Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
Let them get on with it, tired of the UK meddling others affairs

 

Lovely sentiment! what happens when North Korea decides to lob a nuclear warhead, should we be concerned then?

Posted
We won't get involved

 

We don't have much of an armed force left

 

I thought we had the 4 largest armed forces in the world? Even after the nasty "Tory cuts" (sic)?

Posted (edited)

The South's army with the yanks have been doing fairly provocative military exercises right on the Korean border recently

 

The North fired up to 100 artillery shells on a disputed island straddling the maritime border that the North has never recognised, the south fired back. They've frequently had skirmishes there.

 

Reports at half 7 on Sky News were saying one South Korean soldier has been killed, 3 seriously wounded, and a further 15 or so moderately wounded.

 

As for the North launching a nuclear missile, Seoul is only 90 miles away from the border so any nuclear explosion there would be seriously detrimental to the North in more ways than one. it's widely thought the North Korean missiles with the longest range can only hit Alaska. Besides it's also widely thought the North don't have the technology to load nuclear fuel on to missiles yet anyway.

Edited by JackFrost
Posted
The South's army with the yanks have been doing fairly provocative military exercises right on the Korean border recently

 

The North fired up to 100 artillery shells on a disputed island straddling the maritime border that the North has never recognised, the south fired back. They've frequently had skirmishes there.

 

Reports at half 7 on Sky News were saying one South Korean soldier has been killed, 3 seriously wounded, and a further 15 or so moderately wounded.

 

As for the North launching a nuclear missile, Seoul is only 90 miles away from the border so any nuclear explosion there would be seriously detrimental to the North in more ways than one. it's widely thought the North Korean missiles with the longest range can only hit Alaska. Besides it's also widely thought the North don't have the technology to load nuclear fuel on to missiles yet anyway.

 

Not talking missiles, I don't think they have them yet!, however, artillery shells with nuclear warheads are a different thing, the Russians were giving them away with every box of Vodka!

Posted

Cant we stay out of it until they've knocked three kinds of **** out of each other and then go and pick up some juicy reconstruction contracts? The French make a nice living out of that.

Posted

It should be all over by the morning, the amount of troops and weapons that North Korea have, they could wipe out Asia in their dinner hour.

Posted
I seriously hope this doesn't go any further than handbags, potential for a nuclear WW3 right here...

 

Yeah but its miles away. Anyway it would sort out the North Korea food shortage probelm.

Posted
Yeah but its miles away. Anyway it would sort out the North Korea food shortage probelm.

 

The fallout from any nuclear attacks would cause thousands of deaths and injuries across the world though. Most notably China and Japan.

Posted
It should be all over by the morning, the amount of troops and weapons that North Korea have, they could wipe out Asia in their dinner hour.

 

Maybe, but all the troops are leg mental. Have you seen all that marching they do? They look like millions of slitty eyed* little Basil Fawilties going into battle.

 

 

 

 

 

*I'm not racist, xenophobic, bigoted, etc. If it's good enough for HRH Phil the Greek, it's good enough for me.

Posted
Maybe, but all the troops are leg mental. Have you seen all that marching they do? They look like millions of slitty eyed* little Basil Fawilties going into battle.

 

*I'm not racist, xenophobic, bigoted, etc. If it's good enough for HRH Phil the Greek, it's good enough for me.

 

'I'm not racist but... '

Posted

i cynic would see this as "another" island in trouble far far away that with commitments in place to said terrortory (or nation in this case)...time (again) to rip down the "for sale" signs on large parts of the Royal Navy....

 

 

if it does kick off...lets get maggie back to advise this lot how to "win"

Posted
Yeah but its miles away. Anyway it would sort out the North Korea food shortage probelm.

 

you do realise that anything more than "hand bags" and china will awake and take action...they probably wont give a flying who they offend either...

Posted
Maybe, but all the troops are leg mental. Have you seen all that marching they do? They look like millions of slitty eyed* little Basil Fawilties going into battle.

 

 

 

 

 

*I'm not racist, xenophobic, bigoted, etc. If it's good enough for HRH Phil the Greek, it's good enough for me.

 

LOL @ anyone saying they arent racist, and in the same sentence comparing themselves to phil the greek!! Priceless :lol:

Posted
LOL @ anyone saying they arent racist, and in the same sentence comparing themselves to phil the greek!! Priceless :lol:

 

LOL at anyone who took it as a serious post?!?!?! Woooossshhh! :rolleyes:

Posted
Yeah but its miles away. Anyway it would sort out the North Korea food shortage probelm.

 

Erm no. Korea don't have nuclear misiles which can fire far enough away. Absolute worst case scenario is the obliterate each other IMO.

Posted

As they're both anti-Islamic, isn't there a case for sending in a crew of nuked suicide bombers? As a testing ground before we all get to **** virgins in heaven?

Posted
Erm no. Korea don't have nuclear misiles which can fire far enough away. Absolute worst case scenario is the obliterate each other IMO.

 

Surely, the absolute worst case scenario is not the 5th (SK) and 6th (NK) largest armies in the world squaring up, but the fact that it might lead to the largest (China) and second largest (USA) squaring up (only of course, if some politicians put their egos before their brains...)

Posted
Erm no. Korea don't have nuclear misiles which can fire far enough away. Absolute worst case scenario is the obliterate each other IMO.

 

So the absolute worse cast scenario is millions and millions of innocents die. That's ok then.

Plus, you have to think of the fallout. Both countries have many nuclear power stations, and if they were to be hit (inevitably, they will) then it would cause a nuclear fallout across most of Eastern Asia and maybe even the West Coast of America. If you add in nuclear attacks on each country, that just increases the radius and intensity of the fallout.

Posted
So the absolute worse cast scenario is millions and millions of innocents die. That's ok then.

Plus, you have to think of the fallout. Both countries have many nuclear power stations, and if they were to be hit (inevitably, they will) then it would cause a nuclear fallout across most of Eastern Asia and maybe even the West Coast of America. If you add in nuclear attacks on each country, that just increases the radius and intensity of the fallout.

 

Seoul is only 80 miles from the North Korean border. If they attacked Seoul with any nuclear device they'd be practically attacking themselves

Posted
Seoul is only 80 miles from the North Korean border. If they attacked Seoul with any nuclear device they'd be practically attacking themselves

 

1) There is a nut in charge... why would he care about the wellbeing of his own people?

2) If Seoul is too close... why not target Busan instead?

Posted
Seoul is only 80 miles from the North Korean border. If they attacked Seoul with any nuclear device they'd be practically attacking themselves

 

I wouldn't put it past the North Koreans though, they've made some pretty bizarre decisions in the past. I don't think they don't have atomic weapons like the South Koreans do, just missiles with nuclear heads, so they'd be relatively safe from any attack. Pyongyang isn't too far off the border either though...

Posted
1) There is a nut in charge... why would he care about the wellbeing of his own people?

2) If Seoul is too close... why not target Busan instead?

 

If they sent a nuke into a South Korean city the nuclear fallout would damage North Korea practically as much as the South. For example the after effects of the Chernobyl explosion went far beyond the borders of the Ukraine let's just say. To say it'd be like trying to kill someone with a stick of dynamite whilst standing next to it yourself is an understatement. Besides as soon as the rocket went into the sky he'd care far more about the US, Russians and South Koreans, invading and toppling his regime, that's if the regime didn't die of the ill effects of the nuclear explosion first. The regime may be eccentric and may torture any of their own citizens that doesn't love Kim-Jong-Il but they aren't that daft.

 

Anyway, it is widely believed the North Koreans don't have the technology to mount nuclear material on a rocket. They play the nuclear missile card every time they want to gain an advantage in any negotiations.

 

I haven't seen them nuke the South Koreans after all the previous border skirmishes they've had. If the US and South Koreans were that concerned about the North Korean sending a nuclear missile into Busan or Seoul they wouldn't be carrying out provocative military exercises on the North/South Korean border and poking the dragon.

Posted

It must get boring having loads of nuclear weapons and not being allowed to use them, and must be annoying living next door to someone you absolutely hate.

 

I hate my next door neighbour and if I had a nuclear weapon I would definitely throw it at him.

Posted
It must get boring having loads of nuclear weapons and not being allowed to use them, and must be annoying living next door to someone you absolutely hate.

 

I hate my next door neighbour and if I had a nuclear weapon I would definitely throw it at him.

 

Pete???

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...