Lazlo78 Posted 28 February, 2011 Share Posted 28 February, 2011 I have no idea what this means. If someone can find some useful observation in these numbers, do enlighten us all... I take no responsibility for any mistakes in the calculations Total - FL1+JPT+FACP+LGCP (last season/this season) - Played: 59/37 - Wins: 34/19 - Draws: 14/7 - Losses: 11/11 - Goals F: 112/64 - Goals A: 65/34 - Points/game: 1,97/1,73 - Goals F/game: 1,90/1,73 - Goals A/game: 1,10/0,92 Football League One (last season/this season) - Played: 46/30 - Wins: 23/15 - Draws: 14/7 - Losses: 9/8 - Goals F: 85/54 - Goals A: 47/28 - Points/game: 1,80/1,73 - Goals F/game: 1,85/1,80 - Goals A/game: 1,02/0,93 Results spread - last season (this season): 1-1: 8 (2) 3-1: 8 (2) 1-0: 6 (2) 2-2: 5 (0) 2-0: 4 (5) 3-2: 4 (0) 1-2: 4 (1) 0-1: 3 (3) 0-0: 3 (4) 2-1: 3 (2) 1-3: 2 (0) 3-0: 2 (1) 4-1: 2 (3) 5-1: 2 (0) 1-4: 1 (0) 2-3: 1 (1) 5-0: 1 (0) 0-2: 0 (5) 4-0: 0 (3) 6-0: 0 (1) 4-4: 0 (1) 0-3: 0 (1) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jonnyboy Posted 28 February, 2011 Share Posted 28 February, 2011 A lot of 3-1s last season Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jonnyboy Posted 28 February, 2011 Share Posted 28 February, 2011 If lose many more Pardews record will look better than Madkins'? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Saintandy666 Posted 28 February, 2011 Share Posted 28 February, 2011 So we are scoring a bit less, but also conceding less. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Boy Saint Posted 28 February, 2011 Share Posted 28 February, 2011 Useful observation........................... TV is worse in Denmark on a Monday night than it is here!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trousers Posted 28 February, 2011 Share Posted 28 February, 2011 We're yet to draw 3-3 in either season. Make of that what you will. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
doddisalegend Posted 1 March, 2011 Share Posted 1 March, 2011 So we are scoring a bit less, but also conceding less. No surprise when you consider our defence last season compared to this season Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dubai_phil Posted 1 March, 2011 Share Posted 1 March, 2011 Played: 46/30 - Wins: 23/15 So, 16 games to go and we need 8 wins to equal last season's numbers. And we all feel that a 2 points per game average is what we should be aiming for. For "The Others" OMG this is a disaster, we've already had 8 defeats this season, that is only ONE less than in ALL of last year, we are DOOMED Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Turkish Posted 1 March, 2011 Share Posted 1 March, 2011 is anyone else really bored with stats? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trousers Posted 1 March, 2011 Share Posted 1 March, 2011 is anyone else really bored with stats? Yes, 78% of us (up from 64% last year) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
(not THE) Kevin Moore Posted 1 March, 2011 Share Posted 1 March, 2011 Yes, 78% of us (up from 64% last year) Nice... nice work. Did you know that 87.5% of all stats are made up? I don't think we do analysis/stats enough in this country. I hate American Football but they analyse the games in much more depth than we do 'football'. Instead we get no-nothing morons like Shearer telling us something we'd spotted about 10 mins before he did and Lineker taking the p1ss out of 'stats'. I'd like genuine insight from students of the game, like that Jonathan Wilson (?? I think?) who writes for the Guardian and wrote 'inverting the pyramid' or James Richardson. Bit of a tangental rant there... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eelpie Posted 1 March, 2011 Share Posted 1 March, 2011 So we are scoring a bit less, but also conceding less. Millwall were promoted with lots of tight 1-0 wins and a secure defence, if I remember rightly. That would be ok with me, much as we all like to see goals. A 1-0 win tonight would be good. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Saint Luke Posted 1 March, 2011 Share Posted 1 March, 2011 If we win 1-0 tonight and play badly some people on this board will complain. If we win 1-0 and play well some people on this board will complain. If we win 4-0 and play badly some people on this board will complain. If we win 4-0 and play well some people on this board will complain. 100% of the above is correct Make of that what you will. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thesaint sfc Posted 1 March, 2011 Share Posted 1 March, 2011 If we win 8-0 tonight some people would still complain. I remember when we beat Wolves 6-0 some people were saying 'Oh I've seen us play better than that, we were just lucky that they all went in today' Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The9 Posted 1 March, 2011 Share Posted 1 March, 2011 Nice... nice work. Did you know that 87.5% of all stats are made up? I don't think we do analysis/stats enough in this country. I hate American Football but they analyse the games in much more depth than we do 'football'. Instead we get no-nothing morons like Shearer telling us something we'd spotted about 10 mins before he did and Lineker taking the p1ss out of 'stats'. I'd like genuine insight from students of the game, like that Jonathan Wilson (?? I think?) who writes for the Guardian and wrote 'inverting the pyramid' or James Richardson. Bit of a tangental rant there... To be fair to Lee Dixon, he's at least trying to put a tactical perspective on some of the MotD and MotD2 output without dumbing it down or joking around about it. The fact that the BBC thinks that 10 minutes of Lineker / Hansen / Shearer banter is more important than actually showing the games, and the fact that they think ANYONE gives a crap about the idiot messages Lizzie Greenwood-Hughes reads out on the Football League Show is an embarrassment to their sporting coverage - but it's the exact same over-familiar celebrity-based jocularity they have on all of their coverage, and I absolutely despise it as it just detracts from the actual sporting event, the feats of achievement and how they are achieved (including tactical analysis) which SHOULD be the focus. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
(not THE) Kevin Moore Posted 1 March, 2011 Share Posted 1 March, 2011 To be fair to Lee Dixon, he's at least trying to put a tactical perspective on some of the MotD and MotD2 output without dumbing it down or joking around about it. The fact that the BBC thinks that 10 minutes of Lineker / Hansen / Shearer banter is more important than actually showing the games, and the fact that they think ANYONE gives a crap about the idiot messages Lizzie Greenwood-Hughes reads out on the Football League Show is an embarrassment to their sporting coverage - but it's the exact same over-familiar celebrity-based jocularity they have on all of their coverage, and I absolutely despise it as it just detracts from the actual sporting event, the feats of achievement and how they are achieved (including tactical analysis) which SHOULD be the focus. I do like Dixon, he's alright.... even if he does look like Tintin. and ANOTHER thing... When Lawro/Shearer will say something like 'it was a penalty but it was a bit harsh for the ref to send him off/book him' like there is ANY room for the Ref to use his judgement on issues of black/white. They're such dicks, I don't even mind Lineker much either he'd be alright with some decent pundits instead of those idiots he has to work across from currently. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JackFrost Posted 1 March, 2011 Share Posted 1 March, 2011 If lose many more Pardews record will look better than Madkins'? Half of this season's losses must have come under wilkins Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
doddisalegend Posted 1 March, 2011 Share Posted 1 March, 2011 If we win 1-0 tonight and play badly some people on this board will complain. If we win 1-0 and play well some people on this board will complain. If we win 4-0 and play badly some people on this board will complain. If we win 4-0 and play well some people on this board will complain. 100% of the above is correct Make of that what you will. What ever happens tonight some people on this board will complain about others complaining (actually it looks like that has already happened). There is also a 99% chance that the post match thread will turn into another self righteous rant at Alpine from all those who think he isn't allowed an opinion (no matter how mad it maybe). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GenevaSaint Posted 1 March, 2011 Share Posted 1 March, 2011 Half of this season's losses must have come under wilkins 3 and the 1 game where Adkins was appointed but was not "in charge". I really didn't get that comment (not yours, Jonnyboys). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Window Cleaner Posted 1 March, 2011 Share Posted 1 March, 2011 3 and the 1 game where Adkins was appointed but was not "in charge". I really didn't get that comment (not yours, Jonnyboys). Nope Pardew 1 league defeat Plymouth Wilkins 3 league defeats Rochdale,Swindon,MK Dons Adkins 4 league defeats Carlisle,Huddersfield,Brentford,Tranmere, Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frank's cousin Posted 1 March, 2011 Share Posted 1 March, 2011 To be fair to Lee Dixon, he's at least trying to put a tactical perspective on some of the MotD and MotD2 output without dumbing it down or joking around about it. The fact that the BBC thinks that 10 minutes of Lineker / Hansen / Shearer banter is more important than actually showing the games, and the fact that they think ANYONE gives a crap about the idiot messages Lizzie Greenwood-Hughes reads out on the Football League Show is an embarrassment to their sporting coverage - but it's the exact same over-familiar celebrity-based jocularity they have on all of their coverage, and I absolutely despise it as it just detracts from the actual sporting event, the feats of achievement and how they are achieved (including tactical analysis) which SHOULD be the focus. LOL.. to be fair though the amount of coverage they show is probably linked to their contract in terms of minutes etc... so the BeeB need these morons to talk sheidt for half the program to pad it out and fill the slot Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lazlo78 Posted 8 March, 2011 Author Share Posted 8 March, 2011 I have added a column for Adkins results disregarding the 2W/1D/5L-record he inherited... [b]Total - FL1+JPT+FACP+LGCP (last season/this season/Adkins)[/b] Played 59 40 32 Wins 34 21 19 Draws 14 7 6 Losses 11 12 7 F 112 69 62 A 65 35 26 Pts/g 1,97 1,75 1,97 F/g 1,90 1,73 1,94 A/g 1,10 0,88 0,81 [b]FL1 (last season/this season/Adkins)[/b] Played 46 33 28 Wins 23 17 16 Draws 14 7 6 Losses 9 9 6 F 85 59 54 A 47 29 24 Pts/g 1,80 1,76 [b]1,93[/b] F/g 1,85 1,79 [b]1,93[/b] A/g 1,02 0,88 [b]0,86[/b] Key points for me are all in the FL1-stats: Adkins is very close to two points per game We also very nearly average two goals per game which is an improvement Statistically we have a really solid defense We seem a bit more shaky and inconsistent than the stats signal - huge victories (Oldham etc.) and clueless defeats... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lazlo78 Posted 20 March, 2011 Author Share Posted 20 March, 2011 Adkins now averages 2 points/game in League One. Total - FL1+JPT+FACP+LGCP (last season/this season/Adkins) Played 59 42 34 Wins 34 23 21 Draws 14 7 6 Losses 11 12 7 F 112 74 67 A 65 36 27 Pts/g 1,97 1,81 2,03 F/g 1,90 1,76 1,97 A/g 1,10 0,86 0,79 FL1 (last season/this season/Adkins) Played 46 35 30 Wins 23 19 18 Draws 14 7 6 Losses 9 9 6 F 85 64 59 A 47 30 25 Pts/g 1,80 1,83 2,00 F/g 1,85 1,83 1,97 A/g 1,02 0,86 0,83 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NickG Posted 20 March, 2011 Share Posted 20 March, 2011 2 points per game gives us 86 if continued, enough? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lazlo78 Posted 2 May, 2011 Author Share Posted 2 May, 2011 (edited) Played Wins Draws Losses F A Pts/g F (av.) A (av.) Total 52 31 8 13 93 43 1,94 1,79 0,83 FL1 45 27 8 10 83 37 1,98 1,84 0,82 LGCP 2 1 0 1 2 1 1,50 1,00 0,50 FACP 4 3 0 1 8 2 2,25 2,00 0,50 JPT 1 0 0 1 0 3 0,00 0,00 3,00 NA(T) 44 29 7 8 86 34 2,14 1,95 0,77 NA(FL1) 40 26 7 7 78 32 2,13 1,95 0,80 Adkins with a staggering 2,13 points/game in his 40 FL1 games... amazing! Edited 2 May, 2011 by Lazlo78 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lazlo78 Posted 23 January, 2012 Author Share Posted 23 January, 2012 What does it all mean, you say? I don't know, you tell me... Played Wins Draws Losses F A Pts/g F (av.) A (av.) Total 31 19 5 7 61 34 2,00 1,97 1,10 FLC 26 15 5 6 50 28 1,92 1,92 1,08 LGCP 4 3 0 1 9 5 2,25 2,25 1,25 FACP 1 1 0 0 2 1 3,00 2,00 1,00 Total 09/10 10/11 11/12 Played 59 53 31 Wins 34 32 19 Draws 14 8 5 Losses 11 13 7 F 112 96 61 A 65 44 34 Pts/g 1,97 1,96 2,00 F/g 1,90 1,81 1,97 A/g 1,10 0,83 1,10 League 09/10 10/11 11/12 Played 46 46 26 Wins 23 28 15 Draws 14 8 5 Losses 9 10 6 F 85 86 50 A 47 38 28 Pts/g 1,80 2,00 1,92 F/g 1,85 1,87 1,92 A/g 1,02 0,83 1,08 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big Ron fan Posted 23 January, 2012 Share Posted 23 January, 2012 From OP: Football League One (last season/this season) - Played: 46/30 - Wins: 23/15 - Draws: 14/7 - Losses: 9/8 - Goals F: 85/54 - Goals A: 47/28 - Points/game: 1,80/1,73 - Goals F/game: 1,85/1,80 - Goals A/game: 1,02/0,93 I don't understand this. We've only played 26 league games this season. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lazlo78 Posted 23 January, 2012 Author Share Posted 23 January, 2012 I don't understand this. We've only played 26 league games this season. OP was posted 28-02-2011 11:55 PM Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kaiser Soze Posted 23 January, 2012 Share Posted 23 January, 2012 Approximately the last 35 games we have been winning at halftime, we've gone on to win. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steperki Posted 23 January, 2012 Share Posted 23 January, 2012 What does it all mean, you say? I don't know, you tell me... Played Wins Draws Losses F A Pts/g F (av.) A (av.) Total 31 19 5 7 61 34 2,00 1,97 1,10 FLC 26 15 5 6 50 28 1,92 1,92 1,08 LGCP 4 3 0 1 9 5 2,25 2,25 1,25 FACP 1 1 0 0 2 1 3,00 2,00 1,00 Total 09/10 10/11 11/12 Played 59 53 31 Wins 34 32 19 Draws 14 8 5 Losses 11 13 7 F 112 96 61 A 65 44 34 Pts/g 1,97 1,96 2,00 F/g 1,90 1,81 1,97 A/g 1,10 0,83 1,10 League 09/10 10/11 11/12 Played 46 46 26 Wins 23 28 15 Draws 14 8 5 Losses 9 10 6 F 85 86 50 A 47 38 28 Pts/g 1,80 2,00 1,92 F/g 1,85 1,87 1,92 A/g 1,02 0,83 1,08 We're scoring roughly the same number of goals per game but this seems to say to me that the defence is not quite as solid as last season (probably because it's against better players) and is probably a contributing factor as to why we haven't got quite such a good win rate and Pts/g. Obviously this is all relative as we are still up there with the best in the league this year! Makes you wonder though if the call for a new striker is as urgent as the cover for Fonte? Interesting data all the same. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lazlo78 Posted 14 March, 2012 Author Share Posted 14 March, 2012 Total 09/10 10/11 11/12 Played 59 53 43 Wins 34 32 24 Draws 14 8 10 Losses 11 13 9 F 112 96 77 A 65 44 40 Pts/g 1,97 1,96 1,91 F/g 1,90 1,81 1,79 A/g 1,10 0,83 0,93 League 09/10 10/11 11/12 Played 46 46 36 Wins 23 28 20 Draws 14 8 9 Losses 9 10 7 F 85 86 65 A 47 38 33 Pts/g 1,80 2,00 [b]1,92[/b] F/g 1,85 1,87 1,81 A/g 1,02 0,83 0,92 Going by our average this far, we could expect in the vicinity of 19 points for the remainder of the season... Of course statistics means f-all if we go and lose half of our remaining games Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lazlo78 Posted 6 April, 2012 Author Share Posted 6 April, 2012 3 wins and a defeat later, all is looking good. We need 5 draws and a loss to mirror our results two seasons ago, but let's try to aim slightly higher... League 09/10 10/11 11/12 Played 46 46 40 Wins 23 28 23 Draws 14 8 9 Losses 9 10 8 F 85 86 72 A 47 38 38 Pts/g 1,80 2,00 1,95 F/g 1,85 1,87 1,80 A/g 1,02 0,83 0,95 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lazlo78 Posted 28 April, 2012 Author Share Posted 28 April, 2012 Appearances for Saints this season across all competitions - we played a total of 53 games (taken from http://www.saintsfc.co.uk/page/Appearances/0,,10280~201110280,00.html): FLC CUPS TOTAL Name Start Sub Start Sub Start Sub Kelvin Davis 45 0 0 0 45 0 Richard Lambert 42 0 2 4 44 4 Adam Lallana 41 0 3 2 44 2 Jose Fonte 42 0 1 1 43 1 Jack Cork 39 7 3 0 42 7 Jos Hooiveld 39 0 2 0 41 0 Guly Do Prado 36 6 3 1 39 7 Daniel Fox 37 4 2 0 39 4 F. Richardson 33 1 3 0 36 1 Dean Hammond 31 12 3 2 34 14 M. Schneiderlin 29 13 5 0 34 13 Richard Chaplow 17 8 3 0 20 8 David Connolly 17 9 0 0 17 9 Dan Harding 12 8 5 0 17 8 Aaron Martin 7 3 7 0 14 3 D. Butterfield 9 1 3 0 12 1 Billy Sharp 11 4 0 0 11 4 Steve De Ridder 5 27 5 0 10 27 Bart Bialkowski 1 0 7 0 8 0 Daniel Seaborne 4 0 2 0 6 0 Jason Puncheon 4 4 1 0 5 4 Tadanari Lee 4 3 1 1 5 4 Lee Holmes 0 6 4 1 4 7 Ben Reeves 0 3 3 2 3 5 Jonathan Forte 0 1 3 1 3 2 Ryan Dickson 0 0 2 0 2 0 J. Ward-Prowse 0 0 2 0 2 0 Lee Barnard 0 6 1 2 1 8 Ryan Doble 0 0 1 0 1 0 Yago Falque 1 0 0 0 1 0 Sam Hoskins 0 0 0 2 0 2 Luke Shaw 0 0 0 1 0 1 Jack Stephens 0 0 0 1 0 1 Amazing that Schteeve was used as a sub 27 times this season, that Lambo was involved in 48 of 53 games, that Cork was involved in 49 of 53 games, that Hooiveld managed 41 starts, that Aaron Martin got 14 starts, and that Danny Butterfield got 12 starts with a good handful of these coming in the exciting run in... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now