saint lard Posted 26 February, 2011 Author Posted 26 February, 2011 HT. A bit of an anti climax towards the end.
Saintandy666 Posted 26 February, 2011 Posted 26 February, 2011 If results remain similar to this, I will be happy.
hypochondriac Posted 26 February, 2011 Posted 26 February, 2011 Ahead but not playing well ? Sounds like we have played pretty well overall.
Deppo Posted 26 February, 2011 Posted 26 February, 2011 Ahead but not playing well ? Great, isn't it? It's the sort of game that has something for everyone on here. Some people can be happy because we are winning and others can revel in the despair of not playing well. It's almost the perfect game for Saints fans.
Badger Posted 26 February, 2011 Posted 26 February, 2011 Ahead but not playing well ? were playing great for 25 mins- but have calmed down a bit since, encouraging performance and I reckon we'll score another 2 or 3.
stu0x Posted 26 February, 2011 Posted 26 February, 2011 Well so far pretty much all the results are going our way. Brighton losing, and everyone around us (with the exception of Huddersfield) drawing. And we're much better in the second half aren't we?
trousers Posted 26 February, 2011 Posted 26 February, 2011 Up to 4th 4 points off second spot with 3 games in hand
CWD Posted 26 February, 2011 Posted 26 February, 2011 GOAL: Doncaster 1-1 Watford : Euell (45+1) Strange. That one had 0-0 written all over it
alpine_saint Posted 26 February, 2011 Posted 26 February, 2011 It was a genuine question because I havent been following the game, Deppo, FFS.
sfc4prem Posted 26 February, 2011 Posted 26 February, 2011 Adkins questionable for not being able to react to Swindon's tactical change? Anyway, if we had taken our chances - which we rarely seem to do apart from Oldham away - we'd be 3 nil up, and the game would be completely different. We simply have to keep Swindon out, and to not bore me any further I want us to step up our performance and score a couple more.
skintsaint Posted 26 February, 2011 Posted 26 February, 2011 only 1-0 ffs.....we should be battering teams like this 7-0 by half time. Adkins out!!
PhilippineSaint Posted 26 February, 2011 Posted 26 February, 2011 It was a genuine question because I havent been following the game, Deppo, FFS. It was a statement with a question mark after it not a question.
hutch Posted 26 February, 2011 Posted 26 February, 2011 We are going off the boil a bit and need a lift at HT! Swindon switched to 451 Is that any better than SaintsPlayer?
alpine_saint Posted 26 February, 2011 Posted 26 February, 2011 It was a statement with a question mark after it not a question. Who the f**k are you ? It was a question.
Deppo Posted 26 February, 2011 Posted 26 February, 2011 It was a genuine question because I havent been following the game, Deppo, FFS. Why on earth did you assume that we weren't playing well then if you haven't been following the game? Why didn't you ask "Have we been playing well?" or "How have we been playing?"
adj250770 Posted 26 February, 2011 Posted 26 February, 2011 Who the f**k are you ? It was a question. LOL! Who's woken up and put his grumpy pants on today? Saints are winning, all is good, come on - more goals 2nd half please :-)
Deppo Posted 26 February, 2011 Posted 26 February, 2011 He doesn't have anything other than grumpy pants. He sleeps in them. He only has one pair.
PhilippineSaint Posted 26 February, 2011 Posted 26 February, 2011 Ahead but not playing well ? This is a statement not a question.
alpine_saint Posted 26 February, 2011 Posted 26 February, 2011 Why on earth did you assume that we weren't playing well then if you haven't been following the game? Why didn't you ask "Have we been playing well?" or "How have we been playing?" Oh, do shut it with the post dissecting. I was reacting to the previous half-dozen posts I skimmed which said things like "anti-climax" and "going off the boil"
Badger Posted 26 February, 2011 Posted 26 February, 2011 Adkins questionable for not being able to react to Swindon's tactical change? Anyway, if we had taken our chances - which we rarely seem to do apart from Oldham away - we'd be 3 nil up, and the game would be completely different. We simply have to keep Swindon out, and to not bore me any further I want us to step up our performance and score a couple more. we are hardly playing badly
alpine_saint Posted 26 February, 2011 Posted 26 February, 2011 This is a statement not a question. Nope, its a question. Go and find an argument elsewhere.
Deppo Posted 26 February, 2011 Posted 26 February, 2011 Oh, do shut it with the post dissecting. I was reacting to the previous half-dozen posts I skimmed which said things like "anti-climax" and "going off the boil" Of course you were, sweetie.
Saint Without a Halo Posted 26 February, 2011 Posted 26 February, 2011 Is that any better than SaintsPlayer? Anything is better than SaintsPlayer!
alpine_saint Posted 26 February, 2011 Posted 26 February, 2011 Of course you were, sweetie. Glad thats cleared up.
Ohio Saint Posted 26 February, 2011 Posted 26 February, 2011 I think it is fair to say that it was a real question. On the other hand, if one has the reputation of being a very pessimistic asshat, then it is incumbent on the poster of such a poorly phrased question to make it clear that it was, indeed a genuine request for information. (See paragraph 3 subsection D-4)
silversaint Posted 26 February, 2011 Posted 26 February, 2011 Let's get back to the game shall we?Any ht changes?
saint lard Posted 26 February, 2011 Author Posted 26 February, 2011 http://www.saintsweb.co.uk/showthread.php?28539-Saints-(1)v-Swindon(0)-2nd-half-chat....
Kingsbridge Saint Posted 26 February, 2011 Posted 26 February, 2011 It worries me that the Swindon commentators thought we were capable of kicking up a gear 'if necessary' and that we've hit the post twice. The sort of game where we concede a late equaliser and regret the missed opportunities? We need to tear Swindon a new one and put this game to bed.
alpine_saint Posted 26 February, 2011 Posted 26 February, 2011 I think it is fair to say that it was a real question. On the other hand, if one has the reputation of being a very pessimistic asshat, then it is incumbent on the poster of such a poorly phrased question to make it clear that it was, indeed a genuine request for information. (See paragraph 3 subsection D-4) Poorly phrased my arse.
trousers Posted 26 February, 2011 Posted 26 February, 2011 2ND HALF CHAT OVER HERE: http://www.saintsweb.co.uk/showthread.php?28539-Saints-(1)v-Swindon(0)-2nd-half-chat
trousers Posted 26 February, 2011 Posted 26 February, 2011 2ND HALF CHAT OVER HERE: http://www.saintsweb.co.uk/showthrea...-2nd-half-chat
Saint Without a Halo Posted 26 February, 2011 Posted 26 February, 2011 Peterborough 1 up and go fourth!
Recommended Posts