MOTM v Preston North End

[Colinjb]

Another match report request. The options are below. And yes, a Mods help would be outstanding, many thanks.

 

Bart

Butters

Dickson

Hooiveld

Martin

Reeves

De Ridder

Morgan

Chaplow

Forte

Holmes

 

Lallana

Fonte

Lambert

[Stepgar]

Easy holmes. He was brilliant tonight.

[Saint Matty 76]

Reeves started really brightly, thought Chaplow also had a very good game.

[Ohio Saint]

I scored the winner again with a lucky ciggy break. What the hell do I have to do to get on a MOM poll?

[Minsk]

I scored the winner again with a lucky ciggy break. What the hell do I have to do to get on a MOM poll?

 

I'd vote for you. I'm sure that's your third goal this season. Not bad going from the other side of the Atlantic!

 

[Redondo Saint]

Who the feck voted for Forte?

Waste of space

[the saint in winchester]

Who the feck voted for Forte?

Waste of space

 

I was shocked too. If you click the number 2 against his name, the voters ID's appear. You two should be ashamed. Or were you being ironic?

First 45 - Holmesey. Overall - Jos the Boss. So calm and collected, the new Svensson. Sign him up!

[Huntingdon]

Why do people vote when they weren't even at the game?

 

You decide who's MOM just from radio commentary

[Glasgow_Saint]

I voted Forte but wasnt at the game and didnt listen on the radio - just thought he would play well!

[Glasgow_Saint]

doh!! who put Forte above Fonte in the list order? that is a dirty trick!! Fonte got my vote when Forte deserved it more imho

[PhilippineSaint]

I only woke up and got the commentary as lallana came on and scored which is why he got my vote

[Jez]

I only woke up and got the commentary as lallana came on and scored which is why he got my vote

 

Not really your Man Of The Match then was he? More your Man Of The Last 20 Minutes As He Got More Goals Than Anyone Else When I Was Listening And Some Men On The Radio Said He Played Well.

[Ashley Grute]

I was at the game- for me Chaplow ran his socks off and lots of tough tackling, Butterfield had a solid games and Holmes was quite good, but his touch and crossing in the first half was a bit rusty- lovely cross for the second goal though- and with his right foot I think!

[Dimond Geezer]

Who the feck voted for Forte?

Waste of space

 

Bearsy & SFCDan. Just click on the "View Poll Results" button & it tells you.

[Chez]

Chaplow by a country mile

[Glasgow_Saint]

Chaplow by a country mile

 

.+1 to this all day long

[Ashley Grute]

Chez and Glasgow- you two obviously saw the same game as me!

[dune]

I voted Dickson because I take these polls seriously.

[spyinthesky]

Bart 6- Almost a 5. Missed a cross first half and at fault for the goal. Makes those Davis detractors look silly at the moment

Butters 6+ Steady

Dickson 6- OKish but some misplaced passes

Martin 6+ Steady. Not up against much. Distribution a bit of a worry

Hooiveld 6+ As Martin but slightly better distribution

De Ridder 7- Quick and threatening without really delivering

Chaplow 7+ Energetic.Bossed midfield

Schneiderlin 7+ MOTM for me. Class in midfield

Holmes 7- Still unsure about him. Did well enough on the night

Reeves 6+ A decent debut in an unfamiliar position. Looked about 14 and currently would struggle in the 1sr team with his stature

Forte 6 No way a central striker and suffered from quality of passes to him. Just not good enough for our ongoing aspirations

[sidthesquid]

Can I ask what is the flipping point is of having a poll in which people who didn't actually watch the game have a vote?

Meaningless and bizarre are two words that spring to mind.

[Colinjb]

Can I ask what is the flipping point is of having a poll in which people who didn't actually watch the game have a vote?

Meaningless and bizarre are two words that spring to mind.

 

I always include the 'Saintsweb Man of the Match' in my match reports, the only way to get that is to ask the forum users, if they have been to the game great, it allows them to make a more informed opinion, but opinions will be crafted too from reading match reports and hear'say from mates.

 

It would also be impossible on here to seperate the match goers from those who couldn't/didn't attend. So while I agree it may be a little less well informed then the official man of the match award, it is a reflection of the forum's opinion and feeling. Therefore it is far from bizare or meaningless.

Edited 22 September, 2011 by Colinjb

[dune]

Can I ask what is the flipping point is of having a poll in which people who didn't actually watch the game have a vote?

Meaningless and bizarre are two words that spring to mind.

 

[CanadaSaint]

Can I ask what is the flipping point is of having a poll in which people who didn't actually watch the game have a vote?

Meaningless and bizarre are two words that spring to mind.

 

I'd wondered the same thing myself.

[Ooooo Mariaaan]

I really don't see how someone can accurately vote on MoM without having watched the game. An opinion from reading a match report is a million miles away.