dubai_phil Posted 9 July, 2011 Share Posted 9 July, 2011 The contagion spreads still further. Besides the Jobs at NOWT, BSB share price has dropped by almost 1 billion - that affects a great many people as their Pensions (oops lol what pansions) may have some shares in them http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/phone-hacking/8627025/James-Murdoch-could-face-prosecution-over-his-role-in-phone-hacking-scandal.html James Murdoch may have actually (unwittingly) admitted to breaking the law and could face arrest Now the US media is starting to wake up and Wall Street start to worry about AGM's Succession Plans and even relationships with Banks James Murdoch, the chairman of News International, could be prosecuted over the telephone hacking scandal, a former home secretary said yesterday. Brett Pulley, media correspondent for the Bloomberg news agency in New York, said: “If the fall out were to continue, my goodness, if it were to impact James, then we start to talk about it impacting News Corp’s succession plan, so that affects the company globally.” Paul Farhi, media correspondent for The Washington Post, added: “There’s a whole domino effect. What else falls apart? Do bankers get nervous? “He [Rupert Murdoch] had one flirtation with bankruptcy in the early 90s. He’s very dependent on the goodwill of Wall Street and of bankers. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
the stain Posted 9 July, 2011 Share Posted 9 July, 2011 (edited) I've seen this McMullen fella being interviews plenty over the past few days and he really isn't helping the NOTW at all. He reminds me of when Spitting Image used to charicature tabloid hacks as pigs. Coogan has it bang on. Edited 9 July, 2011 by the stain Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dubai_phil Posted 9 July, 2011 Share Posted 9 July, 2011 Ooh I spot a snippet of Irony in all this.... Conrad Black Jailed by the Yanks caused a stir in the UK for something we didn't quite understand... http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1393008/Conrad-Black-facing-jail-Americas-highest-court-throws-appeal.html Now we could get our own back and Jail one and who knows, maybe two Murdochs Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Cat Posted 9 July, 2011 Share Posted 9 July, 2011 dune has been strangely quiet on this subject so far considering he normally seems to relish any sort of debate concerning his beloved Dave. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dubai_phil Posted 9 July, 2011 Share Posted 9 July, 2011 I've seen this McMullen fella being interviews plenty over the past few days and he really isn't helping the NOTW at all. He reminds me of when Spitting Image used to charicature tabloid hacks as pigs. Coogan has it bang on. Unbelievable how somebody can still try and justify this. They simple didn't get it. How can he trot out the "Stopping a Hitler" line as a defence for hacking the phones of Dead Soldiers. Not often I say this about someone, but McCullen truly does deserve to Rot in Hell Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pedg Posted 9 July, 2011 Share Posted 9 July, 2011 Unbelievable how somebody can still try and justify this. They simple didn't get it. How can he trot out the "Stopping a Hitler" line as a defence for hacking the phones of Dead Soldiers. Not often I say this about someone, but McCullen truly does deserve to Rot in Hell There are various hacks commenting that he is not representative of the 'modern' NOTW but they don't appear to be in a hurry to put forward a replacement. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jonnyboy Posted 9 July, 2011 Share Posted 9 July, 2011 Yep, what a surprise, another of Murdoch's cronies bleating. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jonnyboy Posted 9 July, 2011 Share Posted 9 July, 2011 Yep, what a surprise, another of Murdoch's cronies bleating. That Times editor I mean Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Verbal Posted 9 July, 2011 Share Posted 9 July, 2011 I've seen this McMullen fella being interviews plenty over the past few days and he really isn't helping the NOTW at all. He reminds me of when Spitting Image used to charicature tabloid hacks as pigs. Coogan has it bang on. McMullen is almost as much a caricature of a tabloid journo as Danny DeVito in LA Confidential. But it's the earlier YouTube interview you posted which I find the most repugnant, with Roger Alton, a senior executive at The Times. Sneering at mumsnet and anyone else who called for an advertising boycott, and accusing them of destroying a newspaper is stupid, reprehensible, and evidence of precisely the kind of siege mentality and superiority complex within New International that caused this mess in the first place. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
um pahars Posted 9 July, 2011 Share Posted 9 July, 2011 I've seen this McMullen fella being interviews plenty over the past few days and he really isn't helping the NOTW at all. He reminds me of when Spitting Image used to charicature tabloid hacks as pigs. Coogan has it bang on. For all of Coogan's honourable and reasoned words, I have to say that I think Will Self was more on the button. His reference to Wilde's "England being the native land of the hypocrite" and the "ubiquitous appettite for what the gutter press have peddled" had more resonance with me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OldNick Posted 9 July, 2011 Share Posted 9 July, 2011 Cameron was foolish keeping Coulson on, but I dont think any of the past Pm's have anything to be proud about on this subject. He admits that the politicians were too kenn to get RM's vote to get the nations ones. Bad judgement has been rife at the top since 1997 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Saint in Paradise Posted 9 July, 2011 Share Posted 9 July, 2011 OldNick did you really mean 1997 or was that a typo when you really meant 1979? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
um pahars Posted 9 July, 2011 Share Posted 9 July, 2011 Cameron was foolish keeping Coulson on, but I dont think any of the past Pm's have anything to be proud about on this subject. He admits that the politicians were too kenn to get RM's vote to get the nations ones. Bad judgement has been rife at the top since 1997 I think your tense is wrong on two fronts. Firstly it wasn't that he was foolish keeping him on, he was foolish in appointing him the first place (the amount to which Cameron was warned and ignored this advice will be the next big story and there are already differing recollections of this). Secondly, Murdoch's interference went way back before 1997 (e.g. It's the Sun Wot Won It was early 90's). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NickG Posted 9 July, 2011 Share Posted 9 July, 2011 I've seen this McMullen fella being interviews plenty over the past few days and he really isn't helping the NOTW at all. He reminds me of when Spitting Image used to charicature tabloid hacks as pigs. Coogan has it bang on. thanks - interesting but uncomfortable viewing Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OldNick Posted 9 July, 2011 Share Posted 9 July, 2011 I think your tense is wrong on two fronts. Firstly it wasn't that he was foolish keeping him on, he was foolish in appointing him the first place (the amount to which Cameron was warned and ignored this advice will be the next big story and there are already differing recollections of this). Secondly, Murdoch's interference went way back before 1997 (e.g. It's the Sun Wot Won It was early 90's). you are right he was wrong appointing him in the first place. As for the date I dont go with that quite so much. Under Thatcher ,it was the early days of people recognising the Suns power. Yes there were ties but unlike under the leadership of Blair etc, as soon as a transgression was made the person was out. Much to the political cost to the Tories. Parkinson a top Allie to MT, was sacked due to an affair with his secretary, that is nothing to what went on in the later governments and would hardly make the papers now. Mandelson and co were IMO reinstated and defended for much worse. The political spin at the time was supported by Blairs friendship with the Sun etc. Iam not saying the Tories from 79 did not cosy up to the Murdochs but it was not the first priority, as in later days, as with the Suns support you were elected. Too much power and influence was wielded by Murdoch and I for 1 was never comfortable with that. Phil was right when he says looking in from abroad we do look a very corrupt nation, a very sad indictment of the new Britain. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Verbal Posted 9 July, 2011 Share Posted 9 July, 2011 Under Thatcher ,it was the early days of people recognising the Suns power. Yes there were ties but unlike under the leadership of Blair etc, as soon as a transgression was made the person was out. Much to the political cost to the Tories. Parkinson a top Allie to MT, was sacked due to an affair with his secretary, that is nothing to what went on in the later governments and would hardly make the papers now. Mandelson and co were IMO reinstated and defended for much worse. The political spin at the time was supported by Blairs friendship with the Sun etc. Iam not saying the Tories from 79 did not cosy up to the Murdochs but it was not the first priority, as in later days, as with the Suns support you were elected. Too much power and influence was wielded by Murdoch and I for 1 was never comfortable with that. Phil was right when he says looking in from abroad we do look a very corrupt nation, a very sad indictment of the new Britain. Disagree Nick. The whole cosy-ing up between politicians and the Murdoch press began with the close relationship between Margaret Thatcher and the then Sun editor Kelvin MacKenzie. Here's an excruciating taste of the mutual smarm: http://www.margaretthatcher.org/document/107430 This relationship certainly WAS one that was incredibly important to Thatcher, who face electoral annihilation after her first term, but for the Falklands War. The Murdoch press (famously with the Sun and its 'Gotcha' headline) was doing everything to buttress Thatcher's electoral support that it could, and both parties, Thatcher and the Murdoch press, saw themselves as in some kind of mutually dependent relationship. This went even further in 1992, when the truly hopeless John Major faced a (admittedly over-confident) Neil Kinnock and a resurgent Labour Party. Much to everyone's surprise - including Major - the Tories won, and with a working majority (somewhat better than the last election!). The Sun couldn't be more explicit in its belief that its relentless campaigning for Major and against Kinnock was what single-handedly turned the electoral result. The paper trumpeted its owner's electoral interference with the famous headline on 12 april 1992: 'It's The Sun Wot Won It.' From that awful moment in particular, the power of the Murdoch press was not only courted by politicians but actively feared. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
the stain Posted 9 July, 2011 Share Posted 9 July, 2011 In some ways I'm a bit gutted about the NOTW folding. I was only 2 tokens away from getting my exclusive Pippa Middleton's arse commemorative mug. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bridge too far Posted 9 July, 2011 Author Share Posted 9 July, 2011 In some ways I'm a bit gutted about the NOTW folding. I was only 2 tokens away from getting my exclusive Pippa Middleton's arse commemorative mug. This might satisfy your lust ) http://www.viz.co.uk/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
benjii Posted 9 July, 2011 Share Posted 9 July, 2011 I've seen this McMullen fella being interviews plenty over the past few days and he really isn't helping the NOTW at all. He reminds me of when Spitting Image used to charicature tabloid hacks as pigs. Coogan has it bang on. Reminded me of this: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
the stain Posted 9 July, 2011 Share Posted 9 July, 2011 http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/NEWS-WORLD-pre-order-last-issue-/230644311303?_trksid=p4340.m8&_trkparms=algo%3DMW%26its%3DC%26itu%3DUCC%26otn%3D6%26ps%3D63%26clkid%3D1218905732663364311 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
the stain Posted 9 July, 2011 Share Posted 9 July, 2011 Tomorrow's front page: http://ow.ly/i/e6QP Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pedg Posted 9 July, 2011 Share Posted 9 July, 2011 Interesting stuff on the telegraph site tonight. Yates of the yard admits he looks a prat. Rebekah Brooks warned she will be questioned under caution within the next few days. MP Tom Watson wants Brooks, and Murdoch junior and senior to appear in front of the relevant MP committee. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
solentstars Posted 9 July, 2011 Share Posted 9 July, 2011 Disagree Nick. The whole cosy-ing up between politicians and the Murdoch press began with the close relationship between Margaret Thatcher and the then Sun editor Kelvin MacKenzie. Here's an excruciating taste of the mutual smarm: http://www.margaretthatcher.org/document/107430 This relationship certainly WAS one that was incredibly important to Thatcher, who face electoral annihilation after her first term, but for the Falklands War. The Murdoch press (famously with the Sun and its 'Gotcha' headline) was doing everything to buttress Thatcher's electoral support that it could, and both parties, Thatcher and the Murdoch press, saw themselves as in some kind of mutually dependent relationship. This went even further in 1992, when the truly hopeless John Major faced a (admittedly over-confident) Neil Kinnock and a resurgent Labour Party. Much to everyone's surprise - including Major - the Tories won, and with a working majority (somewhat better than the last election!). The Sun couldn't be more explicit in its belief that its relentless campaigning for Major and against Kinnock was what single-handedly turned the electoral result. The paper trumpeted its owner's electoral interference with the famous headline on 12 april 1992: 'It's The Sun Wot Won It.' From that awful moment in particular, the power of the Murdoch press was not only courted by politicians but actively feared. thats how i remember it from that dark period of that evil women and the corruption of our society by her big business elite friends began and carried on with the likes of blair.thank god cameron is takeing the torys back to the one nation party they once were. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dubai_phil Posted 9 July, 2011 Share Posted 9 July, 2011 Interesting stuff on the telegraph site tonight. Yates of the yard admits he looks a prat. Rebekah Brooks warned she will be questioned under caution within the next few days. MP Tom Watson wants Brooks, and Murdoch junior and senior to appear in front of the relevant MP committee. Yeah, but he still has a job.... and a small line in the same saying that Blair tried to shut Tom Watson up.... Careful of the stone throwing peeps http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/phone-hacking/8628052/John-Yates-I-failed-victims-of-News-of-the-World-phone-hacking.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dubai_phil Posted 9 July, 2011 Share Posted 9 July, 2011 http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/phone-hacking/8628127/Phone-hacking-Swagger-that-sowed-the-seeds-of-destruction.html Ouch. More detail, more names. More innuenods about what Brooks knew back in "Those Days" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pedg Posted 9 July, 2011 Share Posted 9 July, 2011 http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/phone-hacking/8628127/Phone-hacking-Swagger-that-sowed-the-seeds-of-destruction.html Ouch. More detail, more names. More innuenods about what Brooks knew back in "Those Days" The sooner sideshow bek is arrested the better. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dubai_phil Posted 10 July, 2011 Share Posted 10 July, 2011 http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/phone-hacking/8628134/Phone-hacking-So-much-that-remains-unanswered.html Ouch again, the story from a lawyer involved. The Police again come out of that article VERY badly Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pedg Posted 10 July, 2011 Share Posted 10 July, 2011 Oh more fun. I appears an internal NI report in 2007 that found evidence of widespread phone hacking and police corruption was suppressed (full story on the sunday times website apparently, don't pay so don't have full details). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dune Posted 10 July, 2011 Share Posted 10 July, 2011 Oh more fun. I appears an internal NI report in 2007 that found evidence of widespread phone hacking and police corruption was suppressed (full story on the sunday times website apparently, don't pay so don't have full details). Make no mistake the NOWT was shutdown becase what has been revealed so far is just the tip of the iceberg. Expect senior politicians and even intelligence services to have been hacked. As the yanks say "we ain't seen nothing yet"... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bridge too far Posted 10 July, 2011 Author Share Posted 10 July, 2011 Make no mistake the NOWT was shutdown becase what has been revealed so far is just the tip of the iceberg. Expect senior politicians and even intelligence services to have been hacked. As the yanks say "we ain't seen nothing yet"... For once, I find myself agreeing with you (maybe I am getting old). Not only do I also think that a lot more hacking will be uncovered, I also think that senior politicians of all parties and senior police officers will also be exposed because Murdoch has some sort of hold over them. Maybe, then, Murdoch's true agenda will also be revealed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dune Posted 10 July, 2011 Share Posted 10 July, 2011 (edited) For once, I find myself agreeing with you (maybe I am getting old). Not only do I also think that a lot more hacking will be uncovered, I also think that senior politicians of all parties and senior police officers will also be exposed because Murdoch has some sort of hold over them. Maybe, then, Murdoch's true agenda will also be revealed. Correct. Is Murdoch a freemason (i'd be shocked if he wasn't seriously high up)? I sniff a New World Order conspiracy here. Edited 10 July, 2011 by dune Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dune Posted 10 July, 2011 Share Posted 10 July, 2011 MASONIC MET COPS HAVE BEEN PROTECTING RUPERT MURDOCH'S HACKERS ARSES Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Verbal Posted 10 July, 2011 Share Posted 10 July, 2011 For once, I find myself agreeing with you. I bet you regret saying that now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bridge too far Posted 10 July, 2011 Author Share Posted 10 July, 2011 I bet you regret saying that now. It'll come back to bite me on the bum, I'm sure. But it has to be read in context and not be construed as a change of direction Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Verbal Posted 10 July, 2011 Share Posted 10 July, 2011 MASONIC MET COPS HAVE BEEN PROTECTING RUPERT MURDOCH'S HACKERS ARSES Okay dune, point out exactly where the reference to Masons pops up in that report. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dune Posted 10 July, 2011 Share Posted 10 July, 2011 Okay dune, point out exactly where the reference to Masons pops up in that report. It's food for thought. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pedg Posted 10 July, 2011 Share Posted 10 July, 2011 Don't usually look at the mail website (usual sudden need to wash hands afterwards) but it does have some interesting articles today: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2013046/Rebekah-Brooks-Sun-News-World-run-fictional-stories-insider-claims.html http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2013027/News-World-Tony-Blair-tried-hush-phone-hacking-scandal.html http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2013055/News-World-Andy-Hayman-criticised-acting-stop-News-World-tracks-earlier.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Verbal Posted 10 July, 2011 Share Posted 10 July, 2011 It's food for thought. No, it's not. It's evidence of a paranoid mind. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jonnyboy Posted 10 July, 2011 Share Posted 10 July, 2011 Masons are all about money, that's exactly what the whole things about. A reporter on the radio was saying tips that lead to the biggest scoops can get paid hundreds of thousands of pounds. That's a fair wedge to share around and the cops wouldve made sure they'd get a big slice of that. Reading Jemima Khan's interview in the i newspaper, she amusedly points out that George Osbourne has been hacked and he was the same person who persuaded Cameron to hire Coulson. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Dark Sotonic Mills Posted 10 July, 2011 Share Posted 10 July, 2011 Masons are all about money, that's exactly what the whole things about. A reporter on the radio was saying tips that lead to the biggest scoops can get paid hundreds of thousands of pounds. That's a fair wedge to share around and the cops wouldve made sure they'd get a big slice of that. Reading Jemima Khan's interview in the i newspaper, she amusedly points out that George Osbourne has been hacked and he was the same person who persuaded Cameron to hire Coulson. That's the biggest load of crap I've read on here for many a year. Masonry has nothing to do with corrupt Police Officers accepting bribes or illegal payments. Greed is the basis for that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jonnyboy Posted 10 July, 2011 Share Posted 10 July, 2011 That's the biggest load of crap I've read on here for many a year. Masonry has nothing to do with corrupt Police Officers accepting bribes or illegal payments. Greed is the basis for that. So you are a mason then? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jonnyboy Posted 10 July, 2011 Share Posted 10 July, 2011 Thought so. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Dark Sotonic Mills Posted 10 July, 2011 Share Posted 10 July, 2011 So you are a mason then? Yes, Third Degree Craft. And the only money ever talked about in the Lodge is the money collected for Charity. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jonnyboy Posted 10 July, 2011 Share Posted 10 July, 2011 And there are no greedy masons? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Dark Sotonic Mills Posted 10 July, 2011 Share Posted 10 July, 2011 And there are no greedy masons? It's not something which would attract greedy people to be fair. There are altogether far too many requirements to give money or time to attract them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
View From The Top Posted 10 July, 2011 Share Posted 10 July, 2011 It's not something which would attract greedy people to be fair. There are altogether far too many requirements to give money or time to attract them. Yeah, right. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pedg Posted 10 July, 2011 Share Posted 10 July, 2011 She don't half manage to get people under her spell doesn't she.. http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/07/10/us-newscorp-murdoch-brooks-idUSTRE76925320110710 News Corp Chief Executive Rupert Murdoch exited his London home on Sunday with his arm around embattled newspaper chief Rebekah Brooks, and told Reuters that she was his first priority. Murdoch, who flew into Britain earlier on Sunday to deal with an escalating phone-hacking scandal at his News of the World tabloid that Brooks used to edit, answered: "This one," gesturing at Brooks, when asked what his first priority was. The two, both smiling, then went into the Stafford hotel opposite Murdoch's apartment in the upmarket Mayfair area of London. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hypochondriac Posted 10 July, 2011 Share Posted 10 July, 2011 Shady unwelcoming and dodgy people are the masons. That's my experience of the ones I have met I eastleigh Winchester an Southampton. Not people I have had any desire to associate myself with for extended periods. My father was invited to join many years ago and turn it down. Having attended the funeral of a mason last year where only masons were allowed in a room to mourn the death, I am glad he did. Elitism like that is very strange. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bridge too far Posted 10 July, 2011 Author Share Posted 10 July, 2011 Shady unwelcoming and dodgy people are the masons. That's my experience of the ones I have met I eastleigh Winchester an Southampton. Not people I have had any desire to associate myself with for extended periods. My father was invited to join many years ago and turn it down. Having attended the funeral of a mason last year where only masons were allowed in a room to mourn the death, I am glad he did. Elitism like that is very strange. My father also turned them down. He was uncomfortable with the idea of a secret society. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dune Posted 10 July, 2011 Share Posted 10 July, 2011 My grandad was a member of the Buffalo Club. From what I gather quite a few members of the armed forces were a few years ago. http://www.raobgle.org.uk/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now