Jump to content

Aitch or haitch


norwaysaint

Recommended Posts

I always thought of haitch as being a bit of a brummie thing to say, apparently it's Irish.

 

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-11642588

 

It's a bit of a shame pronunciation changes as I prefer the more traditional versions, but I suppose it's always been the way and even what I think of as traditional doesn't go back that far.

 

Saying "haitch" really does sound uneducated though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My superiors will duly note that for my next appraisal! :rolleyes:

 

Who cares, Tomayto, Tomahto.

 

If you don't care then you're ignorant. There's no debate to be had here and if you say haitch and know you're saying it wrong then you're just an idiot. Like i've said it's got nothing to do with class, or dialect, it's simply the difference between being eductated and being thick.

Edited by dune
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Aitch , it shouldn't even be open for discussion. Not only does Haitch sound wrong it even feels physically wrong in your throat when you say it.

 

Having said that I'm the only person I know that pronounces "nearly" to rhyme with early instead of yearly. A habit I've never got out of, but as I don't know anyone else that says it that way I don't even know where I got it from in the first place.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's simply the difference between being eductated and being thick.

 

I see.

 

"British English dictionaries give aytch as the standard pronunciation for the letter H. However, the pronunciation haytch is also attested as a legitimate variant."

 

As a young man of the world I do take a slight offence at being described as 'thick' for using something that is accepted as a 'legitimate variant.'

 

Language, like everything else evolves with time. If 'Sumer is Icumen In' breaks into the top 40 charts next week though I will be happy to stand corrected.

Edited by Colinjb
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I see.

 

"British English dictionaries give aytch as the standard pronunciation for the letter H. However, the pronunciation haytch is also attested as a legitimate variant."

 

As a young man of the world I do take a slight offence at being described as 'thick' for using something that is accepted as a 'legitimate variant.'

 

Stop trying to defend your ignorance. You no longer have an excuse for being thick because through this thread you have been educated on how to say "H" properly. Should you choose to continue to say it wrong then that is your choice.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Stop trying to defend your ignorance. You no longer have an excuse for being thick because through this thread you have been educated on how to say "H" properly. Should you choose to continue to say it wrong then that is your choice.

 

And just how will you correct me? What awful punishment will be metered down upon me oh mighty Dune?

 

And the ignorance on display is yours of the evolution of the english language and your intolerance of subtle difference. Step out of your Model T and smell the WW2 rationed coffee substitute.

Edited by Colinjb
Link to comment
Share on other sites

And just how will you correct me? What awful punishment will be metered down upon me oh mighty Dune?

 

And the ignorance on display is yours of the evolution of the english language and your intolerance of subtle difference. Step out of your Model T and smell the WW2 rationed coffee substitute.

 

I have already corrected/educated you by telling to you how to say it properly. It's up to you now whether you accept the education or continue to look thick.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Colin i'm not prepared to debate this with you. I am right and you are wrong. That is all.

 

Except in the eyes of the BBC themselves.

 

Enjoy your perceived correctness. If you are not prepared to answer the question directly then you have lost the debate.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Some of the comments on here are very silly and show that few people actually read the article in the OP, maybe the thread title was a mistake as it infers a right or wrong answer. Yes I say aitch, but I know it's wrong to take part of the language and hold it up as inarguably correct. Language has been evolving for years, which is why we don't speak as they do in Shakespeare plays. The way the majority of people speak WILL become the correct version and rightly so.

 

This is why English speakers no longer use the polite version of "you" (thou) even though many other languages still do. What's correct now is different to what was correct 50 years ago, so it's pretty silly to get too superior to people speaking differently, when as the article infers, what they say might simply be what will be correct in the future. Rules change. Most of us would think nothing of splitting an infinitive and that was once frowned upon strongly, in the future that rule will disappear.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Except in the eyes of the BBC themselves.

 

Enjoy your perceived correctness. If you are not prepared to answer the question directly then you have lost the debate.

 

There is no deabte to be had. I admire you for admitting your ignorance, but I feel sad for you because I think you will continue to say "H" wrong despite being told how to say it properly. In fact I suspect you knew you were wrong long ago, but you're strangely proud of your illiteracy. Perhaps you wear it as a badge to say "Colin is proud to be common".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Some of the comments on here are very silly and show that few people actually read the article in the OP, maybe the thread title was a mistake as it infers a right or wrong answer. Yes I say aitch, but I know it's wrong to take part of the language and hold it up as inarguably correct. Language has been evolving for years, which is why we don't speak as they do in Shakespeare plays. The way the majority of people speak WILL become the correct version and rightly so.

 

This is why English speakers no longer use the polite version of "you" (thou) even though many other languages still do. What's correct now is different to what was correct 50 years ago, so it's pretty silly to get too superior to people speaking differently, when as the article infers, what they say might simply be what will be correct in the future. Rules change. Most of us would think nothing of splitting an infinitive and that was once frowned upon strongly, in the future that rule will disappear.

 

Absolutely. Language like all aspects of human culture is fluid. I worry though about things such as 'txtspk.' The convenient shortening of all words into this form is really starting to become quite prevalent in the teenagers I coach. I do wonder if that will be damaging in the long term.

Edited by Colinjb
Link to comment
Share on other sites

There is no deabte to be had. I admire you for admitting your ignorance, but I feel sad for you because I think you will continue to say "H" wrong despite being told how to say it properly. In fact I suspect you knew you were wrong long ago, but you're strangely proud of your illiteracy. Perhaps you wear it as a badge to say "Colin is proud to be common".

 

It is futile to argue with my intellectual superior.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The point i make is correct and you know it Colin. Why are you so afraid of speaking properly?

 

Why are you so intollerant of an accepted variant? I speak perfectly eloquently thankyou.

 

I'm just trying to imagine the type of twisted image you are building of me in your mind...... care to enlighten me?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why are you so intollerant of an accepted variant? I speak perfectly eloquently thankyou.

 

I'm just trying to imagine the type of twisted image you are building of me in your mind...... care to enlighten me?

 

I'm intollerant of ignorance Colin, and given that you have been educated on the subject you have no reason to remain so.

 

My image of you is as i've already described. You say haitch, fully aware that it is wrong, because you like to present yourself as a common person and as such make an effort to present yourelf as a bit uneducated.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm intollerant of ignorance Colin, and given that you have been educated on the subject you have no reason to remain so.

 

My image of you is as i've already described. You say haitch, fully aware that it is wrong, because you like to present yourself as a common person and as such make an effort to present yourelf as a bit uneducated.

 

It has been stated and accepted that is isn't. Except it seems by you.

 

One person screaming loudly in the face of indisputable opposition is not simply going to be correct because they have their fingers in their ears singing to themself. Haitch and Aitch are both accepted pronounciations of the letter 'H.' Aitch is just the more traditional.

Edited by Colinjb
Link to comment
Share on other sites

You are alost causeColin. Carry on looking thick.

 

Selective quoting. The tool of the scoundrel.

 

I'm happy to accept that we will never agree. So be it. Yet the indesputable fact is that neither of the pronounciations are incorrect. It's just that you feel one is right and I am accepting of both while utilising the more modern itteration.

 

So be it! More people use Aitch... I certainly won't lose any sleep in my filthy common bedsit over it. Now please excuse me, my microwave pizza is done.

Edited by Colinjb
Link to comment
Share on other sites

You can't disagree with me, nobody can, there is no debate. If you say aitch you're correct, if you say haitch you're thick.

 

I hate to say it but I find myself agreeing with Dune/Stanley, but to say someone is thick purely because they are incorrect is in itself incorrect, or possibly even displaying a lack of education. My boss has a PhD in Structural Engineering, he certainly isn’t thick, but it annoys the hell out of me, as he uses ‘haitch’.

 

Here’s something else for Dunely to get his teeth into, the use of the letter ‘h’ as a vowel, especially when preceding ‘hotel’. It’s either “an ‘otel” or “a hotel”.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I hate to say it but I find myself agreeing with Dune/Stanley, but to say someone is thick purely because they are incorrect is in itself incorrect, or possibly even displaying a lack of education. My boss has a PhD in Structural Engineering, he certainly isn’t thick, but it annoys the hell out of me, as he uses ‘haitch’.

 

Here’s something else for Dunely to get his teeth into, the use of the letter ‘h’ as a vowel, especially when preceding ‘hotel’. It’s either “an ‘otel” or “a hotel”.

 

The difference between your boss and Colin is that your boss may be unaware that he's saying it wrong - he's ignorant. I therefore concede the point that it'd be presumptious to call him thick. Colin on the other hand is no longer ignorant as he has been educated today on this thread, and therefore Colin is now deliberately choosing to act in a thick manner.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The difference between your boss and Colin is that your boss may be unaware that he's saying it wrong - he's ignorant. I therefore concede the point that it'd be presumptious to call him thick. Colin on the other hand is no longer ignorant as he has been educated today on this thread, and therefore Colin is now deliberately choosing to act in a thick manner.

 

Keep banging the drum Dune, keep on banging.

 

Incidentally, i've just discovered that my Catholic background may have a little to do with my 'accepted variant' pronounciation. My australian teacher at a young age taught the pronounciation 'Haitch.' This apparently is a trait of Australian Catholic education.

 

Accepted variant. Key phrase. i am not wrong, thick or ignorant. I just use a subtly different but still accepted pronounciation.

Edited by Colinjb
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Keep banging the drum Dune, keep on banging.

 

Incidentally, i've just discovered that my Catholic background may have a little to do with my 'accepted variant' pronounciation.

 

I would suggest a lack of education is more of a factor. Primary schools and parents should correct basic things like this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here’s something else for Dunely to get his teeth into, the use of the letter ‘h’ as a vowel, especially when preceding ‘hotel’. It’s either “an ‘otel” or “a hotel”.

I always find tha 'an otel' sounds somehat pretentious, don't you think? Here's something else for you: An orange was originally called 'a norange'.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...