Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Recently I've noticed on television programmes that presenters have been saying "the next couple in to the final is" .............surely that should be are :?........I even heard someone say it on the news :rolleyes:.............did nun of theese reetards go to skool?

Posted
  harvey said:
How can 'couple' be singular????????

 

Because a couple is a single entity. However, if the reference was to two couples, then it would be 'the two couples are'. Similarly, A pair is singular, two pairs are plural.

Posted
  harvey said:
How can 'couple' be singular????????

 

i too have wondered this.......... "couple" as in "a couple".....how CAN they still be a couple and yet single as in "not a couple".....it's confusing,isn't it............:?

Posted
  bridge too far said:
Because a couple is a single entity. However, if the reference was to two couples, then it would be 'the two couples are'. Similarly, A pair is singular, two pairs are plural.

 

But generally speaking you would say "the next couple are" not "the next couple is" wouldn't you?

Posted
  saint boggy said:
i too have wondered this.......... "couple" as in "a couple".....how CAN they still be a couple and yet single as in "not a couple".....it's confusing,isn't it............:?

 

Because in 'they are a couple', the 'are' agrees with 'they' (ie plural).

Posted
  saint boggy said:
i too have wondered this.......... "couple" as in "a couple".....how CAN they still be a couple and yet single as in "not a couple".....it's confusing,isn't it............:?

 

You're quite right Saint Boggy :nod:.....but I'm really thinking about the current use of the English Language and it's use in the vocabulary of the media at the present time :D

Posted
  Verbal said:
Because in 'they are a couple', the 'are' agrees with 'they' (ie plural).

private "joke" with the OP Verbal........

unlike him, i DO understand the more complex inner workings of the English Language.......

 

the next couple is is indeed correct....the next couples are is also correct.....

Posted
  Deppo said:
There's nothing worse than poorly informed pedants.

 

as you are,presumably,referring to only ONE poster in that post i believe you should have used the singular in your sentence.......ie, there's nothing worse than a poorly informed pedant....:)

Posted
  bridge too far said:
Because a couple is a single entity. However, if the reference was to two couples, then it would be 'the two couples are'. Similarly, A pair is singular, two pairs are plural.

 

Would that not make it a pair of pairs ?

Posted
  Deppo said:
I do like you though, SuperMikey. I should tell you that.

 

What about me??? You pm'd me about 6 months ago and then nothing :shakey:............:lol:

 

Btw.......atm I am currently listening to 'The Extra Action Marching Band with David Byrne'

 

Burning Down The House :toppa:

Posted
  Deppo said:
Oh dear. Another poorly informed pedant. Please don't make this any worse for yourself, saint boggy.

 

tbf, you could've done with having a comma after "Oh dear" rather than a full stop,it would've saved you the trouble of pressing CAPS LOCK for the 'A'.....:p

Posted

:x

  harvey said:
What about me??? You pm'd me about 6 months ago and then nothing :shakey:............:lol:

 

Btw.......atm I am currently listening to 'The Extra Action Marching Band with David Byrne'

 

Burning Down The House :toppa:

DEAR GOD!!!!!! this isn't the effing "What are you listening to " thread ya know!!!!!....stop hijacking other people's threads!!!!!:x.............oh....:rolleyes:

Posted
  saint boggy said:
tbf, you could've done with having a comma after "Oh dear" rather than a full stop,it would've saved you the trouble of pressing CAPS LOCK for the 'A'.....:p

 

Please stop. I'm embarrassed for you. Also... CAPS LOCK? Really?

Posted
  Verbal said:
Can you be a pedant and poorly informed? Surely you have to be right for the pedantry to be pedantry. Otherwise it's delldays.

 

As far as I see it, pedantry doesn't automatically signify correctness.

Posted
  bridge too far said:
If I may make so bold ..........

 

That should be capital.

 

And you're quite right to be so bold BTF,......I stand corrected :toppa:

Posted
  Verbal said:
Descartes?

 

I think, therefore I am

I can't think therefore I steal other peoples ideas.

 

Did you know that Descartes is credited for a lot of early psychology thesis that it is probable that he stole from Edward Reynolds born in Southampton.

Posted
  harvey said:
You're quite right Saint Boggy :nod:.....but I'm really thinking about the current use of the English Language and it's use in the vocabulary of the media at the present time :D

 

Its - meaning belonging to it - does not take an apostrophe. An apostrophe is used when it's is a contraction - when it means it is.

Posted
  Hamilton Saint said:
Its - meaning belonging to it - does not take an apostrophe. An apostrophe is used when it's is a contraction - when it means it is.

 

...

Posted
  Hamilton Saint said:
Its - meaning belonging to it - does not take an apostrophe. An apostrophe is used when it's is a contraction - when it means it is.

 

I committed a terrible faux pas :facepalm: ........from here on in I am your sevant

Posted
  harvey said:
I committed a terrible faux pas :facepalm: ........from here on in I am your sevant

 

don't apologise Harvey, you were right to put an apostrophe.....(if indeed I was taught correctly at school..)....an apostrophe is used to indicate and abbreviation and conjoining of 2 words ,ie "it is" becomes "it's" AND also to indicate "belonging to", ie when something belongs to something or someone....ie that's Bert's porn mag....

Posted
  saint boggy said:
don't apologise Harvey, you were right to put an apostrophe.....(if indeed I was taught correctly at school..)....an apostrophe is used to indicate and abbreviation and conjoining of 2 words ,ie "it is" becomes "it's" AND also to indicate "belonging to", ie when something belongs to something or someone....ie that's Bert's porn mag....

 

Thanks St boggy , maybe I could borrow that porn mag sometime :-)

Posted (edited)

I think so. Unless saint boggy wants to take another stab at it. She was getting closer with the apostrophe thing. We'll mark it down as a near miss.

Edited by Deppo
Posted
  saint boggy said:
don't apologise Harvey, you were right to put an apostrophe.....(if indeed I was taught correctly at school..)....an apostrophe is used to indicate and abbreviation and conjoining of 2 words ,ie "it is" becomes "it's" AND also to indicate "belonging to", ie when something belongs to something or someone....ie that's Bert's porn mag....

 

Sorry, you are wrong. When "its" is used to mean 'belonging to it', an apostrophe is not correct. The apostrophe is only used for the contraction, when it's means 'it is'.

Posted
  Weston Super Saint said:
Once Saint Boggy has mastered the apostrophe, maybe she could move on to how to use a 'space bar'?

 

I doubt it, lots of full stops are the future..........mark my words!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...