scotty Posted 27 September, 2011 Share Posted 27 September, 2011 Is anybody else listening to this? Two minutes in and I'm cringing already, who wrote this cr*p for him? And what have they got against him?? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trousers Posted 27 September, 2011 Share Posted 27 September, 2011 I couldn't possibly comment without the forum thought police giving me a ticking off. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dune Posted 27 September, 2011 Share Posted 27 September, 2011 The sound of his voice is enough to turn most people off voting for Labour. He reminds me of a geek you get in to fix your computer. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trousers Posted 27 September, 2011 Share Posted 27 September, 2011 (edited) Oops....someone just pulled the plug on the BBC's coverage.... Edit: all media streams gone aparently... Conspiracy theory anyone...? Edited 27 September, 2011 by trousers Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scotty Posted 27 September, 2011 Author Share Posted 27 September, 2011 He really is a monumental liability. The more I hear from him, the more I believe Labour have given up on the next election, either because they think they cant win it, or because they dont want to win it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scotty Posted 27 September, 2011 Author Share Posted 27 September, 2011 Oops....someone just pulled the plug on the BBC's coverage.... Still on 5 live. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dune Posted 27 September, 2011 Share Posted 27 September, 2011 At least they have that likeable Mr Balls and his charming wife in the shadow cabinet. Real vote winners are they. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trousers Posted 27 September, 2011 Share Posted 27 September, 2011 Still on 5 live. Yep, audio was OK it seems - just pictures lost. Back again now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dune Posted 27 September, 2011 Share Posted 27 September, 2011 Nobody does it better.... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2h03_QbqhHg Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Colinjb Posted 27 September, 2011 Share Posted 27 September, 2011 Just listening to a bit of this. This guy is head of the 'Labour' party, right? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dune Posted 27 September, 2011 Share Posted 27 September, 2011 Just listening to a bit of this. This guy is head of the 'Labour' party, right? Career politician just like Ed Balls/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scotty Posted 27 September, 2011 Author Share Posted 27 September, 2011 Career politician just like Ed Balls/ Labour really dont have any firepower left. The only half decent politicos they had have been kicked well into the long grass, I'm thinking mainly of Hilary Benn and John Denham. Red Eds brother is in the wilderness, even he would have been a more credible leader than lithping ed the gimp, I suppose theyre trying to keep their powder dry til election time when ed will be firmly shunted out the door. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Colinjb Posted 27 September, 2011 Share Posted 27 September, 2011 Career politician just like Ed Balls/ It doesn't matter which party they are from, any career politician really shouldn't be in a position of power. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OVER THE HILL Posted 27 September, 2011 Share Posted 27 September, 2011 Only millionaire Etonians can be politicians. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lord Duckhunter Posted 27 September, 2011 Share Posted 27 September, 2011 The problem Labour had is Gordon Brown spent 10 years crushing anybody with any leadership qualities in case they stood against him. I've got no time for David Milliband as he should have moved against Brown when Parnell quit. Like Portillo 20 years ago, he tried to box clever, look loyal, and lacked the balls to stand up and be counted. You need a strong opposition to keep a Govt in check, particulary when the Govt is the other 2 main parties. Neither Ed will be able to provide it. On the wider point of career politicans, they can not be a good thing, whether left or right.I want me leaders to have run a business, or led a union, or faced some of the hardships that we have to face. I would like to see more retired police chiefs, doctors, businessmen, shop stewards, and other high flyers from various walks of life, enter Westminister. Unfortunatly, the pay is poor and the work/life balance awful, so it will put these types off. You only end up with rich Etonians or Oxford PPE graduates, who have never done a days work in their life. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dune Posted 27 September, 2011 Share Posted 27 September, 2011 Only millionaire Etonians can be politicians. That's not true. Of course it's easier for those who have been handed a privilidged start in life. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dune Posted 27 September, 2011 Share Posted 27 September, 2011 The problem Labour had is Gordon Brown spent 10 years crushing anybody with any leadership qualities in case they stood against him. I've got no time for David Milliband as he should have moved against Brown when Parnell quit. Like Portillo 20 years ago, he tried to box clever, look loyal, and lacked the balls to stand up and be counted. You need a strong opposition to keep a Govt in check, particulary when the Govt is the other 2 main parties. Neither Ed will be able to provide it. On the wider point of career politicans, they can not be a good thing, whether left or right.I want me leaders to have run a business, or led a union, or faced some of the hardships that we have to face. I would like to see more retired police chiefs, doctors, businessmen, shop stewards, and other high flyers from various walks of life, enter Westminister. Unfortunatly, the pay is poor and the work/life balance awful, so it will put these types off. You only end up with rich Etonians or Oxford PPE graduates, who have never done a days work in their life. Not necessarily high flyers. Just people who have lived in the real world. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Junction 9 Posted 27 September, 2011 Share Posted 27 September, 2011 How he was elected leader infront of his brother is quite incredible. It's like they want to lose the next general election. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LGTL Posted 27 September, 2011 Share Posted 27 September, 2011 How he was elected leader infront of his brother is quite incredible. It's like they want to lose the next general election. I expect they do. 8 years of these current buffons in charge will be enough for anyone, and Labour would probably ease to a majority with Bertie Bassett in charge. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dune Posted 27 September, 2011 Share Posted 27 September, 2011 I expect they do. 8 years of these current buffons in charge will be enough for anyone, and Labour would probably ease to a majority with Bertie Bassett in charge. It's 5 year terms. 2 x 5 = 10. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LGTL Posted 27 September, 2011 Share Posted 27 September, 2011 It's 5 year terms. 2 x 5 = 10. I never realised you were good at Maths dune! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dune Posted 27 September, 2011 Share Posted 27 September, 2011 I never realised you were good at Maths dune! I'm good at lots of things. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thorpe-le-Saint Posted 27 September, 2011 Share Posted 27 September, 2011 It's 5 year terms. 2 x 5 = 10. TECHNICALLY they are meant to be only four year terms, but our 'constitution' allows it to be extended to five years. Not that anyone cares really. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Julian H. Cope Posted 27 September, 2011 Share Posted 27 September, 2011 Yay, nine more years!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Saintandy666 Posted 27 September, 2011 Share Posted 27 September, 2011 (edited) In terms of public speaking, Ed Miliband is probably the worst. Just ahead of him is Cameron, and then Clegg is miles ahead in lead. Not that it will do him much good mind. Remember, it's the substance that counts though, not the style! Edited 27 September, 2011 by Saintandy666 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pap Posted 27 September, 2011 Share Posted 27 September, 2011 They're not fixed terms though. I thought the PM could call an election whenever, as long as it happened before 5 years. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Saintandy666 Posted 27 September, 2011 Share Posted 27 September, 2011 Yay, nine more years!! Come over to the Lib Dems We might be able to suppress them for that entire time. A pure Tory government scares me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Saintandy666 Posted 27 September, 2011 Share Posted 27 September, 2011 They're not fixed terms though. I thought the PM could call an election whenever, as long as it happened before 5 years. It's meant to be binding for this parliament, so they would have to pass another bill in the next parliament again. 5 years is too long really. Anyways, due to the nature of our constitution it is barely binding... if a majority in Parliament wanted an election, they could repeal that law and trigger an election. So a vote of no confidence could still happen, but bar that the election is 2015... so no going to the polls after 4 years if you are doing well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pap Posted 27 September, 2011 Share Posted 27 September, 2011 Blimey. I did not realise that had changed. Depressed now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Saintandy666 Posted 27 September, 2011 Share Posted 27 September, 2011 Blimey. I did not realise that had changed. Depressed now. It has for one term... but really unless they bring in a rigid constitution like the US(which they won't), it really is quite meaningless. When Labour get back in in a decades timeish max(Oh politics, you are predictable), they won't go for 5 years, they want 4 year terms(at least that is what they say on record), which sounds better. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bridge too far Posted 27 September, 2011 Share Posted 27 September, 2011 It's meant to be binding for this parliament, so they would have to pass another bill in the next parliament again. 5 years is too long really. Anyways, due to the nature of our constitution it is barely binding... if a majority in Parliament wanted an election, they could repeal that law and trigger an election. So a vote of no confidence could still happen, but bar that the election is 2015... so no going to the polls after 4 years if you are doing well. But still expect to see a big tax giveaway after year 4 just before the next election. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Saintandy666 Posted 27 September, 2011 Share Posted 27 September, 2011 But still expect to see a big tax giveaway after year 4 just before the next election. If the banks are doing well, and we make a slight profit... probably, though there is no guarantee of that the state the economy is in at the moment. Imo, if there is a profit, there should either be a one off rebate to everyone or just use it to further pay off the deficit. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dune Posted 27 September, 2011 Share Posted 27 September, 2011 But still expect to see a big tax giveaway after year 4 just before the next election. You cynic. Like the Conservatives would do such a thing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Saintandy666 Posted 27 September, 2011 Share Posted 27 September, 2011 You cynic. Like the Conservatives would do such a thing. I'm not sure if that is trolling or not... But they would probably cut tax, like get rid of the 50% tax band. Parties like the Liberal Democrats and Labour would probably either cut taxes for the poorer or invest in the welfare state with any surplus money. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bridge too far Posted 27 September, 2011 Share Posted 27 September, 2011 If the banks are doing well, and we make a slight profit... probably, though there is no guarantee of that the state the economy is in at the moment. Imo, if there is a profit, there should either be a one off rebate to everyone or just use it to further pay off the deficit. This is Labour's plan, I believe. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Saintandy666 Posted 27 September, 2011 Share Posted 27 September, 2011 This is Labour's plan, I believe. Yep, though Andrew Neil was having a go at Ed Balls about it saying it was a gimmick as any profit is predicted to be about £3bn, so not much in the grand scheme of things. The banks should go for a hefty amount though which will help to reduce interest payments instantly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scotty Posted 27 September, 2011 Author Share Posted 27 September, 2011 How he was elected leader infront of his brother is quite incredible. It's like they want to lose the next general election. Ive been saying exactly this since Labour shoehorned Ed into place at the helm. I am certain that they have already given up on the next election and Ed is the bullet catcher. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hypochondriac Posted 27 September, 2011 Share Posted 27 September, 2011 In terms of public speaking, Ed Miliband is probably the worst. Just ahead of him is Cameron, and then Clegg is miles ahead in lead. Not that it will do him much good mind. Remember, it's the substance that counts though, not the style! How often do you get that from any politician though, much less a potential PM. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dune Posted 27 September, 2011 Share Posted 27 September, 2011 This is Labour's plan, I believe. Labour have a plan? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
badgerx16 Posted 27 September, 2011 Share Posted 27 September, 2011 (edited) Labour have a plan? It's simple, hang around until the ConDems implode and walk back into Downing Street as the other 2 parties fight their civil wars - The LDs will lose a lot of support to the tree huggers and the blue rinse brigade will defect from the Tories and boost UKIP into 3rd place nationally. The worrying thing is that none of them deserve to run the country. Edited 27 September, 2011 by badgerx16 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dune Posted 27 September, 2011 Share Posted 27 September, 2011 It's simple, hang around until the ConDems implode and walk back into Downing Street as the other 2 parties fight their civil wars - The LDs will lose a lot of support to the tree huggers and the blue rinse brigade will defect from the Tories and boost UKIP into 3rd place nationally. The worrying thing is that none of them deserve to run the country. I tend to agree and it wold be brilliant to see UKIP emerge as a major player. If and when this happens I envisage defections from the conservative parliamentary party. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scotty Posted 27 September, 2011 Author Share Posted 27 September, 2011 I tend to agree and it wold be brilliant to see UKIP emerge as a major player. If and when this happens I envisage defections from the conservative parliamentary party. Thats an interesting point right there Dune. The idea of the country accepting multi-party coalitions as the norm, rather than an aberration ,would mean that minority parties would suddenly take on more importance than they otherwise would have. Ukip and others would suddenly become a hell of a lot more relevant than they have been up to now, and we wouldnt have to fart about voting "tactically". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Johnny Bognor Posted 27 September, 2011 Share Posted 27 September, 2011 I tend to agree and it wold be brilliant to see UKIP emerge as a major player. If and when this happens I envisage defections from the conservative parliamentary party. I think with the implosion of the Euro Zone and the end of the Euro as we know it, UKIP might have nothing to fight for Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scotty Posted 27 September, 2011 Author Share Posted 27 September, 2011 I think with the implosion of the Euro Zone and the end of the Euro as we know it, UKIP might have nothing to fight for Cant see that happening myself Johnny. They will have to kick out greece, ireland and portugal, possibly italy and maybe even spain, but the core of the eurozone will retain the currency. Its a german/french project when alls said and done. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trousers Posted 27 September, 2011 Share Posted 27 September, 2011 But still expect to see a big tax giveaway after year 4 just before the next election. Political parties in pre-election vote maximisation revelation shocker... ;-) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kev Posted 28 September, 2011 Share Posted 28 September, 2011 That's not true. Of course it's easier for those who have been handed a privilidged start in life. I'm good at lots of things. Were you handed a privileged start in life, Dune? Are you good at spelling? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Special K Posted 28 September, 2011 Share Posted 28 September, 2011 He inspires about as much confidence as back street abortionist. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bridge too far Posted 28 September, 2011 Share Posted 28 September, 2011 Political parties in pre-election vote maximisation revelation shocker... ;-) But Dave said that a fixed term parliament would stop pre-election vote maximisation. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
View From The Top Posted 28 September, 2011 Share Posted 28 September, 2011 Ed is insipid at best and his simply keeping the seat warm for his brother IMHO. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trousers Posted 28 September, 2011 Share Posted 28 September, 2011 But Dave said that a fixed term parliament would stop pre-election vote maximisation. Link to his exact words? Off the top of my head, I think he said it would deter parties from setting a date purely based on when it thought was the best time for it to win, but that doesn't stop parties of any persuasion coming up with policies or dangling carrots at the fixed time of the election. Would be interested to see a transcript of what he said. I suspect he (like every politician) worded it craftily enough to not rule out the dangling of carrots per se, just that he was making it more difficult for parties to determine the timing of an election based on the size of said carrots. It's a load of vegetables whichever way you look at it.... ;-) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now