Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

Bullsh:t Colin, anyone can complete the task. Just listen to your voices.

Edited by Dog
Posted
Bullsh:t Colin, anyone can complete the task. Just listen to your voices.

 

They all talk at the same time, saying different things. It's just one big mess. They will never agree thus will have no effect.

Posted
redknapp is quite a selfish choice. george bush would have the most benefit for the world

 

Whoa! Stop! and think about this. You want to make GeeDubyaBoosh a saint? Because as sure as eggs is eggs, hard over, then his party will be re-elected in a massive lurch even further to the right that will last at least two terms.

 

Don't disturb the balance, at this moment in time things appear to be delicately balanced with a chance that the, apparently, more sane candidate may well make it to the White House.

Posted
If it were free, then I would murder Jamie Oliver. This is because he has a very fat tongue and says things like "pukka".

 

He might do that, but I believe Jamie is actually a reasonably good person. Even if I did have someone in mind, and I don't, he certainly wouldn't be the person.

 

EDIT: Mind you, his Missus is as close as a woman gets to being an arsehole IMO. So maybe...

Posted
He might do that, but I believe Jamie is actually a reasonably good person. Even if I did have someone in mind, and I don't, he certainly wouldn't be the person.

Jamie Oliver is a massive hypocrite and ****. He blabs on about the nation's dietary issues yet is quite happy to put his name and stupid face on products which fly in the face of the agenda he peddles to repressed northern housewives. Additionally, the bull**** he spouted about chickens last year didn't find favour with his corporate sponsors. If he genuinely found chicken's treatment as abhorrent as he claimed he should have told them to poke their cheque and change their policy on eggs; instead he sent a letter and apologised to their CEO.

I had no problem with him when he was the naked chef, but this campaigning ******** is half hearted and hypocritical self-promotion, the guy is a dicksplash.

Posted
Jamie Oliver is a massive hypocrite and ****. He blabs on about the nation's dietary issues yet is quite happy to put his name and stupid face on products which fly in the face of the agenda he peddles to repressed northern housewives. Additionally, the bull**** he spouted about chickens last year didn't find favour with his corporate sponsors. If he genuinely found chicken's treatment as abhorrent as he claimed he should have told them to poke their cheque and change their policy on eggs; instead he sent a letter and apologised to their CEO.

I had no problem with him when he was the naked chef, but this campaigning ******** is half hearted and hypocritical self-promotion, the guy is a dicksplash.

 

Ooh boy. So much agenda. I didn't say the guy was a Saint. I just said he was a reasonably good person.

Posted
Jamie Oliver is a massive hypocrite and ****. He blabs on about the nation's dietary issues yet is quite happy to put his name and stupid face on products which fly in the face of the agenda he peddles to repressed northern housewives. Additionally, the bull**** he spouted about chickens last year didn't find favour with his corporate sponsors. If he genuinely found chicken's treatment as abhorrent as he claimed he should have told them to poke their cheque and change their policy on eggs; instead he sent a letter and apologised to their CEO.

I had no problem with him when he was the naked chef, but this campaigning ******** is half hearted and hypocritical self-promotion, the guy is a dicksplash.

 

The guy doesn't think through his arguments but I wouldn't murder the thick, thick tounged rich arsehole.

 

Paul Daniels and most other "magicians" are within my firing line though.

Posted

I don't get it, is the meaning of this thread that we would murder people if it weren't for the money involved?

 

I can't say that this is the main thing that's been stopping me.

Posted
I don't get it, is the meaning of this thread that we would murder people if it weren't for the money involved?

 

I can't say that this is the main thing that's been stopping me.

 

No, free = you wont get caught. Nothing to do with money

Posted
I don't get it, is the meaning of this thread that we would murder people if it weren't for the money involved?

 

I can't say that this is the main thing that's been stopping me.

 

Go and club some seals you thick cu nt!

Posted

Osama Bin Laden, live on national TV. With a can of petrol and a lit cigarette. I casually toss the fag into the cave which has been pre-laced with petrol, turn to the camera, and do a Fonzie thumbs up.

Posted
Osama Bin Laden, live on national TV. With a can of petrol and a lit cigarette. I casually toss the fag into the cave which has been pre-laced with petrol, turn to the camera, and do a Fonzie thumbs up.

 

You have thought about this a lot , haven't you?

Posted
I'm capable of much worse, I still reckon i'll make front page at some point in my life :smt074

 

Would it be wrong to suggest that a sweepstake is in order to guess the reason?

Posted
Osama Bin Laden, live on national TV. With a can of petrol and a lit cigarette. I casually toss the fag into the cave which has been pre-laced with petrol, turn to the camera, and do a Fonzie thumbs up.

This would not work unless you're talking about throwing a flaming homosexual into the cave; unless you're in the movies a lit cigarette will not ignite petrol.

Posted
This would not work unless you're talking about throwing a flaming homosexual into the cave; unless you're in the movies a lit cigarette will not ignite petrol.

 

Well you've certainly p*ssed on his would be fire haven't you.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...