JustMike Posted 27 November, 2010 Posted 27 November, 2010 Would appreciate if you could find out if it was something to do with the club or if it was just because Boj thought they were leaving themselves open to legal action. yawn! give it a rest. does it actually matter?
dune Posted 27 November, 2010 Posted 27 November, 2010 But it could potentially develop into another NC bashing.............Sigh......Don't you know anything ?? TBF, even if it was the club, which i doubt, i wondered how long it would take. I don't know any employer that would put up with someone posting the team, tactics and any inside trouble on a regular basis. Edited your post.
hypochondriac Posted 27 November, 2010 Posted 27 November, 2010 yawn! give it a rest. does it actually matter? Not particularly but worth knowing. Really odd that you would bother to come onto this thread just to post that.
Deppo Posted 27 November, 2010 Posted 27 November, 2010 If you could find out that would be good. Yes, please find out Saint_clark. hypochondriac really needs to know - it's important.
dune Posted 27 November, 2010 Posted 27 November, 2010 Yes, please find out Saint_clark. hypochondriac really needs to know - it's important..
SB Posted 27 November, 2010 Posted 27 November, 2010 Well I think it is needed as Leftback was actually ITK, which is more than can be said for others..
Smirking_Saint Posted 27 November, 2010 Posted 27 November, 2010 Edited your post. Possibly, i dunno, don't think we will ever know. Though i don't really trust someone who starts of saying he is an ex player and then denies it later. If it was the club it happens, i know Reading FC got one of the posters on HobNob (their forum) banned from the forum AND the training ground, it was apparently Pardew who made sure that happened.
hypochondriac Posted 27 November, 2010 Posted 27 November, 2010 . Please try not to quote him dune. I have him on ignore.
buctootim Posted 27 November, 2010 Posted 27 November, 2010 All of the mods and admin agreed that some of what he was saying was potentially libellous, but i'm not sure what triggered the actual banning. Its only libellous if its not true. Didnt agree that he should have posted some of what he did but tbf what he said seemed to come true.
Window Cleaner Posted 27 November, 2010 Posted 27 November, 2010 Im sure he will be back perhaps in another disguise.
Window Cleaner Posted 27 November, 2010 Posted 27 November, 2010 Its only libellous if its not true. Didnt agree that he should have posted some of what he did but tbf what he said seemed to come true. It's really amazing how hard facts always resemble the truth exactly isn't it. LB was our very own wikileaks,too bad that he's been banned.
Justin C Posted 27 November, 2010 Posted 27 November, 2010 perhaps in another disguise. As 'rightback' noone would ever guess.
the saint in winchester Posted 27 November, 2010 Posted 27 November, 2010 Free the leftback 1 !!!! I think we all suspect we know who it is, but no-one wants to say his name.
Whitey Grandad Posted 27 November, 2010 Posted 27 November, 2010 Its only libellous if its not true. Didnt agree that he should have posted some of what he did but tbf what he said seemed to come true. Er, not necessarily. The way the 'truth' is represented is also important.
Gemmel Posted 27 November, 2010 Posted 27 November, 2010 do give it a rest......no one (with steve and baj) have banned anyone to do with the club.. why on earth would they start now...especially as steve has openly questioned NC on here before lol.... you dont half talk some ****e. And for what it is worth, disappointed he has been banned. Forum continues to go down hill.
georgeweahscousin Posted 27 November, 2010 Posted 27 November, 2010 Does it really matter? Users come and go.
Saint Billy Posted 27 November, 2010 Posted 27 November, 2010 Mark Dennis Bloody hell, Millwall must be fecking desperate.
Dibden Purlieu Saint Posted 27 November, 2010 Posted 27 November, 2010 Personally I think it may be fish...
St Chalet Posted 27 November, 2010 Posted 27 November, 2010 Personally I think it may be fish... If that's the case and the club finds out, he's had his chips.
Dibden Purlieu Saint Posted 27 November, 2010 Posted 27 November, 2010 If that's the case and the club finds out, he's had his chips. Not really our plaice to say.
georgeweahscousin Posted 27 November, 2010 Posted 27 November, 2010 He will certainly be knocked of his perch.
Saint_clark Posted 27 November, 2010 Posted 27 November, 2010 What a load of old pollocks, he continued posting for a fair while after Mills left.
Big John Posted 28 November, 2010 Posted 28 November, 2010 does anyone have the slightest idea who leftback is? i am surprised at that as i am pretty certain that this bloke HAS 'played against' some ex saints, but not at football, thinksnooker hall i reckon..
sandwichsaint Posted 28 November, 2010 Posted 28 November, 2010 does anyone have the slightest idea who leftback is? i am surprised at that as i am pretty certain that this bloke HAS 'played against' some ex saints, but not at football, thinksnooker hall i reckon.. Is it 'Ray' Reardon? I thought it was Jason Dennis or Mark Codd, wot a pollock I am.
Secret Site Agent Posted 28 November, 2010 Posted 28 November, 2010 Well I think it is needed as Leftback was actually ITK, which is more than can be said for others.. Yes......but with an agenda. The trouble is that all we ever heard was what he wanted us to hear.
Thedelldays Posted 28 November, 2010 Posted 28 November, 2010 lol.... you dont half talk some ****e. And for what it is worth, disappointed he has been banned. Forum continues to go down hill. what is "shyte" about what I said..? you are free to leave any time if you dont like this place
Brussels Saint Posted 28 November, 2010 Posted 28 November, 2010 lol.... you dont half talk some ****e. And for what it is worth, disappointed he has been banned. Forum continues to go down hill. I actually thought the forum has been much better recently. Much more football related discussion and less pro/anti Cortese rantings. It is a shame LB has gone however, as he clearly did have some inside info. I don't blame the mods though as I'm sure they only acted because they really needed to.
Saint_John Posted 28 November, 2010 Posted 28 November, 2010 does anyone have the slightest idea who leftback is? i am surprised at that as i am pretty certain that this bloke HAS 'played against' some ex saints, but not at football, thinksnooker hall i reckon.. I am NOT in the know at all, but the comments he made (e.g. very anti Reed) suggests to me he has links to somebody on the coaching side. Take your pick. http://www.saintsfc.co.uk/page/ReservesTable/ I MIGHT BE TOTALLY WRONG but if you look back to the summer one of the coaches left the club (?? sacked ??) (! after 20 years with Saints !!). http://www.dailyecho.co.uk/sport/8274128.Henderson_s_sadness_at_leaving_Saints/ (also http://www.dailyecho.co.uk/sport/8268357.New_coach_joins_Saints___but_Henderson_departs/) (If you want to look up his playing career and position try here http://www.where-are-they-now.co.uk/chelsea/h.php) As I said I AM NOT ITK and this might be TOTALLY WRONG.
Tamesaint Posted 28 November, 2010 Posted 28 November, 2010 I am NOT in the know at all, but the comments he made (e.g. very anti Reed) suggests to me he has links to somebody on the coaching side. Take your pick. http://www.saintsfc.co.uk/page/ReservesTable/ I MIGHT BE TOTALLY WRONG but if you look back to the summer one of the coaches left the club (?? sacked ??) (! after 20 years with Saints !!). http://www.dailyecho.co.uk/sport/8274128.Henderson_s_sadness_at_leaving_Saints/ (also http://www.dailyecho.co.uk/sport/8268357.New_coach_joins_Saints___but_Henderson_departs/) (If you want to look up his playing career and position try here http://www.where-are-they-now.co.uk/chelsea/h.php) As I said I AM NOT ITK and this might be TOTALLY WRONG. I guess that this highlights the problem. We don't know who he is so we guess and whilst we guess a lot of innocent people get accused. Leftback has previously indicated that he is c. 50 years old. This rules out Fish as he is too young. It rules out Henderson as he is too old. He has previously indicated that at a gathering of football people, he had to explain that he was representing Southampton. I think that would rule out Franny as it would have been obvious who he would have been representing. I have no idea who he is but whilst I tired of his anti Cortese bile , I was impressed by his knowledge of the team. He knew 24 hours before KO who was playing and he was clued up on Punchy's unhappiness. His ban is a disappointment .... but lets not guess wildly and name innocent people.
saint_mears Posted 28 November, 2010 Posted 28 November, 2010 No comments from those that run the forum as to why he was banned i see. They where happy for his comments to be on here for many weeks yet now he has been banned. Why ???
sadoldgit Posted 28 November, 2010 Posted 28 November, 2010 If he had been posting anti Lowe agenda a few years ago would anyone have banned him? Whatever you think of his spin, he did seem to have some genuine facts which is more than most of us on here have.
dune Posted 28 November, 2010 Posted 28 November, 2010 If he had been posting anti Lowe agenda a few years ago would anyone have banned him? Keith would have, then he wouldn't have, then he may have, then he met Amy, then he vanished.
Thedelldays Posted 28 November, 2010 Posted 28 November, 2010 Keith would have, then he wouldn't have, then he may have, then he met Amy, then he vanished. lol
JackFrost Posted 28 November, 2010 Posted 28 November, 2010 If he had been posting anti Lowe agenda a few years ago would anyone have banned him? Whatever you think of his spin, he did seem to have some genuine facts which is more than most of us on here have. Oh for crying out loud, why do you have to keep bringing him into any unrelated topic?
Window Cleaner Posted 28 November, 2010 Posted 28 November, 2010 Personally I think it may be fish... not some pike(y) from down the road then
sadoldgit Posted 28 November, 2010 Posted 28 November, 2010 Oh for crying out loud, why do you have to keep bringing him into any unrelated topic? Unrelated topic? Someone gets banned for possibly libelling a CEO when a previous one was libelled every 30 seconds. No link there then?
sadoldgit Posted 28 November, 2010 Posted 28 November, 2010 Keith would have, then he wouldn't have, then he may have, then he met Amy, then he vanished. Nice one
scotty Posted 28 November, 2010 Posted 28 November, 2010 It's really amazing how hard facts always resemble the truth exactly isn't it. LB was our very own wikileaks,too bad that he's been banned. is he wanted for rape in sweden then?
JonnyLove Posted 28 November, 2010 Posted 28 November, 2010 Well BAJ and Steve should know who he is due to his / or her (don't want to appear sexists) registration details and the fact you can't use a free email address so there is a trace to the person. Also the payment of his / or her's membership will also leave a trace. So it would not be difficult to find out who left back actually is.
JackFrost Posted 28 November, 2010 Posted 28 November, 2010 (edited) Unrelated topic? Someone gets banned for possibly libelling a CEO when a previous one was libelled every 30 seconds. No link there then? No there isn't. Cortese has had as much if not more bashing as Lowe did in a 3 month period in the last few months, especially when Pardew got sacked. If someone got banned everytime something libellious was posted about Cortese, 80% of this board would have been banned. The discussion is about a curious poster who had inside information, which was proved correct on numerous occasions who also had an anti Cortese agenda. Why he was banned was up for the mods to decide. There is no link with Lowe there at all. None. The thread is about leftback and his comments about Cortese. Lowe is irrelevant to this debate. It is very irritating that on numerous threads you start contributing to, the name "Lowe" is usually there in the first line. Most of the time the thread has absolutely nothing to do with Lowe, and you try and come up with a ludicrous justification as to why you bring him yet AGAIN. Practically all well known saints related players/managers/CEOs have had libellious material posted about them, and regular offenders (like leftback) have usually had the necessary action taken against them, it's just your extremely selective about which libellious material you choose to read and which you choose to ignore. We've had other previous CEOs that came in for criticism and had libellious material posted about them, Crouch, Wilde, the list goes on. You don't mention any of them though do you? No you go on mention the same old person, same old thing over and over and over again. Edited 28 November, 2010 by JackFrost
Window Cleaner Posted 28 November, 2010 Posted 28 November, 2010 Well BAJ and Steve should know who he is due to his / or her (don't want to appear sexists) registration details and the fact you can't use a free email address so there is a trace to the person. Also the payment of his / or her's membership will also leave a trace. So it would not be difficult to find out who left back actually is. he/she never paid and it was said that they don't know who it is. Now when you go to uni or mcdonalds or kfc or even some pubs you get free wireless access,you can easily set up an e-mail address that can't be traced very easily and the IP provider for those outlets wouldn't have a clue who's using them. Why I must use at least 5 or 6 different connections when I'm posting on here.If I'd wanted it so the admin wouldn't have a clue as to my identity.I even get to log in sometimes on my neighbour's wireless network without even noticing it, silly sod hasn't secured it properly.
sadoldgit Posted 28 November, 2010 Posted 28 November, 2010 No there isn't. Cortese has had as much if not more bashing as Lowe did in a 3 month period in the last few months, especially when Pardew got sacked. If someone got banned everytime something libellious was posted about Cortese, 80% of this board would have been banned. The discussion is about a curious poster who had inside information, which was proved correct on numerous occasions who also had an anti Cortese agenda. Why he was banned was up for the mods to decide. There is no link with Lowe there at all. None. The thread is about leftback and his comments about Cortese. Lowe is irrelevant to this debate. It is very irritating that on numerous threads you start contributing to, the name "Lowe" is usually there in the first line. Most of the time the thread has absolutely nothing to do with Lowe, and you try and come up with a ludicrous justification as to why you bring him yet AGAIN. Practically all well known saints related players/managers/CEOs have had libellious material posted about them, and regular offenders (like leftback) have usually had the necessary action taken against them, it's just your extremely selective about which libellious material you choose to read and which you choose to ignore. We've had other previous CEOs that came in for criticism and had libellious material posted about them, Crouch, Wilde, the list goes on. You don't mention any of them though do you? No you go on mention the same old person, same old thing over and over and over again. Lowe was the obvious choice because he got so much vitriolic flak for so long. But if you like I shall add Wilde, Crouch, Hone and Hoos too. Better? Lowe had few if any supporters. Cortese has quite a few, despite sacking Pardew. These people are not irrelevant to this debate. Previous CEOs get slandered and no one gets banned. This one does and someone gets banned. Link. Like it or not matey. Go back and count how many times Lowe is in the first line of my posts. If my posts irritate you so much, dont read them. Simples.
Window Cleaner Posted 28 November, 2010 Posted 28 November, 2010 I think lb joined the old forum on or about the date that we had that Ray Ranson takeover bid, what was their name again SISU that's it Ranson played rightback most of the time though.
Recommended Posts