The Kraken Posted 24 August, 2010 Posted 24 August, 2010 http://www.football365.com/fun/games/missingmen/0,21276,13272,00.html Saints are the "Missing Men" game on F365 today, for our 1-0 victory at the Reebok in 2001. Basically, name the Saints starting line-up of that game. I completed it in 1min 28sec I'm sure someone can top that though....
Andyb1 Posted 24 August, 2010 Posted 24 August, 2010 http://www.football365.com/fun/games/missingmen/0,21276,13272,00.html Saints are the "Missing Men" game on F365 today, for our 1-0 victory at the Reebok in 2001. Basically, name the Saints starting line-up of that game. I completed it in 1min 28sec I'm sure someone can top that though.... You're a loser
Colinjb Posted 24 August, 2010 Posted 24 August, 2010 Funny how I never associate us with having every played anything other then 4-4-2. Anders as the anchor in a 4-3-3? Really!?
Minty Posted 24 August, 2010 Posted 24 August, 2010 Pretty **** team actually. El Khalej was a bit ropey, Tessem also flattered to deceive, and Delap never lived up to his price tag. All the others were decent players IMO, we just never got them all firing at the same time, especially in midfield.
Pancake Posted 24 August, 2010 Posted 24 August, 2010 Funny how I never associate us with having every played anything other then 4-4-2. Anders as the anchor in a 4-3-3? Really!? Pretty sure JT actually played in midfield rather than up with the front 2.
Minty Posted 24 August, 2010 Posted 24 August, 2010 Funny how I never associate us with having every played anything other then 4-4-2. Anders as the anchor in a 4-3-3? Really!? I think that's a bit of artistic licence from them to be honest. Davies and Beattie were upfront, Delap and Oaks in the middle, Tessem and Svensson out wide.
brightspark Posted 24 August, 2010 Posted 24 August, 2010 about 2:40 for 10 of them, entirely forgetting about Tessem! Pretty good considering I would have been 9 or 10 years old at the time
Arizona Posted 24 August, 2010 Posted 24 August, 2010 1.36, but I was typing one handed (eating a sandwich, I'm not THAT excited about Saints).
LeBenali Posted 24 August, 2010 Posted 24 August, 2010 Didn't accept Benali so I gave up. That would be because it was Bridge!!
Hatch Posted 24 August, 2010 Posted 24 August, 2010 That would be because it was Bridge!! yeah , i know, I still tried Benali in all positions including goal. Not worth doing if he wasn't in it.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now