent are more important than St. Paul's Cathedral in my opinion. Edited 26 October, 2011 by Saintandy666 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
solentstars Posted 26 October, 2011 Share Posted 26 October, 2011 The protesters may have spoke to the H&S brigade, but the fact remains that because of their presence, the church feels unable to open its doors to the public. Perhaps that they think that the protesters intimidate their visitors and parishioners, not in a overtly aggressive way but by their very presence. As to just sticking it out, when you are losing £16,000 a day, you can't stick it out for very long, but hey it's just the church, no one really cares about them anyway. I think the church thinks they are riff raff and not the rich types they mingle with.the board of the church has the great and good .would be suprised if they really care about the poor Sent from my HTC Desire using Tapatalk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CB Saint Posted 26 October, 2011 Share Posted 26 October, 2011 Ahh, must have missed that. Church of England leadership in right wing capitalist infiltration scandal. That explains everything. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ecuk268 Posted 26 October, 2011 Share Posted 26 October, 2011 "Apparently those protesting in London right now are a bunch of armatures." I find that quote quite electrifying They're obviously well informed about current affairs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bridge too far Posted 26 October, 2011 Share Posted 26 October, 2011 They're obviously well informed about current affairs. It's sparked off quite a debate TBF Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pap Posted 26 October, 2011 Share Posted 26 October, 2011 They're obviously well informed about current affairs. It's sparked off quite a debate TBF Your points have some power. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lighthouse Posted 26 October, 2011 Share Posted 26 October, 2011 Not sure what the point in this thread is. Everyone knows hippies are cold blooded. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bridge too far Posted 26 October, 2011 Share Posted 26 October, 2011 Your points have some power. I like to put forward an alternate(ing) point of view. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CB Saint Posted 26 October, 2011 Share Posted 26 October, 2011 Far be it for me to pylon the puns... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Quickfire Double Posted 26 October, 2011 Share Posted 26 October, 2011 Ohm-y God, some of these puns are terrible! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bridge too far Posted 26 October, 2011 Share Posted 26 October, 2011 Will TDD perform a VOLTe-face, I wonder? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pap Posted 26 October, 2011 Share Posted 26 October, 2011 Will TDD perform a VOLTe-face, I wonder? I doubt it. In the face of this sort of resistance he doesn't know watt he's doing. Probably just saying "Ohm my goodness". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pap Posted 26 October, 2011 Share Posted 26 October, 2011 Soz. Just spotted the Ohm. Not trying the steal Quickfire Double's juice.1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hutch Posted 26 October, 2011 Share Posted 26 October, 2011 I think it's a wind up. But back to the topic, I heard that the next stage of their protest is to borrow their parent's Range Rovers and drive to Jarrow. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bridge too far Posted 26 October, 2011 Share Posted 26 October, 2011 I doubt it. In the face of this sort of resistance he doesn't know watt he's doing. Probably just saying "Ohm my goodness". In that case, he might go up there and sort them all out....................... assault and battery, maybe? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pap Posted 26 October, 2011 Share Posted 26 October, 2011 In that case, he might go up there and sort them all out....................... assault and battery, maybe? I expect he'll surge up there tomorrow and do the rounds. As they're all in one place, TDD's punching run should be a very short circuit. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
anothersaintinsouthsea Posted 26 October, 2011 Share Posted 26 October, 2011 (edited) Ohm-y God, some of these puns are terrible! some of these puns have been shocking but it has at least generated some debate. From the responses on this thread it is clear which posters are the livewires Edited 26 October, 2011 by anothersaintinsouthsea Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bridge too far Posted 26 October, 2011 Share Posted 26 October, 2011 S'pose we should get back on topic - we've had ample responses. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pap Posted 26 October, 2011 Share Posted 26 October, 2011 S'pose we should get back on topic - we've had ample responses. Or we could continue with this epic pun joule, and see if anyone else is capable of making the step-up. Who knows, someone may actually run for Minister of Pun in the next General Electron. If it's a female candidate, discharging those responsibilities could transform 'er. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ecuk268 Posted 26 October, 2011 Share Posted 26 October, 2011 Or we could continue with this epic pun joule, and see if anyone else is capable of making the step-up. Who knows, someone may actually run for Minister of Pun in the next General Electron. If it's a female candidate, discharging those responsibilities could transform 'er. And, if she makes a mistake, someone can rectifi 'er. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bridge too far Posted 26 October, 2011 Share Posted 26 October, 2011 Or we could continue with this epic pun joule, and see if anyone else is capable of making the step-up. Who knows, someone may actually run for Minister of Pun in the next General Electron. If it's a female candidate, discharging those responsibilities could transform 'er. Can I put in a plug for myself, then? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pap Posted 26 October, 2011 Share Posted 26 October, 2011 Can I put in a plug for myself, then? You seem like a down to earth girl. Very grounded. How do you think you would conduct yourself? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
anothersaintinsouthsea Posted 26 October, 2011 Share Posted 26 October, 2011 Or we could continue with this epic pun joule, and see if anyone else is capable of making the step-up. Who knows, someone may actually run for Minister of Pun in the next General Electron. If it's a female candidate, discharging those responsibilities could transform 'er. from the punning angle I'd say that there are positives and negatives in this one, a great effort let down by some loose connections. TBF I'm feeling a little drained by the need to come up with new puns, I'm going to switch my attention to some other threads and then re-visit when I'm fully charged. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
anothersaintinsouthsea Posted 26 October, 2011 Share Posted 26 October, 2011 You seem like a down to earth girl. Very grounded. How do you think you would conduct yourself? man, you're wired! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bridge too far Posted 26 October, 2011 Share Posted 26 October, 2011 You seem like a down to earth girl. Very grounded. How do you think you would conduct yourself? Like lightning! Obv Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Quickfire Double Posted 26 October, 2011 Share Posted 26 October, 2011 Or we could continue with this epic pun joule, and see if anyone else is capable of making the step-up. Who knows, someone may actually run for Minister of Pun in the next General Electron. If it's a female candidate, discharging those responsibilities could transform 'er. If it turns out to be a female candidate, I'd very much like to meter...! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bridge too far Posted 26 October, 2011 Share Posted 26 October, 2011 Pylon the puns, why don't we? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pap Posted 26 October, 2011 Share Posted 26 October, 2011 If it turns out to be a female candidate, I'd very much like to meter...! You'll just breaker heart. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Quickfire Double Posted 26 October, 2011 Share Posted 26 October, 2011 You'll just breaker heart. Perhaps, but hopefully there'd be a spark, and I'd turn her on first! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now