Apprehension for the coming season....

[Minsk]

 

 

I'm not repeating myself anymore for your amusement.

If you can't grasp that i have answered what you want then i give up.

You just don't like the answers given,because they don't fall in line with yours.

You either want a forensic account of anything i post or you have aspergers.

Either way you can't seem to be able to read a post in the context it is written.

Infract me mods,it will be a honour to gain my first infraction just prior to my subscription expires.

 

But Fowlyyd is correct, you DO NOT answer the questions asked of you, you merely give your opinion whilst ignoring certain facts. You ask for debate yet when people (Fowlyyd and I) try to engage you in it you (seemingly) ignore questions that you do not want to answer. We fully understand that you not rate Adkins or most of our squad, but when we ask you to explain WHY you just get all shirty.

 

There is nothing here for you directly answer, although I expect you will; these are the kinds of posts you like answering. we will then how well you answer the next post I make on this thread (I just don't have the time to write it at the moment but will do so later this evening).

[Saint Fan CaM]

spot on assement of both saintsweb and the season ahead IMO

 

Thanks. Sorry it took a while to respond - I needed to recover from the shock of someone actually agreeing with me! (;

[saint lard]

But Fowlyyd is correct, you DO NOT answer the questions asked of you, you merely give your opinion whilst ignoring certain facts. You ask for debate yet when people (Fowlyyd and I) try to engage you in it you (seemingly) ignore questions that you do not want to answer. We fully understand that you not rate Adkins or most of our squad, but when we ask you to explain WHY you just get all shirty.

 

There is nothing here for you directly answer, although I expect you will; these are the kinds of posts you like answering. we will then how well you answer the next post I make on this thread (I just don't have the time to write it at the moment but will do so later this evening).

 

Someone expresses an opinion to someone elses question,or a supposed fact......on a forum...how dare they.

I am offering an opinion to reinforce what i believe in,is that not how it works?.

Post what you want,perhaps i should just ignore your opinions as you do me.So save you energy.ive said what i have to say on the subject without having to repeat myself onecemore,see post 94,have you?

Iv'e given all my reasons for what i believe.

Why don't you and Fowllyd just chat amongst yourselves.you can both discard what other people say together.

I will not enter into dialogue with you again,for i have opposing views,which clearly is not agreeable to you two.

Amazing how others have managed to post quite sensibly on the OP.

 

Who the **** are you too determine how i answer your next post.You are a nobody on a internet forum.

****ing tosser.

 

That could be my second infraction.c'mon mods do your stuff.

Edited 4 August, 2011 by saint lard

[Fowllyd]

 

 

I'm not repeating myself anymore for your amusement.

If you can't grasp that i have answered what you want then i give up.

You just don't like the answers given,because they don't fall in line with yours.

You either want a forensic account of anything i post or you have aspergers.

Either way you can't seem to be able to read a post in the context it is written.

Infract me mods,it will be a honour to gain my first infraction just prior to my subscription expires.

 

I'm not asking you to repeat anything, just to answer a question that you haven't - to wit, why do you think that our coaching staff will underestimate our opponents this coming season? You haven't answered that question; or, if you have done so, please point me in the direction of the post in which you did and I'll be happy to admit my error and aplogise unreservedly.

 

And no, I don't suffer from Asperger's, nor do I want a forensic account of what you post. I simply wanted an answer to a simple question - is that really so hard to understand?

 

Oh, and if you get infracted for what you've just posted then it will be clear evidence that this place really has gone mad! I took no offence, anyway.

[saint lard]

I hardly think the players i listed,in answer to your question again,are players that will fulfill there roles substantially over a season in the NPC.But if you could not gleam that info fron the answer i gave previously then i am at a loss.

 

You concur that other managers have more experience in this league,surely that tell you they have an advantage over someone who has minimal experience outside league one.

 

Adkins took Scunny up,then straight back down,who else has he managed in the Championship,no one.

Compiling a squad for the forthcoming season,which also compliments what you have enroute,does not mean you need to spend like other squads have,so i wouldv'e been extremely uncomfortable withe big spending.

 

Would i swap Adkins for Cotterill,no.But would i like to have cotterills' experience at the helm, certainly.

I do think PFC,however short in numbers have a very good starting 11 available,and again with more experience than many of our squad.

 

I feel i am being pragmatic and approching the new campaign with apprehension,which is the point made in the OP,nothing more ,nothing less.Is that a crime..no an opinion.

 

Jaidi and Connolly wont hack it week in week out in the NPC,imo.

 

Would Sneijder make an impact in the Prem,who knows.

But that could be said about De ridder and the others that have not played in the NPC at all or consistantly.

But it does not stop all and sundry taking it for granted that consolidation is a given.....this is my point about my apprehension,have we underestimsted the capabilities of sides that are deemed lesser than us,yet have vastly more experience of this league.

Do i think the coaching staff will underestimate other sides,you bet ya.

Top managers are often undone by underestimating the opposition,Adkins is not yet a top manager but he will come up agaist more tactically aware managers/coaches and this will be a learning curve and the acid test of his abilities outside league one.

 

 

Now, you have responded to my previous answers so i must have fillfilled your remit along the way,i have done so again.

Perhaps others will draw the info they requested of me,oncemore.debate the issue, not the merits of the poster in question would be a bonus.Some have managed to do so.

I hope we can agree to disagree,but i have not sidestepped any topics thrown at me,not on this thread or others.I will do the best to put my point over using the best symantics i can.......but unlike many politicians i did not have a private education.

 

Heres hoping for a successful season,under the stewardship of Adkins...who will then have proven his credentials to him becoming top manager.

 

Done.however i suspect this still wont satisfy.

Edited 4 August, 2011 by saint lard

[Dig Dig]

Someone expresses an opinion to someone elses question,or a supposed fact......on a forum...how dare they.

I am offering an opinion to reinforce what i believe in,is that not how it works?.

Post what you want,perhaps i should just ignore your opinions as you do me.So save you energy.ive said what i have to say on the subject without having to repeat myself onecemore,see post 94,have you?

Iv'e given all my reasons for what i believe.

 

Why don't you and Fowllyd just chat amongst yourselves.you can both discard what other people say together.

I will not enter into dialogue with you again,for i have opposing views,which clearly is not agreeable to you two.

Amazing how others have managed to post quite sensibly on the OP.

 

Who the **** are you too determine how i answer your next post.You are a nobody on a internet forum.

****ing tosser.

 

That could be my second infraction.c'mon mods do your stuff.

 

Lol, and this coming from one of the cry babies who complains about abuse all the time

[Fowllyd]

Done.however i suspect this still wont satisfy.

TBH,i'm past caring.

 

The bit you've highlighted says that you think the coaching staff will underestimate other sides. But it doesn't say why you consider this to be the case, which is the question I was asking. Or do you think that it does?

[saint lard]

Lol, and this coming from one of the cry babies who complains about abuse all the time

Your contribution was invaluable.

Just thought i would stoop to the level to many of the ones that resort to personal abuse .....for a change.

It appears to be the norm on here,nowadays.

[saint lard]

The bit you've highlighted says that you think the coaching staff will underestimate other sides. But it doesn't say why you consider this to be the case, which is the question I was asking. Or do you think that it does?

 

 

I think it encompasses what you wanted in a reply,if you can't read into my explanation what is meant in that paragraph well...

[Fowllyd]

I think it encompasses what you wanted in a reply,if you can't read into my explanation what is meant in that paragraph well...

 

But there isn't any explanation there. It looks like a circular argument, along the lines of "I think that this will happen because it's what I think will happen". Or at least that's how it reads to me. If Adkins or anyone else on the coaching staff had been quoted as saying that they expect some easy games this season, or if Adkins had been guilty of underestimating opponents last season, then you'd have a point. But they haven't, at least not to my knowledge.

 

I reckon I'll leave it there - I can't help feeling that we've got ourselves at cross purposes here. You think you've answered my question, I can't see that you have. That's just the way it goes sometimes...

[The Kraken]

This is getting a bit much, isn't it? Lard thinks that way, he shouldn't have to necessarily justify it in massive depth.

 

I think Saints will finish around 10th this season; playoffs maybe if we sign a defender and a centre forward. Do I have to justify why I think that? Do I have to give a list of all of our fixtures, and how we'll perform in each one? Do I have to make predictions for how the rest of the league will do, in order to justify how I came to my conclusion of where we'll finish?

 

Lard is entitled to his opinions. You (and I) are entitled to disagree with them. And sometimes there are no clear facts to underpin an opinion; its called gut instinct.

[Minsk]

But there isn't any explanation there. It looks like a circular argument, along the lines of "I think that this will happen because it's what I think will happen". Or at least that's how it reads to me. If Adkins or anyone else on the coaching staff had been quoted as saying that they expect some easy games this season, or if Adkins had been guilty of underestimating opponents last season, then you'd have a point. But they haven't, at least not to my knowledge.

 

 

Exactly! He asks for reasoned debate and noy just sh!t slinging yet when asked to explain why he believes something he just says that he believes it in a different way. No debating; no reasoned arguements; and then results to throwing insults himself when pulled on it!

 

P.S. Apologies for spelling your name wrong earlier.

[Dig Dig]

This is getting a bit much, isn't it? Lard thinks that way, he shouldn't have to necessarily justify it in massive depth.

 

I think Saints will finish around 10th this season; playoffs maybe if we sign a defender and a centre forward. Do I have to justify why I think that? Do I have to give a list of all of our fixtures, and how we'll perform in each one? Do I have to make predictions for how the rest of the league will do, in order to justify how I came to my conclusion of where we'll finish?

 

Lard is entitled to his opinions. You (and I) are entitled to disagree with them. And sometimes there are no clear facts to

underpin an opinion; its called gut instinct.

 

Yes but you can't keep an agenda running for as long as he has without eventually having to back up your argument. His whole opinion on adkins and saints in general is based on nothing more than assumptions and he can't handle it when people point out some of the obvious flaws in his arguments. We're not just talking about this thread, it's his constant need to have a dig at any given opportunity which is confounded by his inability to debate which is ironically what he's always accusing others of. I think he just likes the attention and knows exactly what sort of response he'll get.

[Minsk]

This is getting a bit much, isn't it? Lard thinks that way, he shouldn't have to necessarily justify it in massive depth.

 

I think Saints will finish around 10th this season; playoffs maybe if we sign a defender and a centre forward. Do I have to justify why I think that? Do I have to give a list of all of our fixtures, and how we'll perform in each one? Do I have to make predictions for how the rest of the league will do, in order to justify how I came to my conclusion of where we'll finish?

 

Lard is entitled to his opinions. You (and I) are entitled to disagree with them. And sometimes there are no clear facts to underpin an opinion; its called gut instinct.

 

Of course he is entitled to his opinion, as everyone is.

 

However, he created this thread and asked for debate which is all Fowllyd and I have been trying to do. Unfortunately it would appear Saint Lard is unable to do so amd it is he who has reverted to name calling, not us. Which reminds me.........................................

[Minsk]

Someone expresses an opinion to someone elses question,or a supposed fact......on a forum...how dare they.

I am offering an opinion to reinforce what i believe in,is that not how it works?.

Post what you want,perhaps i should just ignore your opinions as you do me.So save you energy.ive said what i have to say on the subject without having to repeat myself onecemore,see post 94,have you?

Iv'e given all my reasons for what i believe.

Why don't you and Fowllyd just chat amongst yourselves.you can both discard what other people say together.

I will not enter into dialogue with you again,for i have opposing views,which clearly is not agreeable to you two.

Amazing how others have managed to post quite sensibly on the OP.

 

Who the **** are you too determine how i answer your next post.You are a nobody on a internet forum.

****ing tosser.

 

That could be my second infraction.c'mon mods do your stuff.

 

Of course we are each entitled to our own opinions, however just repeating these opinions with no reasoning or fact is not debating.

 

Of course eeven when in a debate, or an arguement, you can always tell you have the upperhand when the other person has to resort to insults and name calling.

As you have stated that you will not enter into dialog with me again, and have reverted to insults and name calling, I can confidently leave this thread now in full knowledge that I have out-debated you. Of course, this does mean that my opinion is more valid than yours - just that it is more likely to be the correct one.

 

I am a mas(ter) debator - well, same thing as a tosser isn't it?

 

Bye, bye Lardy.

Edited 4 August, 2011 by Minsk
;)

[Minsk]

Yes but you can't keep an agenda running for as long as he has without eventually having to back up your argument. His whole opinion on adkins and saints in general is based on nothing more than assumptions and he can't handle it when people point out some of the obvious flaws in his arguments. We're not just talking about this thread, it's his constant need to have a dig at any given opportunity which is confounded by his inability to debate which is ironically what he's always accusing others of. I think he just likes the attention and knows exactly what sort of response he'll get.

 

Nail. Head.

[Neil]

Complacency and underestimating our opposition could prove costly.

 

Complacency and underestimating the opposition will almost certainly prove costly, but who is doing that?

 

I've got apprehension ahead of the new season (I always have), but that's only from Saints' traditional bad starts. Other than that, I'm very excited.

 

The team/squad is easily good enough to survive and prosper in this division. De Ridder will make a good impact, I knew that after seeing him for about a minute in that friendly v West Brom!

[Minsk]

Would i rush out to buy Lambert,Guly,Hammond,Jaidi,Davis,Connolly,Richardson,Seabourne,Oxo,Forte,i could go on i suspect, and say look a promotion winning side,nope.But that is what we haveat our disposal.

Oxo,unproven in the league above,De ridder unproven in English football,Lallana only ever relegated from the Championship.

 

 

First half of first game and 2 excellent goals from 2 players you DON'T THINK ARE GOOD ENOUGH FOR THE CHAMPIONSHIP!

 

Oh, and one of those players is ripping the leeds defence apart.

 

[Mustapha Fag]

how did i know this would be refreshed back to the top lol

 

next will be the "its only one game" answers, still at least Saint Lard and friends can sleep well with a smile on the face tonight, for tomorrow the frown shall return

[Saint Without a Halo]

Saint 3 Leeds 1 not a bad start. 1st opening home win since 1988 against a team challenging last year, a win on TV and seventh in the league in a row.

 

Sitting second after the opening game! Looks good so far! (in fact we now have more points than we usually have by mid September.

[saint lard]

how did i know this would be refreshed back to the top lol

 

next will be the "its only one game" answers, still at least Saint Lard and friends can sleep well with a smile on the face tonight, for tomorrow the frown shall return

 

Unless i have missed something, it is only one game.

My apprehension has certainly been dispelled somewhat.

Long way to go,but long may it continue.

[Minsk]

Seven of the dirty dozen deemed not good enough for the Championship (by the OP) started and an eighth came on as sub.

 

All three goals were scored by members of the dirty dozen deemed not good enough to play in the Championship (by the OP) and what excellent goals they were.

 

It didn't seem to me that Adkins, or the coaching staff, or the players had underestimated the opposition.

 

Adkins made excellent tactical changes with use of his substitutions, and was not out-thought by a manager who led his team to 7th in the Championship last season.

 

(Just to remind people, the dirty dozen deemed not good enough to play in the Championship according to Saint Lard are: Lambert, Guly, Hammond, Jaidi, Davis, Connolly, Richardson, Seabourne, Forte, Chamberlain, Lallana and de Ridder.)

Edited 9 August, 2011 by Minsk

[Johnny Shearer]

I'm not apprensive about the season as I do think Saints will finish around mid-table (with maybe a late, late push).

 

However I have prepared myself for not winning as many games as we did last season. Now that is gonna hurt.

[Thedelldays]

apprently, the players dont play for adkins...do they lard..????

[Minsk]

Do i think the coaching staff will underestimate other sides,you bet ya.

 

 

 

In an interview prior to the Torquay match Adkins said:

 

'We know that it's going to be competitive, and what we've got to do is give them (Torquay) the utmost respect AS WE ALWAYS DO.............

 

........... we'll be expected to win the game, but as we always do at this football club, WE NEVER EVER UNDERESTIMATE THE OPPOSITION.'

 

Maybe Nige read this thread and wanted the truth made known?

Edited 9 August, 2011 by Minsk

[Minsk]

Unfortunatly, due to Wenger and £15m from Arsenal, we will never know if Saint Lard was right and whether Chamberlain is or isn't good enough for the Championship.

[SNSUN]

My heart thinks we're good enough to get promoted, my head thinks we'll be thankful for a play-off push.

 

The best time to review our chances would be on the first of September. Only then will we know our complete squad and indeed how we've fared over the first few games.

[CWD]

Saint Lard, you really pi5s me off. I mean, how hard is it to press the space bar after the comma key? Sort it out mate ffs

[saint lard]

Unfortunatly, due to Wenger and £15m from Arsenal, we will never know if Saint Lard was right and whether Chamberlain is or isn't good enough for the Championship.

 

You are correct we did not find out if he was going to be good enough for us this coming season.

 

Hence i asked the question at the time.He is/was untested in that league.

You answered the question in the statement you made above.

 

Wenger is mental to pay that amount..and for that i thank him.

[Verbal]

You are correct we did not find out if he was going to be good enough for us this coming season.

 

Hence i asked the question at the time.He is/was untested in that league.

You answered the question in the statement you made above.

 

Wenger is mental to pay that amount..and for that i thank him.

 

You mean you HOPE he's mental, otherwise you're going to look a bit of a dufus.

[Minsk]

You are correct we did not find out if he was going to be good enough for us this coming season.

 

Hence i asked the question at the time.He is/was untested in that league.

You answered the question in the statement you made above.

 

Wenger is mental to pay that amount..and for that i thank him.

 

Hey, I thought I was a f...ing tosser nonbody who you weren't going to enter into dialogue with anymore?

 

 

Anyway, at least we now only have the 11 (you have named) players who you feel aren't good enough to play in the Championship + £12m to buy players whom you (and the rest of us) are more confident of doing the business here.

[Minsk]

Well, 3 league games in and 3 wins, with 9 goals for and 3 against; plus a nice healthy 4-1 cup win to boot (but let's concentrate on the league matches):

 

7 players from the 12 deemed not good enough for this division by Lardy have started all 3 matches (Davis, Richardson, Hammond, Guly, Connolly, Lallana and Lambert) whilst another (Seaborne) has started the last 2 and another (de Ridder) has come on as a sub in all of them.

 

One of those players not good enough for this division (Connolly) has scored in every league match so far this season; the only player in this division to have done so.

Another two (Lambert and Lallana) bagged a brace apiece away to Ipswich tonight. Ipswich, one of the better teams in this division with ONE OF THE MOST EXPERIENCED MANAGERS! And none of those goals were penalties or free kicks.

 

Oh, lets go back to that manager thing shall we?

 

By Lardy's reckoning. Ipswich should have ripped us apart as Jewell is much more experienced than Adkins. Jewell has got a team promoted to the Prem and kept them there. Surely this should have been a classic example to prove Lard right in that Adkins would be exposed as inexperienced and outclassed in the managerial stakes.

 

Maybe Jewell thought the same and it was HE whu underestimated Adkins? Especially from the kick-off! But even when Jewell did make changes and Ipswich started to get back into it, Adkins stood up to the plate and made the exact changes needed to put our authority back on the match and see the game out.

 

So, Lardy, care to explain to us yet why you think Adkins and his staff will underestimate the opposition? Or why those 12, sorry now 11 as we got £12m for one of them, players are not good enough for the championship?

[Saint_Ash]

Weird, how Lardy isn't around saying much after the great result, sticks in the throat probably.

[St Lej]

Weird, how Lardy isn't around saying much after the great result, sticks in the throat probably.

 

I think lardy has proved once and for all that he has no idea what he's talking about. His stubborn refusal to appreciate he was wrong, and adkins is a top manager, is frankly making himself look like a fool. I would guess that when Adkins was appointed, lardy had never heard of him...and deemed this not good enough for SFC.

He is the sort of clueless fan who would have preferred a loose cannon with like Keegan at the helm just because he is a household name in football, regardless of his suitability to do the job. Embarassing really

[Minty]

At the end of the day, lard, like all of us, is a Saints fan, and is no doubt very happy with our start. The only thing to be achieved by baiting him with this thread is more bad feeling. We're playing some of the best football many of us have ever seen, so why seek out argument and disagreement? We've all been wrong before, none of us are perfect so lets have a bit of humility eh?

[doddisalegend]

I think lardy has proved once and for all that he has no idea what he's talking about. His stubborn refusal to appreciate he was wrong, and adkins is a top manager, is frankly making himself look like a fool. I would guess that when Adkins was appointed, lardy had never heard of him...and deemed this not good enough for SFC.

He is the sort of clueless fan who would have preferred a loose cannon with like Keegan at the helm just because he is a household name in football, regardless of his suitability to do the job. Embarassing really

 

The problem with crowing is it usual comes back to bite you the arse. He had an opinion at this moment in time he's been proved wrong. I wonder if the wheels came off and we went on a 10 game losing streak if Lard would have more class than to drag this thread up to take the ****......

[doddisalegend]

At the end of the day, lard, like all of us, is a Saints fan, and is no doubt very happy with our start. The only thing to be achieved by baiting him with this thread is more bad feeling. We're playing some of the best football many of us have ever seen, so why seek out argument and disagreement? We've all been wrong before, none of us are perfect so lets have a bit of humility eh?

 

Wise words this place would be a lot better if more posters had this opinion.

[The Kraken]

St. Lard is in 10th place in the SWF predictions league. He has (correctly) predicted Saints to win for each of the last 4 games. Make of that what this will.

 

In any case, this baiting is childish and needless.

[hutch]

This place has enough opinions already. Don't go encouraging posters to have more of them.

[The9]

Wise words this place would be a lot better if more posters had this opinion.

 

Minty doesn't have opinions.

 

HTH.

[Minty]

Minty doesn't have opinions.

 

HTH.

 

Au contraire, here's one:

 

You're a ****.

 

[The9]

Au contraire, here's one:

 

You're a ****.

 

 

Aw, thanks.

[Dibden Purlieu Saint]

Au contraire, here's one:

 

You're a ****.

 

 

Think you're confusing opinion and fact there Minty.

[Minty]

Think you're confusing opinion and fact there Minty.

 

That just brings me into line with 90% of posters on here then...!

[Dibden Purlieu Saint]

That just brings me into line with 90% of posters on here then...!

 

BADUM TSSSCHHH!!!

 

He's here all week folks. Try the Veal.

[Minty]

Oh come on, if I hadn't, someone else would've...

[notnowcato]

At the end of the day, lard, like all of us, is a Saints fan, and is no doubt very happy with our start. The only thing to be achieved by baiting him with this thread is more bad feeling. We're playing some of the best football many of us have ever seen, so why seek out argument and disagreement? We've all been wrong before, none of us are perfect so lets have a bit of humility eh?

 

F**k off.

 

 

 

 

 

 

*smiley winkey thingy*

[washsaint]

It's still early days but the start is certainly very encouraging and it appears NA is keeping everyone grounded and is not getting carried away with such a great start to the season,

 

The points scoring and *****iness on this site continues to be a pain in the arse - wish there more posters like Minty.....

[saint lard]

Weird, how Lardy isn't around saying much after the great result, sticks in the throat probably.

 

I think lardy has proved once and for all that he has no idea what he's talking about. His stubborn refusal to appreciate he was wrong, and adkins is a top manager, is frankly making himself look like a fool. I would guess that when Adkins was appointed, lardy had never heard of him...and deemed this not good enough for SFC.

He is the sort of clueless fan who would have preferred a loose cannon with like Keegan at the helm just because he is a household name in football, regardless of his suitability to do the job. Embarassing really

 

And here is the reason i no longer pay the fiver,couple that with an attrocious 'product' on a matchday.

 

I have been unable to post due to the 3 post rule in 24hrs,but of course that would not dawn on either of you,or others,even though it clearly states registered user.

Well aren't the billy big balls out display when there is an opportunity to points score,lol.Quelle surprise.

I strongly suspect this thread would have consigned to the realms of obscurity if our start had not been so bright.Again,quelle surprise.

 

Well, now that all the people who obviously have extra sensory perception could please now give me the lottery numbers.

I wish i had been so certain of such a cracking start,but then when this thread started a ball had not been kicked in anger.

Damn me for having a cause for slight apprehension,thankfully that has been completely dispelled by the fact we are on a world beating 'unbeaten in the league for 3 games' run.

Bloody good start by adkins and all concerned at SFC,long may it continue,especially as i am doing rather well in the prediction league,strange that eh......might as well give me the trophy now...seasons over obviously.

 

Really great start to the campaign,we have the winning habit and hopefully that can be maintained,will be interesting to see how we react after a defeat.....but who knows when that will happen?

Keep it up Nigel,looking good early doors,well done.

 

And to those who claim i have not poured enough adulation on NA,i have done so on other sites,as some can vouch,the sites that are free and the server can cope.

You might find a little sarcasm in my post,i make no apologies.

Well that is another post used up.

Carry on ladies,I enjoy the attempts at point scoring,but the only points i care about are the ones acumillated on the pitch.

[The Kraken]

Bloody good start by adkins and all concerned at SFC,long may it continue,especially as i am doing rather well in the prediction league,strange that eh......might as well give me the trophy now...seasons over obviously.

 

Let's not get carried away; as I mentioned a few posts above, you're only in tenth place for now......