Jump to content

Nicky Maynard will sign


shane d

Recommended Posts

One thing everyone is missing. We made an offer which was accepted. It was Maynard who could not come to an agreement with Saints. Why would we make an improved offer to his club!!!

 

Total cows

 

In fairness, I think that was Billy Sharp.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Think you're getting mixed up with Billy Sharp aren't you?

 

Nicky Maynard has said numerous times this season that he won't be moving, and the City board have said they wouldn't sell for under £5m. I would say it is highly unlikely.

 

In other news I have heard we are looking at Jelle Vossen from Genk for £3.4m.

 

Interesting. A quick search on Google says Villa & Everton were monitoring him last September & Fiorentina were sniffing around in April. Genuinely would be a coup to get this one, if there's some truth in the rumour, and he'd have a new Belgian pal at the club for company already!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Think you're getting mixed up with Billy Sharp aren't you?

 

Nicky Maynard has said numerous times this season that he won't be moving, and the City board have said they wouldn't sell for under £5m. I would say it is highly unlikely.

 

In other news I have heard we are looking at Jelle Vossen from Genk for £3.4m.

 

 

Vossen is a pretty handy striker by Belgian standards but what that means in the real world who knows.

3.4 million seems a lot for him, euros maybe making a round 3 million in GBP.

 

I really really can't understand why we are running after strikers with serious price tags when we already have 3 front men plus Doble plus Guly.Surely it must mean that at least one of RL,LB or DC just isn't in Nigel's plans.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

with all these rumours . how many players do we actually need for the squad 50?

oh shane d your lost all credibility with me with this comment "come back on tomorrow when mummy puts credit back on your phone"

 

rather childish comment to make

 

I gues you must have heard someone talking about the football rumours site.. PS Saints do not discuss transfer fees so your 1.4 milliaon for the tunisian is wrong. If you had said signed for an undisclosed fee then you would have had more credence

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Vossen is a pretty handy striker by Belgian standards but what that means in the real world who knows.

3.4 million seems a lot for him, euros maybe making a round 3 million in GBP.

 

I really really can't understand why we are running after strikers with serious price tags when we already have 3 front men plus Doble plus Guly.Surely it must mean that at least one of RL,LB or DC just isn't in Nigel's plans.

 

They have all signed new contracts this summer !

Link to comment
Share on other sites

with all these rumours . how many players do we actually need for the squad 50?

oh shane d your lost all credibility with me with this comment "come back on tomorrow when mummy puts credit back on your phone"

 

rather childish comment to make

 

I gues you must have heard someone talking about the football rumours site.. PS Saints do not discuss transfer fees so your 1.4 milliaon for the tunisian is wrong. If you had said signed for an undisclosed fee then you would have had more credence

 

 

Anyway 1.4 million won't be anywhere near enough to make YBs part with Ammar,even if he is dicking them around, they paid his Tunisian club more than that.

2.5 million minimum methinks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I love that noone is dismissing this as the fee is 4.5m , its brilliant that we are so happy in our finances , who was the last player we bought for as much as that ?? Think even out 'break the bank' striked Delgado was only 3m ish

 

And I too thought registered users couldn't start threads

 

Oh , and I won't be drinking Guinness around St Marys, for fear the head is jizz

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I love that noone is dismissing this as the fee is 4.5m , its brilliant that we are so happy in our finances , who was the last player we bought for as much as that ??

 

Adkins confirmed publicly the club bid £3.2m for Billy Sharp earlier in the transfer window. Not unreasonable to think they could make a £4.5m bid for another striker. Very unlikely Bristol City would accept such a bid though though, considering they have reportedly already turned down a larger off than that this summer from Leicester City.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Maynard has been omited from Bristol Citys squad for tonights game against Forest green.

 

It is a Bristol City XI team. A number of their senior players are missing, David James for example isn't in goal and an academy player is playing.

Edited by Matthew Le God
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Anyway 1.4 million won't be anywhere near enough to make YBs part with Ammar,even if he is dicking them around, they paid his Tunisian club more than that.

2.5 million minimum methinks.

 

Really?

 

A quick internet search suggests Young Boys either signed him on a free or paid £880k. You're not posting guesses as facts again are you?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Exactly. I really don't understand why people get so precious about this. This isn't the OS, where only factual information gets posted. Its a message board for passing on rumour and conjecture, no matter how believable or otherwise.

 

I think I'm intelligent enough to take everything at face value until it's confirmed without having the Saints Web white knights ride to my rescue and point out the flaming obvious.

 

But clearly not intelligent enough to spend your life trawling other football boards and rumour sites so you can pompously diss any re-posted rumour. There seems to be quite a few people sarcastically dismissing rumour who actually spend most of their time reading rumour boards... Hypocricy I think the word is.

 

Or is it that they really mean "I read it somewhere else before you, nah nah".

Edited by hughieslastminutegoal
Link to comment
Share on other sites

What a boring individual you really are.

 

What is boring about that? This is a forum - for discussion, someone said he had been omitted from the Bristol City squad for a friendly. I said that so had a lot of their first choice team and that it was a Bristol City XI team.

 

If I had not said that, this thread may have gone off on a tangent of believing that statement to be significant, when it is not.

 

I think it is far more boring to tell me that I'm being boring, when I'm actually staying on topic with relevant information.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What is boring about that? This is a forum - for discussion, someone said he had been omitted from the Bristol City squad for a friendly. I said that so had a lot of their first choice team and that it was a Bristol City XI team.

 

If I had not said that, this thread may have gone off on a tangent of believing that statement to be significant, when it is not.

 

I think it is far more boring to tell me that I'm being boring, when I'm actually staying on topic with relevant information.

 

What would be even more boring would be to call you boring for calling someone else boring for calling you boring.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

didnt realise I was banned?
i think they saw your performances in the Forum matches and thought you should be banned from football altogether.........I'm still awaiting for the FA ban to come through for being sent off LOl
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...