So have the saintsWeb banned

[Saint_clark]

Nope, Alpine is still here. He hasn't been posting regularly for quite a while now.

http://www.saintsweb.co.uk/member.php?853-alpine_saint

[Kadeem Hardison]

I did ignore it. I didn't ban him I'm just saying I'm not displeased he has gone as personally I didn't find him funny. Others are extremely amusing on here. I think deppo would have been better if he contributed to the topics in a sensible way an posted other comments as well.

 

I was told by somebody who would know that Deppo was banned almost solely as a result of one poster who constantly reported him and built up his infractions. What a sad, humourless and vindictive individual that must've been, eh Hypochondriac?

[Robsk II]

So Deppo got banned as a result of the vendetta of ONE person!?? What kind of d*ck would do that!??

[hypochondriac]

I was told by somebody who would know that Deppo was banned almost solely as a result of one poster who constantly reported him and built up his infractions. What a sad, humourless and vindictive individual that must've been, eh Hypochondriac?

 

You can check with either admin to confirm that was not me.

[Baj]

So Deppo got banned as a result of the vendetta of ONE person!?? What kind of d*ck would do that!??

 

Yes, if you're to believe the evidence of one person, which is never a good idea on this forum

[dune]

So Deppo got banned as a result of the vendetta of ONE person!?? What kind of d*ck would do that!??

 

I think reporting posts is quite pathetic.

[Kadeem Hardison]

I did ignore it.

 

Really? That's not what the outgoing mods have reported.

[hypochondriac]

Really? That's not what the outgoing mods have reported.

 

O rly? Do you have that confirmed somewhere?

[Robsk II]

Yes, if you're to believe the evidence of one person, which is never a good idea on this forum

 

I know. I was just fascinated by the implication.

[egg]

Some very good points on this thread, but of course the problem is we would then be giving away for free a "facility" that subscribed members have paid the privilege for. Its all well and good saying we should just do it, but how would you (if you were in our shoes) deal with the complaints of those subscribed members who feel we have cheapened their membership. Hardly fair on them is it?

 

Simple, ask them. Have a poll. If the majority agree then implement it.

[St Chalet]

Has Alpine been banned??

 

Nope, but we might auction the rights for someone to do so if funds get low ;-) *

 

*NB This is Banter*

[buctootim]

 

*NB This is Banter*

 

Good plan. We could put this disclaimer on any post which isnt deadly serious. That way there wont be confusion as in the past

[benjii]

If I see any post on the main bored which is not "serious" I will henceforth be reporting it.

 

You have been warned, you frivolous ****s.

[chrisobee]

Quite simply, if you ban people for exhibiting wit or flair, you end up with a bunch of humourless twonks regurgitating the same tired points over and over...

 

 

Good point, now please go away

[OttawaSaint]

That's a shame, I liked Deppo, added some much-needed humour to some pretty dark times involving the Saints..

[trousers]

That's a shame, I liked Deppo, added some much-needed humour to some pretty dark times involving the Saints..

 

+ 1

[St Chalet]

Deppo will be back to bring light to your lives when his ban ends. As far as I can see it is a sin-bin not a permanent ban.

 

I have called the Samaritans in Southampton and they have stood down their reserves now the news that he may be returning is in the public domain.

[St Chalet]

Given that this has turned into a thread of forum suggestions you may want to read and comment on Saint_Clark's proposal.

 

http://www.saintsweb.co.uk/showthread.php?26034-Member-departures