Jump to content

Barney Arrested - Echo


ericofarabia

Recommended Posts

Why?

 

If he is mates with SRS, then he'll have a code of honour where he is not allowed to grass, and no doubt has beef with the police, so won't ever help with any official enquiries like this as it'll be against some thugs code of conduct. Probably :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Since this story first broke on Sunday . there have been various opinions as to what had happen. A bottle be smashed over some head a glass being used. multiple stabs with the bottle.

 

In the past I have only come across a singular glass or bottle injuries to the face. Normally the person on the receiveing end falls to the ground in pain and covered in blood while the assailent legs it. I have never seen a multiple glassing to the face in all the time I worked in an A&E dept. So I will wait for the truth to come out as to who did what in the wee small hours of Sunday

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is there any truth in the Rumour that LB pulled SRS bird or sister and SRS got animated and a fight ensued. Just a rumour doing the rounds?

 

I heard it was that LB came onto SRS, only to be greeted with homophobic hostility.

 

LB then lost it, shoved a bottle up his arse, the pain of which rendered him unconcious.

 

LB's cut hand was due to him then punching the window of Ann Summers in an attempt to acquire a dildo for the night after the cagefighters turned him down too.

 

All was captured on CCTV.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If he is charged I imagine the club will then make some comment. Good luck to the fella, have been what he is going through and it's not easy.

 

 

If he is charged, there must be enough evidence to say he did it, in which case he doesn't deserve good luck. Maybe the guy that got clobbered is more deserving of some good luck, like he is lucky to still have his sight, or lucky he is not scarred for life. (Assuming it was a glassing or bottling).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

These are the only facts being reported by police as yet: A police spokesman said last night: “Police were called at around 2.45am today to reports that a man had been assaulted outside a bar in Southampton.

 

“Officers attended the scene outside White House; a 27-yearold man had suffered head injuries and was unconscious.

 

He was taken by ambulance to hospital.

 

“Four men aged 31, 26, 26 and 25, were arrested by police on suspicion of assault. Three remain in custody this morning.

 

One of the 26-year-olds was street bailed and taken to hospital with an injury to his hand.

 

He is due to answer bail on October 6.”

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If he is charged, there must be enough evidence to say he did it, in which case he doesn't deserve good luck. Maybe the guy that got clobbered is more deserving of some good luck, like he is lucky to still have his sight, or lucky he is not scarred for life. (Assuming it was a glassing or bottling).

 

All charging means is that there is a realistic chance of conviction, so some evidence to prove that he MAY be guilty, it doesn't mean he is. Quite often the OB will charge and then build the case before it gets to court, sometimes using limited evidence to push the charge through. Charging means nothing and does not mean guilt. Maybe the guy he clobbered was a complete arse and deserved it, maybe he wasn't we dont know.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

All charging means is that there is a realistic chance of conviction, so some evidence to prove that he MAY be guilty, it doesn't mean he is. Quite often the OB will charge and then build the case before it gets to court, sometimes using limited evidence to push the charge through. Charging means nothing and does not mean guilt. Maybe the guy he clobbered was a complete arse and deserved it, maybe he wasn't we dont know.

 

Exactly. I heard the guy who was clobbered was a racist rapist. Barnard was trying to keep the peace. Of course, I have no evidence to back this up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

31,26,26,25 if you can believe the Echo, 3 still in custody Monday last. Work it out for yourself

 

Very worrying, but as Viking points out it could just be a coincidence. A big coincidence.

 

If it's more than a coincidence, no wonder the Club is staying quiet right now.

 

This could be a very, very big deal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is it Posible that Harding who is 26 and Butterfield who is 31 and along with barnard also 26 are all involved

or isit just coincidental? Who is the 25 year old?

 

They meet the age criteria put out in the Echo or are the echo just trying to create a non story

 

i think Butters is only 30

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Window . Your right. but he is almost 31 as his Birthday is next month born 1979. and the echo tend to round up or down to suit their needs for the story.

 

I saw in the news that some guy got 24 weeks jail for some minor offence. intially i thought he got 24 months until i read it again

24 weeks sounds a lot mor than 5mths jail

Link to comment
Share on other sites

At least he hasnt been charged at this stage. I do not know about criminal law but like mot assaults and attempted murder cases

they normally charge the individual with a couple of days of the incident.

 

I can only deduce that what ever happened is not as clear cut (no Pun intended) as some of the eye witness rumours would suggest

 

I hope Barney is fit for saturday. As far as I am concerned he is still innocent until proved guilty.

How many People Jumped on the Dave Jones band wagon. those accusations almost destroyed a very innocentman

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Great que Saints fans booing every touch.

 

Even though we have no idea, what really happened.

 

if he plays on saturday i am sure the fans will get behind him, i certainly will.

he'll only get a boo if he bottles any challenges

Link to comment
Share on other sites

OK, what do we do here? (as there won't be a charge against him until December)

Do we say 'he's innocent until proven guilty', support him if he plays in the team, and cheer his every touch?

Or do we take the moral high ground as we know the minimum is 'drunk in the early hours, involved in affray' - that's a minimum. On that basis do we want the club to suspend or de-select the player(s)?

Is his head going to be right? Can he give of his best with this hanging over him?

Of course, I keep writing 'we'. By this I mean 'the Club'. As fans, we have no decision to take. What decision do we think it is right for Adkins and Cortese to take at this stage?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

OK, what do we do here? (as there won't be a charge against him until December)

Do we say 'he's innocent until proven guilty', support him if he plays in the team, and cheer his every touch?

Or do we take the moral high ground as we know the minimum is 'drunk in the early hours, involved in affray' - that's a minimum. On that basis do we want the club to suspend or de-select the player(s)?

Is his head going to be right? Can he give of his best with this hanging over him?

Of course, I keep writing 'we'. By this I mean 'the Club'. As fans, we have no decision to take. What decision do we think it is right for Adkins and Cortese to take at this stage?

 

Well he is innocent until proven guilty. So support him all the way.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

OK, what do we do here? (as there won't be a charge against him until December)

Do we say 'he's innocent until proven guilty', support him if he plays in the team, and cheer his every touch?

Or do we take the moral high ground as we know the minimum is 'drunk in the early hours, involved in affray' - that's a minimum. On that basis do we want the club to suspend or de-select the player(s)?

Is his head going to be right? Can he give of his best with this hanging over him?

Of course, I keep writing 'we'. By this I mean 'the Club'. As fans, we have no decision to take. What decision do we think it is right for Adkins and Cortese to take at this stage?

 

Fine him or take some form of internal action for being trashed at 3am and bringing the club into disrepute. Same for any other player which may have been there and set the expectations for the rest of the team. Then support him until we know what he is charged with if anything

Link to comment
Share on other sites

OK, what do we do here? (as there won't be a charge against him until December)

Do we say 'he's innocent until proven guilty', support him if he plays in the team, and cheer his every touch?

Or do we take the moral high ground as we know the minimum is 'drunk in the early hours, involved in affray' - that's a minimum. On that basis do we want the club to suspend or de-select the player(s)?

Is his head going to be right? Can he give of his best with this hanging over him?

Of course, I keep writing 'we'. By this I mean 'the Club'. As fans, we have no decision to take. What decision do we think it is right for Adkins and Cortese to take at this stage?

 

Innocent until proven guilty - if he's charged he'll have his day in court in front of twelve men fair and true. They will decide if he is guilty or not. We as Saints supports need to support him. As to his head being right - after all the hub hub he'll probably look forward to getting out and kicking a ball.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

OK, what do we do here? (as there won't be a charge against him until December)

Do we say 'he's innocent until proven guilty', support him if he plays in the team, and cheer his every touch?

Or do we take the moral high ground

 

 

As His every touch was not greeted with cheer previously to this why would we now ? cheer and go nuts if he scores as you would normally.

Who are any of us to take the moral high ground ? simply support the team, if he is in it then he gets that support and as highlighted above as he has not been proven guilty of anything why treat him differently at all ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

reading that..

 

"The victim was a member of the local professional boxing circuit and was accompanied by his friend, champion cage fighter Tom Watson. The pair had been with others at an event night in Wahoo bar in the High Street earlier in the evening where a re-run of Watson's recent victory with Alex Reid was shown"

 

So not your run of the mill scrap then... don't tell me, one set giving it large, start mouthing off, blah blah blah, i'm harder than you, peopel start squaring up, punches thrown, someone ****ted with a bottle... 6 of one half a dozen of the other i'm guessing...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

OK, what do we do here? (as there won't be a charge against him until December)

Do we say 'he's innocent until proven guilty', support him if he plays in the team, and cheer his every touch?

Or do we take the moral high ground

 

 

As His every touch was not greeted with cheer previously to this why would we now ? cheer and go nuts if he scores as you would normally.

Who are any of us to take the moral high ground ? simply support the team, if he is in it then he gets that support and as highlighted above as he has not been proven guilty of anything why treat him differently at all ?

 

exactly and even if he is guilty, everyone makes mistakes, that is the one of the problems with this site and society in general, to many taking the moral high ground, to many judgemental tw*ts, let him who is without sin........

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...