Jump to content

David Cameron is a total bellend.


sunrise

Recommended Posts

At least Cameron gives the loony left an outlet for their banal playground humour.

 

 

Ah, so I imagined all the garbage about how a lisp makes someone unelectable, did I? Or was that the point you're making by trying to talk with your tongue in your cheek?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He's an Eton toff and yet compared to Gordon Brown he's a man of the people.

 

You only have to look at the way Brown behaved when his spin Doctors allowed him to meet ordinary people. Turning up at Gillian Duffy's house and standing on her doorstep, like a 2 bob Neville Chamberlain " I have today managed to get an apoligy accepted by Mrs Duffy", was one of the most pathetic and demeaning sights ever seen of a British Prime Minister.

 

Who were Brown's advisers through all those years, who were his closet political allies, The 2 Eds God help us.

 

Hard to disagree with that. I do admire the way he dealt with the banking crisis, but he was never going to win an election.

 

Labour have shot themselves in the foot by electing Ed. A far better alternative would have been Milliband D who could have got James Purnell back as well. Formidable opposition to the lamentable Cameron, Osbourne and Hague.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Labour have shot themselves in the foot by electing Ed. A far better alternative would have been Milliband D who could have got James Purnell back as well. Formidable opposition to the lamentable Cameron, Osbourne and Hague.

 

I think parties lose their heads after losing elections, and end up electing the wrong man. The Tories did it with Hague, whereas they should have held their noses and gone for Clarke. It would have reassured the public that they were going to be a reasonable opposition. I like Hague, but he was too right wing and close to Thatcher for the public at that particular time. When people were giving New Labour a chance and they were in a honeymoon period, the Tories needed someone like Clarke (despite the fact he's hardly a Tory at all). Same now, Labour should have gone with a safe pair of hands (my choice would have been Harmen). Instead of that they've gone with someone from the left, perceived as a union man, and a bit of a policy wonk. If they were going to go down the "next generation" route, should have gone the whole hog and gone for Mrs Balls.I think she's quite impressive and would have looked good against the boys club that appear to run the Tory party. The only issue is her judgement, look at her choice of husband..........

Link to comment
Share on other sites

'Man who is not Bob Crow in personal anger issue' shock - in 'highlighted on Saints forum by Tory sympathiser' shock.

 

I'm shocked.

 

I'm more sad than shocked. trousers is with the swivelly eyes now. He is beyond saving.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You've missed the big picture trousers. This could be the biggest bellend balls up of all. Turning the police into trade union militants just at the time that poll tax-scale rebellion is going to start to build is asking for the mother of all trouble.

 

http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/blog/2011/mar/08/police-cuts-ministers

 

You don't half love a bit of hyperbole do you?!

 

Jolly good fun though, all the same. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He came across quite well, I thought. Very relaxed. But I did struggle to understand when he said he'd been 'araynd and abayt'.

 

The only time he looked uncomfortable was when those two girls asked him when he had his first kiss but they were fit so it would have been a bit awkward.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You've missed the big picture trousers. This could be the biggest bellend balls up of all. Turning the police into trade union militants just at the time that poll tax-scale rebellion is going to start to build is asking for the mother of all trouble.

 

http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/blog/2011/mar/08/police-cuts-ministers

 

I have faith in the British public to react in an intelligent and pragmatic fashion rather than resort to the base human instinct of turning disagreements into a bun fight....ah, hmmm.....yes...sorry...I see your point now....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Did anyone see him on The One Show?

 

Very dishy.

 

He carries himself well and is accomplished at public speaking/interviews. Contrast that with the lisping Millibean and his geeky persona. If he ever becomes PM it'll be a national embarrassment. DC is a Prime minister that we can feel proud of on the global stage. He's a good advertisement for Great Britain.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He carries himself well and is accomplished at public speaking/interviews. Contrast that with the lisping Millibean and his geeky persona. If he ever becomes PM it'll be a national embarrassment. DC is a Prime minister that we can feel proud of on the global stage. He's a good advertisement for Great Britain.

 

When did you acquire the gift of irony?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And the bellend balls-ups keep coming from Cameron. After Libya, India - which he manages to insult in a patronising 'we once ruled you' sort of way.

 

http://blogs.independent.co.uk/2011/03/08/david-cameron’s-‘diplomatic’-gunboats-misfire-in-india-and-libya/

 

I suspect part of the problem is that appalling bald git Hague, who trails around with him on overseas jollies - once an annoyingly precocious 14 year old with wet dreams of Thatch, and now an immature 50-something prone to dumbass gaffs like announcing, two weeks ago, that Gadaffi is in Venezuela.

 

God only knows, they're useless.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And the bellend balls-ups keep coming from Cameron. After Libya, India - which he manages to insult in a patronising 'we once ruled you' sort of way.

 

http://blogs.independent.co.uk/2011/03/08/david-cameron’s-‘diplomatic’-gunboats-misfire-in-india-and-libya/

 

I suspect part of the problem is that appalling bald git Hague, who trails around with him on overseas jollies - once an annoyingly precocious 14 year old with wet dreams of Thatch, and now an immature 50-something prone to dumbass gaffs like announcing, two weeks ago, that Gadaffi is in Venezuela.

 

God only knows, they're useless.

 

I am not sure that they have a monopoly on gaffes.

 

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/politics/milibands-trip-to-india-a-disaster-after-kashmir-gaffe-1418914.html

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And the bellend balls-ups keep coming from Cameron. After Libya, India - which he manages to insult in a patronising 'we once ruled you' sort of way.

 

http://blogs.independent.co.uk/2011/03/08/david-cameron’s-‘diplomatic’-gunboats-misfire-in-india-and-libya/

 

I suspect part of the problem is that appalling bald git Hague, who trails around with him on overseas jollies - once an annoyingly precocious 14 year old with wet dreams of Thatch, and now an immature 50-something prone to dumbass gaffs like announcing, two weeks ago, that Gadaffi is in Venezuela.

 

God only knows, they're useless.

 

So there is a problem with bald people is there Verbal? Now that is not very PC.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not sure why people are up in arms about someone saying a lisp will harm someone's chances of being elected. Make no mistake, the average voter will take this sort of thing into account.

 

Let's see. Lisp (allegedly). Vs Cameron's serial blundering incompetence. As you say, in hypoworld, there are no mistakes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Let's see. Lisp (allegedly). Vs Cameron's serial blundering incompetence. As you say, in hypoworld, there are no mistakes.

 

Tories have been embarassing over Libya Comrade Verbal but lets assess how the alternative got on. Against the wishes of all right minded people and our biggest ally America, they worked behind the scenes to release a convicted mass muderer on the basis that he had three months to live. To humiliating triumphant scenes they then lied to the world and blamed the Jocks (sorry is that racist?) for arranging the release of this terrorist. They also consistantly sucked up to Gaddafi and his brutal and vicious regime. At least teh Tories are trying to oust him. Loved to hear your thoughts on Labour and Libya.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Tories have been embarassing over Libya Comrade Verbal but lets assess how the alternative got on. Against the wishes of all right minded people and our biggest ally America, they worked behind the scenes to release a convicted mass muderer on the basis that he had three months to live. To humiliating triumphant scenes they then lied to the world and blamed the Jocks (sorry is that racist?) for arranging the release of this terrorist. They also consistantly sucked up to Gaddafi and his brutal and vicious regime. At least teh Tories are trying to oust him. Loved to hear your thoughts on Labour and Libya.

 

If you read a detailed account of the trial, it's highly unlikely that he was involved. It's not he first time that political pressure for a conviction has led to innocent people being convicted (see Northern Ireland).

 

All governments deal with unsavoury regimes, especially if they've got lots of money (or oil). Look how Thatcher sucked up to that bastion of democracy Saudi Arabia (who recently announced that any form of anti-government protest was banned).

 

That rabid left-winger Prince Andrew was also mates with Gaddafi.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you read a detailed account of the trial, it's highly unlikely that he was involved. It's not he first time that political pressure for a conviction has led to innocent people being convicted (see Northern Ireland).

 

All governments deal with unsavoury regimes, especially if they've got lots of money (or oil). Look how Thatcher sucked up to that bastion of democracy Saudi Arabia (who recently announced that any form of anti-government protest was banned).

 

That rabid left-winger Prince Andrew was also mates with Gaddafi.

 

He was convicted in a court of law. You cannot release somebody early ojn the grounds that 'he probably did not do it'.

 

I agree with acting in the interests of your nation and dealing with unsavouries - We do iot everyday ourselves in life.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He was convicted in a court of law. You cannot release somebody early ojn the grounds that 'he probably did not do it'.

 

I agree with acting in the interests of your nation and dealing with unsavouries - We do iot everyday ourselves in life.

 

They probably thought that it was cheaper to release him "on medical grounds" than to have dodgy evidence come to light in a few years, a re-trial, aquittal and millions in damages. (Again, see Northern Ireland).

 

If you can afford expensive lawyers, "medical grounds" seems a good way of getting released. Remember Ernest Saunders, who was banged up for fraud, released due to Alzheimers and then made a remarkable recovery - the only person ever to do so.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I listen to PMQ's a lot when i am in the car & the thing that strikes me the most about him is how personal he makes all his replies. He sounds like a bully who does not have a decent answer so calls you four eyes or fatso.

I also dont think he is very bright. He Fails to grasp the big economic issues & what really frustrates me is how he so aggressively went for Brown pre election for not getting voted in by the Country. He forgot about John Major & then conveniently forgets that he does not actually have a mandate to be our Prime Minister as he & his party did not get enough votes which is hugely hypocritical. Therefore for these things alone he is a "Bellend"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ah, so I imagined all the garbage about how a lisp makes someone unelectable, did I? Or was that the point you're making by trying to talk with your tongue in your cheek?

 

You forget that in this country, that DOES make someone unelectable.

 

I know people that voted against labour purely because of Browns one eye, with the excellent reasoning that 'Jeremy Clarkson is so f*cking funny, he looks like a gimp. LOL WHO WOULD VOTE FOR SOMEONE THAT LOOKS LIKE THAT!'

 

............Tools.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You forget that in this country, that DOES make someone unelectable.

 

I know people that voted against labour purely because of Browns one eye, with the excellent reasoning that 'Jeremy Clarkson is so f*cking funny, he looks like a gimp. LOL WHO WOULD VOTE FOR SOMEONE THAT LOOKS LIKE THAT!'

 

............Tools.

 

Anecdotes do not make a social trend - ie not everyone is that dim.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you read a detailed account of the trial, it's highly unlikely that he was involved. It's not he first time that political pressure for a conviction has led to innocent people being convicted (see Northern Ireland).

 

All governments deal with unsavoury regimes, especially if they've got lots of money (or oil). Look how Thatcher sucked up to that bastion of democracy Saudi Arabia (who recently announced that any form of anti-government protest was banned).

 

That rabid left-winger Prince Andrew was also mates with Gaddafi.

you could say the saville report could have been more political spin to keep the peace...???

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...