SaintDonkey Posted 2 October, 2008 Posted 2 October, 2008 Can't see another thread on this so let's get the ball rolling... ------------Davis James----Perry---Lancashire---Mills ---------Cork-----Surman -White-------Lallana------Skacel ------------Robertson Subs: Forecast, McGoldrick, Paterson, Wotton, Thomson Of course the inclusion of Skacel is probably fantasy land but really I can't see who else could be effective on that side with Hlmes out.
Saint Charlie Posted 2 October, 2008 Posted 2 October, 2008 McGoldrick will play instead of Skacel, otherwise probably right.
Window Cleaner Posted 2 October, 2008 Posted 2 October, 2008 Can't see another thread on this so let's get the ball rolling... ------------Davis James----Perry---Lancashire---Mills ---------Cork-----Surman -White-------Lallana------Skacel ------------Robertson Subs: Forecast, McGoldrick, Paterson, Wotton, Thomson Of course the inclusion of Skacel is probably fantasy land but really I can't see who else could be effective on that side with Hlmes out. These Skacel fantasies are disquieting, we won well on tuesday, we'll play the same team, possibly Wotton in midfield in place of Pekhart, that's about it. Southampton shrinks should do cut price group therapy for raging Skacel obsession
trousers Posted 2 October, 2008 Posted 2 October, 2008 (edited) Out of idle curiosity, has anyone ever got one of these team line-up prediction do-dahs correct? (having never been to a game, I wouldn't know of course) Edited 2 October, 2008 by trousers
Saint_Mabes Posted 2 October, 2008 Posted 2 October, 2008 I'd put Surman in place of Mills, Wotton in place of Surman, and McGoldrick in place of Scakel
saintbob40 Posted 2 October, 2008 Posted 2 October, 2008 Our Skipper is fit with two legs which work apparently. Still I'd ease him in as a sub. Would consider Wooton into holding mid with Mr. Perpetual Motion (a.k.a Jack Cork), and Surman on the left of the three (in the 4-2-3-1) although Surman & Cork were excellent in tandem on Tues. Can Gillett or Perry play RB I wonder??
Appy Posted 2 October, 2008 Posted 2 October, 2008 I'd put Surman in place of Mills, Wotton in place of Surman, and McGoldrick in place of Scakel Why take Mills out? Surman played very well in centre midfield on tuesday.
Wildgoose Posted 2 October, 2008 Posted 2 October, 2008 Hey guys, anyone know what's happened to Gillett? There was a hint he was injured but I heard very little mentioned about him and nothing on the injury update which mentions most of the others (except Thomas and Gillett). Is all ok or have I missed something?
Arizona Posted 2 October, 2008 Posted 2 October, 2008 I personally would play: - - - - - - - - Davis - - - - - - - Gillett - Perry - Lancashire - Mills - - - - Wotton - - - Cork - - - - - Lallana - - Surman - - Skacel - - - - - - - Robertson - - - - - -
Stu Man Do Posted 2 October, 2008 Posted 2 October, 2008 I'd put Surman in place of Mills, Wotton in place of Surman, and McGoldrick in place of Scakel Daft IMO Surman isn't a good LB and was superb in MF on tuesday. Mills also looked decent against Lee Croft who is no mug and ripped Sheff Utd a new one just over a week ago. Personally I think the team that ended tuesdays game (bar paterson) should be allowed a chance on the basis that were trying to get a decent run going.
Window Cleaner Posted 2 October, 2008 Posted 2 October, 2008 Hey guys, anyone know what's happened to Gillett? There was a hint he was injured but I heard very little mentioned about him and nothing on the injury update which mentions most of the others (except Thomas and Gillett). Is all ok or have I missed something? the injury update is a bit odd, no mention of Thomas,Pullis or Gasmi but Poke who's a complete bit part player who was on loan to..... (fill in for 10 brownie points) gets a mention.Bizarre.
Andy_Porter Posted 2 October, 2008 Posted 2 October, 2008 -------------Davis James Lancashire Perry Fish -------Wotton -- Cork McGoldrick -- Lallana -- Surman ------------Robertson That would be ideal imo. Skacel won't play, anyone know why he wasn't involved in the reserves?
Wildgoose Posted 2 October, 2008 Posted 2 October, 2008 the injury update is a bit odd, no mention of Thomas,Pullis or Gasmi but Poke who's a complete bit part player who was on loan to..... (fill in for 10 brownie points) gets a mention.Bizarre. Yeah, very strange. Wish we knew what was going on with some of those guys, has Gillett dropped out of favour or something?
Saint Charlie Posted 2 October, 2008 Posted 2 October, 2008 I can't understand why people make loads of changes to a team that has won 2 on the bounce. Quite clearly the team will be almost the same as the Norwich one, maybe with BWP or White coming in for Pekhart. Certainly no need to change a defence that has kept 3 league clean sheets in a row! Madness.
Saint Charlie Posted 2 October, 2008 Posted 2 October, 2008 Yeah, very strange. Wish we knew what was going on with some of those guys, has Gillett dropped out of favour or something? Poke is at Torquay and Gillett has had a knock which has stopped him playing the last two games!
Window Cleaner Posted 2 October, 2008 Posted 2 October, 2008 Madness. Indeed but it seems that many of our fellow fans re obsessed with this guy Skacel, didn't do much last season,wanted away at all cost,still does but they want to play him anyway. I do not see what they think he will bring to our young dynamic side.
Arizona Posted 2 October, 2008 Posted 2 October, 2008 Daft IMO Surman isn't a good LB and was superb in MF on tuesday. Mills also looked decent against Lee Croft who is no mug and ripped Sheff Utd a new one just over a week ago. Personally I think the team that ended tuesdays game (bar paterson) should be allowed a chance on the basis that were trying to get a decent run going. In principle that isn't a bad idea, although Coventry away is likely to prove a much sterner test than Norwich at home, so we should go for the strongest team possible. If we were going for the same team that finished, we should leave out BWP too. That would be ideal imo. Skacel won't play, anyone know why he wasn't involved in the reserves? Wishful thinking - He is being saved for the Coventry game Likely Scenario - JP and MW have been told he can't play due to financial reasons, so they aren't bothering to play him at all.
Griffo Posted 2 October, 2008 Posted 2 October, 2008 A mate went up to the ticket office today to buy his tickets, and apparently we have sold 2,000!
beavis17 Posted 2 October, 2008 Posted 2 October, 2008 A mate went up to the ticket office today to buy his tickets, and apparently we have sold 2,000! os says we only got given 1024 tickets!? so i'm not sure thats true
Window Cleaner Posted 2 October, 2008 Posted 2 October, 2008 os says we only got given 1024 tickets!? so i'm not sure thats true Initially being the operative adverb.
beavis17 Posted 2 October, 2008 Posted 2 October, 2008 Initially being the operative adverb. ah yes my mistake, didnt spot that, i'd still be suprised if we got 2000 though
Window Cleaner Posted 2 October, 2008 Posted 2 October, 2008 ah yes my mistake, didnt spot that, i'd still be suprised if we got 2000 though Well we're supposed to get 10% aren't we, so I expect the fact that we just got 1024 initially means that we asked for that number with an option on the rest. You never know with us.
georgeismyname Posted 2 October, 2008 Posted 2 October, 2008 --------------------------Davis--------------------------- James------------Perry------------Svensson----------Mills ------------------Cork-------------Surman---------------- --------------------------Lallana-------------------------- McGoldrick----------------------------------------Thomson -------------------------Robertson------------------------ Subs: Forecast, Lancashire, Wotton, Wright-Phillips, Pekhart, That or whatever formation we played on Tuesday after Pekhart came off
Dannyboy_Saint Posted 2 October, 2008 Posted 2 October, 2008 ------------------Davis------------------ James------Perry-------Lancashire-----Mills ------------Cork--------Wotton----------- ------------------Lallana------------------ McGoldrick-------------------------Surman ----------------Robertson----------------- Subs: Forecast, Svennson, White, Pekhart, BWP Would like to have kept the Surman/Cork partnership in midfield going but feel that Wotton will add that bit more steel that we're gonna need playing away from home. Othe than that almost the same team as midweek.
Popester Posted 2 October, 2008 Posted 2 October, 2008 Hi everyone If you want a good saints friendly pub to meet for a few beers before and after the Cov game , my mate runs the Vine Inn Warwick. Come off junction 15 M40 and go along towards Wawick town centre and it is on the left next to the Tudor House Inn. You will get a very good welcome . Mention my name and he will put on bar snacks if he knows a few are coming. I would meet you all there but I've got to go to a wedding in dirty Leeds. Feel free to get in touch chaps and here's to three points ! I don't normally post but thought I would pass on this info.
Popester Posted 2 October, 2008 Posted 2 October, 2008 And , if there is a few of you , ring ahead and let them know you are on your way. 01926 490744 , ask for Dave the landlord ! There is a good outside area if the weather's good
Saint_Mabes Posted 2 October, 2008 Posted 2 October, 2008 'I'd put Surman in place of Mills, Wotton in place of Surman, and McGoldrick in place of Scakel' I must admit I didn't see the Norwich game, so if surman was good next to Cork then i'm prob wrong. I just quite like Wotton and was tryin to find a place for him. As for Fish - again fair play if he was good last time, but i've seen him twice and not been that impressed - seems like the 'youngest' of the young ones if ya know what I mean. Glad Sats game is on SKY, surely we'll neat the curse this time!
saintrich Posted 2 October, 2008 Posted 2 October, 2008 I personally would play: - - - - - - - - Davis - - - - - - - Gillett - Perry - Lancashire - Mills - - - - Wotton - - - Cork - - - - - Lallana - - Surman - - Skacel - - - - - - - Robertson - - - - - - Gillett at right back? Lallana is much more effective through the centre too. Why drop McGoldrick who has played reasonably well the last two games, in favour for Skacel who has no match practice? Surely it would be better to ease Skacel back into the team through the means of a substitute first.
saintrich Posted 2 October, 2008 Posted 2 October, 2008 ------------------Davis------------------ James------Perry-------Lancashire-----Mills ------------Cork--------Wotton----------- ------------------Lallana------------------ McGoldrick-------------------------Surman ----------------Robertson----------------- Subs: Forecast, Svennson, White, Pekhart, BWP Would like to have kept the Surman/Cork partnership in midfield going but feel that Wotton will add that bit more steel that we're gonna need playing away from home. Othe than that almost the same team as midweek. I'd go with this team also - hopefully Wotton is back from his knock?
SaintDonkey Posted 3 October, 2008 Author Posted 3 October, 2008 I've got a sneaking suspision that Smith will come strainght in at left wing so that's ------------Davis James----Perry---Lancashire---Mills ---------Cork-----Surman -White-------Lallana------Smith ------------Robertson Subs: Forecast, McGoldrick, Paterson, Wotton, Thomson With just maybe Skacel on the bench instead of Paterson
Saint Martini Posted 3 October, 2008 Posted 3 October, 2008 I've got a sneaking suspision that Smith will come strainght in at left wing so that's ------------Davis James----Perry---Lancashire---Mills ---------Cork-----Surman -White-------Lallana------Smith ------------Robertson Subs: Forecast, McGoldrick, Paterson, Wotton, Thomson With just maybe Skacel on the bench instead of Paterson DMG for White and Pekhart on the bench for Paterson and I think you might be right. I don't think Skacel will be on the bench.
Arizona Posted 3 October, 2008 Posted 3 October, 2008 Gillett at right back? Lallana is much more effective through the centre too. Why drop McGoldrick who has played reasonably well the last two games, in favour for Skacel who has no match practice? Surely it would be better to ease Skacel back into the team through the means of a substitute first. Who would you play instead?
St BATman Posted 3 October, 2008 Posted 3 October, 2008 -----------------Davis--------------------- Cork -- Lancashire -- Svennson/Perry -- Mills ------------Gillett --- Surman-------------- McGoldrick ------ Lallana ------ Skacel/White ----------------Robertson------------------ I'd give James a rest as I'm not convinced James is a RB - his defensive positioning is woeful. Mills looks significantly better each minute he plays and Surman is more effective in the middle. I'd try Skacel on the left as I believe we have been missing Holmes and he can offer defensive cover for Mills when needed. I like McG on the right, I think he offers a bit of pace and thrust going forward and has recently been helping out at the back, Robertson looked good against Norwich and was much better through the middle than out wide. Cork has been one hell of a find and has looked mighty wherever he's been asked to play. I'm not too bothered who plays out of Wotton and Gillett, Wotton can go missing in midfield and Gillett tends to ware himself out too early in games, it's a shame Schniederlin's out...
GeckoSaint Posted 3 October, 2008 Posted 3 October, 2008 -------------Davis James Lancashire Perry Fish -------Wotton -- Cork McGoldrick -- Lallana -- Surman ------------Robertson Ditto, there is a great balance to this side. I'd tweak the formation slightly: ---------------Davis James -- Lancashire -- Perry -- Fish McGoldrick -- Cork -- Wotton -- Surman --------------Lallana ------------Robertson
JibMcdo Posted 3 October, 2008 Posted 3 October, 2008 Who would you play instead? I'd put money on Gillett coming in at full back.
Chez Posted 3 October, 2008 Posted 3 October, 2008 time for 4-4-2 IMO but do we haev anyone that can play right midfield? Davies Gillet Lancashire Perry Mills Lallana Cork Wotton Surman Robertson BWP
John B Posted 3 October, 2008 Posted 3 October, 2008 Reading the Echo I think it may be Davies James Lancashire Perry Mills Cork Gillet Lallana McGoldrick Robertson Surman As Wotton is not fully fit
Colinjb Posted 3 October, 2008 Posted 3 October, 2008 -------------Davies------------ James--Lancashire-Perry---Mills ------Cork-------Wotton------- -White-------Lallana------Smith ------------Robertson
Bearsy Posted 3 October, 2008 Posted 3 October, 2008 ------------Davis James----Perry---Lancashire---Mills ---------Cork-----Surman -White-------Lallana------Skacel ------------Robertson That team looks allwhite to me.
Bon Call Night Posted 3 October, 2008 Posted 3 October, 2008 I personally would play: - - - - - - - - Davis - - - - - - - Gillett - Perry - Lancashire - Mills - - - - Wotton - - - Cork - - - - - Lallana - - Surman - - Skacel - - - - - - - Robertson - - - - - - Why change what worked as much as I wonder about McGoldrick he seemd to get some confidence after the penalty. Would leave the back four alone - James, Perry, Lancashire and Mills. Would leave the midfield pretty much alone too, McGoldrick, Surman, Cork, Lallana and maybe Skacel, White or Jake Thomson Up front Robertson who is the best forward, and better in some ways, I have seen in a Saints shirt since Beattie. The lad has good touch, good movement, is strong holds the ball up well can shoot and does not seem out of place. I don't think JP will change too much although Svensson for Perry as he seems to not like Perry for some reason playing him as a last resort.
Nutwood2 Posted 3 October, 2008 Posted 3 October, 2008 -------------Davies------------ James--Lancashire-Perry---Mills ------Cork-------Wotton------- -White-------Lallana------Smith ------------Robertson Colin, did you really mean to leave Surman out?
wild-saint Posted 3 October, 2008 Posted 3 October, 2008 Killer is off to Italy on sunday for some rehab as his knee is hurting after training, so i doubt he will play saturday.
Stu Man Do Posted 3 October, 2008 Posted 3 October, 2008 I've got a sneaking suspision that Smith will come strainght in at left wing so that's ------------Davis James----Perry---Lancashire---Mills ---------Cork-----Surman -White-------Lallana------Smith ------------Robertson Subs: Forecast, McGoldrick, Paterson, Wotton, Thomson With just maybe Skacel on the bench instead of Paterson Pretty much have to agree with you but I think Skacel will remain on the bench, Mcgoldrick WILL play can you really see him being dropped after his goal and subsequent decent performance. I'm not sure White is yet ready for a return to the starting line up and should be left to break back in maybe via some sub appearances.
simo Posted 3 October, 2008 Posted 3 October, 2008 -------------Davis James Lancashire Perry Fish -------Wotton -- Cork McGoldrick -- Lallana -- Surman ------------Robertson That would be ideal imo. Skacel won't play, anyone know why he wasn't involved in the reserves? I think that will be very close!
Saint Martini Posted 3 October, 2008 Posted 3 October, 2008 ------------Davis James----Perry---Lancashire---Mills ---------Cork-----Surman -DMG-------Lallana------Smith ------------Robertson This is assuming Jan throws Smith straight into the lineup (which he didn't do with Cork, Pekhart or Robertson). If Smith doesn't play I think it will be: ------------Davis James----Perry---Lancashire---Mills ---------Cork-----Gillett -DMG-------Lallana------Surman ------------Robertson
Saints67 Posted 4 October, 2008 Posted 4 October, 2008 ------------------Davis------------------ James------Perry-------Lancashire-----Mills Lallana---Cork---Wotton---Surman---Smith ----------------Robertson-----------------
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now