Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I heard it got hit by a bit of burning paper which made it collapse in the style of a controlled demolition. Is that right?

Posted
What a load of b@ll@x, the building had half the World Trade Centre stuffed in the side of it, it's not exactly a surprise it collapsed.

 

Quite.

 

If you leave aside the technical details of why the building collapsed, and suppose that it was brought down as a result of the American government's making a deliberate decision to demolish it (along with the two towers), then you're left with a conspiracy so colossal that there is no way SOMEONE, among the many thousands who'd have had to be in on it, wouldn't have blurted out the 'truth'.

Posted

The world trade center dropped straight down it didn't cause the collapse of building 7. The owner of building 7 is an extremely wealthy man

with very powerful friends. It would only take a very small group of experts to demolish that building. Experts who would

know how to keep their mouths firmly shut.

 

 

 

 

.

Posted
The world trade center dropped straight down it didn't cause the collapse of building 7. The owner of building 7 is an extremely wealthy man with very powerful friends. It would only take a very small group of experts to demolish that building. Experts who would know how to keep their mouths firmly shut.

 

Rubbish.

 

1) Part of one of the towers fell into building 7, you can see this from numerous camera shots of the day.

 

2) It takes months to demolish a building of that size, huge amounts of the interior of the building would need to be removed to weaken it and provide room to insert the explosives along with hundreds of miles of wire which would be all over the building criss-crossing everywhere. People would notice it!

 

A building that has been gutted and wired for demolition looks like this after weeks of preperation...

 

columns-loaded-with-explosives.jpeg

 

I think people would notice when stood at the water cooler in the office, don't you think?

Posted
The world trade center dropped straight down it didn't cause the collapse of building 7. The owner of building 7 is an extremely wealthy man

with very powerful friends. It would only take a very small group of experts to demolish that building. Experts who would

know how to keep their mouths firmly shut.

.

 

Great theory but ignoring many facts.

 

To bring down a building that size the explosions would have shattered all the windows within half a mile.

 

Organising a controlled demolition with all the other crap going on and with a wrecked building on fire would be impossible.

Posted
The world trade center dropped straight down it didn't cause the collapse of building 7. The owner of building 7 is an extremely wealthy man

with very powerful friends. It would only take a very small group of experts to demolish that building. Experts who would

know how to keep their mouths firmly shut.

 

 

 

 

.

 

Experts from where exactly? American experts going home to their American wives and kids keeping their mouths firmly shut about the single most audacious and pointless genocide in american history. And perpetrated on their own people. Not one of these experts has even considered speaking out on this mass murder they committed in the decade following. Experts with their mouths firmly shut indeed....utterly ****ing delusional.

Posted
Experts from where exactly? American experts going home to their American wives and kids keeping their mouths firmly shut about the single most audacious and pointless genocide in american history. And perpetrated on their own people. Not one of these experts has even considered speaking out on this mass murder they committed in the decade following. Experts with their mouths firmly shut indeed....utterly ****ing delusional.

 

At last! A subject we agree on.

Posted
I can't believe the BBC broadcast this spurious, sensationalist nonsense.

 

Have you actually watched it? It is a program where the tone of it is largely to debunk the conspiracy theories.

Posted (edited)
I can't believe the BBC broadcast this spurious, sensationalist nonsense.

 

Indeed, I am only 30 minutes in, but thus far I would not say it has been promoting either side, just presenting the facts.

 

Edit: And it pretty much debunks it all.

Edited by Saintandy666
Posted

The only Conspiracy about 9/11 that I believe is the one involving the plane that the "passengers" crashed. I'm convinced that the US Govt blew it out of the sky to prevent it crashing into 3 mile island or wherever, and they then invented this passenger revolt story.

 

I base this theory on no fact whatsoever but I'm hoping the BBC will commission me to make a programme about it.

Posted
Have you actually watched it? It is a program where the tone of it is largely to debunk the conspiracy theories.

 

I watched the first half and it was very much playing devil's advocate, constantly asking "Is this a sign of an explosion within Tower 7 or just debris fallen from the South tower?", when it was obvious it was the latter. Perhaps I turned it off too soon, but it seemed like it was asking pretty pointless questions to me. My apologies.

Posted
The only Conspiracy about 9/11 that I believe is the one involving the plane that the "passengers" crashed. I'm convinced that the US Govt blew it out of the sky to prevent it crashing into 3 mile island or wherever, and they then invented this passenger revolt story.

 

I base this theory on no fact whatsoever but I'm hoping the BBC will commission me to make a programme about it.

 

Plausible. But the problem is, if you made a programme about it, loads of people would take it as gospel. Where's john nada these days?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...