Jump to content

Saints sign 21 year old Dale Stephens on loan - official


Saint_clark

Recommended Posts

CM

Hammond - club capt, seems to be in form

Chaplow - good, young recent signing

Morgan - injured, possibly for season but wouldn't be stunned to see him again this season

Vast majority on here agreed that any 2 out of those 3 make a good pairing for us. We still have that!

Now signed 21 midfielder who has scored 10 in 37 games, 2nd highest assists in his club, - which is more goals and assists in this division than our CM!

Whose fans seem gutted to lose him

fit and ready to perform at league 1 pace

Can see no reason to moan

 

Nothing to moan about the signing - until we see him play we can't have an informed opinion, so is it OK just to moan about the ingratiating post?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Satisfied with this signing. I always thought bringing in a player from a higher league as cover wasn't required and could upset things more than help. Dale Stephens is a young lad who will be keen to make an impression and help us over the line in order to help himself in the long term. It also means that the injuries to AOC and Lallana can't be particularly bad.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't get it, if this guy is good why would Oldham let him go? Surely they haven't chucked in the towel already as far as their own promo hopes are concerned? Smells fishy, waht's going on?

 

What promo hopes?

 

Do you ever have a clue what you are talking about?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't get it, if this guy is good why would Oldham let him go? Surely they haven't chucked in the towel already as far as their own promo hopes are concerned? Smells fishy, waht's going on?

 

They've got no chance of promotion being 15 pts behind at this stage.

 

They are skint, openly considering administration and we offered them a decent financial package which clubs in their situation and size cannot really turn down.

 

He's their best player and we've once again signed one of the best players at L1 level.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The reason it turns to moaning is because no one has actually seen him play in a Saints short yet, so the half glass full lot talk him up to be another Messi, and the half glass full brigade put him the keith Cassells class. Truth is he is somewhere in-between. If he was a world beater SAF would have snapped him up by now. He is here for 10 games to do a cover job and help get us promoted. If it all goes to plan then who knows, we can both look longer term. If he turns out to be another JP then thanks, and its the A34, M40, M6 for him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just watched his goals for Oldham this season - a few pens, but some cracking hits from outside the box.

 

He seems the type of player that makes late runs into the box and starts off attacks by playing the ball deep...and then continuing to run forward.

 

At the mo - I'd stick him in there in place of Chappers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just watched his goals for Oldham this season - a few pens, but some cracking hits from outside the box.

 

He seems the type of player that makes late runs into the box and starts off attacks by playing the ball deep...and then continuing to run forward.

 

At the mo - I'd stick him in there in place of Chappers.

 

On current form, I'd stick Pulis on there in place of Chappers!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I suppose this is what the Wolves fans said about signing Drew Surman?!

 

Only if the Wolves fans in question had

1) Not noticed we were in already administration at the time, as opposed to "possibly being in financial trouble" like Oldham are...

2) Thought they were still in the same league as us, rather than already promoted to the Prem...

3) Thought we were somehow in a promotion battle (like we are now), rather than just being relegated from the CCC...

4) Not seen him play (or at least not noticed him on the numerous occasions he started for us against them, which is rather more likely).

 

And I'm not sure if you're saying Surman was good - but he was crap for Wolves; or crap - but he was good for Norwich ?

Edited by The9
clarity
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On current form I would actually not change very much apart from have cover for AL and Oxo....................................................oh!

 

Lallana will be back for MK.

 

Forte, Guly or N'guessan can come in for Chambo.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm glad we got a signing. Will be interesting to see if he is a useful addition or an underwhelming one. I will reserve judgement on this one I think.

 

What is more interesting for me is that we are continuing our policy of 'the cheap option,' something we have been doing since the summer. Whether this is the correct strategy I am not sure, it's certainly the most financially sensible one but I continue to wonder if this policy was a conscious decision or whether it was imposed upon us by tighter financial constraints.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

don't think there is any evidence of us being tight

 

Well yes you have given that opinion but I think differently. We continue to be linked with proven championship players only to go for decent league one players. This may of course be the correct strategy but it is what I believe we are doing nonetheless. When I say the money has run out, what I mean is not that we have no money (we still have vastly more resources than most other league one clubs), simply that we are not as financially well supported as last year and have to be more selective about hat we spend our money on. Before people bang on about Lallana contracts, it makes financial sense to offer Lallana a long term contract.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm glad we got a signing. Will be interesting to see if he is a useful addition or an underwhelming one. I will reserve judgement on this one I think.

 

What is more interesting for me is that we are continuing our policy of 'the cheap option,' something we have been doing since the summer. Whether this is the correct strategy I am not sure, it's certainly the most financially sensible one but I continue to wonder if this policy was a conscious decision or whether it was imposed upon us by tighter financial constraints.

 

How can you say it's the cheap option when you have no details of a) - The wage offered, B) the Loan Fee and C) the fee at the end of the season.?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Satisfied with this signing. I always thought bringing in a player from a higher league as cover wasn't required and could upset things more than help. Dale Stephens is a young lad who will be keen to make an impression and help us over the line in order to help himself in the long term. It also means that the injuries to AOC and Lallana can't be particularly bad.

 

These sort of comments do make me laugh though how people are always positive no matter what happens. If we had signed no one it would have been 'I'm glad, we have the strongest squad depth in the division and another signing would have frozen out our promising youngsters.' If we had signed a player from a higher league it would have been 'I'm glad, we have brought in proven quality and gone for someone with proper experience.' I'm not necessarily disagreeing with you but it is amusing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lallana will be back for MK.

 

Forte, Guly or N'guessan can come in for Chambo.

 

Yes but is three players enough cover?!

 

It should be. Afterall you only need one to replace AOC when he is tired or injured,and another to replace him when its not working out.

 

The third one is then sufficient for all of us to jump up and down saying we have not got enough quality in the squad,and NA was clueless in bringing in Forte/N'G as they only warm the bench...ad nauseum.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Who knows the fees involved? When is Howard out of contract? Potentially fees may not be different - persuading team to lose their young star and regular as opposed to another losing a reserve.

 

I don't know, but it doesn't jump out as an anyone who is cheap option

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How can you say it's the cheap option when you have no details of a) - The wage offered, B) the Loan Fee and C) the fee at the end of the season.?

 

Fair enough I don't know all the details. It does however APPEAR to be the cheap option. I'm giving my opinion based on the probability that he is a cheaper option than Brian Howard.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

These sort of comments do make me laugh though how people are always positive no matter what happens. If we had signed no one it would have been 'I'm glad, we have the strongest squad depth in the division and another signing would have frozen out our promising youngsters.' If we had signed a player from a higher league it would have been 'I'm glad, we have brought in proven quality and gone for someone with proper experience.' I'm not necessarily disagreeing with you but it is amusing.

 

or perhaps it putting some faith in our manager, and a those who know more about football than us - who would have watched all options and know exactly how they see them fitting in?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Fair enough I don't know all the details. It does however APPEAR to be the cheap option. I'm giving my opinion based on the probability that he is a cheaper option than Brian Howard.

 

It doesn't appear a cheap option to me at all.

 

We've signed a teams best player, clubs from the premiership wanted him and we went back with a second offer which turned his head.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Championship players signed this season:

 

Butterfied- good player and an exception though possibly not on too much wage wise and we got him on a free.

Chaplow- On a free again probably not on too much

Forte- Certainly would not have been on much and not rated at all by S****horpe. Yet to show much here so jury still out

N'Guessan- Looked good against Exter away then not much cop since. Fringe player in the CCC and on loan.

 

Serie A players signed this season:

 

Guly- Played majority of career in serie B.

 

League One players signed this year:

 

Dickson- Unnecessary signing and money possibly based on appearances, hence why he hasn't played much recently?

Richardson- Hardly featured, wouldn't have been on much wage wise

Stephens- Young midfielder, unproven above this league, possibly good but unknown yet.

 

Yeah, you're right.

 

Just my opinions based on the above and with the exception possibly of Butterfield, certainly not in the same calibure as proven successes like Barnard, Lambert and Fonte.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Plus it seems pretty likely we tried to sign Mackail-Smith which would've been a seven figure fee.

 

That is really my point. We have been LINKED with a host of players who are proven succeses and many who look class in the league above. It isn't since last year that we have signed someone in that bracket IMO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

or perhaps it putting some faith in our manager, and a those who know more about football than us - who would have watched all options and know exactly how they see them fitting in?

 

I think you misunderstand my comment. What I found amusing was that there would have been a positive slant from someone whatever the club had done, had we signed someone or not and whoever we had signed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

maybe a 21/23 year old midfielder, who is his clubs top scorer and vice captain, who signed 3 year contract a few months ago and seems to be a fans favorite is not much cheaper than a 28 year old midfielder, who hasn't scored this season, played less than half of his sides games and is towards the end of his contract?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It doesn't appear a cheap option to me at all.

 

We've signed a teams best player, clubs from the premiership wanted him and we went back with a second offer which turned his head.

 

A young player is still a gamble. A gamble which I really hope pays off but Brian Howard is a proven championship performer, who certainly would have been more. What I'm trying to say is that I would rate Howard as a Fonte, Lambert type signing (i.e. proven) whereas Stephens is a bit more of a youngster with potential. It may be that we have changed our transfer policy since last year. I'm just speculating about the possibility and wondering aloud whether this will pay off or not. I'm not being negative so there is no need to be defensive, I just find it interesting.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...