SO16_Saint Posted 13 September, 2010 Posted 13 September, 2010 Just seen it on BBC. It was a foul on Fonte, surely!
saint_stevo Posted 13 September, 2010 Posted 13 September, 2010 It was miles away from me, and all the others who were there so god knows
surrey1saint Posted 13 September, 2010 Posted 13 September, 2010 Just seen it on BBC. It was a foul on Fonte, surely! They said on the BBC highlights it looked like a foul.
sfc4prem Posted 13 September, 2010 Posted 13 September, 2010 And it went in off Davis's chins... so unlucky.
Saints67 Posted 13 September, 2010 Posted 13 September, 2010 And it went in off Davis's chins... so unlucky. I thought it hit his ankle
Saint Fan CaM Posted 13 September, 2010 Posted 13 September, 2010 And it went in off Davis's chins... so unlucky. I know the players are unfit, but that's a bit harsh on Kelv saying he's got a porky double chin?!
Danny R Posted 14 September, 2010 Posted 14 September, 2010 It was so blatent even from our end. It was also never a free kick. Hopefully NA will at least kick up a fuss on the sidelines so the ref knows he's being a 'homer'.
scott_saints Posted 14 September, 2010 Posted 14 September, 2010 We haven't been at our best, granted. But there's no getting away from the fact that luck has also been against us of late!
Bailey Posted 14 September, 2010 Posted 14 September, 2010 http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/football/eng_div_2/8992404.stm For those that haven't seen it yet.
saint_stevo Posted 14 September, 2010 Posted 14 September, 2010 We haven't been at our best, granted. But there's no getting away from the fact that luck has also been against us of late! you make your own luck in this league, sonny
oldsarum Posted 14 September, 2010 Posted 14 September, 2010 I thought so at the time. Fonte was just about to head the ball when the bloke pushed him in the back
Victor Posted 14 September, 2010 Posted 14 September, 2010 We lost to the bottom team in the league because we didn't score. Check the rules.
oldsarum Posted 14 September, 2010 Posted 14 September, 2010 but we would have drawn if that goal hadn't been allowed correctly as per the rules
RonManager Posted 14 September, 2010 Posted 14 September, 2010 but we would have drawn if that goal hadn't been allowed correctly as per the rules Not so. What would then have happened is unknown.
OldNick Posted 14 September, 2010 Posted 14 September, 2010 first time I have seen the goal and it was a blatant push on Fonte. That's the way it goes sometimes.
saintsforlife7 Posted 14 September, 2010 Posted 14 September, 2010 All of our players went crazy and I thought it was a foul at the time too!
SO16_Saint Posted 14 September, 2010 Author Posted 14 September, 2010 We lost to the bottom team in the league because we didn't score. Check the rules. There's no rules saying you have to score but there are rules saying a push = a foul = no goal
Smirking_Saint Posted 14 September, 2010 Posted 14 September, 2010 From the highlights of this game and seeing him in the JPT it seems that Pericard would have been just the sort of Lambert foil backup that IMO we need right now to take the pressure off of him a little bit. We will just have to see the sort of game that NA employs with us, whether he will use Lambert and the long ball again or play a direct, fast paced, passing game
Jesus Reigned Posted 15 September, 2010 Posted 15 September, 2010 Just seen the goal for the first time; such a blatant foul on Fonte it's unreal.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now