Master Bates Posted 23 October, 2008 Share Posted 23 October, 2008 Going back to the main title of this thread, i'd like to say that epileptics are fit. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Window Cleaner Posted 23 October, 2008 Share Posted 23 October, 2008 Which begs the question : Which retarded 'player' in the whole SFC saga is Long Shot? It's very clear that he/she has an agenda, and once again agenda peddling on this site is rife. I say let us know who Long Shot is so we can make our own minds up about his/her intentions. I won't be holding my breath for an answer though. Nope nobody has the right to disclose the identity of a fellow poster. If LongShot wants us to know, then he'll tell us. Anyway if you really wanted to know you only had to hang about at Ladbrokes in Shirley on the Monday after the Doncaster game. There's a clue, lives or works in Shirley probably. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Window Cleaner Posted 23 October, 2008 Share Posted 23 October, 2008 Going back to the main title of this thread, i'd like to say that epileptics are fit. Master, why does the person in you avatar have to put grease on her arse to pull her knickers up? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Master Bates Posted 23 October, 2008 Share Posted 23 October, 2008 Master, why does the person in you avatar have to put grease on her arse to pull her knickers up? Not for the knickers, it's so I can see my face in her ar$e. Have you ever tried pulling on tight PVC knickers without lubing up first. Really pulls your hairs it does!! What you on about Wilson? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big Bad Bob Posted 23 October, 2008 Share Posted 23 October, 2008 Master, why does the person in you avatar have to put grease on her arse to pull her knickers up? Have you ever tried pulling on tight PVC knickers without lubing up first. Really pulls your hairs it does!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Weston Super Saint Posted 23 October, 2008 Share Posted 23 October, 2008 Nope nobody has the right to disclose the identity of a fellow poster. If LongShot wants us to know, then he'll tell us. Anyway if you really wanted to know you only had to hang about at Ladbrokes in Shirley on the Monday after the Doncaster game. There's a clue, lives or works in Shirley probably. So many hints like 'if only you knew'.... So perhaps we should know. If Long Shot wants to continue his / her petulant war of words against Wilde, maybe we should know who he / she is. Wilde was man enough to register in his own name.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Window Cleaner Posted 23 October, 2008 Share Posted 23 October, 2008 Have you ever tried pulling on tight PVC knickers without lubing up first. Really pulls your hairs it does!! Ah no, I've no experience of that,must try it sometime. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stevegrant Posted 23 October, 2008 Share Posted 23 October, 2008 Wilde was man enough to register in his own name.... Eventually Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Weston Saint Posted 23 October, 2008 Share Posted 23 October, 2008 So many hints like 'if only you knew'.... So perhaps we should know. If Long Shot wants to continue his / her petulant war of words against Wilde, maybe we should know who he / she is. Wilde was man enough to register in his own name....Eventually Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Weston Super Saint Posted 23 October, 2008 Share Posted 23 October, 2008 Eventually Like the old account fooled anyone Let's go Wilde!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Window Cleaner Posted 23 October, 2008 Share Posted 23 October, 2008 So many hints like 'if only you knew'.... So perhaps we should know. If Long Shot wants to continue his / her petulant war of words against Wilde, maybe we should know who he / she is. Wilde was man enough to register in his own name.... Well, not at first. I mean St Marc, isn't exactly the same as Mike Wilde is it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Weston Super Saint Posted 23 October, 2008 Share Posted 23 October, 2008 Well, not at first. I mean St Marc, isn't exactly the same as Mike Wilde is it. The other clues were there Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Weston Saint Posted 23 October, 2008 Share Posted 23 October, 2008 Eventually Snap Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Window Cleaner Posted 23 October, 2008 Share Posted 23 October, 2008 Not for the knickers, it's so I can see my face in her ar$e. H'm brings back to memory the old puerile retort. Got a match? yep your face and my arse. My ,weren't we stupid when we were kids. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EastleighSoulBoy Posted 23 October, 2008 Share Posted 23 October, 2008 If you tell everyone in confidence then no-one will ever know that you've broken a confidence because everyone will be in confidence. Are you intimating that every one of us could be trusted with a confidence? That's a little naive in my opinion. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trousers Posted 23 October, 2008 Share Posted 23 October, 2008 Eventually "Ev-en-tu-aaa-ly" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trousers Posted 23 October, 2008 Share Posted 23 October, 2008 Are you intimating that every one of us could be trusted with a confidence? That's a little naive in my opinion. Depends how far one's tongue was planted in one's cheek (so to speak) when One said it one guesses. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Saint Nicholas Posted 23 October, 2008 Share Posted 23 October, 2008 . Wilde knows he's drinking in the last chance saloon any way and his glass is nearly empty. Cheers! Yes but was it at 5:00am the morning before a game, or was this another drinking session? I'm confused! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EastleighSoulBoy Posted 23 October, 2008 Share Posted 23 October, 2008 Not that surprising really - it was wrapped up in all the other gumph about late-night drinking and junior employee sacking. Also, Long Shot had hardly did himself any favours in terms of credibility with his first posts on the thread. As you know who he is, you'll have a far better idea than I or most other posters do as to whether his statement about the overdraft increase is true or not. Either way, how much does it have to do with Wilde? Does he have any real influence on what happens? I'd rather assumed that he doesn't, but I could be wrong about that. It may well be worth giving some credence to what Long Shot has to say. He may not have approached this in the way you would agree with, we are all capable of making mistakes or misjudging opportunities, but he does know a lot more than he can let on at this moment in time. I'm not asking you to trust him, you are your own man, just hear him out. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Weston Super Saint Posted 23 October, 2008 Share Posted 23 October, 2008 So, is the answer to the Question : Is Wilde fit to be Chairman - yes? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fowllyd Posted 23 October, 2008 Share Posted 23 October, 2008 It may well be worth giving some credence to what Long Shot has to say. He may not have approached this in the way you would agree with, we are all capable of making mistakes or misjudging opportunities, but he does know a lot more than he can let on at this moment in time. I'm not asking you to trust him, you are your own man, just hear him out. Fair enough; the problem I had was that in his first few posts in this thread he came across like so many of the ITK buffoons we've suffered over the past 18 months or so. That didn't exactly invite credence. Once he started posting in something other than riddles hearing him out became a whole lot easier! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mole Posted 23 October, 2008 Share Posted 23 October, 2008 To be honest i'm not really interested in the stuff about a club employee getting sacked. There's enough stuff we do know about Wilde to conclude he's not fit to be chairman of Southampton Football Club. Wilde reminds me of a Peter Mandelson type character - slimey, manipulative and not to be trusted. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
benjii Posted 23 October, 2008 Share Posted 23 October, 2008 To be honest i'm not really interested in the stuff about a club employee getting sacked. There's enough stuff we do know about Wilde to conclude he's not fit to be chairman of Southampton Football Club. Wilde reminds me of a Peter Mandelson type character - slimey, manipulative and not to be trusted. Careful, you'll be appearing in the letters pages of The Times before you can say "retarded-thread-media-storm-in-a-tea-cup". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fos1 Posted 23 October, 2008 Share Posted 23 October, 2008 So many hints like 'if only you knew'.... So perhaps we should know. If Long Shot wants to continue his / her petulant war of words against Wilde, maybe we should know who he / she is. Wilde was man enough to register in his own name.... What !! your having a laugh only after he was caught singing his own praises saying how wonderful he was dont you remember saintmarc !!!! After being caught out he then came on as himself can he be trusted no way !!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fos1 Posted 23 October, 2008 Share Posted 23 October, 2008 So, is the answer to the Question : Is Wilde fit to be Chairman - yes? The answer to the question is NO WAY Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wes Tender Posted 23 October, 2008 Share Posted 23 October, 2008 (edited) Dave Jones, why would any idiot bring him into the equation unless you are Cherry Pester? All Dave Jones does is adds up the figures, shows what's gone out, what we can expect in and what will be going out. As long as the figures presented are accurate, there is nothing more you can demand from the bloke. As the Financial Director it is his duty to make the current financial state of the company known to the board. So saying that Crouch did not have a clue about the finances is either plain wrong or would infer that Jones had not done his job properly. And cut out the name calling please, or I'll just have to stoop down to your level in retaliation. If you are going to blame Dave Jones you may as well throw in the abacus or calculator you have used along the line, even when it's giving you the correct figures. Just because idiots ignore the figures, believe the take over fairy or the figures are not too bad if you squint at them, has nothing to do with Jones. Where did I say that Jones was to blame for the financial situation? Obviously he was only the bean counter rather than the one actually spending the money. I only said that it was his duty to advise the board if expenditure was far outstripping income. See a stick and grab the wrong end of it, eh, why don't you? As for losing all the money, that is as plain as a pikestaff. Just add up all the revenue we had / could of had from player transfers and see where it went and what we have left of value from that. What we have seen done this season with bringing in the youth players was done ages ago with the other teams that came down with us. Then we could have had a sustainable business plan with old heads married with the young pups to give us a real chance. Other clubs never even had the transfer monies or even the parachute, but it is us who are favourites for administration. Do you really think that what you have written above constitutes a response for my call for you to justify your statement that Crouch wasted 10s of millions because he didn't have a clue. Reading other responses by seemingly clued up people on here, they reckon 13 -17 million. As I pointed out to you, 10s of millions has to be at least £20 million, so where did you pluck your figures from? Cloud cuckoo land? As for the rest of your last paragraph, since the club's relegation, the majority of the time we were run by either Lowe, Wilde, Wilde's executives and lastly Crouch, before the return of the two failures. Crouch had been in charge a relatively short time, but seems to be your favourite fall guy. As for now, there is no reason why the team could not be a blend of older and younger players. There was no financial imperative to play mostly the youngsters; that is just the path that Lowe chose partly through choice and not purely because of financial constraints, so your argument that we are forced down that particular path is not strictly true. Edited 23 October, 2008 by Wes Tender Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Weston Super Saint Posted 23 October, 2008 Share Posted 23 October, 2008 The answer to the question is NO WAY To be fair I meant 'fit' to be Chairman in the context of the damning evidence of drinking at night as the original post suggested. Whether or not he is 'able' / has the necessary skills to be Chairman is another matter entirely. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mole Posted 23 October, 2008 Share Posted 23 October, 2008 What !! your having a laugh only after he was caught singing his own praises saying how wonderful he was dont you remember saintmarc !!!! After being caught out he then came on as himself can he be trusted no way !!!! Wilde even had the brass necked cheek to have a dig at the Execs - the people he left running the club after he'd bottled it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Weston Super Saint Posted 23 October, 2008 Share Posted 23 October, 2008 Wilde even had the brass necked cheek to have a dig at the Execs - the people he left running the club after he'd bottled it. When you found out who Saint Marc was though, don't tell me you didn't have a little chuckle at the irony of the situation. More comical value than tommac and scooby. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fos1 Posted 23 October, 2008 Share Posted 23 October, 2008 Wilde even had the brass necked cheek to have a dig at the Execs - the people he left running the club after he'd bottled it. Stanley good point and he is now our chairman someone told me that most of those Execs were unemployed until Wilde gave them a job !!! He gave them a job then they sacked him wonder why that was ??? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fos1 Posted 23 October, 2008 Share Posted 23 October, 2008 When you found out who Saint Marc was though, don't tell me you didn't have a little chuckle at the irony of the situation. More comical value than tommac and scooby. Not really no felt sorry that he felt he had to sing his own praises and does not have anyone to do it for him !! Just proved to me the man is not right in the head !! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NickG Posted 23 October, 2008 Share Posted 23 October, 2008 makes you wonder why none of us (St Marc excluded) ever got rich enough to buy the club! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Weston Super Saint Posted 23 October, 2008 Share Posted 23 October, 2008 makes you wonder why none of us (St Marc excluded) ever got rich enough to buy the club! Not everyone has 'getting rich' as their number priority in life Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gordon Mockles Posted 23 October, 2008 Share Posted 23 October, 2008 I agree, just can't understand his agenda or point he' trying to make. If he's trying to discredit Wilde, then he's to late, I don't think MW is on many fans xmas card list anyway. Exactly! There's loads of dirt you could throw at Mike (I've a few things) but what does it achieve? the internet is not a place for that. Things could ruin his marriage for a start. The guy is a class "A" t*sser who is more interested in having a laugh and enjoying the fame of being on a football club board. Until we've a totally new group of leaders, we're going to tread water, or sink. Sad but true. Let's not b*tch about scandals or personal issues though. I mentioned stuff aobut Jim Hone previously which I'd not normally put on the WWW but that's only cos we had good SFC patrons being threatened by Hone, esq. (amongst death threats) and people on here were defending Hone! WTF?! The ugly side of football. It's bad enough at St Mary's as it stands, without dragging up irrelevant, petty sh*t! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
saintwarwick Posted 23 October, 2008 Share Posted 23 October, 2008 I have heard this from 2 totally unconnected but respected sources none of which come from the dressing room (the players would be unaware of such matters). I am prepared to believe it is true. Concrete evidence is not possible unless it is announced as a trading update when the accounts are finally released. I would encourage such statement to clear this matter up. OK, thanks for that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gordon Mockles Posted 23 October, 2008 Share Posted 23 October, 2008 Wilde even had the brass necked cheek to have a dig at the Execs - the people he left running the club after he'd bottled it. You've just got to laugh at his bare faced cheek - more front that Harrods. Lowe's as bad! Together, they're more responsible for our demise than anyone but do they have the balls to admit it?! DO THEY F*CK! Sling mud and blame Crouch for his tiny tenure sandwiched between their more lengthy, incompetent reigns. You just can't argue that point, yet people on here do. Laughable! In truth, you've got to laugh at us and our predicament. If you don't, you'd just break down and cry. I love our club deeply (despite my often angry rants, it's merely steam - frustration vented) but I have to take a step back in current circumstances and distance myself. It's too painful to watch at times. Still, I still watch most games (Just missed Waford and made the right decision it seemed). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Roman Posted 23 October, 2008 Share Posted 23 October, 2008 Nope nobody has the right to disclose the identity of a fellow poster. If LongShot wants us to know, then he'll tell us. Anyway if you really wanted to know you only had to hang about at Ladbrokes in Shirley on the Monday after the Doncaster game. There's a clue, lives or works in Shirley probably. So Long Shot's real name is Shirley. Thanks. Mystery solved. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stanthemanfairoak Posted 23 October, 2008 Share Posted 23 October, 2008 Is anyone going to say who this junior employee is/was ? Who is Longshot ? hughie fishers son in law! :smt081 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trousers Posted 23 October, 2008 Share Posted 23 October, 2008 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trousers Posted 25 October, 2008 Share Posted 25 October, 2008 Hugh Fisher for manager! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Long Shot Posted 25 October, 2008 Author Share Posted 25 October, 2008 Hugh Fisher for manager! or even his son:rolleyes: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
offix Posted 26 October, 2008 Share Posted 26 October, 2008 Is Wilde fit to be Chairman? He isn't. Puppet master Ru**rt has got his hand up his **/* and operates the Quisling completely. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now