SuperMikey Posted 7 June, 2011 Posted 7 June, 2011 If he can play with Hammond then yes he will be. NA will play Hammond and 1 other, count on it. I wouldn't count on Hammond being first-choice CM next season, Schneiderlin is much better than him.
SFC Forever Posted 7 June, 2011 Posted 7 June, 2011 Get a decent ball to ball winner and Hammond will be lucky to get a game.
Window Cleaner Posted 7 June, 2011 Posted 7 June, 2011 (edited) I wouldn't count on Hammond being first-choice CM next season, Schneiderlin is much better than him. you wouldn't, I wouldn't,about 70% of us wouldn't but we don't pick the team. Edited 7 June, 2011 by Window Cleaner
Nexstar Posted 7 June, 2011 Posted 7 June, 2011 Now has his twitter picture as him at St. Mary's. Make of that what you will
K,Billy's supersound Posted 7 June, 2011 Posted 7 June, 2011 7 pages 309 posts, so has he signed yet then?
darren2 Posted 7 June, 2011 Posted 7 June, 2011 Not telling us what is going on????? Cortese and Adkins out!!!!!!
shurlock Posted 7 June, 2011 Posted 7 June, 2011 Cork is a solid receive and pass CM and yes in a similar vein to MS. Cork is also versatile which adds value to the squad. The real difference maker, however, would be Danns. Pace, skill, delivery, set pieces, goals ... this is the attacking piece we are desperately missing and NC should let bygones be bygones and make it happen. Of course, it would be handy to have Cork in CM to give Danns the ball ... Cork is a better player than Danns and has more room to improve. I would rather a Schneiderlin/Cork than a Schneiderlin/Danns CM partnership especially with all the attacking options around them.
NickG Posted 7 June, 2011 Posted 7 June, 2011 if Ox-C stays, Lallana and Ox-C are more attacking than most other midfielders.
capitalsaint Posted 7 June, 2011 Posted 7 June, 2011 (edited) -------Cork-------MS---------- OXC ----------------------Lallana -------------Guly---------------- -----------Lambert-------------- ? Edited 7 June, 2011 by capitalsaint
SaintJc Posted 7 June, 2011 Posted 7 June, 2011 http://www.mirrorfootball.co.uk/news/Transfer-news-Chelsea-youngster-Jack-Cork-set-for-massive-Southampton-payday-article745378.html
Badger Posted 7 June, 2011 Posted 7 June, 2011 http://www.mirrorfootball.co.uk/news/Transfer-news-Chelsea-youngster-Jack-Cork-set-for-massive-Southampton-payday-article745378.html probably a load of b0ll0cks about the wage !!
Saint Stimp Posted 7 June, 2011 Posted 7 June, 2011 -------Cork-------MS---------- OXC ----------------------Lallana -------------Guly---------------- -----------Lambert-------------- ? I also had this in mind.
Ivan Katalinic's 'tache Posted 7 June, 2011 Posted 7 June, 2011 Whether or not the wage thing is true, let's hope the news of him signing is!!
Saint_clark Posted 7 June, 2011 Posted 7 June, 2011 Well personally I rate Jack Cork that highly that I don't think £15k pw would be unreasonable. Let's not forget he would be turning down clubs with parachute payments still coming in and most likely Premiership clubs to come here - we'd need to offer above the norm.
Matthew Le God Posted 7 June, 2011 Posted 7 June, 2011 He is on a plane to Denmark tomorrow for a few weeks of tournament football.
RedAndWhite91 Posted 7 June, 2011 Author Posted 7 June, 2011 15k to win his signature is not unreasonable IMO. Jaidi is on around 12k a week...
Matthew Le God Posted 7 June, 2011 Posted 7 June, 2011 (edited) Well personally I rate Jack Cork that highly that I don't think £15k pw would be unreasonable. Let's not forget he would be turning down clubs with parachute payments still coming in and most likely Premiership clubs to come here - we'd need to offer above the norm. Exactly, for example "poor" Pompey have Nugent, Kitson and Lawerence all on huge wages £15k+. I would imagine a number of Saints players had promotion clauses in their contracts that mean they are getting towards(ish) the £15k p/w figure, from the approx £9k p/w in League One. I'd guess Lambert, Fonte and Lallana would be getting near those figures now that Saints are in the Championship. Edited 7 June, 2011 by Matthew Le God
peacey Posted 7 June, 2011 Posted 7 June, 2011 What about a cheeky bid for Dale Jennings? Im sure he would jump at the move to, as lets be honest he aint going to Bayern as the papers suggested recently!
Glasgow_Saint Posted 8 June, 2011 Posted 8 June, 2011 Just heard that rickets will sign today and cork has agreed to join Pompey! Gutted
wild-saint Posted 8 June, 2011 Posted 8 June, 2011 Exactly, for example "poor" Pompey have Nugent, Kitson and Lawerence all on huge wages £15k+. I would imagine a number of Saints players had promotion clauses in their contracts that mean they are getting towards(ish) the £15k p/w figure, from the approx £9k p/w in League One. I'd guess Lambert, Fonte and Lallana would be getting near those figures now that Saints are in the Championship. Fonte is on 19k per week.
Raging Bull Posted 8 June, 2011 Posted 8 June, 2011 -------Cork-------MS---------- OXC ----------------------Lallana -------------Guly---------------- -----------Lambert-------------- ? I would love to see us play this system, it's the future!
itchen_dan Posted 8 June, 2011 Posted 8 June, 2011 (edited) http://www.clarets-mad.co.uk/news/tmnw/cork_set_for_saints_680627/index.shtml? Gonna be a good signing if it comes off!! Edited 8 June, 2011 by itchen_dan
thorpie the sinner Posted 8 June, 2011 Posted 8 June, 2011 still just the Burnley fans reading the Mirror! Still, will be a great signing if it comes off!
Window Cleaner Posted 8 June, 2011 Posted 8 June, 2011 Fonte is on 19k per week. that's a lot of money for a League 1 player then.No wonder all the others despised us, there must have been clubs who's entire first XI weren't making that much added together in our League last year then.
Bakovnetski Posted 8 June, 2011 Posted 8 June, 2011 Just heard that rickets will sign today and cork has agreed to join Pompey! Gutted WTF, are you serious or was last night a late one?
verlaine1979 Posted 8 June, 2011 Posted 8 June, 2011 What about a cheeky bid for Dale Jennings? Im sure he would jump at the move to, as lets be honest he aint going to Bayern as the papers suggested recently! Yes, great player.
Colinjb Posted 8 June, 2011 Posted 8 June, 2011 WTF, are you serious or was last night a late one? Mate, don't feed the troll.
niceandfriendly Posted 8 June, 2011 Posted 8 June, 2011 WTF, are you serious or was last night a late one? Glasgow saint has never been serious about anything on this forum. Perhaps in normal life too, we can only speculate as to that. Hopefully most of us won't ever have to find out. Never seen Cork play for Saints as I was away for the entire time he was at the club, but seen him a few times on sky playing for Burnley. Seems like the right sort of player to aim for.
Bakovnetski Posted 8 June, 2011 Posted 8 June, 2011 Glasgow saint has never been serious about anything on this forum. Perhaps in normal life too, we can only speculate as to that. Hopefully most of us won't ever have to find out. Never seen Cork play for Saints as I was away for the entire time he was at the club, but seen him a few times on sky playing for Burnley. Seems like the right sort of player to aim for. I did manage to see him a couple of times and he did look quite assured for a young man. If he has matured over the past 2 years then he should be a good signing.
Ivan Katalinic's 'tache Posted 8 June, 2011 Posted 8 June, 2011 According to his Twitter account, Cork was getting on the plane for the Euros an hour ago. Guessing any deal won't be done until afterwards, if we've not sorted something out already?
St Marco Posted 8 June, 2011 Posted 8 June, 2011 Reading the Burnley boards http://boards.footymad.net/forum.php?tno=104&fid=297&sty=2&act=1&mid=2117285682&page=1 and have to say there are some really lovely comments on there! They think we offered him £20k a week. Chelsea accept £1m bid. It is a done deal. But my fav comment has to be the one where the guy says something like "I thought they were broke and went out of business a few seasons ago? How can they afford players and wages like that? Or are they just continuing like before where they are spending money they don't have?" For someone to reply saying "They are now owned by the estate of a multi-billionaire"..... I know it sucks for them but you have to admit for the first time in a longtime it is nice to be in a position to be able to buy quality players ahead of other teams
Colinjb Posted 8 June, 2011 Posted 8 June, 2011 But my fav comment has to be the one where the guy says something like "I thought they were broke and went out of business a few seasons ago? How can they afford players and wages like that? Or are they just continuing like before where they are spending money they don't have?" For someone to reply saying "They are now owned by the estate of a multi-billionaire"..... I know it sucks for them but you have to admit for the first time in a longtime it is nice to be in a position to be able to buy quality players ahead of other teams It is good to be in the ascendancy with these things, but simply outspending teams does feel a bit distasteful. Especially after our hatred of the Skates for similar tactics.
Thedelldays Posted 8 June, 2011 Posted 8 June, 2011 Reading the Burnley boards http://boards.footymad.net/forum.php?tno=104&fid=297&sty=2&act=1&mid=2117285682&page=1 and have to say there are some really lovely comments on there! They think we offered him £20k a week. Chelsea accept £1m bid. It is a done deal. But my fav comment has to be the one where the guy says something like "I thought they were broke and went out of business a few seasons ago? How can they afford players and wages like that? Or are they just continuing like before where they are spending money they don't have?" For someone to reply saying "They are now owned by the estate of a multi-billionaire"..... I know it sucks for them but you have to admit for the first time in a longtime it is nice to be in a position to be able to buy quality players ahead of other teams yet we hate man city and chelsea for ruining football
trousers Posted 8 June, 2011 Posted 8 June, 2011 "The re-emergence of Southampton after writing off most of it's debts is unfair, but let's face it, fair trade practices have no place in football and this is the fault of the (football) authorities who allow this to happen."
St Marco Posted 8 June, 2011 Posted 8 June, 2011 It is the food chain though isn't it. We all have our place. But right now it would appear (at least if you believe what the press say) that we are ahead of Burnley at least. The same thing will happen to us with Alex sooner or later. I think modern football has always been that way.
djharvey Posted 8 June, 2011 Posted 8 June, 2011 "The re-emergence of Southampton after writing off most of it's debts is unfair, but let's face it, fair trade practices have no place in football and this is the fault of the (football) authorities who allow this to happen." Are you really sure we wrote off most our debts?
Dalek2003 Posted 8 June, 2011 Posted 8 June, 2011 It is good to be in the ascendancy with these things, but simply outspending teams does feel a bit distasteful. Especially after our hatred of the Skates for similar tactics. Us outspending other teams...we have yet to spend a single penny ! You 'avin a lafff. Even Pumpey will outspend us !
S-Clarke Posted 8 June, 2011 Posted 8 June, 2011 Us outspending other teams...we have yet to spend a single penny ! You 'avin a lafff. Even Pumpey will outspend us ! Don't be such a bore. Name me a championship club that has made a signing since the window opened just over a week ago...?
Colinjb Posted 8 June, 2011 Posted 8 June, 2011 Us outspending other teams...we have yet to spend a single penny ! You 'avin a lafff. Even Pumpey will outspend us ! Just like Glasgow Saint, you are nothing if not consistent. How's the shrine to Glenda coming along?
beatlesaint Posted 8 June, 2011 Posted 8 June, 2011 Don't be such a bore. Name me a championship club that has made a signing since the window opened just over a week ago...? Barnsley
saintscottofthenortham Posted 8 June, 2011 Posted 8 June, 2011 Are you really sure we wrote off most our debts? The day Markus purchased us.
Dalek2003 Posted 8 June, 2011 Posted 8 June, 2011 Just like Glasgow Saint, you are nothing if not consistent. How's the shrine to Glenda coming along? Nothing to do with Glenda, however unless we get a move on we are going to have a hard season ahead of us !
Colinjb Posted 8 June, 2011 Posted 8 June, 2011 Nothing to do with Glenda, however unless we get a move on we are going to have a hard season ahead of us ! Quite right, get back to work on the shrine, sharpish. If you have nothing to pray to all hope will be lost.
Dalek2003 Posted 8 June, 2011 Posted 8 June, 2011 Quite right, get back to work on the shrine, sharpish. If you have nothing to pray to all hope will be lost. If you think it was right that we sacrificed our premier status just to make a point, then fine.As you were probably one of the vocal minority there are many that disagree with you. I am assuming you were one of the vocal minority by the tone of your writing.
sotonist Posted 8 June, 2011 Posted 8 June, 2011 Are you really sure we wrote off most our debts? The company with the debts was liquidated. There's really no debate to be had.
Fowllyd Posted 8 June, 2011 Posted 8 June, 2011 If you think it was right that we sacrificed our premier status just to make a point, then fine.As you were probably one of the vocal minority there are many that disagree with you. I am assuming you were one of the vocal minority by the tone of your writing. You seem to assume that a majority were, in fact, part of the vocal minority. Not quite sure how that works, but in your world it clearly does.
djharvey Posted 8 June, 2011 Posted 8 June, 2011 The company with the debts was liquidated. There's really no debate to be had. I understood the vast majority of any debt was paid off when the club was purchased.
sotonist Posted 8 June, 2011 Posted 8 June, 2011 I understood the vast majority of any debt was paid off when the club was purchased. I think the debt was around 32m (excluding administrators expenses) and the club plus stadium subsidiaries were boughts for 15m or thereabouts. That's looks like less than half in my book.
djharvey Posted 8 June, 2011 Posted 8 June, 2011 I think the debt was around 32m (excluding administrators expenses) and the club plus stadium subsidiaries were boughts for 15m or thereabouts. That's looks like less than half in my book. Your little black book of facts from where exactly!
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now