Viking Warrior Posted 26 April, 2011 Share Posted 26 April, 2011 Well done to Ian Hislop for challenging Mr Marr Marr is a total hypocrite, Does his journalist bit pushing MPs etc about priviacy laws and their extra Marital affairs etc of Politicians and he has done it himself and managed to have one of those super privacy injunctions to stip people reporting his dirty deeds. Oh and how come sky news and the beeb are not allowing a comments section for this story. Are they fearful Mr Hypocrite will sue them for breaching the injunction? I know I have a dislike for BBC reporters, this is another reason why Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kev Posted 26 April, 2011 Share Posted 26 April, 2011 I thought this story about him having extra-marital giggity, (am I allowed to say that?), was common knowledge. Mind you, I read Private Eye. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pap Posted 26 April, 2011 Share Posted 26 April, 2011 I was listening to Ian Hislop on the Today programme this morning. He said that most of the super-injunctions were down to "slappers and football", but he had to challenge this one because of Marr's position and responsibilities. Of course, he'll have to go now. Forever compromised. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scotty Posted 26 April, 2011 Share Posted 26 April, 2011 ^ all of the above. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dibden Purlieu Saint Posted 26 April, 2011 Share Posted 26 April, 2011 He's ****ing ugly as well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spudders Posted 26 April, 2011 Share Posted 26 April, 2011 So was he knobbing Imogen from big brother! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bridge too far Posted 26 April, 2011 Share Posted 26 April, 2011 He's ****ing ugly as well. I love his little car, though Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scummer Posted 26 April, 2011 Share Posted 26 April, 2011 So was he knobbing Imogen from big brother! No, that was Bryan Riggs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spudders Posted 26 April, 2011 Share Posted 26 April, 2011 Andrew Marr & Bryan Riggs.........well I never. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Verbal Posted 26 April, 2011 Share Posted 26 April, 2011 Who is Imogen? Who is Bryan Riggs? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frank's cousin Posted 26 April, 2011 Share Posted 26 April, 2011 ...does anyone really care.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Verbal Posted 26 April, 2011 Share Posted 26 April, 2011 ...does anyone really care.... If they resort to a superinjunction to protect their identity, then for that reason alone I care. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OVER THE HILL Posted 26 April, 2011 Share Posted 26 April, 2011 I like this story about Andrew Marr. http://newsthump.com/2011/04/26/woman-uses-super-injunction-to-prevent-identification-as-andrew-marrs-sexual-partner/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frank's cousin Posted 26 April, 2011 Share Posted 26 April, 2011 About a journo getting a bit of fanny? really it interests you that much? people having sex... great story. (and before you mention it, could not give a flying feck who is ****ging who, of those MPs either even if they have in the past been going on about morals and the like) no interest to me whatsoever... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Verbal Posted 26 April, 2011 Share Posted 26 April, 2011 About a journo getting a bit of fanny? really it interests you that much? people having sex... great story. (and before you mention it' date=' could not give a flying feck who is ****ging who, of those MPs either even if they have in the past been going on about morals and the like) no interest to me whatsoever...[/quote'] If this is directed at me, no. I thought I'd answered that. The idea of superinjunctions extends well beyond footballers, journos, etc. They are being used by multinationals to cover up scandals that are of great public concern. As such, superinjunctions are a pretty draconian limitation on freedom of speech. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Saintandy666 Posted 26 April, 2011 Share Posted 26 April, 2011 He's a great journalist and presenter. His programme on the history of Britain was great. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Viking Warrior Posted 26 April, 2011 Author Share Posted 26 April, 2011 Bryan Riggs he is the outside forward for melchester rovers Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wade Garrett Posted 26 April, 2011 Share Posted 26 April, 2011 I thought it was Nobby Spleen, who is on loan to East Pork Rovers from Hotshot Hotspurs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dune Posted 26 April, 2011 Share Posted 26 April, 2011 (edited) I'd want to take out a super injuction to prevent details of my last conquest going public. I'd had a few to drink and to give a brief summary she had a tooth missing, a dodgy heart that beat like f/ck, i think she was a prozzy, she was a drug addict, she was living in sheltered accomodation, had had her 6 kids taken into care, and she informed me she was bi polar (some sort of bonkers disorder i think) and hadn't taken her medication. And to cap it all she asked for some money to go to tescos for some wkds and f/cked off with my tenner. Edited 26 April, 2011 by dune Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wade Garrett Posted 26 April, 2011 Share Posted 26 April, 2011 I'd want to take out a super injuction to prevent details of my last conquest going public. I'd had a few to drink and to give a brief summary she had a tooth missing, a dodgy heart that beat like f/ck, i think she was a prozzy, she was a drug addict, she was living in sheltered accomodation, had had her 6 kids taken into care, and she informed me she was bi polar (some sort of bonkers disorder i think) and hadn't taken her medication. And to cap it all she asked for some money to go to tescos for some wkds and f/cked off with my tenner. A bit of a step up for you then dune. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
revolution saint Posted 26 April, 2011 Share Posted 26 April, 2011 About a journo getting a bit of fanny? really it interests you that much? people having sex... great story. (and before you mention it' date=' could not give a flying feck who is ****ging who, of those MPs either even if they have in the past been going on about morals and the like) no interest to me whatsoever...[/quote'] If this is directed at me, no. I thought I'd answered that. The idea of superinjunctions extends well beyond footballers, journos, etc. They are being used by multinationals to cover up scandals that are of great public concern. As such, superinjunctions are a pretty draconian limitation on freedom of speech. Agree with both of these opinions. When these super injunctions are used to protect privacy and basically just stop gossip getting in the media then I think they're great but not when they protect corporations from covering up what is in the public interest to know. The Corporation book and film are interesting in explaining how corporations use laws that are designed for individuals and worth a look. As for Andrew Marr being a hypocrite then that's only if he's criticised others for using them, or advocated scrapping them. Has he done that before? I haven't checked. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Barney Trubble Posted 26 April, 2011 Share Posted 26 April, 2011 I'd want to take out a super injuction to prevent details of my last conquest going public. I'd had a few to drink and to give a brief summary she had a tooth missing, a dodgy heart that beat like f/ck, i think she was a prozzy, she was a drug addict, she was living in sheltered accomodation, had had her 6 kids taken into care, and she informed me she was bi polar (some sort of bonkers disorder i think) and hadn't taken her medication. And to cap it all she asked for some money to go to tescos for some wkds and f/cked off with my tenner. It's a small world, were her kids all the colours of the rainbow? I think I had her too after a mammoth all day session on the snakebite. She was a dirty ***** though which made it all worthwhile. As for the original post, well I'm all for live and let live but he's got a bit of cheek, taking for the holier than thou approach he likes to take in his work. The History programme he did was awesome though Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Verbal Posted 26 April, 2011 Share Posted 26 April, 2011 I'd want to take out a super injuction to prevent details of my last conquest going public. I'd had a few to drink and to give a brief summary she had a tooth missing, a dodgy heart that beat like f/ck, i think she was a prozzy, she was a drug addict, she was living in sheltered accomodation, had had her 6 kids taken into care, and she informed me she was bi polar (some sort of bonkers disorder i think) and hadn't taken her medication. And to cap it all she asked for some money to go to tescos for some wkds and f/cked off with my tenner. Can we have a superinjunction to prevent us having to read this sordid catalogue of abasement? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deppo Posted 26 April, 2011 Share Posted 26 April, 2011 I am dune's latest conquest. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
capitalsaint Posted 26 April, 2011 Share Posted 26 April, 2011 I am dune's latest conquest. mum, is it really you? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pap Posted 26 April, 2011 Share Posted 26 April, 2011 I'd want to take out a super injuction to prevent details of my last conquest going public. I'd had a few to drink and to give a brief summary she had a tooth missing, a dodgy heart that beat like f/ck, i think she was a prozzy, she was a drug addict, she was living in sheltered accomodation, had had her 6 kids taken into care, and she informed me she was bi polar (some sort of bonkers disorder i think) and hadn't taken her medication. And to cap it all she asked for some money to go to tescos for some wkds and f/cked off with my tenner. You buy cheap, you buy three times Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dune Posted 26 April, 2011 Share Posted 26 April, 2011 You buy cheap, you buy three times She told me I talked posh and I told her she only thought that because she was common as muck. For some reason she didn't like this comeback. But it was true and she was a proper slag so I didn't care. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wilko Posted 26 April, 2011 Share Posted 26 April, 2011 Hypocrite. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jonnyboy Posted 26 April, 2011 Share Posted 26 April, 2011 She told me I talked posh and I told her she only thought that because she was common as muck. For some reason she didn't like this comeback. But it was true and she was a proper slag so I didn't care. Being single is starting to eat away at Dune's sanity. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chez Posted 26 April, 2011 Share Posted 26 April, 2011 who gives a **** who Marr or anyone else is ****ing on the side? It's their business and they should be left in peace. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deppo Posted 26 April, 2011 Share Posted 26 April, 2011 She told me I talked posh and I told her she only thought that because she was common as muck. For some reason she didn't like this comeback. But it was true and she was a proper slag so I didn't care. She's clearly the best you can get. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baj Posted 26 April, 2011 Share Posted 26 April, 2011 She told me I talked posh and I told her she only thought that because she was common as muck. For some reason she didn't like this comeback. But it was true and she was a proper slag so I didn't care. Pretty sure this is a Pulp lyric? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jonnyboy Posted 26 April, 2011 Share Posted 26 April, 2011 who gives a **** who Marr or anyone else is ****ing on the side? It's their business and they should be left in peace. So you wouldnt be vaguely interested if David Cameron was sh*tting in Desmond Tutu's mouth whilst having Emu t*ss him off? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scotty Posted 26 April, 2011 Share Posted 26 April, 2011 So you wouldnt be vaguely interested if David Cameron was sh*tting in Desmond Tutu's mouth whilst having Emu t*ss him off? Are you itk jonny??? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jonnyboy Posted 27 April, 2011 Share Posted 27 April, 2011 Are you itk jonny??? I could never divulge my sources, sorry :-( Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OldNick Posted 28 April, 2011 Share Posted 28 April, 2011 Andrew Marr having an affair! I didn't realise Quasimodo had a sister Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dronskisaint Posted 29 April, 2011 Share Posted 29 April, 2011 I'd want to take out a super injuction to prevent details of my last conquest going public. I'd had a few to drink and to give a brief summary she had a tooth missing, a dodgy heart that beat like f/ck, i think she was a prozzy, she was a drug addict, she was living in sheltered accomodation, had had her 6 kids taken into care, and she informed me she was bi polar (some sort of bonkers disorder i think) and hadn't taken her medication. And to cap it all she asked for some money to go to tescos for some wkds and f/cked off with my tenner. Yep, like someone as cute as that would sleep with you.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wes Tender Posted 30 April, 2011 Share Posted 30 April, 2011 So you wouldnt be vaguely interested if David Cameron was sh*tting in Desmond Tutu's mouth whilst having Emu t*ss him off? Or whether your local MP extolled the virtues of family life whilst having an affair? So the electorate should take the view that it's nothing to do with them, then? After all, lots of them do it, much as many of them fiddled their expenses claims. But who are we to pass judgement, eh, Chez? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now