Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
Writing a long list of names is as meaningless as the original Twitter comment. Unless you have a list of which players (if any) have walked away from negotiations because their agent has the hump.

A perfectly valid point but I suspect that such a list does not exist i.e. one in which a player has walked away because their agent was p1ssed off

Posted
No I didn't. If a poster is going to make up lies then at least man up and post after they have been made to look foolish.

 

But you were the one that looked foolish.

Posted

Haven't read the thread, but I'm assuming it went along the lines of GOOD agents won't deal with us, but BAD agents don't want to put the work in and ignore us. Sounds like we are doing a good job to me!!

Posted
It must be sh*te, it's something negative about the club. Has to be rubbish. I wider if your reaction would have been the same had it been a nice positive tweet?

 

Take heart from this one hypo

 

All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident."

- Arthur Schopenhauer (1788-1860)

Posted

There's been very little mention so far of the fact that there's a very high chance this tweet is referring to dealings the other way around than people are assuming.

 

Clubs have apparently been coming in for Chamberlain, Cortese said that he was just putting the offers in the bin. Therefore we are tricky to deal with, as he won't enter into negotiations about players that we have under contract. It certainly makes more sense than the other way around.

Posted
There's been very little mention so far of the fact that there's a very high chance this tweet is referring to dealings the other way around than people are assuming.

 

Clubs have apparently been coming in for Chamberlain, Cortese said that he was just putting the offers in the bin. Therefore we are tricky to deal with, as he won't enter into negotiations about players that we have under contract. It certainly makes more sense than the other way around.

haha....good point and completely missed by everyone

Posted
There's been very little mention so far of the fact that there's a very high chance this tweet is referring to dealings the other way around than people are assuming.

 

Clubs have apparently been coming in for Chamberlain, Cortese said that he was just putting the offers in the bin. Therefore we are tricky to deal with, as he won't enter into negotiations about players that we have under contract. It certainly makes more sense than the other way around.

 

I thought that straight away but I couldn't be bothered to post it. Good post though.

 

As others have pointed out, no agent is going to refuse to deal with Saints if Saints make an enquiry about a player they represent. We are probably deliberately being awkward with agents who tout players we're not interested in and try to engineer moves for players we don't want to sell. Quite right too.

 

That doesn't mean "agents won't deal with us".

 

Thread closure time, methinks.

Posted
I thought that straight away but I couldn't be bothered to post it. Good post though.

 

As others have pointed out, no agent is going to refuse to deal with Saints if Saints make an enquiry about a player they represent. We are probably deliberately being awkward with agents who tout players we're not interested in and try to engineer moves for players we don't want to sell. Quite right too.

 

That doesn't mean "agents won't deal with us".

 

Thread closure time, methinks.

 

Absolutely.

Posted
According to an agent on twitter agents won't deal with us. See below:

 

" @FootballAgent46: Lots of people ask about Southampton deals. A lot of you on Twitter! They are so tricky to deal with now most agents and clubs don't bother" Worrying if true.

 

On the contrary..I always felt that some managers put their own interests before those of their club, and do a deal with the agent first.

Is this the agent's way of saying they can't do this sort of deal with us ? .. if so...it's one-up for Nicola Cortese's ethical stance.

Posted
On the contrary..I always felt that some managers put their own interests before those of their club, and do a deal with the agent first.

Is this the agent's way of saying they can't do this sort of deal with us ? .. if so...it's one-up for Nicola Cortese's ethical stance.

 

I think Cortese maybe difficult to deal with so as it is not the first time this has been raised

 

But that seems how he operates and it appears to be working very well at the moment and I feel confident that new players will arrive and we will have a successful season like the previous two.

Posted
That's a lot of words to not actually deal with what I said, or have said throughout this thread.

 

I have said that the statement is a concern IF true. I have said that nobody on here knows the truth either way. I have also said that I doubt that it is true.

 

Yes we have done a lot of deals in the past. We are now in with bigger boys chasing bigger boys. Relationships with agents will be important. IF we have poor relations we are at a disadvantage.

 

Crystal?

 

What you spectacularly fail to understand is the relevance of the comments from this agent.

 

  • Does it mean we will stop signing players? No
  • Does it mean we will not be able to sign players we desperately want, No
  • It does mean that certain offers will be left non negotiable and happy to take the consequences either way.

You don't have any social or business debilitating etiquette with agents, it's the size of the fee they can extract. This statement is nothing new and originally quoted back when we were in the middle of a buying spree. When this first came up it was in relationship with the agent wanting us to pay his fee after a deal had been done with a club, we declined.

Posted
No club in for Puncheon at the mo, horses mouth.

 

Another loan move is about the best we can hope for I'd think.Everybody seems to know his situation with us and I really don't see anyone being wiling to pay us a lot of money for a player they know we don't want. I'd be happy enough to see him back in the group anyway,probably just as good as a lot of the players that are always getting mentioned in he rumour thread.Did he not score more goals than Danns at an equal or higher level last season,in less games?

Posted
Another loan move is about the best we can hope for I'd think.Everybody seems to know his situation with us and I really don't see anyone being wiling to pay us a lot of money for a player they know we don't want. I'd be happy enough to see him back in the group anyway,probably just as good as a lot of the players that are always getting mentioned in he rumour thread.Did he not score more goals than Danns at an equal or higher level last season,in less games?

 

Exactly

Posted
What you spectacularly fail to understand is the relevance of the comments from this agent.

 

  • Does it mean we will stop signing players? No
  • Does it mean we will not be able to sign players we desperately want, No
  • It does mean that certain offers will be left non negotiable and happy to take the consequences either way.
     

You don't have any social or business debilitating etiquette with agents, it's the size of the fee they can extract. This statement is nothing new and originally quoted back when we were in the middle of a buying spree. When this first came up it was in relationship with the agent wanting us to pay his fee after a deal had been done with a club, we declined.

 

But if a player we might want has asked his agent to find him a new club, and his agent thinks he can get a decent move for his player without the perceived hassle of dealing with us, we lose out. (That's not to say I'm wholly believing what the agent is saying though).

Posted
well isn't that what managers and first team coaches get handsome stipends to be able to resolve?

 

Within reason, would be my reply to that.

 

I certainly agree that for the majority of players, managers should use their skills to cajole, convince or kick the best out of them, but I do think there will always be a small minority who are just best given the cold shoulder as no amount of man management skills will win them round.

Posted

Well, 5 pages of complete, unsubstantiated b*llocks in response to some unproven nonsense typed by someone who may or may not be an agent on Twitter...the home of all solid news stories! Some troll must be sat under his bridge laughing his hairy a*se off!!

 

This thread should be sponsored by Wikipedia!

Posted
Another loan move is about the best we can hope for I'd think.Everybody seems to know his situation with us and I really don't see anyone being wiling to pay us a lot of money for a player they know we don't want. I'd be happy enough to see him back in the group anyway,probably just as good as a lot of the players that are always getting mentioned in he rumour thread.Did he not score more goals than Danns at an equal or higher level last season,in less games?

 

If whatever issues might exist could be worked out, I think he would be worth a look in central midfield alongside Hammond or Morgan. I thought he had a good game there against Blackpool reserves in the cup last season.

Posted
Take heart from this one hypo

 

All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident."

- Arthur Schopenhauer (1788-1860)

 

Agree with this,especially in relation to the clubs history over the last 10 years and one issue in particular. Of course, issues(and individuals who try and reveal the truth), are often ridiculed to deflect attention by those who are the chief perpetrators or have the most to lose.

Posted
Far too bloody sensible for this place.

 

And so simple, right? Surprisingly this guy doesn't reply to all 15,000 followers. This is the last he said on the matter:

 

"FootballAgent46

Funny reading peoples responses to Saints tweet. Relax guys very non specific comment just word round the agent campfire"

Posted
And so simple, right? Surprisingly this guy doesn't reply to all 15,000 followers. This is the last he said on the matter:

 

"FootballAgent46

Funny reading peoples responses to Saints tweet. Relax guys very non specific comment just word round the agent campfire"

 

So 4 pages of tripe then?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...