Whitey Grandad Posted 11 November, 2010 Share Posted 11 November, 2010 I say get rid of all MPs and let the Queen and her family run their country instead of entrusting it to the people and their inept representatives. Now that would save a few bob.... How about a benevolent dictatorship? I'll toss you for it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
benjii Posted 11 November, 2010 Share Posted 11 November, 2010 With regard to student loans, tuition fees, etc; How many on here with degrees obtained them, like me, before loans & fees were introduced, and therefore were subsidised by the tax payer without having to pay anything back ? One thing above all else that p!sses me off in this debate is MPs, of any hue, journos, and other talking heads, who benefitted from the 'old way' of funding FE/HE and now spout out that graduates must pay their way because it is 'unfair' on the taxpayer. That should not really annoy you. They weren't repsonsible for the state of the system when they were students and so there is no hypocrisy or contradiction in wanting to tighten it up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
benjii Posted 11 November, 2010 Share Posted 11 November, 2010 I doubt students are done any favours by being repreented by the NUS to be honest. My experience of it when I was an 'oodent was that it was a hotbead of left-wing extremism. Nice to see it actually talking about something relevant to students though rather than worrying for some inexplicable reason about Israel and Palestine. Let's be honest it's a bit cool to be all politically agitated and angry when you're younger. That's why all the best rock music is anti-establishment in some way. Most of the people there yesterday went because they thought it would be a laugh, they like the buzz of protest and it was better than lectures/work/watching Countdown. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
benjii Posted 11 November, 2010 Share Posted 11 November, 2010 How about a benevolent dictatorship? I'll toss you for it. "There will be no end to the troubles of the state or indeed of humanity until philosophers become kings or until those we now call kings really and truly become philosophers" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trousers Posted 11 November, 2010 Share Posted 11 November, 2010 How about a benevolent dictatorship? I'll toss you for it. You're on. Do we have a venue for the tossing? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trousers Posted 11 November, 2010 Share Posted 11 November, 2010 "There will be no end to the troubles of the state or indeed of humanity until philosophers become kings or until those we now call kings really and truly become philosophers" Bob Carolgees? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Whitey Grandad Posted 11 November, 2010 Share Posted 11 November, 2010 You're on. Do we have a venue for the tossing? I would reply with the traditional response but this is The Lounge, after all. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dune Posted 11 November, 2010 Author Share Posted 11 November, 2010 Check out the scum website.. http://whitechapelanarchistgroup.wordpress.com/2010/11/10/at-long-last/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rocknrollman no2 Posted 11 November, 2010 Share Posted 11 November, 2010 Actually,apart from the trouble,im really proud of all of those students who went to London to protest against the injustice of the Condem policies.Its about time the student population started to become interested in politics and the things that affect them.I think its rich that the MPs who all had a free education and got us into this mess in the first place,now have the cheek to preach to our younger generation that they have to pay for mistakes that are not their fault and the hipocrisy of the Libdems is astounding. Just a thought,how much airtime do you think their march would have had,if it had been peaceful?Two minutes at the most? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dune Posted 11 November, 2010 Author Share Posted 11 November, 2010 Actually,apart from the trouble,im really proud of all of those students who went to London to protest against the injustice of the Condem policies.Its about time the student population started to become interested in politics and the things that affect them.I think its rich that the MPs who all had a free education and got us into this mess in the first place,now have the cheek to preach to our younger generation that they have to pay for mistakes that are not their fault and the hipocrisy of the Libdems is astounding. Just a thought,how much airtime do you think their march would have had,if it had been peaceful?Two minutes at the most? You're probably right, but from a political point of view the anarchists behaviour made the event an own goal and it'll be remembered not for the cause, but for the marxist vandalism. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aintforever Posted 11 November, 2010 Share Posted 11 November, 2010 You're probably right, but from a political point of view the anarchists behaviour made the event an own goal and it'll be remembered not for the cause, but for the marxist vandalism. Not really, the violence achieved a lot more than what a peaceful protest would have - it got them prime spot on the news instead of 25 seconds at the end. Protests are all about getting attention, the more violence the more effective. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dune Posted 11 November, 2010 Author Share Posted 11 November, 2010 Not really, the violence achieved a lot more than what a peaceful protest would have - it got them prime spot on the news instead of 25 seconds at the end. Protests are all about getting attention, the more violence the more effective. The more violence the more publicity, but it certainly will not have any effect on policy and it certainly will not have impressed British people aside from fringe Marxist types. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aintforever Posted 11 November, 2010 Share Posted 11 November, 2010 The more violence the more publicity, but it certainly will not have any effect on policy and it certainly will not have impressed British people aside from fringe Marxist types. I think it will have more effect than a peaceful protest no one even notices. The nutters who did the violence will be treated as scum (and rightly so) but the underlying cause will be helped. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rocknrollman no2 Posted 11 November, 2010 Share Posted 11 November, 2010 I was on the Poll tax march 20 odd years ago (makes me feel old),and although 99% of protesters were peaceful,the trouble there was on all the news and it was the lead story for days.Eventually the Poll tax was changed.Im not saying it was because of the march,but it sure helped things along. I also went on the anti war march in London,where over a million protesters marched against the government.There was no violence and the march achieved absolutely nothing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dune Posted 11 November, 2010 Author Share Posted 11 November, 2010 I think it will have more effect than a peaceful protest no one even notices. The nutters who did the violence will be treated as scum (and rightly so) but the underlying cause will be helped. Unfortunately the cause is lost because as the previous chief secretary to the treasury stated "There is no money left". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rocknrollman no2 Posted 11 November, 2010 Share Posted 11 November, 2010 Unfortunately the cause is lost because as the previous chief secretary to the treasury stated "There is no money left". But they can find the money to fight two major wars,keep trident and give billions to overseas aid? Perhaps the government have the wrong priorities? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dune Posted 11 November, 2010 Author Share Posted 11 November, 2010 I was on the Poll tax march 20 odd years ago (makes me feel old),and although 99% of protesters were peaceful,the trouble there was on all the news and it was the lead story for days.Eventually the Poll tax was changed.Im not saying it was because of the march,but it sure helped things along. I also went on the anti war march in London,where over a million protesters marched against the government.There was no violence and the march achieved absolutely nothing. It's interesting that the vast majority of the population didn't attend these marches. I supported the war in Iraq so that cancels you out. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dune Posted 11 November, 2010 Author Share Posted 11 November, 2010 But they can find the money to fight two major wars,keep trident and give billions to overseas aid? Perhaps the government have the wrong priorities? I most certainly agree re overseas aid. This is scandalous. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aintforever Posted 11 November, 2010 Share Posted 11 November, 2010 Unfortunately the cause is lost because as the previous chief secretary to the treasury stated "There is no money left". I totally agree that Labour screwed up, in idiot Brown's own words - he thought he ended boom and bust. But I am very wary of the Tories putting up uni fees, we all know that deep down all the average Tory wants to do is make sure their offspring get in to the best uni instead of poorer people. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dune Posted 11 November, 2010 Author Share Posted 11 November, 2010 I totally agree that Labour screwed up, in idiot Brown's own words - he thought he ended boom and bust. But I am very wary of the Tories putting up uni fees, we all know that deep down all the average Tory wants to do is make sure their offspring get in to the best uni instead of poorer people. I think it's perfectly reasonable to expect those are who're given the opportunity to earn high wages to pay for the privilidge. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
buctootim Posted 11 November, 2010 Share Posted 11 November, 2010 But they can find the money to fight two major wars,keep trident and give billions to overseas aid? Perhaps the government have the wrong priorities? University education costs £13bn a year - a lot of money - but any meaningful reduction in government spending will have to come from pensions and healthcare - between them they account for £230 billion. http://www.ukpublicspending.co.uk/uk_education_budget_2010_2.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
badgerx16 Posted 11 November, 2010 Share Posted 11 November, 2010 I think it's perfectly reasonable to expect those are who're given the opportunity to earn high wages to pay for the privilidge. £21k pa qualifies as 'high' wages ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scotty Posted 11 November, 2010 Share Posted 11 November, 2010 I was on the Poll tax march 20 odd years ago (makes me feel old),and although 99% of protesters were peaceful,the trouble there was on all the news and it was the lead story for days.Eventually the Poll tax was changed.Im not saying it was because of the march,but it sure helped things along. I also went on the anti war march in London,where over a million protesters marched against the government.There was no violence and the march achieved absolutely nothing. It was nearer two million I think, but it was never going to achieve a halt to the invasion even if double that number had turned out and demolished the capital. Blairs tongue was so far up bush's ar5e by then it would have needed surgery to remove it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
View From The Top Posted 11 November, 2010 Share Posted 11 November, 2010 £21k pa qualifies as 'high' wages ? It is to someone on low wages due to only having a HND. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Whitey Grandad Posted 11 November, 2010 Share Posted 11 November, 2010 Is nobody watching 'Britain's Trillion Pound Horror Story' on Channel Four? An interesting alternative view to the pamphlet to which we were referred earlier. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dune Posted 11 November, 2010 Author Share Posted 11 November, 2010 It is to someone on low wages due to only having a HND. I've missed your little digs VFTB. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
benjii Posted 11 November, 2010 Share Posted 11 November, 2010 £21k pa qualifies as 'high' wages ? If you're earning £21k you probably pay back about £100 per month and that stops if you drop under the £21k p.a income threshold. Student loan repayments hardly push people into poverty and suggestions that these repayments make university prohibitive to people is a fallacy born either of ignorance or deceit. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trousers Posted 11 November, 2010 Share Posted 11 November, 2010 £21k pa qualifies as 'high' wages ? Graduates earning that figure will pay less under the "ConDems" than they currently do under the tuition fees introduced by Labour . Let's all storm the Labour HQ in protest....hmmm..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AndyNorthernSaints Posted 11 November, 2010 Share Posted 11 November, 2010 I've missed your little digs VFTB. Here's another one Stanley. Sad pathetic little bitter man scared of anyone of a different race, culture, class, intelligence, education, nationality, political view, union member, public sector worker, council estate tennant, disability, anyone on benefits...... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
saint_mears Posted 12 November, 2010 Share Posted 12 November, 2010 Socialists are nothing more than anti british scum. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trousers Posted 12 November, 2010 Share Posted 12 November, 2010 Socialists are nothing more than anti british scum. Discuss. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dune Posted 12 November, 2010 Author Share Posted 12 November, 2010 Socialists are nothing more than anti british scum. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dune Posted 12 November, 2010 Author Share Posted 12 November, 2010 Here's another one Stanley. Sad pathetic little bitter man scared of anyone of a different race, culture, class, intelligence, education, nationality, political view, union member, public sector worker, council estate tennant, disability, anyone on benefits...... Another bedroom general with intollerance towards anyone that doesn't pursue a Marxist agenda. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thorpe-le-Saint Posted 12 November, 2010 Share Posted 12 November, 2010 (edited) I think it's perfectly reasonable to expect those are who're given the opportunity to earn high wages to pay for the privilidge. My 22k a year is NOT a high wage. Edited 12 November, 2010 by Thorpe-le-Saint Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dune Posted 12 November, 2010 Author Share Posted 12 November, 2010 Judging by your grasp of the English language you are not one of these 'higher earners'? ' Who're '! Give me strength. http://www.yourdictionary.com/who-re Now you look stupid. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thorpe-le-Saint Posted 12 November, 2010 Share Posted 12 November, 2010 Another bedroom general with intollerance towards anyone that doesn't pursue a Marxist agenda. That's ****ing ironic isn't it? You could lead 'Bedroom General Bootcamp #101' for anyone with intolerance towards those who don't hold a purely Thatcherite/fascist agenda. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thorpe-le-Saint Posted 12 November, 2010 Share Posted 12 November, 2010 http://www.yourdictionary.com/who-re Now you look stupid. Hmmmm, I still doubt it's use regardless. Show me a link to it in the Oxford English dictionary because it's probably some American English word. Anyway I've edited it for your own amusement. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thorpe-le-Saint Posted 12 November, 2010 Share Posted 12 November, 2010 Socialists are nothing more than anti british scum. Fascists are anti British scum. See, anyone can play this game. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dune Posted 12 November, 2010 Author Share Posted 12 November, 2010 My 22k a year is NOT a high wage. You're right about that, but you do spend half the year on holiday. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Johnny Bognor Posted 12 November, 2010 Share Posted 12 November, 2010 You're right about that, but you do spend half the year on holiday. So pro rata, that's equivalent to £44k a year Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AndyNorthernSaints Posted 12 November, 2010 Share Posted 12 November, 2010 Another bedroom general with intollerance towards anyone that doesn't pursue a Marxist agenda. Keep posting your racist crap (i see you tried to highjack the lest we forget thread with your usual racial incitement) and i will keep giving you it back. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dune Posted 12 November, 2010 Author Share Posted 12 November, 2010 Keep posting your racist crap (i see you tried to highjack the lest we forget thread with your usual racial incitement) and i will keep giving you it back. The story was in the Daily Mail so it can hardly be described as racial incitement. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dune Posted 12 November, 2010 Author Share Posted 12 November, 2010 LABOUR MPS CHEERED ON MARXIST VANDALS As missiles were hurled at police backbencher John McDonnell tweeted: 'Just shows what can be done when people get angry. We must build on this'. Then MP Alex Cunningham tweeted: 'Well done our students – thousands outside the office getting stuck into the LibDem/Tory government.' http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1328958/Labour-MPs-cheered-student-tuition-fee-vandals-Twitter.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dune Posted 12 November, 2010 Author Share Posted 12 November, 2010 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wade Garrett Posted 12 November, 2010 Share Posted 12 November, 2010 I remember protesting with Tucker Jenkins, Benny Green and Trisha Yates when Scruffy McGuffy got sacked. Now that was a proper student demonstration. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
badgerx16 Posted 12 November, 2010 Share Posted 12 November, 2010 (edited) LABOUR MPS CHEERED ON MARXIST VANDALS As missiles were hurled at police backbencher John McDonnell tweeted: 'Just shows what can be done when people get angry. We must build on this'. Then MP Alex Cunningham tweeted: 'Well done our students – thousands outside the office getting stuck into the LibDem/Tory government.' http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1328958/Labour-MPs-cheered-student-tuition-fee-vandals-Twitter.html http://www.saintsweb.co.uk/showthread.php?26404-Tory-arrested-for-twitter-comment From the comments on that thread, it seems to be acceptable for a Tory to ask for somebody to be stoned to death via Twitter, as the law is judged to be too harsh and it was just 'a bit of fun'. Edited 12 November, 2010 by badgerx16 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dune Posted 12 November, 2010 Author Share Posted 12 November, 2010 http://www.saintsweb.co.uk/showthread.php?26404-Tory-arrested-for-twitter-comment From the comments on that thread, it seems to be acceptable for a Tory to ask for somebody to be stoned to death via Twitter, as the law is judged to be too harsh and it was just 'a bit of fun'. They are two separate issues. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
badgerx16 Posted 12 November, 2010 Share Posted 12 November, 2010 They are two separate issues. In what way ? They are both examples of very poor judgement being exhibited by our elected representatives, and both are offensive. Just because one of them might agree with parts of your own personal prejudice, whilst the other might be reinforcing your stereotypical views of Labour MPs, doesn't make either acceptable. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trousers Posted 12 November, 2010 Share Posted 12 November, 2010 Hmmmm, I still doubt it's use regardless. Show me a link to it in the Oxford English dictionary because it's probably some American English word Showing Oxford English dictionary definitions on here falls on death ears I'm afraid......especially when trying to correct people about festive holiday dates..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thorpe-le-Saint Posted 12 November, 2010 Share Posted 12 November, 2010 You're right about that, but you do spend half the year on holiday. I do :-D Thanks fellow taxpayer! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now