Jump to content

Letting a place without a 'buy-to-let' mortgage


saint_stevo
 Share

Recommended Posts

Yep my mortgage company had to be informed. it is all to do with legal implications. If you do not keep up payments on your mortgage then the tenant has rights in their contract. So can cause problems if they do not know.

 

I did not really finish that, if you do not keep up payments then they cannot just kick the tenant out as they have rights.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If the mortgage company find out they can ask you to pay the whole mortgage in one go as you will have breached their policy. They have to find out though. With regards to the insurance issue, you can be up front with the insurance broker that it is rented, just make sure your insurance company does not use a policy supplied by the mortgage company. Insurer can't share your information with a lender.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

other than a larger APR, would there be any extra costs to change over to a B-T-L mortgage?

 

I recently visited the mortgage advisor.

 

About 18 months ago you could have had the whole lot done on a buy to let for £500 - solicitors, fees etc etc.

 

Now they want about £3k to do the same job! If you have a decent rate on your current mortgage, it is well worth the hassle keeping the residential one and paying them £100 or so to allow you to let it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you don't inform them, technically, you have committed mortgage fraud which could cause problems for you down the line. As a surveyor/valuer I quite frequently come across this situation where people have a tenant but have not informed the lender. Do not do it. Somehow, they will find out - particularly if I have to value your property for a remortgage application. I know the signs and was not born yesterday....!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

]pay your monthlies and lender will not give a fiddler's fart imo.[/b]risky letting to 'mates' or relatives but then again we're living in a recession and cash is king mate.

 

i am not ifa registered my advice is both free and impartial.

 

Absolutely NOT true my rodent like friend. As I stated above it is mortgage fraud and you could find yourself blacklisted from obtaining any mortage from any other lender. Do not do it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

/\

okay.

 

s-s dont do it, even though it may save you lots of money in these cash strapped times, it may lead to you being labelled a politician, sorry fraudster.

 

I will however go on record as saying that imho a little bit of creativity may be called for, it's a game and the people at the very top are role models in creativity.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you don't inform them' date=' technically, you have committed mortgage fraud which could cause problems for you down the line. As a surveyor/valuer I quite frequently come across this situation where people have a tenant but have not informed the lender. Do not do it. Somehow, they will find out - particularly if I have to value your property for a remortgage application. I know the signs and was not born yesterday....!![/quote']

 

what if you are just letting out one room to a friend for under the 4k limit pa?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

it seems to me its a bit like file-sharing.....

 

you shouldn't do it, but everyone does

 

nail on the head.

 

As others have said, technically it's mortgage fraud.

 

most lenders will give you a Global Consent to Let which is their authority for you (your sister) to let the property out.

 

Some lenders will charge you an admin fee (NatWest) amd very few will decline the request.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

what if you are just letting out one room to a friend for under the 4k limit pa?

 

Pretty much the same situation. Any lender will want to know if anyone other than you, over the age of 16 (I think) , the borrower is occupying the property so that a disclaimer can be signed by your lodger stating thay will have no legal claim in terms of occupation of the property should you default on the loan. This therefore ensures the property can be sold with vacant possession should it be necessary to repossess. Trust that helps.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pretty much the same situation. Any lender will want to know if anyone other than you' date=' over the age of 16 (I think) , the borrower is occupying the property so that a disclaimer can be signed by your lodger stating thay will have no legal claim in terms of occupation of the property should you default on the loan. This therefore ensures the property can be sold with vacant possession should it be necessary to repossess. Trust that helps.[/quote']

 

thats alright. aint no sucker repossessing me

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...