sammysaint Posted 13 March, 2011 Share Posted 13 March, 2011 Fletcher is hench Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
beatlesaint Posted 13 March, 2011 Share Posted 13 March, 2011 Fletcher is hench Pardon ? He is what ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Griffo Posted 13 March, 2011 Share Posted 13 March, 2011 If any of you on here are the absolute ******s that decided to dress up for football, either **** off and don't come again, or sort your ****ing lives out. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Saint_Jonny Posted 13 March, 2011 Share Posted 13 March, 2011 Fletcher is hench Hella massive. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Saint_Jonny Posted 13 March, 2011 Share Posted 13 March, 2011 If any of you on here are the absolute ******s that decided to dress up for football, either **** off and don't come again, or sort your ****ing lives out. I hope you die in your sleep. (I don't really, I just thought i'd make a pointless statement like yours above, that will mean **** all to most and can do whatever the **** they want, you w^nker) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deppo Posted 13 March, 2011 Share Posted 13 March, 2011 If any of you on here are the absolute ******s that decided to dress up for football, either **** off and don't come again, or sort your ****ing lives out. That was me. I'm going to dress up even more flamboyantly for the next game and sit next to you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
saintscottofthenortham Posted 13 March, 2011 Author Share Posted 13 March, 2011 If any of you on here are the absolute ******s that decided to dress up for football, either **** off and don't come again, or sort your ****ing lives out. I'm gonna do same as Deppo apart from I'm going to put red & White glitter around my willy and colour my pines with red & White stripes then get it out and wave it all in your face. Hope your well offended. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
benjii Posted 13 March, 2011 Share Posted 13 March, 2011 Good idea Saintscottofhteonortham, let's all get the mother of all pejazzles and smurf the granny out of Griffo with them next week. Also, on the last away day of the season we could all get them out, plain vanilla, and make it Richard Chaplow day. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The9 Posted 13 March, 2011 Share Posted 13 March, 2011 Can't quite understand those who are saying the goal should be disallowed, especially as the evidence is right there in video form, but thanks for the link OP. At the ground people were saying the lino already had his flag up before the clearance which bounced back to the Bournemouth player. This is tangibly cobblers, as the action immediately prior to the clearance was a Bournemouth throw-in, and everyone (I wish) knows you can't be offside from a throw-in. So what happened was the lino saw the Bournemouth scorer in an offside position, the ref clarified that the ball had last been played by a Saints player, and the goal stood. Crap though it was, it was definitely a legitimate goal, and both referee and his assistant did their jobs correctly. Unlike the penalty they should have had... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
saintscottofthenortham Posted 13 March, 2011 Author Share Posted 13 March, 2011 Good idea Saintscottofhteonortham, let's all get the mother of all pejazzles and smurf the granny out of Griffo with them next week. Also, on the last away day of the season we could all get them out, plain vanilla, and make it Richard Chaplow day. I was thinking more along the line of "Guly Day"...? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The9 Posted 13 March, 2011 Share Posted 13 March, 2011 (edited) Don't see why people agree that their goal should stand because it came off one of our players ? A deflection doesn't count the player that the ball comes off must be in "control" of the ball first for it to stand ! That is absolute garbage, if that had last smacked a Bournemouth player in the face it would have been offside. There is nothing at all in the laws OR the interpretations about the pass to the player in an offside position being deliberate or not. In open play the only issues are 1) whether the player is beyond the penultimate defender (he was) 1b) whether the player was ahead of the ball... (ta), and he was... 2) whether he is interfering - fortunately we don't need to get into the intricacies of that interpretation because he played the ball, so he was interfering 3) whether the ball was last played by a teammate - it wasn't, even before the rebound, therefore he wasn't offside. Had it hit a Bournemouth player, 3) would be different, and he would have been offside. Edited 13 March, 2011 by The9 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The9 Posted 13 March, 2011 Share Posted 13 March, 2011 The assistant referee was correct, Andre Mariner got it wrong (how unusual). The laws of the game and the International Board decisions clearly state that it is an offside offence if a player gains advantage by being in an offside position. Gaining an advantage means ""playing a ball that rebounds to him off a post or the crossbar having been in an offside position or playing the ball that rebounds to him off an opponent having been in an offside position". There is nothing in the laws or the clarifications from the IB about control etc. The goal should definitely have been disallowed. But hey, who cares, we won 3-1. Um, you've just quoted "if it rebounds off an opponent", but the pass BEFORE it was also made by an opponent, which makes your argument irrelevant. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smirking_Saint Posted 13 March, 2011 Share Posted 13 March, 2011 That is absolute garbage, if that had last smacked a Bournemouth player in the face it would have been offside. There is nothing at all in the laws OR the interpretations about the pass to the player in an offside position being deliberate or not. In open play the only issues are 1) whether the player is beyond the penultimate defender (he was) 2) whether he is interfering - fortunately we don't need to get into the intricacies of that interpretation because he played the ball, so he was interfering 3) whether the ball was last played by a teammate - it wasn't, even before the rebound, therefore he wasn't offside. Had it hit a Bournemouth player, 3) would be different, and he would have been offside. You also have to be infront of the ball to be offside, HTH Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
benjii Posted 13 March, 2011 Share Posted 13 March, 2011 I was thinking more along the line of "Guly Day"...? Yeah, and that. Coolio. That's the theme sorted then. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The9 Posted 13 March, 2011 Share Posted 13 March, 2011 You also have to be infront of the ball to be offside, HTH That is true, I should edit. Maybe I was using the idiot pundit version where they bang on about the utterly irrelevant "ball going forward" rule that they've all just made up in their heads to try and understand that law... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
benjii Posted 13 March, 2011 Share Posted 13 March, 2011 That is true, I should edit. Maybe I was using the idiot pundit version where they bang on about the utterly irrelevant "ball going forward" rule that they've all just made up in their heads to try and understand that law... It's not irrelevant. There has to be a ball passed forwards for there to be an offside. I think. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
St Chalet Posted 13 March, 2011 Share Posted 13 March, 2011 The ref and lino got it right. Had Butterfield passed the ball as opposed to be smashed by it then there would be no debate on the matter, the Laws of the Game treat those two situations identically. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smirking_Saint Posted 13 March, 2011 Share Posted 13 March, 2011 It's not irrelevant. There has to be a ball passed forwards for there to be an offside. I think. Well, yeah, but no, but yeah. The law is actually that a player behind the ball cannot be offside, and so, if i was behind you, you could pass the ball forward and i would be onside no matter what. I think. I don't quite get if The9 is sarcastically mocking me or the pundits, i hate t'internetz Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Whitey Grandad Posted 13 March, 2011 Share Posted 13 March, 2011 Well, yeah, but no, but yeah. The law is actually that a player behind the ball cannot be offside, and so, if i was behind you, you could pass the ball forward and i would be onside no matter what. I think. I don't quite get if The9 is sarcastically mocking me or the pundits, i hate t'internetz The actual wording is 'nearer to the opponents' goal line than both the ball and the second-last opponent', so he was in an offside position, but not committing an offence because the ball was not played or touched by a member of his own team. I was behind the goal and saw the flag go up straight away, so I wasn't too bothered at the time. I told my neighbour that I didn't celebrate because of the flag, in case he thought I was 'only there to watch Southampton'. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
boxosponge Posted 13 March, 2011 Share Posted 13 March, 2011 If any of you on here are the absolute ******s that decided to dress up for football, either **** off and don't come again, or sort your ****ing lives out. ** **** ******** Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Saint_lambden Posted 14 March, 2011 Share Posted 14 March, 2011 :lol: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Saint_Jonny Posted 14 March, 2011 Share Posted 14 March, 2011 :lol: I wouldn't do it, well I might if the misses made me, or if my mum made me, but that is beside the point. Good on him for having a good time. Don't see the reasoning for belittling people who get into it more than others. But if you want to pretend that replica shirts and face paint make you less of a "bloke" than the normal footy fan then I think you are deluded. (not you in specific lambden) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scotty Posted 14 March, 2011 Share Posted 14 March, 2011 I wouldn't do it, well I might if the misses made me, or if my mum made me, but that is beside the point. Good on him for having a good time. Don't see the reasoning for belittling people who get into it more than others. But if you want to pretend that replica shirts and face paint make you less of a "bloke" than the normal footy fan then I think you are deluded. (not you in specific lambden) Fair comment, imo. Each to his own. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
saintscottofthenortham Posted 14 March, 2011 Author Share Posted 14 March, 2011 Yeah, and that. Coolio. That's the theme sorted then. Sweet. We could always just pay tribute to whichever player you do so wish...? You take Chaplow (bold), I'll take Guly (landing strip), Dune can do Killer (Ginger Ninja) and Deppo can Do the Keegan! This'll Be great fun! Griffo's face is gonna be a picture! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rooney Posted 14 March, 2011 Share Posted 14 March, 2011 He's a local tramp. He's usually down at the speedway on a Wednesday peering in through the fence . Ken Bailey? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SW11_Saint Posted 14 March, 2011 Share Posted 14 March, 2011 The whole feature had the feel of one of those specials that are done when the non league team gets a big team in the Cup. eg All the interviews with the Bompey fans with the face paint, the weird looking ex hippy, thekids singing, the old dear cheering on the Cherries etc etc. It could have beem subtitled Bournemouth - the town that style forgot. Strange that they decided to analyse the Gobern sending off (and agreed they could not add anything to it) but did not even mention that the ref overruled the linesman for the Bompey goal. Exactly right, it clearly really was their 'cup final'. The whole thing had the feel of League of Gentlemen or Little Britain. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
doddisalegend Posted 14 March, 2011 Share Posted 14 March, 2011 The highlights where crap I thought we might see more of the match but no just lots of pointless fan interviews and such like. The punditry afterwards was even worse why spend so much time on the red card that had no effect on the game and came with only miniutes on the clock? Basically we end up with the same amount of football highlights as we always do, 30 econds of punditry (30 more than usual) and five miniutes of wasted guff when we could have had more football. Poor. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crazy Diamond Posted 14 March, 2011 Share Posted 14 March, 2011 In all 'fairness', a lot of them weren't doing fancy dress - they usually dress like that for Bournemouth games. Including the bloke in the wig and tights. He's bloody annoying and just stands around shouting at random passers by. The bloke with the United scarf is indeed the famous tramp, the Bournemouth equivalent of Burping Ron of Winchester (God rest his soul). There's a few strange people at Bournemouth games it has to be said. The line between being a good fan and a freak is a bit blurred down Dean Court way... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wadge Posted 14 March, 2011 Share Posted 14 March, 2011 You can actually be offside from a ball being played backwards, as long as you are in front of the ball. Was explained that on a ref's course!! So the ball is played backwards and you run from your offside position back to get the ball, from in front of the ball. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eastcowzer Posted 14 March, 2011 Share Posted 14 March, 2011 The highlights where crap I thought we might see more of the match but no just lots of pointless fan interviews and such like. The punditry afterwards was even worse why spend so much time on the red card that had no effect on the game and came with only miniutes on the clock? Basically we end up with the same amount of football highlights as we always do, 30 econds of punditry (30 more than usual) and five miniutes of wasted guff when we could have had more football. Poor. I think the 'Beeb' are contractually limited to showing no more than 10 minutes of action, a purely hypothetical time as they rarely,if ever, reach that point in time. As for the pre-match lunacy of the Cherries fans, they were probably encouraged by the Mancunian pillock introducing the item. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
doddisalegend Posted 14 March, 2011 Share Posted 14 March, 2011 I think the 'Beeb' are contractually limited to showing no more than 10 minutes of action, a purely hypothetical time as they rarely,if ever, reach that point in time. As for the pre-match lunacy of the Cherries fans, they were probably encouraged by the Mancunian pillock introducing the item. Fair enough shouldn't be suprised really. Takes me back to the days of MOTD when you'd watch the whole thing to get 30 seconds of saints highlights and a some snide comment from that **** Lawrenson right the end of the show. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smirking_Saint Posted 14 March, 2011 Share Posted 14 March, 2011 You can actually be offside from a ball being played backwards, as long as you are in front of the ball. Was explained that on a ref's course!! So the ball is played backwards and you run from your offside position back to get the ball, from in front of the ball. Which was my point, its not about ball direction, but where you physically are. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dune Posted 14 March, 2011 Share Posted 14 March, 2011 It's nice for Bournemouth fans to have big days like that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now