Redbul Posted 10 August, 2011 Posted 10 August, 2011 Rioters in London are being advised by the Met Police to stay indoors on Saturday as Millwall are playing at home.
Crab Lungs Posted 10 August, 2011 Posted 10 August, 2011 527 thieving rioting looters shot dead by police, many in the back of the head, over 1000 in hospital with cracked skulls due to excessive baton use by police. Hundreds of people torn apart by police dogs. The armed Forces are moving to finish rioters in affected areas using bayonets so as to save tax payers money on bullets....Carlsberg don't do headlines but if they did...... Yes, oh yes.
shurlock Posted 10 August, 2011 Posted 10 August, 2011 (edited) Good article by Kevin Sampson "Liverpool riots: I remember the buzz of mob mayhem from 1981" http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2011/aug/10/liverpool-riots-mob-mayhem Edited 10 August, 2011 by shurlock
Saint in Paradise Posted 10 August, 2011 Posted 10 August, 2011 Magistrates Association sentencing committee chairman Peter Chapman says it's unlikely any of the younger offenders will go to jail for their part in the riots. "The statistical probability of going to prison for a young person appearing in the youth court for the first time is very low. It would have to be a very serious grievous crime," he says. Mr Chapman says shoplifting, breaking and entering or burning a car would fall short of being considered serious enough to send someone under 18 to jail. Well so much for strong action then lads just help yourselves.
jawillwill Posted 10 August, 2011 Posted 10 August, 2011 This video has some views about the civil unrest throughout England and Southampton; and Pompeys game v Barnet last night. Fascinating stuff. [video=youtube;HqXU-fjW2Hg]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HqXU-fjW2Hg
dubai_phil Posted 10 August, 2011 Posted 10 August, 2011 Magistrates Association sentencing committee chairman Peter Chapman says it's unlikely any of the younger offenders will go to jail for their part in the riots. "The statistical probability of going to prison for a young person appearing in the youth court for the first time is very low. It would have to be a very serious grievous crime," he says. Mr Chapman says shoplifting, breaking and entering or burning a car would fall short of being considered serious enough to send someone under 18 to jail. Well so much for strong action then lads just help yourselves. IF Cameron has the balls to back up his rhethoric of the past few days, then Mr Chapman should be seeking new employment tomorrow morning
dune Posted 10 August, 2011 Posted 10 August, 2011 IF Cameron has the balls to back up his rhethoric of the past few days, then Mr Chapman should be seeking new employment tomorrow morning The vast majority of cases wil be dealt with at Magistrates court level sadly (due to the huge volume) and what we'll need to see is maximum sentences. I heard on the news yesterday the exact length this could be but forget now what it was. Does anyone know?
JRM Posted 10 August, 2011 Posted 10 August, 2011 This video has some views about the civil unrest throughout England and Southampton; and Pompeys game v Barnet last night. Fascinating stuff. [video=youtube;HqXU-fjW2Hg]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HqXU-fjW2Hg brilliant, absolutely brilliant, i feel like i am full of knowledge now
Gemmel Posted 10 August, 2011 Posted 10 August, 2011 brilliant, absolutely brilliant, i feel like i am full of knowledge now Is it against the forum rules to say I would love to beat the fook out of the feak
JRM Posted 10 August, 2011 Posted 10 August, 2011 Is it against the forum rules to say I would love to beat the fook out of the feak i don't think i could beat him, he just seems so incapable and pathetic, good representation of skates though, i like the fact going through the results it dawns on him that they are the worst club on the south coast
Jonnyboy Posted 10 August, 2011 Posted 10 August, 2011 527 thieving rioting looters shot dead by police, many in the back of the head, over 1000 in hospital with cracked skulls due to excessive baton use by police. Hundreds of people torn apart by police dogs. The armed Forces are moving to finish rioters in affected areas using bayonets so as to save tax payers money on bullets....Carlsberg don't do headlines but if they did...... why don't you go live in Iran or Syria?
Gingeletiss Posted 11 August, 2011 Posted 11 August, 2011 why don't you go live in Iran or Syria? Lived in Saudi for 18 months, trust me fella, they wouldn't tolerate any of your liberal cra p, the religious police out there would flog you in public.
Verbal Posted 11 August, 2011 Posted 11 August, 2011 Lived in Saudi for 18 months, trust me fella, they wouldn't tolerate any of your liberal cra p, the religious police out there would flog you in public. Will one of you right-wing loons please explain how the EDL attacking police in London helped?
Junior Mullet Posted 11 August, 2011 Posted 11 August, 2011 The vast majority of cases wil be dealt with at Magistrates court level sadly (due to the huge volume) and what we'll need to see is maximum sentences. I heard on the news yesterday the exact length this could be but forget now what it was. Does anyone know? 6 months and/or a few thousand pound fine
Junior Mullet Posted 11 August, 2011 Posted 11 August, 2011 Welldone to the EDL Millwall fans for protecting their streets. Scenes like this put some pride back into the country. Total respect from me. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/crime/8692872/London-riots-far-right-political-party-protect-Eltham-residents.html Never thought I would find myself agreeing with those scum but after what I have seen this week I would have been right there with them.
dubai_phil Posted 11 August, 2011 Posted 11 August, 2011 Really worried about England & how this is all panning out. Just watched a bunch of English lads mug 11 Indians in Brimingham. How could 25.000 people just sit there and cheer them on and do nothing to try and save those poor defenceless victims?
anothersaintinsouthsea Posted 11 August, 2011 Posted 11 August, 2011 Lived in Saudi for 18 months, trust me fella, they wouldn't tolerate any of your liberal cra p, the religious police out there would flog you in public. so we should be more like Saudi? bit of sharia law perhaps?
JackFrost Posted 11 August, 2011 Posted 11 August, 2011 http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-14482697 Fair play
Gingeletiss Posted 11 August, 2011 Posted 11 August, 2011 so we should be more like Saudi? bit of sharia law perhaps? No, he suggested I go to Syria, just pointing out, that all this liberal nonsense, that this country puts up with, would not be allowed out there. For the record, I'm against sharia law, but for a more robust form of punishment in this country, a trip to Alton towers for commiting burglery, doesn't cut it for me I'm afraid!
dune Posted 11 August, 2011 Posted 11 August, 2011 No, he suggested I go to Syria, just pointing out, that all this liberal nonsense, that this country puts up with, would not be allowed out there. For the record, I'm against sharia law, but for a more robust form of punishment in this country, a trip to Alton towers for commiting burglery, doesn't cut it for me I'm afraid! Most people would agree with you. What these threads have demonstrated is that the Liberal Elite might shout the loudest, but they are the minority on this forum. I expect this has come as a shock to them.
Verbal Posted 11 August, 2011 Posted 11 August, 2011 No, he suggested I go to Syria, just pointing out, that all this liberal nonsense, that this country puts up with, would not be allowed out there. For the record, I'm against sharia law, but for a more robust form of punishment in this country, a trip to Alton towers for commiting burglery, doesn't cut it for me I'm afraid! Syria doesn't have sharia. It has a brutal secularist regime which massacres people who have advocated it.
Verbal Posted 11 August, 2011 Posted 11 August, 2011 Most people would agree with you. What these threads have demonstrated is that the Liberal Elite might shout the loudest, but they are the minority on this forum. I expect this has come as a shock to them. As Andy NS says on the other thread, it seems that recent events have brought out the ugly underbelly of racism. Just as your and others' anti-Muslim rants have associated all Muslims with Chaudhray and his lunatic friends, you are gleefully associating anyone with a black face with the riots. Your clearly evident stunted emotional and intellectual growth is perhaps an excuse for you, but to see the pervasiveness of a revenge narrative on here is depressing and as much a sign of the moron-ocracy in this country as the looters. What's need is justice, not revenge.
miserableoldgit Posted 11 August, 2011 Posted 11 August, 2011 This video has some views about the civil unrest throughout England and Southampton; and Pompeys game v Barnet last night. Fascinating stuff. [video=youtube;HqXU-fjW2Hg]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HqXU-fjW2Hg I know him! Isn`t he the Mayor of P*rtsmouth?
miserableoldgit Posted 11 August, 2011 Posted 11 August, 2011 Interesting view on things:- http://nathanieltapley.com/2011/08/10/an-open-letter-to-david-camerons-parents/
Gingeletiss Posted 11 August, 2011 Posted 11 August, 2011 Syria doesn't have sharia. It has a brutal secularist regime which massacres people who have advocated it. Do keep up, I have not said it does, I was responding to anothersaintinsouthsea, who, in turn, was commenting on a response I made to leftwing Johnny. Again, for the record, I am against the regime in Syria, along with several other countrys in this world, alas, I'm concerned about the soft approach to crime in this country, which has allowed groups of individuals to rampage through our streets, in the knowledge, that very little will happen to them if caught.
Hatch Posted 11 August, 2011 Posted 11 August, 2011 Really worried about England & how this is all panning out. Just watched a bunch of English lads mug 11 Indians in Brimingham. How could 25.000 people just sit there and cheer them on and do nothing to try and save those poor defenceless victims? :)
anothersaintinsouthsea Posted 11 August, 2011 Posted 11 August, 2011 Do keep up, I have not said it does, I was responding to anothersaintinsouthsea, who, in turn, was commenting on a response I made to leftwing Johnny. Again, for the record, I am against the regime in Syria, along with several other countrys in this world, alas, I'm concerned about the soft approach to crime in this country, which has allowed groups of individuals to rampage through our streets, in the knowledge, that very little will happen to them if caught. Just to clarify: You seemed to sound positive about your experience of Saudi and that's what I was commenting upon.
anothersaintinsouthsea Posted 11 August, 2011 Posted 11 August, 2011 Most people would agree with you. What these threads have demonstrated is that the Liberal Elite might shout the loudest, but they are the minority on this forum. I expect this has come as a shock to them. Dear Dune, Whatever points you want to make are instantly diminished whenever you use the phrase "liberal elite". Whilst I disagree with pretty much every post you've ever made on here, I'm pointing this out to you so that you can sound less of an idiot. Yours Anothersaintinsouthsea xx
Turkish Posted 11 August, 2011 Posted 11 August, 2011 Dear Dune, Whatever points you want to make are instantly diminished whenever you use the phrase "liberal elite". Whilst I disagree with pretty much every post you've ever made on here, I'm pointing this out to you so that you can sound less of an idiot. Yours Anothersaintinsouthsea xx BUt that is what they are. Open minded, fair minded, tolerant. THe bastions of liberalism and freedom of speech. The Elite of society. Unless it's something they dont agree with.
JackFrost Posted 11 August, 2011 Posted 11 August, 2011 It's purely because of the art of 'labelling' is either done by children or people with limited intelligence. When applied to people of different inherent beliefs that the labeller doesn't know on a personal basis be it "socialists", "the liberal elite" "the lunatic fringe" "Lowe Luvvies" etc. etc. it only illustrates a lack of intelligence more than anything else. Anyway LOL at this thread becoming another debate about Sharia Law/Muslims/race when the riots have nothing to do with any of these issues
Turkish Posted 11 August, 2011 Posted 11 August, 2011 It's purely because of the art of 'labelling' is either done by children or people with limited intelligence. When applied to people of different inherent beliefs that the labeller doesn't know on a personal basis be it "socialists", "the liberal elite" "the lunatic fringe" "Lowe Luvvies" etc. etc. it only illustrates a lack of intelligence more than anything else. Anyway LOL at this thread becoming another debate about Sharia Law/Muslims/race when the riots have nothing to do with any of these issues This cant be true. We all know how intellgent Verbal is, yet he has labelled Dune & Myself racists, TDD a woman beater and accused Sour Mash of having a gang mentality.
Verbal Posted 11 August, 2011 Posted 11 August, 2011 BUt that is what they are. Open minded, fair minded, tolerant. THe bastions of liberalism and freedom of speech. The Elite of society. Unless it's something they dont agree with. I'm afraid your last bit betrays a befuddled inability to grasp a simple idea. Liberalism, as defined by such layabouts as John Stuart Mill, is broadly the defence of the principles of freedom to allow all forms of freedom of expression so long as those forms do not themselves limit freedom of expression. For some reason, I keep getting lumped in with liberals when in fact I'm a Trotskyist who spends his time making lists of people who come the revolution will be up against the not so proverbial wall, so long as I can keep an axe out of my head. You're not on the list, because you are 'special' - good news, right?
Sour Mash Posted 11 August, 2011 Posted 11 August, 2011 Spurs game on Saturday now confirmed called off.
Verbal Posted 11 August, 2011 Posted 11 August, 2011 This cant be true. We all know how intellgent Verbal is, yet he has labelled Dune & Myself racists, TDD a woman beater and accused Sour Mash of having a gang mentality. I have done no such thing. You've rubber-stamped yourselves. All others have done is called you on your racism/sexism/gang mentality, etc.
anothersaintinsouthsea Posted 11 August, 2011 Posted 11 August, 2011 (edited) BUt that is what they are. Open minded, fair minded, tolerant. THe bastions of liberalism and freedom of speech. The Elite of society. Unless it's something they dont agree with. Who is "they"? are these the same posters that Dune labels "socialist" or "marxist"? lol. Whatever your opinions resorting to labelling groups of people with nonsense terms that you don't even understand just makes you sound stupid. just as if I was to label everyone on the right that I disagreed with as "fascists". How anyone who posts regularly on here could be described as 'elite' is beyond me. Edited 11 August, 2011 by anothersaintinsouthsea
Turkish Posted 11 August, 2011 Posted 11 August, 2011 I have done no such thing. You've rubber-stamped yourselves. All others have done is called you on your racism/sexism/gang mentality, etc. Like i said, it can't be true. Want to pick Jack up on his statement, or would this be incorrect because he is in your gang??
Turkish Posted 11 August, 2011 Posted 11 August, 2011 I'm afraid your last bit betrays a befuddled inability to grasp a simple idea. Liberalism, as defined by such layabouts as John Stuart Mill, is broadly the defence of the principles of freedom to allow all forms of freedom of expression so long as those forms do not themselves limit freedom of expression. For some reason, I keep getting lumped in with liberals when in fact I'm a Trotskyist who spends his time making lists of people who come the revolution will be up against the not so proverbial wall, so long as I can keep an axe out of my head. You're not on the list, because you are 'special' - good news, right? I prefer not to give myself a label and attach myself as to a group. Liberalist, Racists, Trotskyists, lefties, Socialists etc etc. Just say what I believe in but leave everything open to be proven otherwise. All this calling yourself this that and the other, Sounds all a bit gang mentality to me and we certainly dont want that, right?
Turkish Posted 11 August, 2011 Posted 11 August, 2011 Who is "they"? are these the same posters that Dune labels "socialist" or "marxist"? lol. Whatever your opinions resorting to labelling groups of people with nonsense terms that you don't even understand just makes you sound stupid. just as if I was to label everyone on the right that I disagreed with as "fascists". How anyone who posts regularly on here could be described as 'elite' is beyond me. You're not wrong there.
Verbal Posted 11 August, 2011 Posted 11 August, 2011 (edited) I prefer not to give myself a label and attach myself as to a group. Liberalist, Racists, Trotskyists, lefties, Socialists etc etc. Just say what I believe in but leave everything open to be proven otherwise. All this calling yourself this that and the other, Sounds all a bit gang mentality to me and we certainly dont want that, right? I think your befuddlement include the lack of a sense of irony. And if, like Dune, you argue for violent solutions to perceived problems with 'race', and advocate ridiculous ideas about white supremacy, then you will be called a racist. It is not a 'group' so much as an affliction. Edited 11 August, 2011 by Verbal
locksheathsaint101 Posted 11 August, 2011 Posted 11 August, 2011 This cant be true. We all know how intellgent Verbal is, yet he has labelled Dune & Myself racists, TDD a woman beater and accused Sour Mash of having a gang mentality. I thought Verbal was mentally challenged, then he pulled out his dictionary and started using words like 'verbose.' Boy did I feel foolish.
Verbal Posted 11 August, 2011 Posted 11 August, 2011 I thought Verbal was mentally challenged, then he pulled out his dictionary and started using words like 'verbose.' Boy did I feel foolish. I sensed you did.
Sour Mash Posted 11 August, 2011 Posted 11 August, 2011 Reading through some of the news coverage on this, its hard to tell if a lot of the most serious rioters have been/will be caught or if it is mainly the opportunists that came along at the end with the chance to nick something? Most of the original rioters doing the serious damange had their faces well covered up, hoods up etc, I really can't see how most of them will successfully be prosecuted?
Turkish Posted 11 August, 2011 Posted 11 August, 2011 (edited) I think your befuddlement include the lack of a sense of irony. And if, like Dune, you argue for violent solutions to perceived problems with 'race', and advocate ridiculous ideas about white supremacy, then you will be called a racist. It is not a 'group' so much as an affliction. How can this be? You suggested i was racist for having Papa Lazirou from The League of Gentlemen as my avatar. Surely you dont just need to be or support violence to be called a racist, just simply having things misinterpreted by superior beings to suit thier agenda can be enough to attain that label. Edited 11 August, 2011 by Turkish
pap Posted 11 August, 2011 Posted 11 August, 2011 Dear Dune, Whatever points you want to make are instantly diminished whenever you use the phrase "liberal elite". Whilst I disagree with pretty much every post you've ever made on here, I'm pointing this out to you so that you can sound less of an idiot. Yours Anothersaintinsouthsea xx Completely agree. It's purely because of the art of 'labelling' is either done by children or people with limited intelligence. When applied to people of different inherent beliefs that the labeller doesn't know on a personal basis be it "socialists", "the liberal elite" "the lunatic fringe" "Lowe Luvvies" etc. etc. it only illustrates a lack of intelligence more than anything else. Anyway LOL at this thread becoming another debate about Sharia Law/Muslims/race when the riots have nothing to do with any of these issues And agree with this too. The form is generally like this:- "Er?! You just made a well-reasoned point. I have no response. Liberal Elite!!!!" I prefer not to give myself a label and attach myself as to a group. Liberalist, Racists, Trotskyists, lefties, Socialists etc etc. Just say what I believe in but leave everything open to be proven otherwise. All this calling yourself this that and the other, Sounds all a bit gang mentality to me and we certainly dont want that, right? And how does that tally with you labelling other people as the Liberal Elite? Speaking only for myself, I actually try to debate the points rather than exercise an agenda against certain posters. I'm more than guilty of being a sarcastic sod on a couple of occasions, but that's normally after I've been witnessed tears and toys flowing out of a pram. FWIW, no-one is on my ignore list and I try to read threads before I post. Again, not always 100% on that one. Still, whenever I see the likes of yourself and Dune playing the victim and crying 'Liberal Elite', pretty much anything else you have to say in that post becomes null and void. If you're a victim of anything, it's your own limited capacity to respond. Don't think it's an intelligence thing either. Just think that a lot of people on here are used to saying whatever they like and not having it robustly challenged. If the so-called Liberal Elite are upsetting you that much, I'd suggest setting up your own forum and spending all day posting and agreeing with yourselves. Firstly, you might not feel as victimised. Second, you won't look like tubes when you post that crap on here.
Turkish Posted 11 August, 2011 Posted 11 August, 2011 Reading through some of the news coverage on this, its hard to tell if a lot of the most serious rioters have been/will be caught or if it is mainly the opportunists that came along at the end with the chance to nick something? Most of the original rioters doing the serious damange had their faces well covered up, hoods up etc, I really can't see how most of them will successfully be prosecuted? I suspect it will be the usual case of a lot of bluster about tough sentancing, followed by lots of charges for minor offences with a few fall guys who will be taking the rap for the instigators who they couldn't catch. Followed by back slapping headlines and statements from the police and goverment about how tough they were, what a great job they've done and this sending out a message they wont tolerate this sort of behaviour etc etc.
Turkish Posted 11 August, 2011 Posted 11 August, 2011 Completely agree. And agree with this too. The form is generally like this:- "Er?! You just made a well-reasoned point. I have no response. Liberal Elite!!!!" And how does that tally with you labelling other people as the Liberal Elite? Speaking only for myself, I actually try to debate the points rather than exercise an agenda against certain posters. I'm more than guilty of being a sarcastic sod on a couple of occasions, but that's normally after I've been witnessed tears and toys flowing out of a pram. FWIW, no-one is on my ignore list and I try to read threads before I post. Again, not always 100% on that one. Still, whenever I see the likes of yourself and Dune playing the victim and crying 'Liberal Elite', pretty much anything else you have to say in that post becomes null and void. If you're a victim of anything, it's your own limited capacity to respond. Don't think it's an intelligence thing either. Just think that a lot of people on here are used to saying whatever they like and not having it robustly challenged. If the so-called Liberal Elite are upsetting you that much, I'd suggest setting up your own forum and spending all day posting and agreeing with yourselves. Firstly, you might not feel as victimised. Second, you won't look like tubes when you post that crap on here. Sorry, please show me where i have said i am a victim?
pap Posted 11 August, 2011 Posted 11 August, 2011 Sorry, please show me where i have said i am a victim? You haven't said you're a victim, but whenever you use the term, particularly when you bizarrely paint the 'Liberal Elite' as some kind of all-powerful autocracy who cannot be challenged, you look like one.
Turkish Posted 11 August, 2011 Posted 11 August, 2011 You haven't said you're a victim, but whenever you use the term, particularly when you bizarrely paint the 'Liberal Elite' as some kind of all-powerful autocracy who cannot be challenged, you look like one. They are though. Just look at Verbal. He is so clever it's frightening. It's also impossible for him to make a point without being patronising and condecending, just look at this thread.
pap Posted 11 August, 2011 Posted 11 August, 2011 They are though. Just look at Verbal. He is so clever it's frightening. It's also impossible for him to make a point without being patronising and condecending, just look at this thread. "Waaaah!" "What is it, Turkish?" "Waaah!" "Is it that Liberal Elite again?" "Waaah!" "Have they been hitting you again?" "Sniff. Ye-ye-yes. With well reasoned arguments!"
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now