saint lard Posted 23 November, 2010 Posted 23 November, 2010 Lotto winner has to pay a chunk to his ex of 10 years..... http://news.sky.com/skynews/UKNews/EuroMillions-Winner-Nigel-Page-Forced-To-Fork-Out-2m-To-Ex-Wife-After-Ten-Year-Divorce/Article/201011415821513 If it was to go towards the childs up keep quite correct even though he is paying maintanance already,and i'm sure he will leave some in trust for his child.But......
bridge too far Posted 23 November, 2010 Posted 23 November, 2010 Dreadful spelling in that article! It's maintenance FFS!
GenevaSaint Posted 23 November, 2010 Posted 23 November, 2010 Lotto winner has to pay a chunk to his ex of 10 years..... http://news.sky.com/skynews/UKNews/EuroMillions-Winner-Nigel-Page-Forced-To-Fork-Out-2m-To-Ex-Wife-After-Ten-Year-Divorce/Article/201011415821513 If it was to go towards the childs up keep quite correct even though he is paying maintanance already,and i'm sure he will leave some in trust for his child.But...... Wrong but this is always a potential problem with divorce. Had a mate who got a decent payout from redundancy about 70k, was really concerned his ex would come after him for it when she found out. People also get fcked over with maintenance for the wife to keep her in the lifestyle she's accustomed to. FFS. If they were living a millionaires lifestyle, possibly, but this happens to normal blokes as well.
hamster Posted 23 November, 2010 Posted 23 November, 2010 no one made him put his willy into to the innocent kid's mummy's foo foo. non story imho
Crab Lungs Posted 23 November, 2010 Posted 23 November, 2010 Oh, I'm sure she done it entirely for the kid's interests. Women aren't selfish, manipulative cockle twangers at all... :-/
Whitey Grandad Posted 23 November, 2010 Posted 23 November, 2010 He didn't have to pay her. He chose to settle out of court.
hamster Posted 23 November, 2010 Posted 23 November, 2010 good man. i just know too many arseholes to take the 'facts' as read. quick to judge perhaps?
Saint in Paradise Posted 24 November, 2010 Posted 24 November, 2010 He didn't have to pay her. He chose to settle out of court. Yes but if he had not done so she would have taken him to Court and he would have been made to pay a lot lot more. I think that he should look at sueing his lawyer of ten years ago as it looks like they stuffed up and didn't eneter the clause "full and final settlement". If they had thise greedy woman would have got sod all, just like she deserved IMHO. Mind you over here even when both parties agree to a full and final settlement it is common for the one given the money to go back later claiming more as it was not really a full and final settlement as they think they deserve more money. It is also amazing how many upset feelings are suddenly cured by the offer of more money. Some,who know where I live, will understand straight away whom I am talking about .
CB Saint Posted 24 November, 2010 Posted 24 November, 2010 Give it a few more years and I suspect that Uk divorce will become less advantageous to the low (non) earning party. and it will be women who push for the change. As more women out earn their partners, there will be a greater reluctance to pay over. we already are seeing that. Recently a prenup was accepted by the courts when a millionairess did not want to pay out a greater ("fairer") share of her fortune than was previously agreed.
Whitey Grandad Posted 24 November, 2010 Posted 24 November, 2010 Yes but if he had not done so she would have taken him to Court and he would have been made to pay a lot lot more. I think that he should look at sueing his lawyer of ten years ago as it looks like they stuffed up and didn't eneter the clause "full and final settlement". If they had thise greedy woman would have got sod all, just like she deserved IMHO. Mind you over here even when both parties agree to a full and final settlement it is common for the one given the money to go back later claiming more as it was not really a full and final settlement as they think they deserve more money. It is also amazing how many upset feelings are suddenly cured by the offer of more money. Some,who know where I live, will understand straight away whom I am talking about . The comment that I read said that she would probably have got nothing in court. I guess that he felt he could afford £2m out of over £50m just to avoid the bother. My son got divorced recently and insisted on no spousal maintenance. I know of one woman who went to the judge complaining that she couldn't make ends meet and when the judge looked at all the details he said he could not award her any more than one penny a year extra. But it's a gamble.
Turkish Posted 24 November, 2010 Posted 24 November, 2010 i give my incumbent £2m out of my £56m fortune if it meant she'd f*** off.
Special K Posted 24 November, 2010 Posted 24 November, 2010 My mate packed in his bird and 6 months later she won 1.5 million on the lottery. How we lol'd when his desperate attempt to get back with her was met with a swift, nasty rebuke.
Saint-scooby Posted 24 November, 2010 Posted 24 November, 2010 My mate packed in his bird and 6 months later she won 1.5 million on the lottery. How we lol'd when his desperate attempt to get back with her was met with a swift, nasty rebuke. I thought it was only women who chased the £
Special K Posted 24 November, 2010 Posted 24 November, 2010 I thought it was only women who chased the £ No mate, he badly let himself down with that.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now