Dog Posted 8 August, 2010 Share Posted 8 August, 2010 Guilty or Not? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Red Alert Posted 8 August, 2010 Share Posted 8 August, 2010 Na, Kate did it, he is just sticking up for his wife. They will get found out one day. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spudders Posted 8 August, 2010 Share Posted 8 August, 2010 The comments people leave on youtube clips are always very interesting are they! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
for_heaven's_Saint Posted 8 August, 2010 Share Posted 8 August, 2010 Interesting reading... http://thegaspersstatement.blogspot.com/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
REDARMY79 Posted 9 August, 2010 Share Posted 9 August, 2010 I would do Kate McCann, child killer or no child killer. I feel better to have got that off my chest. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SuperMikey Posted 9 August, 2010 Share Posted 9 August, 2010 Guilty as sin, the both of them. Blood and hair from Maddie found in the car they rented 2 days after she disappeared...? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Block 5 Posted 9 August, 2010 Share Posted 9 August, 2010 Guilty. Both of them. I wonder how much money they have made from whoring themselves out to the media.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crab Lungs Posted 9 August, 2010 Share Posted 9 August, 2010 Not a lot of sympathy here. and deservedly so: http://www.digitalspy.co.uk/forums/showthread.php?t=1155552&page=2 I remember I got panned for being so insensitive and daring enough to criticise them during a love-in... If they're not guilty of her death, they are most definitely guilty of child negligence. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kev Posted 10 August, 2010 Share Posted 10 August, 2010 I wouldn't trust this pair as far as I could throw them. *scratches ear* Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SuperMikey Posted 10 August, 2010 Share Posted 10 August, 2010 They were saved from proper questioning and prosecution by the British government. If they hadn't been a 'well-connected' family with cute blond-haired kids they would have been fed to the dogs (maybe the ones who smelt Maddy's dead body in the wardrobe and hire car). The deal with the gov't and media is that they carry on the 'search' for Madeleine because it helps push various agendas (child protection, slowly easing us into accepting chipping at birth, ID cards etc.), and it helped sell papers for a year. In return they will not be thrown in jail. Essentially they sold their souls, regardless of whether their daughter's death was accidental or not (if they gave the children drugs and that's why she fell and died they WOULD lie about it). Spot on imo. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crab Lungs Posted 10 August, 2010 Share Posted 10 August, 2010 (edited) http://www.mccannfiles.com/id167.html http://www.mccannfiles.com/id59.html Edited 10 August, 2010 by Crab Lungs Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now