rallyboy Posted 2 January, 2011 Share Posted 2 January, 2011 from the TV I would say the big difference seems to be that now when he shoots he's aiming between the big sticks with the bar on the top so even poor shots like his third yesterday have half a chance of going in. On the strength of his new found form hopefully Millwall have put a huge value on him, we just need Nicola to keep the poker face he used when dealing with Preston and take their money before he goes back to his usual shooting style. Yes we could use him, but let's not pretend the player Millwall are seeing is the same one who was here - I would welcome a goalscoring influential midfielder but I fear we would get back the Puncheon of his last half a dozen appearances for us. An observer might suggest that he seems to have found a little extra when it comes to looking for a new contract, a common trait among journeymen. He has the choice of regular championship football or a squad role in Lg1 so I would imagine he has packed his bags, I wish him well.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
saintjay77 Posted 2 January, 2011 Share Posted 2 January, 2011 Taking out the playing for a contract line, it always makes me wonder how some teams fail to get the best out of a player yet for other teams they become world beaters? We had McDonald I think that WGS saw going nowhere and got rid. He went on to be prolific in Scotland and WGS took him onto Celtic. He even did ok in the champions league with them. Now back in England he is half the player again. Puncheon has been up and down at several clubs and seems to be showing us what we were missing while he was here. I wonder if players have any idea what's going on? Do managers get them in to do a job that is outside there skill set? Do players need to be more professional? Good luck to punch if he stays gone. I'm with others in that if he comes back to us it won't be with his new found form so better all round if he gets the move he seems to be after. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DrZuess1979 the 2nd Posted 2 January, 2011 Share Posted 2 January, 2011 2 very lucky goals yesterday but goals are goals Still think that Chamberlin is more of an attacking threat and a better crosser. When ever I saw Punch play, he tended to come in side and shoot, or cut back try and beat his man 2-3 time`s more then cross, not poor performances but just too slow to get the ball in the box. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stevy777_x Posted 2 January, 2011 Share Posted 2 January, 2011 In the Dagenham pre match interview, Adkins just said that he and the Millwall manager have had a private conversation regarding Punch and that we would have to see what comes out of it. Didn't sound like he wanted to keep him and reading between the lines if the club receives a good offer for him then he is free to go. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Badger Posted 2 January, 2011 Share Posted 2 January, 2011 On the strength of his new found form hopefully Millwall have put a huge value on him, we just need Nicola to keep the poker face he used when dealing with Preston and take their money before he goes back to his usual shooting style. Yes we could use him, but let's not pretend the player Millwall are seeing is the same one who was here - I would welcome a goalscoring influential midfielder but I fear we would get back the Puncheon of his last half a dozen appearances for us. An observer might suggest that he seems to have found a little extra when it comes to looking for a new contract, a common trait among journeymen. He has the choice of regular championship football or a squad role in Lg1 so I would imagine he has packed his bags, I wish him well.... Agree with most of your post. The pre-contract form must be the "saganowski factor". Out of interest are Millwall playing him in a different, more central or advanced role perhaps, than we do ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VectisSaint Posted 2 January, 2011 Share Posted 2 January, 2011 Out of interest are Millwall playing him in a different, more central or advanced role perhaps, than we do ? I watched the goals on the FL show earlier, and all three (I think) were scored with him cutting in from the left. I'm not a regular attendee at SMS but I thought we were mainly playing him on the right. If he is being kept out here by Lallana then I can understand his frustration, but sorry that will not change. I thought his frustration was due to losing out to AOC, but he is primarily playing wide right. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
benjii Posted 2 January, 2011 Share Posted 2 January, 2011 Can Milwall actually afford him though? We got him for a snip and I would say he must be worth about £500k now. Hopefully his performances for Milwall catch the eye of a bigger Champ fish and we can get a decent price or maybe a decent player in exchange. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thedelldays Posted 2 January, 2011 Share Posted 2 January, 2011 would he want to come back and go straight to the bench..? cant see it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
croydonsaint Posted 2 January, 2011 Share Posted 2 January, 2011 would he want to come back and go straight to the bench..? cant see it Hes our player. If Adkins wants him back he has no choice. If hes on the bench its up to him to fight his way off it. If he is as good a player as some people say then he will play. I do not think Adkins has the kind of ego that would keep a good player out the team for any reason other than the player not fulfilling his role in the team. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VectisSaint Posted 2 January, 2011 Share Posted 2 January, 2011 Hes our player. If Adkins wants him back he has no choice. If hes on the bench its up to him to fight his way off it. If he is as good a player as some people say then he will play. I do not think Adkins has the kind of ego that would keep a good player out the team for any reason other than the player not fulfilling his role in the team. With respect, that is somewhat naive. Its clear that JP doesn't really want to be at Saints, don't know why but he wants away. Just because he is our player, contractually, doesn't mean it would be good to have him back. Players like him can be disruptive, and will not play to their potential. I guess thats why NA let him go on loan in the first place. I don't think NA's ego is the issue here. Sounds to me like Millwall are looking to extend the loan anyway, not get him on a permanent, at least for now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aintforever Posted 2 January, 2011 Share Posted 2 January, 2011 I would have him back, was a strange move sending him out on loan anyway. Of course if NA thinks he's a disruptive influence then that's a different story, better off getting rid. To be a good team it's more important to have everyone pulling in the same direction than have the best individuals. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hopkins Posted 2 January, 2011 Share Posted 2 January, 2011 I don't think we should be getting him back, simply because if he does come back he'll be on the bench again which was probably part of the reason he got the hump and also he does force his way back into the side the crowd will just be waiting to jump on him again. Imagine he comes back and has a bad few touches and blazes one over early on. There'll be moans and groans all over again, his confidence will drop and he won't be backed by the fans like he is at Millwall. He's made a bit of a name for himself over there, the best he could do is play on these recent performances and stay there. Adkins goes out and gets someone he wants as a replacement and someone who will be given more of a chance by the fans. Bring Punch back doesn't suit anyone really. He's a winger, he'll have ups and downs wherever he is but the best option all round would be to let him stay if they can afford him. He's obviously enjoying the responsibility and confidence he's got from playing at Millwall, and I doubt he'll fancy coming back much. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clifford Nelson Posted 2 January, 2011 Share Posted 2 January, 2011 I would have him back, was a strange move sending him out on loan anyway. Of course if NA thinks he's a disruptive influence then that's a different story, better off getting rid. To be a good team it's more important to have everyone pulling in the same direction than have the best individuals. His fall-out with Crosbie is well recorded, as is not taking lightly being pushed to the bench by a 17 year old. Adkins could force him to stay, but how motivated would he be? And if he won't step back from his argument with the assistant manager, which it didn't seem like he was prepared to, then he will be a disruptive factor, and he needs to go. NA is well aware of our shortage of RMs, apart from AOX, and I will be surprised if we don't remedy this before the month is up. Some players are like it. Their confidence can't cope with not always being in the team. I don't think NA has got a choice, really. I don't think his talents suits the flowing, quick passing football which we are now playing, especially since he is not very quick at passing, and mostly slows things down. That doesn't make him into a bad player, just a player who doesn't suit us. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Professor Posted 2 January, 2011 Share Posted 2 January, 2011 Puncheon took some stick over his mode of dress at the Memorial Service to Marcus and there was a suggestion that he could have showed more respect. True or not, that did seem to co-incide with fans turning against him on the pitch. Do we want him back. My opinion is No. Nothing personal, but with AOC and Lallana as first choices I can't see a place for Puncheon except as a squad player. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Window Cleaner Posted 2 January, 2011 Share Posted 2 January, 2011 Puncheon took some stick over his mode of dress at the Memorial Service to Marcus and there was a suggestion that he could have showed more respect. True or not, that did seem to co-incide with fans turning against him on the pitch. Do we want him back. My opinion is No. Nothing personal, but with AOC and Lallana as first choices I can't see a place for Puncheon except as a squad player. He won't want to come back and why should he. He has flourished at Millwall and has done well. Might even buy himself out if we insist overmuch on a big(g'ish) fee. We would be wrong to stand in his way if he really wants to go. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ottery st mary Posted 2 January, 2011 Share Posted 2 January, 2011 Man in pub told me that Punch is on his way to Premier League. West Ham was mentioned...Source is unreliable but then again he is a Pompey supporter. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
benjii Posted 2 January, 2011 Share Posted 2 January, 2011 I don't think we should be getting him back, simply because if he does come back he'll be on the bench again which was probably part of the reason he got the hump and also he does force his way back into the side the crowd will just be waiting to jump on him again. Imagine he comes back and has a bad few touches and blazes one over early on. There'll be moans and groans all over again, his confidence will drop and he won't be backed by the fans like he is at Millwall. He's made a bit of a name for himself over there, the best he could do is play on these recent performances and stay there. Adkins goes out and gets someone he wants as a replacement and someone who will be given more of a chance by the fans. Bring Punch back doesn't suit anyone really. He's a winger, he'll have ups and downs wherever he is but the best option all round would be to let him stay if they can afford him. He's obviously enjoying the responsibility and confidence he's got from playing at Millwall, and I doubt he'll fancy coming back much. This is a very sensible post IMO. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dubai_phil Posted 3 January, 2011 Share Posted 3 January, 2011 NA has quite word with Millwall manager. Am I the only one who reads this as - "if a PL team come along and give us 10mil for Lallana we may need to have him back to play wide on the left for a while while we sign a replacement" I don't think that will happen but having a back up emergency plan may not be a bad idea Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
david in sweden Posted 3 January, 2011 Share Posted 3 January, 2011 I don't think we should be getting him back, simply because if he does come back he'll be on the bench again which was probably part of the reason he got the hump and also he does force his way back into the side the crowd will just be waiting to jump on him again. Imagine he comes back and has a bad few touches and blazes one over early on. There'll be moans and groans all over again, his confidence will drop and he won't be backed by the fans like he is at Millwall. He's made a bit of a name for himself over there, the best he could do is play on these recent performances and stay there. Adkins goes out and gets someone he wants as a replacement and someone who will be given more of a chance by the fans. Bring Punch back doesn't suit anyone really. He's a winger, he'll have ups and downs wherever he is but the best option all round would be to let him stay if they can afford him. He's obviously enjoying the responsibility and confidence he's got from playing at Millwall, and I doubt he'll fancy coming back much. Yes I'd go with that, too Hopkins. He was AP's " jack-in-the-box " buy and had several good performances but rarely seemed to be consistant. Towards the end of last season and early this..he really appeared out of sorts. He was often the first to be substituted in almost every game, and didn't scored at all in 17 starts for Saints.(Aug-Dec) Pleased (for him) if he finds a new home, we'll get some cash back ...and it'll be likely more than expected if AP wants to add him to the squad at Newcastle.(as one journo suggested on a site) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NickG Posted 3 January, 2011 Share Posted 3 January, 2011 http://www.southwarknews.co.uk/00,news,22008,5227,00.htm Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JustMike Posted 3 January, 2011 Share Posted 3 January, 2011 cash in Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
holepuncture Posted 3 January, 2011 Share Posted 3 January, 2011 I've been sat in the millwall home end before. Losing one nil, Incredibly negative, never witnessed such foul mouthed attacking of your own team. Punch, watch out, if your form slips back to what it was like with us befoe you left, they will ****ing destroy you. Thick, violent aggressive supporters, they will turn on you punch And the stick some at ST.marys gave you will looking like unwavering support compared to that luck. My mate showed me the lions player post match punch interview, he well and truly burnt his bridges, very naughty. 'I love this club, I love the fans blah blah... This club appreciates me, this manager appreciates me blah blah...' ... Very naughty. Careful what you wish for. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SaintRichmond Posted 3 January, 2011 Share Posted 3 January, 2011 I would have him back, was a strange move sending him out on loan anyway. Of course if NA thinks he's a disruptive influence then that's a different story, better off getting rid. To be a good team it's more important to have everyone pulling in the same direction than have the best individuals. How come it was a strange move ??? He was playing Krap, but, more to the point, he didnot WANT to play for us, his body language said that Sell him whilst he's got some form back, if he comes back to us, he will be as Krap again, and will be a disruptive influence IMHO Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aintforever Posted 3 January, 2011 Share Posted 3 January, 2011 How come it was a strange move ??? He was playing Krap, but, more to the point, he didnot WANT to play for us, his body language said that Sell him whilst he's got some form back, if he comes back to us, he will be as Krap again, and will be a disruptive influence IMHO I thought it was strange because he would be a good option to have on the bench, we don't have alot of options if Chambo and Lallana get injured. It has turned out a good move for both Saints and Puncheon but if we had needed backup on the wings we could have been left short. IF he is a disruptive influence then getting rid is 100% the best thing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RobM Posted 3 January, 2011 Share Posted 3 January, 2011 If AOC or Lallana get injured I'm sure we can recall JP, but I'm not sure how productive that would be. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Professor Posted 3 January, 2011 Share Posted 3 January, 2011 So Mr Adkins says "me and Kenny have been having private conversations behind the scenes...." Thats not right, you know, Nigel. It should be "Kenny and I". Its as simple as that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
St Chalet Posted 3 January, 2011 Share Posted 3 January, 2011 Yet again this thread moved off the topic of Jason Puncehon and onto personal attacks. I've deleted the posts as they add no value to the thread. Any continuation of this will lead to infractions and / or a loan spell to another forum (just to keep it aligned to topic). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
martyg1950 Posted 3 January, 2011 Share Posted 3 January, 2011 or a loan spell to another forum. What a wonderful idea ! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matthew Le God Posted 3 January, 2011 Share Posted 3 January, 2011 Puncheon injured with a dead leg and not playing for Millwall today. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
benjii Posted 3 January, 2011 Share Posted 3 January, 2011 Puncheon injured with a dead leg and not playing for Millwall today. Sign of a bad attitude IMO. Either that or a phantom injury that actually means there is "activity" behind the scenes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alpine_saint Posted 3 January, 2011 Share Posted 3 January, 2011 The bottom line is that he is registered to a L1 club, has gone to an NPC club and done pretty well, so he aint going to go back. If anything, if his attitude is as bad as issuspected, he's probably thinking mid-to-bottom PL club. There is not a chance in hell of him coming back here and keeping his Millwall form going. Its as simple as that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RobM Posted 3 January, 2011 Share Posted 3 January, 2011 I think it really is as simple as that. If he came back here I unfortunately think his attitude would make him believe he is too good for us, so he would be looking at the door all the time. Whether he stays at Millwall or goes elsewhere I don't know. I hope somebody buys him though rather than continues his loan, as I'd like us to cash in while we can and before his attitude takes over and his value drops as people work him out. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smirking_Saint Posted 3 January, 2011 Share Posted 3 January, 2011 The bottom line is that he is registered to a L1 club, has gone to an NPC club and done pretty well, so he aint going to go back. If anything, if his attitude is as bad as issuspected, he's probably thinking mid-to-bottom PL club. There is not a chance in hell of him coming back here and keeping his Millwall form going. Its as simple as that. I agree with this Its a shame he was chasticised and pretty much forced out of the club, he really wasn't as bad as some fans thought if you actually watched the game properly. But he won't come back now, he has made his mind up and wants out. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
benjii Posted 3 January, 2011 Share Posted 3 January, 2011 I agree with this Its a shame he was chasticised and pretty much forced out of the club, he really wasn't as bad as some fans thought if you actually watched the game properly. But he won't come back now, he has made his mind up and wants out. "Chastised and forced out". Melodramatic, a bit? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smirking_Saint Posted 3 January, 2011 Share Posted 3 January, 2011 "Chastised and forced out". Melodramatic, a bit? Yeah was a bit TBH Just always annoys me when fans get on the back of players, especially as soon as we do. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
up and away Posted 3 January, 2011 Share Posted 3 January, 2011 I agree with this Its a shame he was chasticised and pretty much forced out of the club, he really wasn't as bad as some fans thought if you actually watched the game properly. But he won't come back now, he has made his mind up and wants out. Adkins kept on telling Puncheon to hug the touch line, he wouldn't. That resulted in him being substituted for Holmes and the toys came out. People keep on saying Pardew played the long ball, he didn't, but the players did anyway. You could see from the look on Pardews face and the disgust when they pumped it long. The difference is that Adkins makes sure they do his bidding. The major problem we have is that Oxo cannot go on for much longer without having a spell out. Just tell Puncheon he's in for a few games until things get sorted with Milllwall or whatever, give Oxo his rest so we can use him for what remains. There is no doubt in my mind that Oxo is a far better player, but puncheon is very useful when fit. I would try everything I could to get Puncheon playing for us the rest of the season. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SNSUN Posted 3 January, 2011 Share Posted 3 January, 2011 Just showed his goals on FLS - big difference is that he's playing on LM. I said this when he was here, and I say it about most Southpaws, but left footers should not play on the right - I thought it about Fabrice Fernandes too, although less so. I haven't been following Millwall, so I'm taking you at your word that he's been playing on the left, but when he plays on the right his trick is to cut in and strike the ball at goal, regularly unsuccessfully. Playing him on the left doesn't restrict his goalscoring abilities, but it does encourage him to try more crosses. Punch is quick, he should be running down the line, not cutting in and shooting all the time. Yes, bringing him back and playing him on the left does mean we have to move Lallana, whom while right footed does have the ability to play on the left, but I still feel he could do a job back here. Will he? Who knows. Probably not. As long as we can bring in decent replacement cover, we'll be fine. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smirking_Saint Posted 3 January, 2011 Share Posted 3 January, 2011 The other thing is the fact that i bet Punch hates playing on the right, he is left footed and makes life hard, in a Millwall shirt he plays on the left and beats players, shoots at goal etc, he can keep up momentum that way. On the right however he needs to check and come back which will allways cause a stutter in play. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cricketphilly Posted 3 January, 2011 Share Posted 3 January, 2011 Had my Millwall supporting chum on the phone, they are desperate for him. Seems to think that the two boards have not spoken yet. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SuperSAINT Posted 3 January, 2011 Share Posted 3 January, 2011 Fulham supposedly want Millwall's Morison http://www.skysports.com/story/0,19528,11735_6632798,00.html Would give Millwall the ££'s to sign Punch. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chez Posted 3 January, 2011 Share Posted 3 January, 2011 Fulham supposedly want Millwall's Morison http://www.skysports.com/story/0,19528,11735_6632798,00.html Would give Millwall the ££'s to sign Punch. I heard Forrest have bid £2m for him - again this would give them the cash to buy Puncheon - although I'd of thought they'd want £4m. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
derry Posted 3 January, 2011 Share Posted 3 January, 2011 Unless he is loaned or transferred his registration with Millwall lapses today and he reverts to his registration with Saints. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
corky morris Posted 5 January, 2011 Share Posted 5 January, 2011 So he is back then? I wonder if he will be included on Saturday??? I would be surprised as him not having played in the FAC would be a benefit for whoever signed him? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Armitage Shanks Posted 5 January, 2011 Share Posted 5 January, 2011 Really not difficult this one. Puncheon doesn't want to stay at Saints (going from his post match comments at Milwall), Saints don't want him (as we wouldn't have sent him on loan in the first place) and we need some cash to buy potential new players. We should just get on and sell him for as much as we can. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
saintjay77 Posted 5 January, 2011 Share Posted 5 January, 2011 I said this when he was here, and I say it about most Southpaws, but left footers should not play on the right - I thought it about Fabrice Fernandes too, although less so. I haven't been following Millwall, so I'm taking you at your word that he's been playing on the left, but when he plays on the right his trick is to cut in and strike the ball at goal, regularly unsuccessfully. Playing him on the left doesn't restrict his goalscoring abilities, but it does encourage him to try more crosses. Punch is quick, he should be running down the line, not cutting in and shooting all the time. Yes, bringing him back and playing him on the left does mean we have to move Lallana, whom while right footed does have the ability to play on the left, but I still feel he could do a job back here. Will he? Who knows. Probably not. As long as we can bring in decent replacement cover, we'll be fine. Not quite the same but I play skater hockey on the left yet I am a right hander with the stick. Much better angle to shoot from and get good goals but not much use getting crosses in for others. If you want a winger to get balls into the box then they need to be playing on the side of there strongest foot. If you want the winger to join the front 2 to make a front 3 then play them on the oposite side so they can have a good angle to shoot on there stronger foot. Cant play both systems at the same time without having a manic full back that overlaps for great crosses. Leaves the defence open though so allot of variables to consider. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Window Cleaner Posted 5 January, 2011 Share Posted 5 January, 2011 I said this when he was here, and I say it about most Southpaws, but left footers should not play on the right - I thought it about Fabrice Fernandes too, although less so. I haven't been following Millwall, so I'm taking you at your word that he's been playing on the left, but when he plays on the right his trick is to cut in and strike the ball at goal, regularly unsuccessfully. Playing him on the left doesn't restrict his goalscoring abilities, but it does encourage him to try more crosses. Punch is quick, he should be running down the line, not cutting in and shooting all the time. Yes, bringing him back and playing him on the left does mean we have to move Lallana, whom while right footed does have the ability to play on the left, but I still feel he could do a job back here. Will he? Who knows. Probably not. As long as we can bring in decent replacement cover, we'll be fine. One name here ...Messi, all this playing on the wrong side stems from Barca fever. Their wide midfielders both play on the wrong side. Coaches take the attitude if it works for them it should work for us. I'm sure there's a respected coaching manual that advocates it though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smirking_Saint Posted 5 January, 2011 Share Posted 5 January, 2011 One name here ...Messi, all this playing on the wrong side stems from Barca fever. Their wide midfielders both play on the wrong side. Coaches take the attitude if it works for them it should work for us. I'm sure there's a respected coaching manual that advocates it though. You get a lot of coaches trying to pull it off these days, Messi isn't really one of them IMO, Barcelona play too fluid and he is given much more of a free reign then to call him an inside forward as Puncheon was extensively used as. One player that does sum it up is Robben, he plays primarily as an inside forward, and yes it deos put him in dangerous situations at times but dependant on the players you have in the box it could also nullify one of the main threats. IMO crossing the ball into the box with decent variety (I.E Long, short, low, high, hard, soft) is enough to upset any defence, especially when you have the likes of Lambert in there who is no mug on the ground or in the air. So IMO it is much better having a player such as Punch's ability really driving at players, beating the full back and getting crosses in. Unfortunately we do have (for this level) and very good player who plays very well as an inside forward as he is two footed, Lallana. We have all seen how dangerous he in on both feet, both cutting in and swinging in crosses and before AOC really grabbed the bulls by the horn the only other real winger we had was the left footed Puncheon, unfortunately this made us far too narrow and so he lost his place. If he was playing consistently on the left he would have probably kept it. But what with Lallana on one flank and an effective winger on the right it nullified his need as he was never going to oust Lallana for the left berth and cutting in isn't his game. All IMO anyways. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Graffito Posted 5 January, 2011 Share Posted 5 January, 2011 http://www.newsnow.co.uk/A/467603002?-11205 Worth over £1m? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sfc4prem Posted 5 January, 2011 Share Posted 5 January, 2011 I'd be chuffed if we got a mill for him. Obviously doesn't like it here from him post match comments, so just sell him for as much as we can and bring in a winger like Pilkington. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SaintNeil90 Posted 5 January, 2011 Share Posted 5 January, 2011 I really cant see Pilkington coming here. He has literally just signed a new contract with Huddersfield despite reports of premier league and championship interest. He would cost us £2m plus Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now