SuperMikey Posted 19 December, 2010 Posted 19 December, 2010 http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-12028657 US ban on gay soldiers revealing their sexualities is lifted. Good thing? Bad thing? Personally, I think it's great. The military has too many oppressive and discriminatory rules that stop so many from signing up.
Turkish Posted 19 December, 2010 Posted 19 December, 2010 http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-12028657 US ban on gay soldiers revealing their sexualities is lifted. Good thing? Bad thing? Personally, I think it's great. The military has too many oppressive and discriminatory rules that stop so many from signing up. And your experience of the armed forces is??.......
Turkish Posted 19 December, 2010 Posted 19 December, 2010 Very little. And yours? Mine is irelevant, i am not giving an opinion on something i know nothing about and have no experience of.
dune Posted 19 December, 2010 Posted 19 December, 2010 The military has too many oppressive and discriminatory rules that stop so many from signing up. Such as?
Deppo Posted 19 December, 2010 Posted 19 December, 2010 What is the law in this country? Could you answer with reference to the Navy, specifically submariners, thanks.
Thedelldays Posted 19 December, 2010 Posted 19 December, 2010 no issue really.. what is an issue is the those who want sex changes serving.....going a bit far and can cause unrest in the messes
dune Posted 19 December, 2010 Posted 19 December, 2010 What is the law in this country? Could you answer with reference to the Navy, specifically submariners, thanks. This is a good point. Put yourself in Delldays position. How would he feel with a homosexual man swinging in the hammock above him?
Turkish Posted 19 December, 2010 Posted 19 December, 2010 This is a good point. Put yourself in Delldays position. How would he feel with a homosexual man swinging in the hammock above him? aroused, probably.
Thedelldays Posted 19 December, 2010 Posted 19 December, 2010 This is a good point. Put yourself in Delldays position. How would he feel with a homosexual man swinging in the hammock above him? as long as one does not push back
georgeweahscousin Posted 19 December, 2010 Posted 19 December, 2010 Equality is a good thing, but making it a rule is a bad thing. The military is not like other jobs, and shouldn't be subjected to over PC rules. Gay soldiers now are treated equally, but have to keep quiet about it, with this rule they will be able to say it without fear of the sack, but do they really want attention drawn to them because of their sexuality. By giving them equality, you are actually ensuring that they are treated differently.
Deppo Posted 19 December, 2010 Posted 19 December, 2010 Equality is a good thing, but making it a rule is a bad thing. The military is not like other jobs, and shouldn't be subjected to over PC rules. Gay soldiers now are treated equally, but have to keep quiet about it, with this rule they will be able to say it without fear of the sack, but do they really want attention drawn to them because of their sexuality. By giving them equality, you are actually ensuring that they are treated differently. Yeh, you're right. We should protect them from the homophobes out there. The way I see it, the gaybashers are doing a really bad thing, but how do we stop them doing that? We could put a law in place that allows them to be punished for homophobia, but that would probably upset a few people. I know! We should put a law in place for the gays instead. That'll solve the problem for everyone.
georgeweahscousin Posted 19 December, 2010 Posted 19 December, 2010 I served in the Army for 6 years, there was a gay lad in our squadron, everybody knew it. He was treated no differently. i.e. he had the **** out of him as much as the ginger, fat, foreign, bald, speccy, thick, religious lads. In the army you get a lot of banter, if you can't handle it, don't join. It is an integral part of the camaraderie, the PC brigade would die of shock if they spent a day in an Army platoon. By pointing out that somebody is different and that is fine, you are giving them unwanted attention.
Turkish Posted 19 December, 2010 Posted 19 December, 2010 I served in the Army for 6 years, there was a gay lad in our squadron, everybody knew it. He was treated no differently. i.e. he had the **** out of him as much as the ginger, fat, foreign, bald, speccy, thick, religious lads. In the army you get a lot of banter, if you can't handle it, don't join. It is an integral part of the camaraderie, the PC brigade would die of shock if they spent a day in an Army platoon. By pointing out that somebody is different and that is fine, you are giving them unwanted attention. FFS dont bring your bigoted views on here, you have the cyber lynch mob after you
Jonnyboy Posted 19 December, 2010 Posted 19 December, 2010 Banter is fine, its when you are driven to suicide or quitting that its out of order, passed up for promotions, ostracised etc etc dont help anyone
Deppo Posted 19 December, 2010 Posted 19 December, 2010 I served in the Army for 6 years, there was a gay lad in our squadron, everybody knew it. He was treated no differently. i.e. he had the **** out of him as much as the ginger, fat, foreign, bald, speccy, thick, religious lads. In the army you get a lot of banter, if you can't handle it, don't join. It is an integral part of the camaraderie, the PC brigade would die of shock if they spent a day in an Army platoon. By pointing out that somebody is different and that is fine, you are giving them unwanted attention. It was you, wasn't it?
georgeweahscousin Posted 19 December, 2010 Posted 19 December, 2010 Banter is fine, its when you are driven to suicide or quitting that its out of order, passed up for promotions, ostracised etc etc dont help anyone The British Army is so desperate to appear to be PC, you are more likely to be promoted if you are a minority of some sort. I served with a guy who was half Persian, they basically told him that if he changed his religion to Islam on his personal record and joined the recruiting team he would be promoted. It was you, wasn't it? I was the fat one.
Deppo Posted 19 December, 2010 Posted 19 December, 2010 How did they find out that you were fat? Did you tell them?
georgeweahscousin Posted 19 December, 2010 Posted 19 December, 2010 How did they find out that you were fat? Did you tell them? It's all in the eyes.
Jonnyboy Posted 19 December, 2010 Posted 19 December, 2010 It's all in the eyes. Ive got fat eyes too :-(
Saintandy666 Posted 19 December, 2010 Posted 19 December, 2010 Good, it doesn't mean they have to come out, but at least if they are out it doesn't mean they also get kicked out. I don't see how being gay affects your performance as a soldier.
Thedelldays Posted 19 December, 2010 Posted 19 December, 2010 Good, it doesn't mean they have to come out, but at least if they are out it doesn't mean they also get kicked out. I don't see how being gay affects your performance as a soldier. its not about that..its combat effectiveness of the team...
doddisalegend Posted 19 December, 2010 Posted 19 December, 2010 (edited) Gentlemen I give you the sacred band of Thebes, the toughest sons of *****es in Ancient greek warfare made up of 150 couples of male lovers. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sacred_Band_of_Thebes I really don't see how being gay is going to make any difference to someones ability to pull a trigger or drive a tank? whats the big deal? Edited 19 December, 2010 by doddisalegend
Thedelldays Posted 19 December, 2010 Posted 19 December, 2010 Gentlemen I give you the sacred band of Thebes, the toughest sons of *****es in Ancient greek warfare made up of 150 couples of male lovers. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sacred_Band_of_Thebes I really don't see how being gay is going to make any difference to someone ability to pull a trigger or drive a tank? whats the big deal? its not big deal....dont know people go on about it..? the only deal is if the team breaks down....the issue is nothing to do with an individual pulling the trigger..
Saintandy666 Posted 19 December, 2010 Posted 19 December, 2010 its not about that..its combat effectiveness of the team... I get that, but why should it affect combat effectiveness? I can see why it COULD, but it shouldn't. People should be professional, if they can't do their job effectively because someone they are working with so happens to be gay, they should be sacked.
Thedelldays Posted 19 December, 2010 Posted 19 December, 2010 I get that, but why should it affect combat effectiveness? I can see why it COULD, but it shouldn't. People should be professional, if they can't do their job effectively because someone they are working with so happens to be gay, they should be sacked. you can see why it could..then you have your answer
Saintandy666 Posted 19 December, 2010 Posted 19 December, 2010 you can see why it could..then you have your answer I should hope though that the majority of people in the army should not care about it. If they can't cope because they have to work with a gay man, sack them. Don't you agree?
SuperMikey Posted 19 December, 2010 Author Posted 19 December, 2010 I should hope though that the majority of people in the army should not care about it. If they can't cope because they have to work with a gay man, sack them. Don't you agree? TDD won't agree with that because the thought of being on a sub with a gay bloke terrifies him. People have pre-conceptions about gay people that are completely wrong - just because someone is gay doesn't mean they're going to try and f*ck every bloke in their squadron. Putting a gay man in a submarine is no different to putting anyone else in there, so they shouldn't be discriminated against by not being allowed to be open about their sexual orientation.
Deppo Posted 19 December, 2010 Posted 19 December, 2010 Gentlemen I give you the sacred band of Thebes, the toughest sons of *****es in Ancient greek warfare made up of 150 couples of male lovers. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sacred_Band_of_Thebes I really don't see how being gay is going to make any difference to someones ability to pull a trigger or drive a tank? whats the big deal? There were straight men in that army. They just had a "don't ask, don't tell" policy. However, the bullying was ridiculous when they got found out. They got called 'skirtlifters' and 'fanny bandits'.
Thedelldays Posted 19 December, 2010 Posted 19 December, 2010 TDD won't agree with that because the thought of being on a sub with a gay bloke terrifies him. People have pre-conceptions about gay people that are completely wrong - just because someone is gay doesn't mean they're going to try and f*ck every bloke in their squadron. Putting a gay man in a submarine is no different to putting anyone else in there, so they shouldn't be discriminated against by not being allowed to be open about their sexual orientation. Dont be such a ****
SuperMikey Posted 19 December, 2010 Author Posted 19 December, 2010 Dont be such a **** Am I right though?
Thedelldays Posted 19 December, 2010 Posted 19 December, 2010 Am I right though? What part of my posts above that it's no big deal have you missed..?
doddisalegend Posted 19 December, 2010 Posted 19 December, 2010 there were straight men in that army. They just had a "don't ask, don't tell" policy. However, the bullying was ridiculous when they got found out. They got called 'skirtlifters' and 'fanny bandits'. lol
Turkish Posted 20 December, 2010 Posted 20 December, 2010 What part of my posts above that it's no big deal have you missed..? Come on TDD, you should know by now that at the mature age of 18, Superdoopermikey has an opinion on everything, has experienced everything and knows all there is too know. He is an authority on homosexuality in the armed forces because as a virgin with 0 days experience in the military he is well qualified to speak on this subject.
thesaint sfc Posted 20 December, 2010 Posted 20 December, 2010 It's a good thing - no one should be told that they can do/be something - but they're not allowed to tell anyone about it. It was a ridiculous situation. I'm sure gay people in the Army aren't suddenly going to start bringing handbags to the front line, and insisting on bulletproof anal beads. This rule HAD to be changed to keep up with what Obama is doing in America, and I personally think he's doing a sterling job of un-doing their past.
Turkish Posted 20 December, 2010 Posted 20 December, 2010 It's a good thing - no one should be told that they can do/be something - but they're not allowed to tell anyone about it. It was a ridiculous situation. I'm sure gay people in the Army aren't suddenly going to start bringing handbags to the front line, and insisting on bulletproof anal beads. This rule HAD to be changed to keep up with what Obama is doing in America, and I personally think he's doing a sterling job of un-doing their past. Not quite true, surely you would want people being told they cant be peados, rapists, murders, terrorists etc?
thesaint sfc Posted 20 December, 2010 Posted 20 December, 2010 TDD won't agree with that because the thought of being on a sub with a gay bloke terrifies him. People have pre-conceptions about gay people that are completely wrong - just because someone is gay doesn't mean they're going to try and f*ck every bloke in their squadron. Putting a gay man in a submarine is no different to putting anyone else in there, so they shouldn't be discriminated against by not being allowed to be open about their sexual orientation. I don't really see anywhere where he has said that.
thesaint sfc Posted 20 December, 2010 Posted 20 December, 2010 Not quite true, surely you would want people being told they cant be peados, rapists, murders, terrorists etc? Yeah but then that's illegal, being gay isn't, so slightly different.
Deppo Posted 20 December, 2010 Posted 20 December, 2010 Not quite true, surely you would want people being told they cant be peados, rapists, murders, terrorists etc? Agreed. The "Don't ask, don't tell" policy should remain in place for these situations.
thesaint sfc Posted 20 December, 2010 Posted 20 December, 2010 Agreed. The "Don't ask, don't tell" policy should remain in place for these situations. peadophobe, rapist, mudererist, terrororistophobe.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now