dune Posted 24 January, 2011 Share Posted 24 January, 2011 But the bit of paper proves nothing. I remember many a **** teacher (degree qualified), so even though you have a history degree, it does not make you a better history teacher. However, if you could tell me how your input has improved the average history grade within your school, then I would be impressed. GCSE's get easier every year so I wouldn't be impressed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deppo Posted 24 January, 2011 Share Posted 24 January, 2011 GCSEs get easier every year. That's what I heard down the pub. FACT. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
buctootim Posted 24 January, 2011 Share Posted 24 January, 2011 GCSE's get easier every year so I wouldn't be impressed. Might as well go for those retakes then Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thorpe-le-Saint Posted 24 January, 2011 Share Posted 24 January, 2011 But the bit of paper proves nothing. I remember many a **** teacher (degree qualified), so even though you have a history degree, it does not make you a better history teacher. However, if you could tell me how your input has improved the average history grade within your school, then I would be impressed. The initial problem was that dunce claimed I wasn't qualified to analyse or infer, when I am. The statement on my previous post challenged how you would expect me to prove this. Of course it doesn't make be a better teacher, you have to be taught to be a teacher and there are those better than me, as there are in any job. However, I am more than qualified to analyse and infer, that I'm afraid is a fact due to my postgraduate qualifications, no mater in what self-loathing regard you hold University education. Anyway, not only did my second to bottom set all hit or exceed the targets as laid out in the ambitious data given to schools by the FFT between Year 7 and Year 11, but in my new school, where I also teach English alongside A-Level history, my sets are all making similar progress. But I'll be fair, there is no reason for you take this information on anything more than face value Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dune Posted 24 January, 2011 Share Posted 24 January, 2011 Might as well go for those retakes then You've gone quite r.e the big brother poll. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dune Posted 24 January, 2011 Share Posted 24 January, 2011 The initial problem was that dunce claimed I wasn't qualified to analyse or infer, when I am. The statement on my previous post challenged how you would expect me to prove this. Of course it doesn't make be a better teacher, you have to be taught to be a teacher and there are those better than me, as there are in any job. However, I am more than qualified to analyse and infer, that I'm afraid is a fact due to my postgraduate qualifications, no mater in what self-loathing regard you hold University education. Anyway, not only did my second to bottom set all hit or exceed the targets as laid out in the ambitious data given to schools by the FFT between Year 7 and Year 11, but in my new school, where I also teach English alongside A-Level history, my sets are all making similar progress. But I'll be fair, there is no reason for you take this information on anything more than face value Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deppo Posted 24 January, 2011 Share Posted 24 January, 2011 I've paid him off not to enter. It's me and you dune, me and you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dune Posted 24 January, 2011 Share Posted 24 January, 2011 I've paid him off not to enter. It's me and you dune, me and you. Nah, I will only enter if Buctootim and Verbal do. They are keen enough to criticise me at every opportunity but they ain't so gobby now they've been challenged to enter. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
buctootim Posted 24 January, 2011 Share Posted 24 January, 2011 Nah, I will only enter if Buctootim and Verbal do. They are keen enough to criticise me at every opportunity but they ain't so gobby now they've been challenged to enter. Im happy enough to enter, but tbh I'd like to see Hypo hung out to dry as the most obnoxious poster even more than you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sergei Gotsmanov Posted 24 January, 2011 Share Posted 24 January, 2011 (edited) The initial problem was that dunce claimed I wasn't qualified to analyse or infer, when I am. The statement on my previous post challenged how you would expect me to prove this. Of course it doesn't make be a better teacher, you have to be taught to be a teacher and there are those better than me, as there are in any job. However, I am more than qualified to analyse and infer, that I'm afraid is a fact due to my postgraduate qualifications, no mater in what self-loathing regard you hold University education. Anyway, not only did my second to bottom set all hit or exceed the targets as laid out in the ambitious data given to schools by the FFT between Year 7 and Year 11, but in my new school, where I also teach English alongside A-Level history, my sets are all making similar progress. But I'll be fair, there is no reason for you take this information on anything more than face value [/quote Edited 24 January, 2011 by Sergei Gotsmanov Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thorpe-le-Saint Posted 24 January, 2011 Share Posted 24 January, 2011 Nah, I will only enter if Buctootim and Verbal do. They are keen enough to criticise me at every opportunity but they ain't so gobby now they've been challenged to enter. I'll enter, will do me good to get away from this place for a week Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deppo Posted 24 January, 2011 Share Posted 24 January, 2011 Nah, I will only enter if Buctootim and Verbal do. They are keen enough to criticise me at every opportunity but they ain't so gobby now they've been challenged to enter. Oh. This comment seems a bit previous now that you've backed out after being challenged to enter. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deppo Posted 24 January, 2011 Share Posted 24 January, 2011 Twice. Backed out twice. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Special K Posted 25 January, 2011 Share Posted 25 January, 2011 Which - to bring this back to the thread - is why I'm happy to see Johnson gone. He plainly wasn't up to the job of mastering the complexities of being Shadow Chancellor. Johnson was lauded by many precisely because he was a postie, which would have been fine had he any idea what he was talking about. Ed Balls is an intellectually tough-minded politician. He may have other many other failings, but I doubt he'll fail to grasp the brief. Then surely you must question the Dear Leader is his original appointment? Red Ed gambled on a postie to be his right hand man because he was a good bloke, but wasn't up to the job? Not exactly inspiring to the party faithful and the country at large; appointing an incompetent to the most powerful position, bar one, in the Party. A few months later he's gone (probably better now than waiting for him to get his GCSE in Economics over the next few years) and Milliband is forced to apoint someone who knows what he is doing but has serious ambitions to get the top job. I reckon Ed must be squirming around now, knowing his power base is weakened. Watch out Ed, he's behind you! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thorpe-le-Saint Posted 25 January, 2011 Share Posted 25 January, 2011 ****ing hilarious coming from someone who can't spell for toffee. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now