hypochondriac Posted 10 June, 2011 Share Posted 10 June, 2011 Maybe I'll mess with people's heads and put the little sh*ts avatar on mine. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
egg Posted 10 June, 2011 Share Posted 10 June, 2011 Maybe I'll mess with people's heads and put the little sh*ts avatar on mine. Why not a self portrait? A picture of a cock should do it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scotty Posted 10 June, 2011 Share Posted 10 June, 2011 Why not a self portrait? A picture of a cock should do it. Can you supply one from your stash? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
egg Posted 10 June, 2011 Share Posted 10 June, 2011 Can you supply one from your stash? Cheers poppet :-) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hamster Posted 10 June, 2011 Share Posted 10 June, 2011 Cheers poppet :-) You do know what a 'poppet' is don't you? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
egg Posted 10 June, 2011 Share Posted 10 June, 2011 You do know what a 'poppet' is don't you? There are loads of meanings. I'm guessing there's one that I'm not yet aware Of. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hypochondriac Posted 10 June, 2011 Share Posted 10 June, 2011 Why not a self portrait? A picture of a cock should do it. You changed pretty quick from your mask of civility to abuse. I knew your game all along. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
egg Posted 10 June, 2011 Share Posted 10 June, 2011 You changed pretty quick from your mask of civility to abuse. I knew your game all along. Mask? My view of you has been consistent. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hamster Posted 10 June, 2011 Share Posted 10 June, 2011 There are loads of meanings. I'm guessing there's one that I'm not yet aware Of. It's a witchcraft doll I believe. Why would you refer to scotty as your witchcraft doll? do you want to stick pins in his eyes? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
egg Posted 10 June, 2011 Share Posted 10 June, 2011 It's a witchcraft doll I believe. Why would you refer to scotty as your witchcraft doll? do you want to stick pins in his eyes? Really. Not what I had in mind. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OttawaSaint Posted 11 June, 2011 Share Posted 11 June, 2011 A streaker ran across the ice during tonight's Stanley Cup final matchup in Vancouver, might have had to many Alexander Keiths but I swear it said "free Deppo" on his back... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hamster Posted 11 June, 2011 Share Posted 11 June, 2011 A streaker ran across the ice during tonight's Stanley Cup final matchup in Vancouver, might have had to many Alexander Keiths but I swear it said " free Deppo" on his back... Do I have to collect tokens to get one? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Atticus Finch of Maycomb Posted 11 June, 2011 Share Posted 11 June, 2011 It's time to move on, may I nominate TRAF for the new funniest poster award. I know he's been eyeing Deppo's trophy. Woooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooohoooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Atticus Finch of Maycomb Posted 11 June, 2011 Share Posted 11 June, 2011 It's time to move on, may I nominate TRAF for the new funniest poster award. I know he's been eyeing Deppo's trophy. Woooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooohoooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hamster Posted 11 June, 2011 Share Posted 11 June, 2011 Traf? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hamster Posted 11 June, 2011 Share Posted 11 June, 2011 Traf? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jawillwill Posted 11 June, 2011 Share Posted 11 June, 2011 Yes? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jawillwill Posted 11 June, 2011 Share Posted 11 June, 2011 Yes? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dronskisaint Posted 11 June, 2011 Share Posted 11 June, 2011 Traf? Backward fa*t Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dronskisaint Posted 11 June, 2011 Share Posted 11 June, 2011 Traf? Backward fa*t Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
the stain Posted 11 June, 2011 Share Posted 11 June, 2011 Backward fa*t [video=youtube;Ofn8-3SWd8M] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
the stain Posted 11 June, 2011 Share Posted 11 June, 2011 Backward fa*t [video=youtube;Ofn8-3SWd8M] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OttawaSaint Posted 11 June, 2011 Share Posted 11 June, 2011 As Deppomania grips the US, Deppo is rumoured to be making an appearance at Shea Stadium tonight... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scotty Posted 12 June, 2011 Share Posted 12 June, 2011 I swear I overheard a couple of blokes in the pub last night, far as I could earwig they were called Badge and Granty, discussing the cost of a hitman in furtive whispers. Kept on about "the thread getting annoying" and "we'll have to do something about it" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sergei Gotsmanov Posted 12 June, 2011 Share Posted 12 June, 2011 There does seem to be a strong suspicion that this is personal. If so, pursuing vendettas in this petty way doesn't exactly cover the powers that be in glory. Losing any poster is depressing - but losing one of the most entertaining ones 'permanently' is self-defeating. For a brief moment I am in your camp Verbal. There is a nasty whiff about this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
percy windham Posted 12 June, 2011 Share Posted 12 June, 2011 I think it is only right that Deppo was banned. I was recently barred from my local pub for interupting a conversation about "The Wonders of the Universe" with a Pointless and Sarcastic Remark. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SNSUN Posted 12 June, 2011 Share Posted 12 June, 2011 I am itk, Cork transfer off due to Deppogate. Cork impressed by all aspects of Southampton except their unofficial messageboard. Cork is apparently a pacifist who hates infighting. Saints to re-sign Pulis on a 7 year contract out of desperation. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Verbal Posted 12 June, 2011 Share Posted 12 June, 2011 (edited) For a brief moment I am in your camp Verbal. There is a nasty whiff about this. I think the problem with Deppogate is that it's based on a misunderstanding of the English language. The supposed infringements are for 'pointless' and 'sarcastic' posts. 'Pointless' is of course entirely in the eye of the beholder, and is therefore nothing but hopelessly subjective. It IS, though, easy to demonstrate that deppo mostly had a point to make. Easy, because deppo was only very rarely 'sarcastic' His modus operandum was to adopt the point of view of someone he disagreed with, or whose post he just found unintentionally funny (like that never happens!), and turn it on its head. This is properly called satirising, not being sarcastic. Satiric take-downs almost always have a clear underlying, and very economically expressed point to them - so they were not pointless at all, and very, very few of us, I'd suggest, ever saw that they were. So on neither count - pointlessness or sarcasm - could deppo have accumulated enough infractions to warrant such an absurdity as a 'life ban'. Which leads me back to the only logical conclusion: it's personal. Edited 12 June, 2011 by Verbal Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
benjii Posted 12 June, 2011 Share Posted 12 June, 2011 I think the problem with Deppogate is that it's based on a misunderstanding of the English language. The supposed infringements are for 'pointless' and 'sarcastic' posts. 'Pointless' is of course entirely in the eye of the beholder, and is therefore nothing but hopelessly subjective. It IS, though, easy to demonstrate that deppo mostly had a point to make. Easy, because deppos was only very rarely 'sarcastic' 'His modus operandum was to adopt the point of view of someone he disagreed with, or whose post he just found unintentionally funny (like that never happens!), and turn it on its head. This is properly called satirising, not being sarcastic. Satiric take-downs almost always have a clear underlying, and very economically expressed point to them - so they were not pointless at all, and very, very few of us, I'd suggest, ever saw that they were. So on neither count - pointlessness or sarcasm - could deppo have accumulated enough infractions to warrant such an absurdity as a 'life ban'. Which leads me back to the only logical conclusion: it's personal. Agree. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RedAndWhite91 Posted 12 June, 2011 Share Posted 12 June, 2011 This is a sarcastic and pointless remark. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
solentstars Posted 12 June, 2011 Share Posted 12 June, 2011 I think the problem with Deppogate is that it's based on a misunderstanding of the English language. The supposed infringements are for 'pointless' and 'sarcastic' posts. 'Pointless' is of course entirely in the eye of the beholder, and is therefore nothing but hopelessly subjective. It IS, though, easy to demonstrate that deppo mostly had a point to make. Easy, because deppo was only very rarely 'sarcastic' His modus operandum was to adopt the point of view of someone he disagreed with, or whose post he just found unintentionally funny (like that never happens!), and turn it on its head. This is properly called satirising, not being sarcastic. Satiric take-downs almost always have a clear underlying, and very economically expressed point to them - so they were not pointless at all, and very, very few of us, I'd suggest, ever saw that they were. So on neither count - pointlessness or sarcasm - could deppo have accumulated enough infractions to warrant such an absurdity as a 'life ban'. Which leads me back to the only logical conclusion: it's personal. seems that way Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
the stain Posted 12 June, 2011 Share Posted 12 June, 2011 I think the problem with Deppogate is that it's based on a misunderstanding of the English language. The supposed infringements are for 'pointless' and 'sarcastic' posts. 'Pointless' is of course entirely in the eye of the beholder, and is therefore nothing but hopelessly subjective. It IS, though, easy to demonstrate that deppo mostly had a point to make. Easy, because deppo was only very rarely 'sarcastic' His modus operandum was to adopt the point of view of someone he disagreed with, or whose post he just found unintentionally funny (like that never happens!), and turn it on its head. This is properly called satirising, not being sarcastic. Satiric take-downs almost always have a clear underlying, and very economically expressed point to them - so they were not pointless at all, and very, very few of us, I'd suggest, ever saw that they were. So on neither count - pointlessness or sarcasm - could deppo have accumulated enough infractions to warrant such an absurdity as a 'life ban'. Which leads me back to the only logical conclusion: it's personal. I agree with Verbal. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr Who? Posted 12 June, 2011 Share Posted 12 June, 2011 I think it is only right that Deppo was banned. I was recently barred from my local pub for interupting a conversation about "The Wonders of the Universe" with a Pointless and Sarcastic Remark. This. I do this all the time down the pub (like a forum), during quiz nights, at football with friends (like this forum, but with friends), and also at work. I have to say I can still go to the pub, quiz nights, football with friends, and into work!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
norwaysaint Posted 12 June, 2011 Share Posted 12 June, 2011 I think the problem with Deppogate is that it's based on a misunderstanding of the English language. The supposed infringements are for 'pointless' and 'sarcastic' posts. 'Pointless' is of course entirely in the eye of the beholder, and is therefore nothing but hopelessly subjective. It IS, though, easy to demonstrate that deppo mostly had a point to make. Easy, because deppo was only very rarely 'sarcastic' His modus operandum was to adopt the point of view of someone he disagreed with, or whose post he just found unintentionally funny (like that never happens!), and turn it on its head. This is properly called satirising, not being sarcastic. Satiric take-downs almost always have a clear underlying, and very economically expressed point to them - so they were not pointless at all, and very, very few of us, I'd suggest, ever saw that they were. So on neither count - pointlessness or sarcasm - could deppo have accumulated enough infractions to warrant such an absurdity as a 'life ban'. Which leads me back to the only logical conclusion: it's personal. Agree 100% I think people like boj and hypo just don't really get satire and actually feel a bit insecure around it. I could certainly see the point in nearly all of deppo's posts. Have a quick look through hypo's post history and you'll see most of his posts add almost nothing of value to the thread, that's what I call pointless. If deppo's posts were pointless, people wouldn't be missing them so much. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RonManager Posted 12 June, 2011 Share Posted 12 June, 2011 I think the problem with Deppogate is that it's based on a misunderstanding of the English language. The supposed infringements are for 'pointless' and 'sarcastic' posts. 'Pointless' is of course entirely in the eye of the beholder, and is therefore nothing but hopelessly subjective. It IS, though, easy to demonstrate that deppo mostly had a point to make. Easy, because deppo was only very rarely 'sarcastic' His modus operandum was to adopt the point of view of someone he disagreed with, or whose post he just found unintentionally funny (like that never happens!), and turn it on its head. This is properly called satirising, not being sarcastic. Satiric take-downs almost always have a clear underlying, and very economically expressed point to them - so they were not pointless at all, and very, very few of us, I'd suggest, ever saw that they were. So on neither count - pointlessness or sarcasm - could deppo have accumulated enough infractions to warrant such an absurdity as a 'life ban'. Which leads me back to the only logical conclusion: it's personal. Les Mots Juste, mon Brave. Vive le Deppo! Vive le satire! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scotty Posted 12 June, 2011 Share Posted 12 June, 2011 I just dont see the problem. He still posts on here as kadeem hardison, and if he'd only scrape out another fiver from the massive inheritance he's forever crowing about he could post as often as he wants. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Atticus Finch of Maycomb Posted 12 June, 2011 Share Posted 12 June, 2011 I just dont see the problem. He still posts on here as kadeem hardison, and if he'd only scrape out another fiver from the massive inheritance he's forever crowing about he could post as often as he wants. Several good points. Especially the one about him being called Kadeem Hardison. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scotty Posted 12 June, 2011 Share Posted 12 June, 2011 Several good points. Especially the one about him being called Kadeem Hardison. Sorry, I missed the atticus one. And pink scarf. Blow a fiver on any of them, you'll feel better. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Saint in Paradise Posted 12 June, 2011 Share Posted 12 June, 2011 IMHO he could also be signing in as "verbal" . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smirking_Saint Posted 12 June, 2011 Share Posted 12 June, 2011 Maybe I'll mess with people's heads and put the little sh*ts avatar on mine. Not sure you will ever be capable of messing with peoples heads TBF, that takes intelligence. Being a pompous little pr!ck is about your limit Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SNSUN Posted 12 June, 2011 Share Posted 12 June, 2011 In further news, Gordon Strachan weighed into the Deppogate saga, claiming "Deppo? Pah. I've got more important things to worry about than Deppo, such as a pork pie in the fridge that's reached it's expiry date." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deano6 Posted 12 June, 2011 Share Posted 12 June, 2011 Thanks for the support guys. I'll be continuing to make lesser appearances using a couple of my less-oft used accounts such as egg and Sergei Gotsmanov. Be interesting to see if those logins get infracted quite so quickly! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SuperMikey Posted 13 June, 2011 Author Share Posted 13 June, 2011 I got infracted for saying that Cuba Gooding Jr. was my favourite cricket commentator on The Lounge once - that shook me up so much that i've been a good boy ever since. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OttawaSaint Posted 13 June, 2011 Share Posted 13 June, 2011 As Deppogate reaches its 9th day, Southampton's pre-season preparations have been thrown into turmoil as several high profile players have rejected moves to the Saints after logging on to SWF only to see themselves described as "****e", "not good enough for Saints" "a poor man's gary neville"... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tpbury Posted 13 June, 2011 Share Posted 13 June, 2011 I think the problem with Deppogate is that it's based on a misunderstanding of the English language. The supposed infringements are for 'pointless' and 'sarcastic' posts. 'Pointless' is of course entirely in the eye of the beholder, and is therefore nothing but hopelessly subjective. It IS, though, easy to demonstrate that deppo mostly had a point to make. Easy, because deppo was only very rarely 'sarcastic' His modus operandum was to adopt the point of view of someone he disagreed with, or whose post he just found unintentionally funny (like that never happens!), and turn it on its head. This is properly called satirising, not being sarcastic. Satiric take-downs almost always have a clear underlying, and very economically expressed point to them - so they were not pointless at all, and very, very few of us, I'd suggest, ever saw that they were. So on neither count - pointlessness or sarcasm - could deppo have accumulated enough infractions to warrant such an absurdity as a 'life ban'. Which leads me back to the only logical conclusion: it's personal. It can only be as a result of a tawdry love affair gone wrong. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tpbury Posted 13 June, 2011 Share Posted 13 June, 2011 I'm thinking that Deppo can only return after a transformation exhibited by Jack Nicholas in One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest, or John Hurt in 1984. He is gone. Apparently under ECG as we speak, and the rats are next. He will be denouncing comrades. Be worried. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RedAndWhite91 Posted 13 June, 2011 Share Posted 13 June, 2011 This is a sarcastic and pointless remark. Where is my infraction Mods?! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dune Posted 13 June, 2011 Share Posted 13 June, 2011 It's good to see Baj has stuck to his guns on this despite the whinging. The sign of a true leader of men. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
benjii Posted 13 June, 2011 Share Posted 13 June, 2011 Max Clifford is representing Deppo now so expect this one to go national soon. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Special K Posted 13 June, 2011 Share Posted 13 June, 2011 Max Clifford is representing Deppo now so expect this one to go national soon. Ryan Giggs ****ged Deppo's cat. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts