Jump to content

Should we know and do we care?


John Smith

Recommended Posts

John Smith's limitations have long been obvious, but finding this out about Pap is like discovering your favourite uncle is a cross dressing astrology devotee.

 

I admire your creative use of language.

 

I'm happy to have been thought of as a favourite uncle.

 

I hope that you get back into this debate, and play the ball, not the man.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And so, your whole side capitulates. Currently, I am not in my bedroom, when I wrote what I did yesterday, not in my bedroom. When I took a lot of time responding to you twice before, not in my bedroom. You on the other hand, I couldn't care less whether you were in your bedroom or half way up a gum tree. You have brought nothing to this debate. I have answered your feet stomping questions, and you have nothing in return, lket me point that out again, "nothing". For all your prevado and put downs about intellect, you, Mr. Thicky have missed the obvious. Yes, I did do a little test on you, and yes you failed, Mr Well Read.

 

So, climb back up your Gum tree, swing from the tree's and you will know more than you do today. You're not worth my time, Corrie is more your level of debate, enjoy the muppet show!

 

Again, nothing. Thankfully I have an IQ above that of a fool, something you clearly aspire to.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

John Smith's limitations have long been obvious, but finding this out about Pap is like discovering your favourite uncle is a cross dressing astrology devotee.

 

Quite. I've always rather enjoyed his input and now I find I hold him utter contempt. John Smith couldn't debate with himself in an empty room. His inability is there for all to see.

 

Still, if people want to believe it's all some major conspiracy then that's their concern and like must zealots, I'll simply ignore and pity them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

I think we can all agree that on capability terms, an internal conspiracy with hooks into the Government has a far better chance of pulling this off than ( as VFTT puts it ) 'lowely Al Qaeda' operatives. Indeed, some have questioned whether the AQ boys had the capability at all. Let's not forget that these guys managed to hi-jack four planes and navigate three of them to highly symbolic targets through some of the most protected air-space in the world.

 

No. YOU believe that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No. YOU believe that.

 

I'm stressing capability.

 

Who has more resources at their disposal?

 

Who would be more capable of making it happen? Capable of overcoming the problems that they would undoubtedly face in completing their objective?

 

Let's look at one small detail in terms of capability.

 

How would you get three planes to highly symbolic targets and crash into them?

 

Who would be more capable of that? What's Al Qaeda's plan here? Do they have someone on the inside? Just hope for the best?

 

So let's compare that with the capability of a hypothetical conspiracy with access to different branches of government. Well, it might have capability to run drills simulating the exact same attacks on the exact same day. That could be confusing. The sad thing is that it is exactly what happened - a NORAD wargame happening on the same day.

 

So are you really telling us that a group of Arabs led by a man in a cave had greater operational capability than a group of conspirators with access to the apparatus of state?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...