NickG Posted 22 January, 2011 Posted 22 January, 2011 poor back line for the goal 1st half not acceptable 2nd half -some saves, chances to Lambert, created numerous opportunities won't win giving away those sort of goals
NickG Posted 22 January, 2011 Author Posted 22 January, 2011 played too many long balls in first half hour
trousers Posted 22 January, 2011 Posted 22 January, 2011 played too many long balls in first half hour Does he know why?
NickG Posted 22 January, 2011 Author Posted 22 January, 2011 they played 3 CBs - look at players not passing well enough or quick enough
Saint_clark Posted 22 January, 2011 Posted 22 January, 2011 "Then you look at Morgan and you look...well I don't wanna use names individually" Not happy with Morgan for some reason obviously.
NickG Posted 22 January, 2011 Author Posted 22 January, 2011 they then cut it short before any talk about players!!
thorpie the sinner Posted 22 January, 2011 Posted 22 January, 2011 what the new players we need and arent going to get???? last time i trust my instincts lol
S-Clarke Posted 22 January, 2011 Posted 22 January, 2011 2 or 3 week lay off for hammond and lallana. Punch was excluded as he's not ''mentally'' right. more on that later.
Matthew Le God Posted 22 January, 2011 Posted 22 January, 2011 He also said... - Pucheon's mental state reason for his omission. - Lallana and Hammond 2 or 3 weeks away from a return.
Saint_clark Posted 22 January, 2011 Posted 22 January, 2011 He also said... - Pucheon's mental state reason for his omission. - Lallana and Hammond 2 or 3 weeks away from a return. What an unprofessional c*ck.
S-Clarke Posted 22 January, 2011 Posted 22 January, 2011 What an unprofessional c*ck. That's the reason he's a kind of journey man at such a young age...shame really, could be a good player if he wasn't so screwy. It was exactly the same at Plymouth.
dune Posted 22 January, 2011 Posted 22 January, 2011 Pucheon's mental state reason for his omission. He needs some counselling. Lesson 1 - Pull yourself together you big poof.
trousers Posted 22 January, 2011 Posted 22 January, 2011 they played 3 CBs - look at players not passing well enough or quick enough Did he explain why we had two centre backs on the bench...? Hardly impact players?
Weston Saint Posted 22 January, 2011 Posted 22 January, 2011 Puncheon played in the same Paul Elliott Academy as Drew Surman when Saints let him as Paul arranged games against other London teams. Even then he had an attitude. Would be interested to know why Plymouth let him go. Believe their may have been an off the field incident there.
Matthew Le God Posted 22 January, 2011 Posted 22 January, 2011 He needs some counselling. Lesson 1 - Pull yourself together you big poof. They should hire you as a sports psychologist.
S-Clarke Posted 22 January, 2011 Posted 22 January, 2011 Adkins seems to be commenting on agents unsettling Punchon. They will deal with it ''internally'' He wants people at this football club who will give everything they've got. Sounds like he's a goner.
MarkSFC Posted 22 January, 2011 Posted 22 January, 2011 What an unprofessional c*ck. now listen to what he actually said in full and Im sure you'll withdraw that!
MarkSFC Posted 22 January, 2011 Posted 22 January, 2011 Did he explain why we had two centre backs on the bench...? Hardly impact players? which is why the squad isnt good enough..........
Jimmy Gabriel's Halo Posted 22 January, 2011 Posted 22 January, 2011 Adkins just said JP's head "hasn't been right since Thursday". Question is, which Thursday ? He didn't specify unfortunately...
Liquidshokk Posted 22 January, 2011 Posted 22 January, 2011 Puncheon you c o c k. You don't know a good opportunity when you see it. Good comment regarding saints only wanting players that will give everything to saints when they put the shirt on.
dan17 Posted 22 January, 2011 Posted 22 January, 2011 He needs some counselling. Lesson 1 - Pull yourself together you big poof. I've just smiled for the first time this afternoon. Thankyou!
Matthew Le God Posted 22 January, 2011 Posted 22 January, 2011 now listen to what he actually said in full and Im sure you'll withdraw that! If anything what he actually said reinforces it even more. He was due to travel on Thursday and then decided his head wasn't right. That is unprofessional, he is under contract at Saints for the next 2 years. Adkins said it will be dealt with in house (maybe that means a fine), and I doubt he will be at Saints in February.
dune Posted 22 January, 2011 Posted 22 January, 2011 They should hire you as a sports psychologist. In puncheon's case I wouldn't waste my breath as he's the sort that'd just sulk. Adkins just needs to get rid of him because he's not good for morale.
madruss Posted 22 January, 2011 Posted 22 January, 2011 Puncheon played in the same Paul Elliott Academy as Drew Surman when Saints let him as Paul arranged games against other London teams. Even then he had an attitude. Would be interested to know why Plymouth let him go. Believe their may have been an off the field incident there. When Plymouth played at St. Mary's earlier in the season, the Plymouth fans booed Puncheon - which seemed strange at the time given that he hardly played for them. Perhap it's something to do with an off-the-field incident?
Thedelldays Posted 22 January, 2011 Posted 22 January, 2011 all I know is that when we bought puncheon, plymouth could not wait to get shot
dune Posted 22 January, 2011 Posted 22 January, 2011 Puncheon you c o c k. You don't know a good opportunity when you see it. Good comment regarding saints only wanting players that will give everything to saints when they put the shirt on. Maybe he's having a "Is Life Really All That?" moment.
MarkSFC Posted 22 January, 2011 Posted 22 January, 2011 If anything what he actually said reinforces it even more. He was due to travel on Thursday and then decided his head wasn't right. That is unprofessional, he is under contract at Saints for the next 2 years. Adkins said it will be dealt with in house (maybe that means a fine), and I doubt he will be at Saints in February. now listen to what he actually said in full and Im sure you'll withdraw that! just realised Saint_Clark may mean that Puncheon is the unprofessional C***!!!!
doddisalegend Posted 22 January, 2011 Posted 22 January, 2011 which is why the squad isnt good enough.......... Not true Bompey are doing better than us with a team that cost pence compared to ours. It's not just about buying loads of players it's about the players putting the effort n we have one of the best teams in the league if they can be arsed, sadly they have far too many can't be bothered days.
Window Cleaner Posted 22 January, 2011 Posted 22 January, 2011 "Then you look at Morgan and you look...well I don't wanna use names individually" Not happy with Morgan for some reason obviously. I'm not sure that's exactly what he said, he seemed to be talking about getting the ball out wide and I heard it as "so we looked to Morgan,well i don't want to name players but we weren't quick enough to the second ball". Could be wrong though, I wasn't paying all that much attention.
Legod Third Coming Posted 22 January, 2011 Posted 22 January, 2011 Can someone go round and kick the cr4p out of Jason Puncheon. There are two and half million people out of work you fecking worthless pr i ck!!
MarkSFC Posted 22 January, 2011 Posted 22 January, 2011 Can someone go round and kick the cr4p out of Jason Puncheon. There are two and half million people out of work you fecking worthless pr i ck!! well said...
MarkSFC Posted 22 January, 2011 Posted 22 January, 2011 Not true Bompey are doing better than us with a team that cost pence compared to ours. It's not just about buying loads of players it's about the players putting the effort n we have one of the best teams in the league if they can be arsed, sadly they have far too many can't be bothered days. they will struggle to make the play-offs come May.
Window Cleaner Posted 22 January, 2011 Posted 22 January, 2011 Can someone go round and kick the cr4p out of Jason Puncheon. There are two and half million people out of work you fecking worthless pr i ck!! But it's obvious that he no longer wants to be here. We have seemingly priced him out of a move that he wanted to happen,so Millwall have signed someone they could afford. That's the trouble with letting players go out on loan, if they like where they went and you put an enormous price tag on them they tend to get ****ed off.If we told him on Thursday he was on the bench today and yet he was a starter at Millwall, well then I can see him being hacked off.
Amesbury Saint Posted 22 January, 2011 Posted 22 January, 2011 they will struggle to make the play-offs come May. us or Bompey? they are not second because of a fluke.
Window Cleaner Posted 22 January, 2011 Posted 22 January, 2011 us or Bompey? they are not second because of a fluke. they score goals consistently, that's their great strength.
dune Posted 22 January, 2011 Posted 22 January, 2011 But it's obvious that he no longer wants to be here. We have seemingly priced him out of a move that he wanted to happen,so Millwall have signed someone they could afford. That's the trouble with letting players go out on loan, if they like where they went and you put an enormous price tag on them they tend to get ****ed off.If we told him on Thursday he was on the bench today and yet he was a starter at Millwall, well then I can see him being hacked off. So what do we do with him? Another club would be mad to want him. The last thing we want is someone like him lowering morale. It could well be his fault we've been so crap the last two games.
Big Dick Last Posted 22 January, 2011 Posted 22 January, 2011 What an unprofessional c*ck. Is it not about time for a club owner to let a player like this rot in the reserves for the rest of his contract ? I know the club would make no money from him when his contract finished but it would send a message to these overpaid prima donnas that they do not own or run our clubs. You are under contract, so play to the best of your ability and train as a professional or play with the trainees. If you fail to turn up to training we will fine you. If this happened it would make my day. Players like this, and he is not the only one, p*ss me off.
Chez Posted 22 January, 2011 Posted 22 January, 2011 (edited) Would be interested to know why Plymouth let him go. Having made the two league jump from Barnet he was garbage in the early games of the season, in which Plymouth failed to win any games and the fans thought he was out of his depth and gave him some stick - his languid style suggested a lack of interest. In his sixth and final game against Norwich they had a defender sent off after half an hour. Puncheon was immediatley substituted by Luggy to bring another defender on. Plymouth were already a goal down at that point and went on to lose the game. He was then dropped and didn't play for five weeks until MK Dons took him on loan. What odds he was less than impressed about being the man taken off and had words with Sturrock that led to his exit. Having said that you'd of thought he would have gone quicker than five weeks later, but perhaps the emergency loan window does not open till end of October? BTW Adkins saying his head is not right usually just means he has been offered a contract elsewhere and that is bound to take his focus. Edited 22 January, 2011 by Chez
Window Cleaner Posted 22 January, 2011 Posted 22 January, 2011 So what do we do with him? Another club would be mad to want him. The last thing we want is someone like him lowering morale. It could well be his fault we've lost the last two games. We sell him to Millwall, or one of those "other" clubs that are keen on signing him (if you believe agent talk in the papers).Jackett has said he wants him but our price is far too high.There is absolutely no point in retaining a player against his wishes if you have some sort of valid(and reasonable) offer for him.
OVER THE HILL Posted 22 January, 2011 Posted 22 January, 2011 Is it not about time for a club owner to let a player like this rot in the reserves for the rest of his contract ? I know the club would make no money from him when his contract finished but it would send a message to these overpaid prima donnas that they do not own or run our clubs. You are under contract, so play to the best of your ability and train as a professional or play with the trainees. If you fail to turn up to training we will fine you. If this happened it would make my day. Players like this, and he is not the only one, p*ss me off. Agree with this. Kenwyne Jones tried the same thing but we were desperate for money so he had to go.
dune Posted 22 January, 2011 Posted 22 January, 2011 Is it not about time for a club owner to let a player like this rot in the reserves for the rest of his contract ? In principle i'd say do it, but in practice you don't want a spoilt brat undermining morale. If I was the club i'd try and loan him to lots of clubs where he didn't want to go - places like yeovil, Mansfield, Carlisle - all the backwater clubs. He clearly likes the big lights of London so we should not let him get his way. Get a pair of compasses and draw a circle around London for 100 miles and any club within this zone should not be considered. If Puncheon then keeps refusing the loans it'll draw attention to his attitude and no club will ever touch him. That is what i'd do if I was Cortese.
Chez Posted 22 January, 2011 Posted 22 January, 2011 There is absolutely no point in retaining a player against his wishes if you have some sort of valid(and reasonable) offer for him.if we bought him for £250,000 and they are only offering £150,000, that does not appear a valid offer.
Legod Third Coming Posted 22 January, 2011 Posted 22 January, 2011 So what do we do with him? Another club would be mad to want him. The last thing we want is someone like him lowering morale. It could well be his fault we've been so crap the last two games. We send him to do community work until he wakes up and realises that when you have priveleges you also have responsibilities, and that professionalism in sport is everything. Or... You send around two big fellas with career ending hardware and tell him to buck his petty little ideas up. Ungrateful t o ss er!!
doddisalegend Posted 22 January, 2011 Posted 22 January, 2011 they score goals consistently, that's their great strength. Despite selling their top two strikers this season, yet we need to buy another half dozen players to be competitive..............................
Window Cleaner Posted 22 January, 2011 Posted 22 January, 2011 Despite selling their top two strikers this season, yet we need to buy another half dozen players to be competitive.............................. It's obviously their system that scores the goals and not the individualities.
Liquidshokk Posted 22 January, 2011 Posted 22 January, 2011 Maybe he's having a "Is Life Really All That?" moment. Jeez, and turkeyhead said I was a bore. Do you and him have to refer to threads that are done and dusted all the time? Don't make me pull out all of your cr@p contributions to this site.
alpine_saint Posted 22 January, 2011 Posted 22 January, 2011 He also said... - Pucheon's mental state reason for his omission. - Lallana and Hammond 2 or 3 weeks away from a return. It really is time to get rid. Totally undependable
Turkish Posted 22 January, 2011 Posted 22 January, 2011 It really is time to get rid. Totally undependable We agree on something my chunky friend, lets put out the bunting!!! Any player, no matter how good that misses a game because of their "mental state" is a c*nt and should be got shot off at the earliest opportunity. If they cant hack a midseason game at Tranmere how are they going to cope with the pressure of having to win a game to secure a title or promotion?
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now