trousers Posted 7 January, 2011 Share Posted 7 January, 2011 http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2011/jan/07/david-chaytor-jailed-mps-expenses David Chaytor, the first former MP to be convicted over the expenses scandal, was today sentenced to 18 months in prison. The former Labour MP for Bury North last month pleaded guilty at the Old Baileyto three charges of false accounting, days before he had been due to stand trial. He faced a maximum sentence of seven years. Chaytor had admitted false accounting involving a total of £18,350. He had agreed to pay back the sum before today's hearing at Southwark crown court. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dune Posted 7 January, 2011 Share Posted 7 January, 2011 On the news it said he could get sent down for a term between 18 months and 7 years. Personally i think it's worse for a Socialist to be caught out than a Tory. Afterall Socialists are supposed to be all about the redistribution of wealth. Hypocrites of the highest order. At least with a Tory you know where you stand. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Seaford Saint Posted 7 January, 2011 Share Posted 7 January, 2011 On the news it said he could get sent down for a term between 18 months and 7 years. Personally i think it's worse for a Socialist to be caught out than a Tory. Afterall Socialists are supposed to be all about the redistribution of wealth. Hypocrites of the highest order. At least with a Tory you know where you stand. SO tories are dishonest then....all of them? And that's who you vote for. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joensuu Posted 7 January, 2011 Share Posted 7 January, 2011 At least with a Tory you know where you stand. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dune Posted 7 January, 2011 Share Posted 7 January, 2011 SO tories are dishonest then....all of them? And that's who you vote for. Tories will always look after their own interests, which is private commerce. Successful private commerce is my interest and in the interest of everyone employed in the private sector. The only people who benefit from Labour are those in made up public sector jobs (Socialists love a bloated public sector) and the bone idle slobs who love to sit on their arses and claim benefits. If you're want work and you want private sector jobs you vote Conservative. It's unreal how many thick working people think Labour are their party. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
badgerx16 Posted 7 January, 2011 Share Posted 7 January, 2011 At least with a Tory you know where you stand. Exhibit #2 = Jonathan Aitken Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dune Posted 7 January, 2011 Share Posted 7 January, 2011 Very good bodger, but it's still more hypocritical for a Socialist to feather his own nest. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joensuu Posted 7 January, 2011 Share Posted 7 January, 2011 it's still more hypocritical for a Socialist to feather his own nest. Strange. So it doesn't matter how much of a c*** you are, so long as you tell people that you are a c*** first? Is this your way of excusing Adolf? "At least he wasn't a hypocrite..." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Verbal Posted 7 January, 2011 Share Posted 7 January, 2011 Tories will always look after their own interests, which is private commerce. Successful private commerce is my interest and in the interest of everyone employed in the private sector. The only people who benefit from Labour are those in made up public sector jobs (Socialists love a bloated public sector) and the bone idle slobs who love to sit on their arses and claim benefits. If you're want work and you want private sector jobs you vote Conservative. It's unreal how many thick working people think Labour are their party. I work in the private sector and have done since 1982, and as an employer since 1995. I wouldn't dream of voting for such utter, sponging trash as the Tory party. While you slag off the public sector, you might consider how it is that you're able to go on to the www to write your nonsensical twaddle. The reason is that a British public sector physicist working at Cern, called Tim Berners-Lee, invented it. I imagine he's have second thoughts with the above drivel. There are of course countless examples like this, but I'm sure in your tiny hermetically sealed world, in which Hitler won the war and Apartheid still ruled supreme, this is all beside some imaginary point. In sheer hard cash terms, the worst spongers off the state are the drug companies overcharging the NHS, the PFI companies gouging the contract-bidding system, the defence contractors inflating production costs by several billions, the ongoing scandal of IT companies installing systems that mysteriously double or treble original estimates and then STILL don't work, etc, ad nauseum. The majority of these, of course, do so with the help of directorships lavished on sponging, I'll-do-anything-for-money Tory MPs and corrupt civil servants jumping ship from departments that had just awarded multi-million pound contracts. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dune Posted 7 January, 2011 Share Posted 7 January, 2011 I work in the private sector and have done since 1982, and as an employer since 1995. I wouldn't dream of voting for such utter, sponging trash as the Tory party. While you slag off the public sector, you might consider how it is that you're able to go on to the www to write your nonsensical twaddle. The reason is that a British public sector physicist working at Cern, called Tim Berners-Lee, invented it. I imagine he's have second thoughts with the above drivel. There are of course countless examples like this, but I'm sure in your tiny hermetically sealed world, in which Hitler won the war and Apartheid still ruled supreme, this is all beside some imaginary point. In sheer hard cash terms, the worst spongers off the state are the drug companies overcharging the NHS, the PFI companies gouging the contract-bidding system, the defence contractors inflating production costs by several billions, the ongoing scandal of IT companies installing systems that mysteriously double or treble original estimates and then STILL don't work, etc, ad nauseum. The majority of these, of course, do so with the help of directorships lavished on sponging, I'll-do-anything-for-money Tory MPs and corrupt civil servants jumping ship from departments that had just awarded multi-million pound contracts. If only we were a one party communist state eh Verbal. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dune Posted 7 January, 2011 Share Posted 7 January, 2011 Is this your way of excusing Adolf? "At least he wasn't a hypocrite..." Don't bring Hitler into this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trousers Posted 7 January, 2011 Author Share Posted 7 January, 2011 And there was me thinking I'd trigger a rational discussion on a Friday afternoon.... :-) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Verbal Posted 7 January, 2011 Share Posted 7 January, 2011 And there was me thinking I'd trigger a rational discussion on a Friday afternoon.... :-) Listen trousers: you're either a football fan or you're a Tory. It's your choice. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dune Posted 7 January, 2011 Share Posted 7 January, 2011 And there was me thinking I'd trigger a rational discussion on a Friday afternoon.... :-) Ha Ha, no chance. Labour types cannot converse without throwing about insults because their arguments and the whole Socialist ideology is flawed and history has taught us that Socialism doesn't work. Yet they have this weird superiority complex towards anyone that tells it like is. I tell it like it is. They really hate that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trousers Posted 7 January, 2011 Author Share Posted 7 January, 2011 Listen trousers: you're either a football fan or you're a Tory. It's your choice. Ok if I consult successful banker Nicola Cortese on that one first...? ;-) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Verbal Posted 7 January, 2011 Share Posted 7 January, 2011 Ok if I consult successful banker Nicola Cortese on that one first...? ;-) Yes. Tell me what he says. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dune Posted 7 January, 2011 Share Posted 7 January, 2011 Ok if I consult successful banker Nicola Cortese on that one first...? ;-) Trousers don't you think it's hypocritical how these hardline Socialists attend football matches when players recieve such huge wages? Then again I bet Bob Crow shops at Top Shop. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thedelldays Posted 7 January, 2011 Share Posted 7 January, 2011 he said.. "tell supa dupa verbal..the next time he goes for a shyt, to remember to wipe his chin" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Seaford Saint Posted 7 January, 2011 Share Posted 7 January, 2011 Ha Ha, no chance. Labour types cannot converse without throwing about insults because their arguments and the whole Socialist ideology is flawed and history has taught us that Socialism doesn't work. Yet they have this weird superiority complex towards anyone that tells it like is. I tell it like it is. They really hate that. I am a labour type and I think you do the tories down...not all tories are as you describe them. Neither is socialist ideology any more flawed than tory capitalism. You tell it as it appears to you Dune, no more and no less. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dune Posted 7 January, 2011 Share Posted 7 January, 2011 he said.. "tell supa dupa verbal..the next time he goes for a shyt, to remember to wipe his chin" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joensuu Posted 7 January, 2011 Share Posted 7 January, 2011 Trousers don't you think it's hypocritical how these hardline Socialists attend football matches when players recieve such huge wages? Then again I bet Bob Crow shops at Top Shop. Bob Crow plays five a side in his work team. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dune Posted 7 January, 2011 Share Posted 7 January, 2011 I am a labour type and I think you do the tories down...not all tories are as you describe them. Neither is socialist ideology any more flawed than tory capitalism. You tell it as it appears to you Dune, no more and no less. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trousers Posted 7 January, 2011 Author Share Posted 7 January, 2011 Trousers don't you think it's hypocritical how these hardline Socialists attend football matches when players recieve such huge wages Given all human beings are inherently hypocritical, yes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
solentstars Posted 7 January, 2011 Share Posted 7 January, 2011 http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2011/jan/07/david-chaytor-jailed-mps-expenses David Chaytor, the first former MP to be convicted over the expenses scandal, was today sentenced to 18 months in prison. The former Labour MP for Bury North last month pleaded guilty at the Old Baileyto three charges of false accounting, days before he had been due to stand trial. He faced a maximum sentence of seven years. Chaytor had admitted false accounting involving a total of £18,350. He had agreed to pay back the sum before today's hearing at Southwark crown court. agree reminds me of the more and more of the sleezey thatcher years, Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
solentstars Posted 7 January, 2011 Share Posted 7 January, 2011 Ha Ha, no chance. Labour types cannot converse without throwing about insults because their arguments and the whole Socialist ideology is flawed and history has taught us that Socialism doesn't work. Yet they have this weird superiority complex towards anyone that tells it like is. I tell it like it is. They really hate that. if you were a real tory you would have voted for blairs torys,its bad when the left in this country find cameron more leftwing than the present labour party. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wilko Posted 7 January, 2011 Share Posted 7 January, 2011 Seems harsh to me. Many people get away with community sentences for beating the crap out of somebody in the street. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rocknrollman no2 Posted 7 January, 2011 Share Posted 7 January, 2011 It shouldnt matter what party an MP represents.They should remember that it is a privilige to be able to serve the public and therefore they are only there to serve our interests,not their own. Any MP found to be breaking the law should rightly be punished and hopefully banned from ever standing again as a public servant. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trousers Posted 11 January, 2011 Author Share Posted 11 January, 2011 Another one today..... http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-12157768 Former Labour MP Eric Illsley has admitted he fraudulently claimed more than £14,000 in parliamentary expenses. He pleaded guilty to three false accounting charges over claims for council tax, maintenance, repairs and utility bills for his second home. Illsley, appearing at Southwark Crown Court, previously denied all charges. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GenevaSaint Posted 11 January, 2011 Share Posted 11 January, 2011 IF they're getting relatively long sentences for admitting the crime anyone who pleased not guilty will be looking at a much longer term (hopefully) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
anothersaintinsouthsea Posted 11 January, 2011 Share Posted 11 January, 2011 Tories will always look after their own interests, which is private commerce. Successful private commerce is my interest and in the interest of everyone employed in the private sector. The only people who benefit from Labour are those in made up public sector jobs (Socialists love a bloated public sector) and the bone idle slobs who love to sit on their arses and claim benefits. If you're want work and you want private sector jobs you vote Conservative. It's unreal how many thick working people think Labour are their party. FFS give it a rest. The chance of you persuading anyone who thinks differently to you is next to zero. Anyone who's been in "The Lounge" for longer than a few days knows where you coming from already. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Special K Posted 11 January, 2011 Share Posted 11 January, 2011 In sheer hard cash terms, the worst spongers off the state are the drug companies overcharging the NHS, the PFI companies gouging the contract-bidding system, the defence contractors inflating production costs by several billions, the ongoing scandal of IT companies installing systems that mysteriously double or treble original estimates and then STILL don't work, etc, ad nauseum. The majority of these, of course, do so with the help of directorships lavished on sponging, I'll-do-anything-for-money Tory MPs and corrupt civil servants jumping ship from departments that had just awarded multi-million pound contracts. Most of whom made hay during the New Labour era of old school favours and supressed competition. Crapita are a prime example, of course there are others, but it seems that irrespective of the colours up their political mast, most politicians are unable to supervise departments capable of administering efficiency in procurement and delivery and are more than open to lining themselves up for a non-exec payday, post-election loss/stand down (e.g. Patsy Hewitt). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Saintandy666 Posted 11 January, 2011 Share Posted 11 January, 2011 On the news it said he could get sent down for a term between 18 months and 7 years. Personally i think it's worse for a Socialist to be caught out than a Tory. Afterall Socialists are supposed to be all about the redistribution of wealth. Hypocrites of the highest order. At least with a Tory you know where you stand. New Labour aren't socialist. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bridge too far Posted 11 January, 2011 Share Posted 11 January, 2011 Capita was formed about 25 years ago at a time that the then government decided to outsource back-office functions in local government and the NHS. No doubt there will be similar success stories when the NHS in its current form is decentralised (against the wishes of most GPs and Royal Colleges and with virtually no consultation). There will be an avalanche of such companies, charging more for delivering less. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trousers Posted 11 January, 2011 Author Share Posted 11 January, 2011 charging more for delivering less. Something the public sector is just as adept at as the private sector.... ;-) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Verbal Posted 11 January, 2011 Share Posted 11 January, 2011 Something the public sector is just as adept at as the private sector.... ;-) So you haven't travelled by train recently. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joensuu Posted 11 January, 2011 Share Posted 11 January, 2011 So you haven't travelled by train recently. Why would a Tory lower himself to using public transport, surely that's the domain of the proles? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deppo Posted 11 January, 2011 Share Posted 11 January, 2011 You tell it as it appears to you Dune, no more and no less. That's unfair and totally unfounded. He tells it how he sees it on YouTube. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trousers Posted 11 January, 2011 Author Share Posted 11 January, 2011 So you haven't travelled by train recently. I wish! As it happens, I'm on my 'usual' train home from London as we speak. Have been doing the same commute for 25 years now. You are indeed correct in alluding to a difference between the train service when I first started (1986) and now. Up until privatisation of the South Western division of 'Network SouthEast' in 1996 the service was very unreliable. Since taken over by Stagecoach it has got progressively better. So, in summary for my train line: Public sector: cost less, deliver less Private sector: cost more, deliver more I know which one I prefer Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Verbal Posted 11 January, 2011 Share Posted 11 January, 2011 I wish! As it happens, I'm on my 'usual' train home from London as we speak. Have been doing the same commute for 25 years now. You are indeed correct in alluding to a difference between the train service when I first started (1986) and now. Up until privatisation of the South Western division of 'Network SouthEast' in 1996 the service was very unreliable. Since taken over by Stagecoach it has got progressively better. So, in summary for my train line: Public sector: cost less, deliver less Private sector: cost more, deliver more I know which one I prefer Me too. Much better to pay less and travel on those lovely comfortable slam-doors rather than the nasty new plastic carriages with no seats. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joensuu Posted 11 January, 2011 Share Posted 11 January, 2011 Me too. Much better to pay less and travel on those lovely comfortable slam-doors rather than the nasty new plastic carriages with no seats. +1 Nothing worse than electric doors which jam to slow down boarding. And computerised voices repeating station names to annoy all the travellers. Bring back affordability. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trousers Posted 11 January, 2011 Author Share Posted 11 January, 2011 Me too. Much better to pay less and travel on those lovely comfortable slam-doors rather than the nasty new plastic carriages with no seats. Ah yes....the halcyon days of springs up your arse and an arctic draft coming through the slam doors. And as for the sauna like carriages in the summer...I do miss that musky smell... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pap Posted 3 November, 2014 Share Posted 3 November, 2014 No further investigations, your honour. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/mps-expenses/11204405/MPs-to-escape-expenses-investigations-after-paperwork-destroyed-by-Parliament.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JackFrost Posted 4 November, 2014 Share Posted 4 November, 2014 No further investigations, your honour. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/mps-expenses/11204405/MPs-to-escape-expenses-investigations-after-paperwork-destroyed-by-Parliament.html It just gives you an indication of the sheer scale of it doesn't it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now