Mao Cap Posted 5 June, 2011 Posted 5 June, 2011 Limits Mao... Well probably not the best in terms of erudite opinions and suchlike, but he produced the most LOLs for me during the last year or two.
SuperMikey Posted 5 June, 2011 Author Posted 5 June, 2011 Does anyone know how tall Boj is? Shorter than me.
saintscottofthenortham Posted 5 June, 2011 Posted 5 June, 2011 Shorter than me. Hmmmmm... Interesting.
Spudders Posted 5 June, 2011 Posted 5 June, 2011 Well probably not the best in terms of erudite opinions and suchlike, but he produced the most LOLs for me during the last year or two. Could be a good opportunity to step up your game and take the crown! You used to be pretty funny on that old lungs forever forum, you seem to have kept a lower profile on here though
timebomb Posted 5 June, 2011 Posted 5 June, 2011 He was one of the main reasons I go on the "off topic" areas, very funny guy. A very sad loss to the site.
Spudders Posted 5 June, 2011 Posted 5 June, 2011 Does anyone know how tall Boj is? Was the answer to this question influential as to whether or not you challenged him to a low hanging fruit picking duel? You win, Deppo is allowed back, you lose, you get banned as well!
saintscottofthenortham Posted 5 June, 2011 Posted 5 June, 2011 Was the answer to this question influential as to whether or not you challenged him to a low hanging fruit picking duel? You win, Deppo is allowed back, you lose, you get banned as well! That wasn't what I had in mind... but it beats my idea that involved a HD Videocam, a yellow pages, a pinata, bamboo stick, KY, Eggnog and Hundreds & Thousands.
hypochondriac Posted 5 June, 2011 Posted 5 June, 2011 Great news. Baj has gone up (slightly) in my estimation.
trousers Posted 5 June, 2011 Posted 5 June, 2011 Great news. Baj has gone up (slightly) in my estimation. Boooooo!
trousers Posted 5 June, 2011 Posted 5 June, 2011 FREE THE SWF 1....... bring back deppo Change your avatar man. It's the only way to resolve this grave injustice!
revolution saint Posted 5 June, 2011 Posted 5 June, 2011 Deppo was the best poster on here and funny, shame if he's gone.
S-Clarke Posted 5 June, 2011 Posted 5 June, 2011 Shame, he was a good laugh. Makes you wonder how the likes of Charlie Weyman can continue winding people up, and get away with it? He's a skate on a wind up yet he carries on posting, but Deppo gets banned for being a good laugh. Go figure.
hamster Posted 5 June, 2011 Posted 5 June, 2011 That's the second time you've got the words bellend and legend confused in as many days! Come on hamster, we need someone of your standing on this forum to get behind the avatar campaign. It's what he'd have wanted. Tear in eye moment, please don't do that mate. I shall sleep on it, can't say fairer than that, he did call me a bellend after all. In case anyone was wondering, I did not report him for it as I do know (and live with the fact daily) that he was very accurate in saying so. In fact, I'd go As far as to say that Deppo has helped me through some extremely tough times in my recent life. Seriously, he is a legend. Okay, I've slept on it and although I can't do it on my iPhone, I will make it a priority tomorrow in my tea-break.
latter day saint Posted 5 June, 2011 Posted 5 June, 2011 is this a joke? banned for being interesting & humourous ? ( & a little bit annoying sometimes !) its only a forum ffs! Pathetic.
saintscottofthenortham Posted 5 June, 2011 Posted 5 June, 2011 Is it just me who canny see this shizz?
latter day saint Posted 5 June, 2011 Posted 5 June, 2011 Is it just me who canny see this shizz? nope, me either .
Sarnia Saint Posted 5 June, 2011 Posted 5 June, 2011 I dont post that often but I have to say given the amount of vitriolic abuse thrown around by various users onthis site I find this very sad, he was definitely one of the wittiest posters on here.
egg Posted 5 June, 2011 Posted 5 June, 2011 What were the infraction points for? This board has gone downhill big time since the old board died. Anyone of interest gets banned so others leave as there is less of interest. Do the owners of the this site really think that banning people with an opinion makes for a better forum?
Verbal Posted 5 June, 2011 Posted 5 June, 2011 What were the infraction points for? This board has gone downhill big time since the old board died. Anyone of interest gets banned so others leave as there is less of interest. Do the owners of the this site really think that banning people with an opinion makes for a better forum? I'm not sure but it's been suggested it was for his last post on the 'save our saint' thread. If that's true, it is (in the unfunny sense) laughable.
Spudders Posted 5 June, 2011 Posted 5 June, 2011 (edited) although I can't do it on my iPhone, I will make it a priority tomorrow in my tea-break. Good man. Likewise tomorrow morning I will start getting quotes on getting some 'free the SWF1' t-shirts made up, (obviously with the Gary Colman avatar picture). This kind of action worked for Deirdre Rachid, so it could work for Deppo as well. Edited 5 June, 2011 by Spudders Bring back Deppo
saintbletch Posted 5 June, 2011 Posted 5 June, 2011 Tear in eye moment, please don't do that mate. I shall sleep on it, can't say fairer than that, he did call me a bellend after all. In case anyone was wondering, I did not report him for it as I do know (and live with the fact daily) that he was very accurate in saying so. In fact, I'd go As far as to say that Deppo has helped me through some extremely tough times in my recent life. Seriously, he is a legend. Okay, I've slept on it and although I can't do it on my iPhone, I will make it a priority tomorrow in my tea-break. Hamster, I read that thread and when I saw Deppo's comment I thought 'harsh', but then I read your own use of it earlier in the thread and it was just another example of Deppo's brilliant humour. But I fear that from now on that incident will be known as the Bell End Controversy in these parts. Deppo made this slowly dying forum a much funnier place. I'm sure he would be proud to see this spontaneous movement to reinstate him. So now we've got a campaign logo, may I now suggest a campaign slogan? Free the bellend one.
egg Posted 5 June, 2011 Posted 5 June, 2011 I'm not sure but it's been suggested it was for his last post on the 'save our saint' thread. If that's true, it is (in the unfunny sense) laughable. Why can't admin be more transparent ? This "we've sent someone to his room but won't tell anyone why" approach is a bit silly imo.
Saint_clark Posted 5 June, 2011 Posted 5 June, 2011 All the infractions that led to this were 1 point infractions for "posting a pointless/sarcastic remark". Also worth pointing out that infraction points expire after a while, so if he hadn't been so relentless with some of his jokes he wouldn't have been banned.
egg Posted 5 June, 2011 Posted 5 June, 2011 All the infractions that led to this were 1 point infractions for "posting a pointless/sarcastic remark". Also worth pointing out that infraction points expire after a while, so if he hadn't been so relentless with some of his jokes he wouldn't have been banned. So banned for being sarcastic and telling jokes. That's ridiculous.
Saint_clark Posted 5 June, 2011 Posted 5 June, 2011 So banned for being sarcastic and telling jokes. That's ridiculous. He did make me chuckle on a lot of occasions, but I could also tell that sometimes he didn't know where the line was.
Baj Posted 5 June, 2011 Posted 5 June, 2011 Deppo had 19 opportunities to understand where the line was to be drawn. Having been banned once (after 10 infractions) and numerous PM exchanges where I told him to wind it in and keep his humour to the appropriate places, he couldnt follow that. Seems to be a tendency by most on here to assume that his standard behaviour was deemed as unacceptable, it was generally fine, it was the 20 occasions where he deliberately de-railed someone elses thread or was abusive to another member for his own amusement that he was infracted for. Having been warned on 20 separate occasions, he's now banned This is the only reply I'll be posting.
hamster Posted 5 June, 2011 Posted 5 June, 2011 We care Deppo, we care mate even if you are a legend (sp)
egg Posted 5 June, 2011 Posted 5 June, 2011 Deppo had 19 opportunities to understand where the line was to be drawn. Having been banned once (after 10 infractions) and numerous PM exchanges where I told him to wind it in and keep his humour to the appropriate places, he couldnt follow that. Seems to be a tendency by most on here to assume that his standard behaviour was deemed as unacceptable, it was generally fine, it was the 20 occasions where he deliberately de-railed someone elses thread or was abusive to another member for his own amusement that he was infracted for. Having been warned on 20 separate occasions, he's now banned This is the only reply I'll be posting. Perhaps he didn't think that he had crossed the line. It may be that the threshold is too low. Indeed, I haven't got a clue where the line is. Out of interest, does punishment get issued where the victim of perceived abuse does not complain? I would be concerned if the line was being drawn subjectively by admin in circumstances where nobody felt the need to complain. Most of us are big boys and should be trusted to sort things out ourselves, surely?
Verbal Posted 5 June, 2011 Posted 5 June, 2011 Deppo had 19 opportunities to understand where the line was to be drawn. Having been banned once (after 10 infractions) and numerous PM exchanges where I told him to wind it in and keep his humour to the appropriate places, he couldnt follow that. Seems to be a tendency by most on here to assume that his standard behaviour was deemed as unacceptable, it was generally fine, it was the 20 occasions where he deliberately de-railed someone elses thread or was abusive to another member for his own amusement that he was infracted for. Having been warned on 20 separate occasions, he's now banned This is the only reply I'll be posting. So if Deppo comes back on here under another name, you'll accept him in the same way you accepted dune, right?
Saint_clark Posted 5 June, 2011 Posted 5 June, 2011 Perhaps he didn't think that he had crossed the line. It may be that the threshold is too low. Deppo had 19 opportunities to understand where the line was to be drawn. Having been banned once (after 10 infractions) and numerous PM exchanges where I told him to wind it in and keep his humour to the appropriate places, he couldnt follow that. Bajs post pretty much answers any questions you could have about this.
Nexstar Posted 5 June, 2011 Posted 5 June, 2011 So if Deppo comes back on here under another name, you'll accept him in the same way you accepted dune, right? And BenTheLegend/Dannysfc?
egg Posted 5 June, 2011 Posted 5 June, 2011 Bajs post pretty much answers any questions you could have about this. It doesn't. This is a members forum. The rules and how they are to implemented and enforced should be shared with its members.
Verbal Posted 5 June, 2011 Posted 5 June, 2011 Bajs post pretty much answers any questions you could have about this. It doesn't answer a damned thing if we don't know what the '19 opportunities' were. I have to say in all honesty I haven't read a single thing posted by Deppo that I could see as worth an infraction - even on a thread where another poster (who was crowing on here about the banning) wished him dead.
Spudders Posted 5 June, 2011 Posted 5 June, 2011 So if Deppo comes back on here under another name, you'll accept him in the same way you accepted dune, right? He could just stick with his PinkScarf profile
Smirking_Saint Posted 5 June, 2011 Posted 5 June, 2011 Bajs post pretty much answers any questions you could have about this. Its f*cking pathetic, this forum is slowly becoming lifeless and humourless. In fact these days its bloody boring, completely devoid to the life it had when I first started posting, look at the amount of posters that have left or been banned. Deppo permanently banned for having a sense of humour ? pathetic
Dr Who? Posted 5 June, 2011 Posted 5 June, 2011 All the infractions that led to this were 1 point infractions for "posting a pointless/sarcastic remark". Also worth pointing out that infraction points expire after a while, so if he hadn't been so relentless with some of his jokes he wouldn't have been banned. This is just plan silly. Banned for the above is just not on!
egg Posted 5 June, 2011 Posted 5 June, 2011 It doesn't answer a damned thing if we don't know what the '19 opportunities' were. I have to say in all honesty I haven't read a single thing posted by Deppo that I could see as worth an infraction - even on a thread where another poster (who was crowing on here about the banning) wished him dead. Quite. It may be that on some or all of these 19 occasions that nobody complained or felt the need to.
Smirking_Saint Posted 5 June, 2011 Posted 5 June, 2011 Quite. It may be that on some or all of these 19 occasions that nobody complained or felt the need to. I expect it was the work of the forum hero Hypo. Either that or the fact that Granty and Boj don't like humour.
Verbal Posted 5 June, 2011 Posted 5 June, 2011 He could just stick with his PinkScarf profile PinkScarf's was one of the threads we're led to assume Deppo 'derailed'. Frankly, the mind boggles.
Junction 9 Posted 5 June, 2011 Posted 5 June, 2011 What do you think the chances are that any of these 19 infractions came from any of the other forum mods? None I'd wager. All from Boj, guarantee it. Well good for you, Super forum admin owner man has got his little way.
Recommended Posts