Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
Alternatively, by saying we have agreed a fee with chelsea, it is showing our intent. Kind of masks diappointment of player not signing by showing that we are in for players! Its a web of intrigue

 

I think this is more likely. To me it indicates Cork isn't interested.

Posted
we had our bid accepted weeks ago, Chelsea said yes, but Cork no.

 

So if that is the case, why bother making it public? If it doesn't happy now and we don't get someone in at least as good, many people are going to be p*ssed off.

Posted
So if that is the case, why bother making it public? If it doesn't happy now and we don't get someone in at least as good, many people are going to be p*ssed off.

 

Well exactly, but we have fans that would moan either way. This is exactly why transfers should be kept silent until 100%, and i'm fairley confident this will happen as Cork has no where else to go and he's on record stating that he wants to get it sorted for pre-season.

Posted
So if that is the case, why bother making it public? If it doesn't happy now and we don't get someone in at least as good, many people are going to be p*ssed off.

 

I agree with Pat! I think they mentioned it to emphasise the kind of player we are bidding on! Got to face it, Corky is waiting on better options otherwise it would have been announced!

Posted
Well exactly, but we have fans that would moan either way. This is exactly why transfers should be kept silent until 100%, and i'm fairley confident this will happen as Cork has no where else to go and he's on record stating that he wants to get it sorted for pre-season.

 

Mark my words Clarkey. he will be off to leicester by the end of the day lol!! They have definitely nicked our transfer list!!!

Posted

On my OfficialSaints twitter link it's still on there, also on Sibley's. There are issues sometimes on twitter updates, but it's still there for me.

 

As has been mentioned, it would be extremely wierd for Saints to talk about it if it was dead in the water. Especially as they would have known for the last two weeks.

Posted
Where is this actually being reported? There's nothing on that Twitter link, and nothing on the OS

 

From Adkins, check out the interview on saints player.

Posted (edited)
Where is this actually being reported? There's nothing on that Twitter link, and nothing on the OS

 

It is on the OS and BBC Radio Solent's twitter, watch the video of the interview with Nigel Adkins on Saints Player.

 

Also mentioned here and in a number of other online papers...

 

http://www.independent.co.uk/sport/football/premier-league/no-arsenal-offer-for-alex-chamberlain-say-southampton-2305396.html

Edited by Matthew Le God
Posted

I had heard before the U21s that it was a done deal and he had bought a audi R8 with his £200k signing on fee, but as i have low post count thought id be ridiculed as a WUM

Posted
we had our bid accepted weeks ago, Chelsea said yes, but Cork no.

 

When is Martin from Norwich signing? Will he be living with O'Neill?

Posted (edited)

Adkins only said we had a bid accepted by Chelsea for Cork, he didn't say he was likely to sign.

If he was going to sign Adkins would have stayed silent.

In any case Jack Cork has openly admitted publicly he is interested only in West Hams offer.

It's been in all the press,and on all the relevant forums including on here.

Adkins was only trying use the Cork bid as an example of intent

Edited by patred44
Posted

In any case Jack Cork has openly admits publicly he interested only in West Hams offer. It's been in all the press.

 

Source for that? I don't recall him admitting publicly anything about West Ham anywhere in the press over the last few months.

Posted
in any case jack cork has openly admitted publicly he is interested only in west hams offer.

It's been in all the press,and on all the relevant forums including on here.

 

link?

Posted
Adkins only said we had a bid accepted by Chelsea for Cork, he didn't say he was likely to sign.

If he was going to sign Adkins would have stayed silent.

In any case Jack Cork has openly admitted publicly he is interested only in West Hams offer.

It's been in all the press,and on all the relevant forums including on here.

Adkins was only trying use the Cork bid as an example of intent

 

I have to say that I think you're probably right. I'd love Cork to sign but can't help thinking this is, as you say, a statement to show we're active and the type of player we're interested in. NC seems too cautious to allow a deal to be jeopardised by leaking it too the press. Only reason I can see for mentioning Cork is if he knows he definitely will sign......or he definitely won't Hope it's the former.

Posted

Jack Cork's agent would be hawking his client out to every club in England that might have him. They would all be aware of the situation, Adkins mentioning it today would make little difference.

Posted
why would it jeopardise it?

 

Confirms our interest and alerts other clubs to sort something out earlier? Could be a whole host of reasons - you're best off asking NC as he's the one operating that policy up till now.

Posted
Confirms our interest and alerts other clubs to sort something out earlier? Could be a whole host of reasons - you're best off asking NC as he's the one operating that policy up till now.

 

press reported our interest weeks ago

 

Cork's agent would be aware, and also aware if any other clubs likely and would share the info in best interests of his client

 

can't think of any reason??

 

will be polite but we haven't got a clue about any 'policy' NC has, likely to be get best players, who club can work with at price willing to play??

Posted
Adkins only said we had a bid accepted by Chelsea for Cork, he didn't say he was likely to sign.

If he was going to sign Adkins would have stayed silent.

In any case Jack Cork has openly admitted publicly he is interested only in West Hams offer.

It's been in all the press,and on all the relevant forums including on here.

Adkins was only trying use the Cork bid as an example of intent

 

one of many links two weeks ago

http://londonthenews.com/news/Sports/20110618/23311580/West-Ham-interested-in-Chelsea-midfielder-Cork.htm

 

" Cork is keen to move across London and join Sam Allardyce's new-look squad."

 

lol!!!

open and publically = uncredited comment by journo in West Ham's local paper

 

only interested in West Ham = keen to move across London.

 

 

Don't think you even convinced yourself!

Posted

well, he has NEVER let it be known he is keen on signing for us, despite our bid being on the table a week before.

Face it if he were interested in us he would not let be known publicly he was keen on another club, would he.

Posted
one of many links two weeks ago

http://londonthenews.com/news/Sports/20110618/23311580/West-Ham-interested-in-Chelsea-midfielder-Cork.htm

 

" Cork is keen to move across London and join Sam Allardyce's new-look squad."

 

That article does not prove what you claimed.

 

You said...

 

"In any case Jack Cork has openly admitted publicly he is interested only in West Hams offer. It's been in all the press,and on all the relevant forums including on here."

 

- That article is from the non-reliable source that is Tribal Football.

- Nor is it a number of sources as you claimed and "all in the press".

- Nor is it an actual quote from Cork publicly admitting anything. It is completely unsubstantiated.

Posted
press reported our interest weeks ago

 

Cork's agent would be aware, and also aware if any other clubs likely and would share the info in best interests of his client

 

can't think of any reason??

 

will be polite but we haven't got a clue about any 'policy' NC has, likely to be get best players, who club can work with at price willing to play??

 

Of course I don't have a clue really, none of us have, it's just my opinion that it's less likely Cork signs than him signing. I really hope I'm wrong. Bloody hell - you lot take this seriously don't you? It was just my take on it.

Posted
well, he has NEVER let it be known he is keen on signing for us, despite our bid being on the table a week before.

Face it if he were interested in us he would not let be known publicly he was keen on another club, would he.

 

he has never let it be known he doesn't, or that he wants to go elsewhere - as far as I can see,

Posted
Of course I don't have a clue really, none of us have, it's just my opinion that it's less likely Cork signs than him signing. I really hope I'm wrong. Bloody hell - you lot take this seriously don't you? It was just my take on it.

 

ffs take it seriously! This is a football forum!

 

you maybe right in that it maybe a statement of our intent and he may not sign, just don't think comments today will effect it

Posted

 

You are making this too easy now!

 

None of those links have direct quotes from the player as you originally suggested. They are just rehashes of the same article that are completely unsubstantiated and do not count as evidence of any real note.

Posted

Having been on duty with the U21s Cork has an additional week before reporting in for pre-season. The deal won't formally be anounced until he's back for the press jamboree.

 

 

 

 

IMO

Posted
ffs take it seriously! This is a football forum!

 

you maybe right in that it maybe a statement of our intent and he may not sign, just don't think comments today will effect it

 

Hmm maybe I need to work on taking it more seriously...... Anyway to be pedantic I never suggested the comments today would affect the chances of Cork signing. My opinion was that by releasing details of our interest it indicated that we probably knew he wouldn't sign. That is just my opinion though.....I've nothing to back that up.

Posted
Cork is definitely waiting for WHU to have a bid accepted, IMO

 

;)

 

he may well, or bids from other clubs - why not see all your options

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...